Notices
Far East/Asia Serving the Far East

Fuel Consumption Survey!

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 09:38 AM
  #126  
lost sheep's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
After my 5th tank, Esso 5000, still around 6-6.5km/l. my god
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 10:00 AM
  #127  
CoupeM's Avatar
Night Rider
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Renesis SE3P
I was driving down a huge mountain in California, the mountain is called Mt. Baldy and it's all downhill so I stayed in Neutral the whole time.

cause leaving it in nuetral is as gd as letting the engine idle. this engine drinks more during idling. must make it work for its meal.
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 08:31 PM
  #128  
Ringer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
Renesis SE3P,

Never leave car in neutral going downhill for any stretch of time. You may get brake overheat and even failure and go off the road !

-Ringer-
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 08:38 PM
  #129  
Spinning Sushi's Avatar
I <3 Sushi
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,967
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by CoupeM
cause leaving it in nuetral is as gd as letting the engine idle. this engine drinks more during idling. must make it work for its meal.
Oh, I see, I thought I was going crazy when my mpg went down quick when in neutral....
Reply
Old Aug 19, 2007 | 08:40 PM
  #130  
Spinning Sushi's Avatar
I <3 Sushi
iTrader: (21)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 3,967
Likes: 4
From: SoCal
Originally Posted by Ringer
Renesis SE3P,

Never leave car in neutral going downhill for any stretch of time. You may get brake overheat and even failure and go off the road !

-Ringer-
Yikes, I drive a lot and America is full of mountainous terrain especially when you're traveling from one State to another, every time I hit a downhill section, I always leave it in neutral. I'm going to start leaving it in gear now, I also need to change my brakes too.... thanks for the tip.
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 06:53 AM
  #131  
killinghall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
I generally do 75%-80% highway driving during off-peak hours, and so usually average 8 - 8.5km/l. Best was 8.991 = 9km/l.

At the 1/4 mark it's usually anything from 380km to 400km.

And oh, I'm light-footed as well!

Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 07:16 AM
  #132  
SushiFan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
Originally Posted by killinghall
I generally do 75%-80% highway driving during off-peak hours, and so usually average 8 - 8.5km/l. Best was 8.991 = 9km/l.

At the 1/4 mark it's usually anything from 380km to 400km.

And oh, I'm light-footed as well!

what's your car model? 4AT? 6AT? Type S?
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 10:18 AM
  #133  
lost sheep's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 9
Likes: 0
Anyone currently using fuel saving devices on their 8? How's the FC after that? Great if can share your experience.

Seriously considering one after my 6km/l FC. Not much difference whether I drive light footed or slightly heavy on my 6AT...
Reply
Old Aug 20, 2007 | 05:31 PM
  #134  
killinghall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by SushiFan
what's your car model? 4AT? 6AT? Type S?
4AT / 18" Toyo T1R / 33 PSI all round

Last edited by killinghall; Aug 21, 2007 at 09:21 PM.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 12:44 PM
  #135  
craz77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Hi all bros, i am pretty new in this forum, getting my 8 in Sept. I understand that keeping smaller rims enables better FC but Just wondering if keeping a 16/17 inch rim will actually big diff in the FC .
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 07:43 PM
  #136  
killinghall's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 13
Likes: 0
My experience with my current 18" tells me there's little or no difference using them; lighter rims lower profile tyres COULD possibly mean less weight and mass, or otherwise just a negligible increase.

I mean, I've yet to hit anything less than 7.5km/l (but I do mostly highway driving!)
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 09:06 PM
  #137  
tksnobords's Avatar
TK
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 362
Likes: 1
04 6MT USA 15-19 miles per gallon. normally about 280 miles on a full tank. tank is about 15 gallons.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 09:41 PM
  #138  
jeronlee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by lost sheep
Anyone currently using fuel saving devices on their 8? How's the FC after that? Great if can share your experience.

Seriously considering one after my 6km/l FC. Not much difference whether I drive light footed or slightly heavy on my 6AT...
I'm doing around 5.5km/l n heavy footed. Tried to rev less but also not much diff hence I gave up. Might as well just whack lah... haha!

Anyway, i'm 90% city driving so i think 5.5 is still acceptable to me...
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 10:00 PM
  #139  
craz77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by killinghall
My experience with my current 18" tells me there's little or no difference using them; lighter rims lower profile tyres COULD possibly mean less weight and mass, or otherwise just a negligible increase.

I mean, I've yet to hit anything less than 7.5km/l (but I do mostly highway driving!)
Thanks for the reply! will be checking out some fuel savings device once i get my 8. Will update bros here if there's anything worth looking at.
Reply
Old Aug 24, 2007 | 10:27 PM
  #140  
mkl22's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 299
Likes: 0
there isnt any fuel saving device. if there is, power stations would use it to save fuel already. a 10% saving to them is in millions
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 03:06 AM
  #141  
SushiFan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
just did my second tank, 445km with 54.3 litres Shell 98. 1 year old 4AT stock. But something strange. I did 250km up to the halfway mark shown on the fuel meter, so that means I only did 195km on the remaining half. Driving profile didnt change much other than slightly poorer FC on a SAT with city driving while doing errands. Perhaps that means what is shown on the fuel meter is not exactly proportional?
Reply
Old Aug 25, 2007 | 11:47 AM
  #142  
Rei's Avatar
Rei
White Rotary
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 405
Likes: 0
From: Somewhere I Belong...
Originally Posted by SushiFan
just did my second tank, 445km with 54.3 litres Shell 98. 1 year old 4AT stock. But something strange. I did 250km up to the halfway mark shown on the fuel meter, so that means I only did 195km on the remaining half. Driving profile didnt change much other than slightly poorer FC on a SAT with city driving while doing errands. Perhaps that means what is shown on the fuel meter is not exactly proportional?
I suppose its like that...I always get more mileage on my 1st quater tank...
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 10:59 PM
  #143  
allen's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
Originally Posted by SushiFan
just did my second tank, 445km with 54.3 litres Shell 98. 1 year old 4AT stock. But something strange. I did 250km up to the halfway mark shown on the fuel meter, so that means I only did 195km on the remaining half. Driving profile didnt change much other than slightly poorer FC on a SAT with city driving while doing errands. Perhaps that means what is shown on the fuel meter is not exactly proportional?
All along i thought Fuel tank is from big to small.
The top part is usually larger then the bottom and thus you can drive more distance.
I believe the fuel tank look something similar to a cone.


Anyway i am getting between 6-7km/l.
never rev much. but give up on asking abt petrol anymore.
Reply
Old Aug 26, 2007 | 11:47 PM
  #144  
Mazdaspeed 88's Avatar
Limited
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Malaysia
Has anyone used the Octane Booster before? any particular brand? NOS? Snap?
Reply
Old Aug 27, 2007 | 12:32 AM
  #145  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,838
Likes: 1,794
From: Y-cat-o NZ
Originally Posted by Mazdaspeed 88
Has anyone used the Octane Booster before? any particular brand? NOS? Snap?
don't use octane booster - it does nothing for the renesis
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2007 | 11:09 PM
  #146  
dr11855i's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Dec 2006
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by allen
All along i thought Fuel tank is from big to small.
The top part is usually larger then the bottom and thus you can drive more distance.
I believe the fuel tank look something similar to a cone.


Anyway i am getting between 6-7km/l.
never rev much. but give up on asking abt petrol anymore.
About the disproportionate mileage/litre of petrol on the fuel gauge...
The needle drops much faster in the first quater than last quarter for me...
when u drive on a full tank with 60 litre of petrol which is equivalent of 60 kg, the fuel efficiency is poorer than when there is less petrol in the fuel tank after the second half. Hence the fuel efficiency is slightly better in the second half, thus the needle drops slower in second half than the first half...
my 2 cents worth...
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2007 | 02:03 AM
  #147  
jeronlee's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 27
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by dr11855i
About the disproportionate mileage/litre of petrol on the fuel gauge...
The needle drops much faster in the first quater than last quarter for me...
when u drive on a full tank with 60 litre of petrol which is equivalent of 60 kg, the fuel efficiency is poorer than when there is less petrol in the fuel tank after the second half. Hence the fuel efficiency is slightly better in the second half, thus the needle drops slower in second half than the first half...
my 2 cents worth...
Actually i noticed that mine is quite proportionate. 70km for 1st quarter mark, 80km for both 2nd and 3rd quarter mark, warning light usually appears ard 260km or 30km into the final quarter and i'll usually drive on for 30km or so before refuelling.

If what you said is true, maybe someone can try topping up to only half tank everytime or even just $20 of fuel daily and share with us if your fuel efficiency improve?
Reply
Old Aug 31, 2007 | 05:56 AM
  #148  
SushiFan's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 320
Likes: 0
From: Singapore
Mine really plunge really fast on the last QTR. But its strange that fuel efficiency is higher when u are heavier? It should be the other way round? My first QTR I can do 120-150km, second QTR 100km. third 110km, last one 85km. hmmm?

Another observation, i was stationary on a slope (about 30 deg upwards) and tank was 1/8. within the 1 min I saw the needle go from 1/8 to zero. Cool.. But when got moving again on level ground it bounced back to 1/8. nevertheless still quite a big fluctuation.
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 10:24 AM
  #149  
craz77's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 10
Likes: 0
Has anyone tried the ion accelerator called Calski before on their 8?
Reply
Old Sep 4, 2007 | 09:42 PM
  #150  
CoupeM's Avatar
Night Rider
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 981
Likes: 0
The calski is damn gd man....i put like 20pcs and my fc went from 7.2km/l to 7.25km/l
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:47 PM.