View Poll Results: What is your fuel economy?
10L/100km or below
0
0%
11L/100km
1
4.76%
12L/100km
2
9.52%
13L/100km
4
19.05%
14L/100km
5
23.81%
15L/100km
5
23.81%
16L/100km
2
9.52%
17L/100km or gasp! above
4
19.05%
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 21. You may not vote on this poll
Canadian fuel economy poll!
Registered
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
From: Montreal
The thing is Wing that i have 2 kids, a GF, tons of studying for an exams and at 44 it isn't as easy as at 24 to manage all this. ( well, the GF is easy...) Plus i have to return my leased Passat and have to have an appt with VW... ( i know, ranting..........)
i'll try to go in the next few days.
i'll try to go in the next few days.
I figured you were busy. Canada also said he might go, but if you can go that's cool!
Thread Starter
Love to rev!
Joined: Aug 2002
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
From: Mississauga - Ontario
Originally posted by Quick_lude
I finally remembered to get an application.. Not a huge fan of their regular and mid grade fuels, they have a lot of sulphur. For some reason the Supreme is low on sulphur though. Well, according to this data from 2002:
http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/air/sig/2002.htm
I finally remembered to get an application.. Not a huge fan of their regular and mid grade fuels, they have a lot of sulphur. For some reason the Supreme is low on sulphur though. Well, according to this data from 2002:
http://www.ene.gov.on.ca/envision/air/sig/2002.htm
Momentum Keeps Me Going
Joined: Sep 2002
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 5
From: Colorado
Originally posted by wakeech
...actually, the best method is to fill your tank right to the top ... and record your km's from there. then at your next fill up, see how much you have to put back in to get to full. you'll then have pretty darned accurate volume and very accurate distance numberes. because the volume number is so small, accuracy here is really where it counts, as error has a bigger effect on the ratio.
...actually, the best method is to fill your tank right to the top ... and record your km's from there. then at your next fill up, see how much you have to put back in to get to full. you'll then have pretty darned accurate volume and very accurate distance numberes. because the volume number is so small, accuracy here is really where it counts, as error has a bigger effect on the ratio.
If your then using a mileage of >100 the error possibilities start to compound themselves. Result.. misleadingly and inncorrect gas useage numbers. Only flaw here is how come few if any are reporting like 25-30 mi/gal?
Last edited by Spin9k; Aug 20, 2003 at 10:36 AM.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
