What are the official MPG figs ?
#1
Mucho Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Herts - UK
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
What are the official MPG figs ?
What are the gigs you are all talking about ? The ones I saw in the book were bang on (somewhere between 18-28 as I recall)?
Also - what is the CO2 rating ?
Just wondered if there were some new stats that MazdaUK have released that I have not seen.....
There is alot of negative talk at the moment about things I thought we already knew from the outset... (fuel figs etc).
Any official figs please post -
ta -
Morgan.
Also - what is the CO2 rating ?
Just wondered if there were some new stats that MazdaUK have released that I have not seen.....
There is alot of negative talk at the moment about things I thought we already knew from the outset... (fuel figs etc).
Any official figs please post -
ta -
Morgan.
#2
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hannover, Germany
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This is what the Swiss Mazda.ch website tells us about hipo / stdpwr RX-8:
Fahrleistungen
Beschleunigung 0?100 km/h, s (Acceleration)
6,5 / 7,8
Höchstgeschwindigkeit, km/h (Max speed)
240 / 230
Normverbrauch (1999/100/EG), Gesamt, L/100 km (norm consumption)
11,4 / 10,9
CO2 is not stated like this, simply Euro4....
Have my Excel sheet with MPG conversions at home, not sure at the moment.
Fahrleistungen
Beschleunigung 0?100 km/h, s (Acceleration)
6,5 / 7,8
Höchstgeschwindigkeit, km/h (Max speed)
240 / 230
Normverbrauch (1999/100/EG), Gesamt, L/100 km (norm consumption)
11,4 / 10,9
CO2 is not stated like this, simply Euro4....
Have my Excel sheet with MPG conversions at home, not sure at the moment.
#5
_________________
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cambridge - UK
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by oilman
Here they are definative.
Urban 17.9 (15.8)
Extra 31.7 (8.9)
Comb 24.8 (11.4)
CO2 g/km 284
This is based on High Power 231ps
Cheers
Oilman
Here they are definative.
Urban 17.9 (15.8)
Extra 31.7 (8.9)
Comb 24.8 (11.4)
CO2 g/km 284
This is based on High Power 231ps
Cheers
Oilman
#6
Registered User
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Hannover, Germany
Posts: 82
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Re: Conversion
Originally posted by Titanium Grey
I make that 24.8 and 25.9 MPG (UK).
What does the German 'Normal Consumption' test comprise of?
I make that 24.8 and 25.9 MPG (UK).
What does the German 'Normal Consumption' test comprise of?
did read your post on the other thread... Good points! The Norm consumption is the mentioned "Normverbrauch according to 1999/100/EG" is a European community standard test -- don't know details, should be available via Google maybe?
Oilman -- your figures seem to be mixed up somewhat?!?
#7
Mucho Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Herts - UK
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Have to say - strikes me as well into the good...
What were you all expecting for a 200+bhp car ?
Actually , it is better than I was expecting !
(and about twice as good as previous rotaries ! )
What were you all expecting for a 200+bhp car ?
Actually , it is better than I was expecting !
(and about twice as good as previous rotaries ! )
#8
RX-8 wher art thou RX-8
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Cheshire, England
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
It will be an improvement for me, the MX-6 does about 22.5 MPG.
Cheers, Maverik.
(I loved that MX-3 the only reason I don't still have it is because some idiot behind me forgot to stop when every one else did.
Hit us at around 30mph in a motorway contraflow. It was a complete write off.)
Cheers, Maverik.
(I loved that MX-3 the only reason I don't still have it is because some idiot behind me forgot to stop when every one else did.
Hit us at around 30mph in a motorway contraflow. It was a complete write off.)
#9
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: www.rx8ownersclub.co.uk
Posts: 1,040
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think the fuel figures are acceptable for a 200bhp+ car, it is not really a big issue for me.
RX-8
Urban 17.9
Extra 31.7
Comb 24.8
My Impreza STi is
Urban 18.2
Extra 33.2
Comb 25.4
and I have averaged 18 over the last year, I must have a heavy right foot :D
On that basis I would expect to only get the same or less from the RX-8 especially as you have to rev it to get the performance.
I think these figures are less than cars like the TT, 330CI, etc though
RX-8
Urban 17.9
Extra 31.7
Comb 24.8
My Impreza STi is
Urban 18.2
Extra 33.2
Comb 25.4
and I have averaged 18 over the last year, I must have a heavy right foot :D
On that basis I would expect to only get the same or less from the RX-8 especially as you have to rev it to get the performance.
I think these figures are less than cars like the TT, 330CI, etc though
#10
Registered User
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Herts - UK
Posts: 350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by morganrogers
Have to say - strikes me as well into the good...
What were you all expecting for a 200+bhp car ?
Actually , it is better than I was expecting !
Have to say - strikes me as well into the good...
What were you all expecting for a 200+bhp car ?
Actually , it is better than I was expecting !
It's not a big problem for me as I don't do a high mileage and it's what I was expecting given that it's a rotary. But lets be honest, it's not one of the car's strong points. To put it in perspective the official figures are about the same as a BMW M3, and a lot worse than a 330Ci or TT220.
#12
Mucho Senior Member
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Herts - UK
Posts: 832
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
ChrisW - Yep. Fair 'nuf.
My mileage is all motorway (although lots of it).
My integraR is rated at combined of ~28 and I get ~33.
I am hoping to get at least 25 from the RX8 , and think I should be fine.
What is more interesting (maybe EastMoon can help) is what sort of petrol do I need ? Traditionally rotaries use low octane fuel (2star it used to be). If the RX8 runs on normal95 octane unleaded it will be even closer to my current scenario.
IntegraR has to use 98 octane , so expensive. Lower octane fuel would mean 6% less cost immediately.
Anyone know the answer ?
Morgan.
PS - Dont think 20 is unreasonable for just kicking around. Early imprezas struggled to get this much ! (seems to be better in later models from MarkWs posts)
My mileage is all motorway (although lots of it).
My integraR is rated at combined of ~28 and I get ~33.
I am hoping to get at least 25 from the RX8 , and think I should be fine.
What is more interesting (maybe EastMoon can help) is what sort of petrol do I need ? Traditionally rotaries use low octane fuel (2star it used to be). If the RX8 runs on normal95 octane unleaded it will be even closer to my current scenario.
IntegraR has to use 98 octane , so expensive. Lower octane fuel would mean 6% less cost immediately.
Anyone know the answer ?
Morgan.
PS - Dont think 20 is unreasonable for just kicking around. Early imprezas struggled to get this much ! (seems to be better in later models from MarkWs posts)
#13
Pure Unadulterated Fun
Join Date: Oct 2002
Location: Monterey Park, CA
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally posted by morganrogers
What is more interesting (maybe EastMoon can help) is what sort of petrol do I need ? Traditionally rotaries use low octane fuel (2star it used to be). If the RX8 runs on normal95 octane unleaded it will be even closer to my current scenario.
IntegraR has to use 98 octane , so expensive. Lower octane fuel would mean 6% less cost immediately.
Anyone know the answer ?
What is more interesting (maybe EastMoon can help) is what sort of petrol do I need ? Traditionally rotaries use low octane fuel (2star it used to be). If the RX8 runs on normal95 octane unleaded it will be even closer to my current scenario.
IntegraR has to use 98 octane , so expensive. Lower octane fuel would mean 6% less cost immediately.
Anyone know the answer ?
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
pdxhak
General Automotive
7
09-22-2015 07:39 AM
AMOC
SE RX-8 Forum
1
09-09-2015 05:14 AM