Notices
Australia/New Zealand Forum They come from The Land Down Under.

Nitrogen in my Tyres - or Air in my Head?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Dec 3, 2005 | 10:42 PM
  #1  
mboptom's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 23
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia
Nitrogen in my Tyres - or Air in my Head?

At 48,000km and nearly 2 yrs old, I've just replaced my tyres with same type, Bridgestone Potenzas. Got them filled with nitrogen cause told "it's better"!

Is it just me, but I was expecting awesome handling just like when it was new, but the car seems to "float" more, doesn't seem to hug as sweet as before and seems jittery on the road. Still grips well, but don't have the immediate confidence as before.

Have I done the wrong thing? I haven't talked to mazda yet or BJ Tmart, thought I'd check here first for anyone with similar experience.

Michael
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2005 | 10:50 PM
  #2  
carbonRX8's Avatar
U-Stink-But-I-♥-U
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 2
From: 12 o'clock on the Beltway.
Air is 78% nitrogen. And alot cheaper. Should try Helium.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2005 | 11:26 PM
  #3  
JonnyBoy's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 41
Likes: 0
Ive got the nitrogen air in my tyres too, it came together when i bought new tyres, dont think it will have any bearing on the perforamnce/handling. THe idea behind using pure nitrogen is apparently it doesnt leak as much as like using normal air.
Reply
Old Dec 3, 2005 | 11:32 PM
  #4  
dannobre's Avatar
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 13,720
Likes: 345
From: Smallville
New tires are always "squidgy" when new.....they actually have better grip...and less tread block distortion when they are about 1/2 worn out. Thats why racers shave the tires.....for dry traction

Give them a chance to wear in a bit for a bit as well....the can really be slippery till you wear of the mold release and stuff
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 12:16 AM
  #5  
takahashi's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,944
Likes: 2
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by carbonRX8
Air is 78% nitrogen. And alot cheaper. Should try Helium.
I love this logic
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 12:29 AM
  #6  
labrat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane Australia
Originally Posted by mboptom
At 48,000km and nearly 2 yrs old, I've just replaced my tyres with same type, Bridgestone Potenzas. Got them filled with nitrogen cause told "it's better"!
Probably the main advantage of nitrogen out of a bottle versus air from the compressor is that it has less moisture in it - it's quite dry. When the air in the tyre cools, the water vapour can condense and the tyre pressure drops. If you fill your tyres in a very humid climate, this can make a bit of difference. Every 18mL of liquid water makes 22.4L of water vapour at normal temperature and pressure (this is a fact of physical chemistry). If you fill your tyres with dry nitrogen (or dry air), there will be less pressure variation between hot and cold. This is probably of interest to racing drivers where fractions of a second spell the difference, but for the rest of us punters, well, I'd say you'll never notice it.

As has already been stated, air is already 78% nitrogen. I'm not even sure whether pure nitrogen would leak at a slower rate, since there's not much difference in the size of the molecules. In fact, the atomic weight of oxygen (16) is a bit higher than nitrogen (14). Even when it gets down to the specific heat of the two gases, it's scarcely enough to make a difference.

So I reckon the nitrogen in tyres thingy is probably 98% hot air and 2% fact.

Going off topic ever so slightly, I think the best time to check your tyre pressure is first thing in the morning, before you drive off and the tyres warm up.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 12:56 AM
  #7  
auzoom's Avatar
Hmmmmmm.........
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,564
Likes: 6
From: Melbourne, Australia
I was told by the guy that does my nitrogen that nitrogen will leak faster than air and the biggest benefit from nitrogen is that it doesnt expand like air does when the tyres heat up.

Andrew
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 02:21 AM
  #8  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
"Better" Hehehe - better for the tyre stores $$$$
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 02:36 AM
  #9  
Gomez's Avatar
Shifty Bastard.
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,835
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne, Australia.
I had this discussion over twelve months back. Some guy claimed amazing performance benefits when using nitrogen in his RX-8 tyres....

Originally Posted by Gomez
Nitrogen is superior to air in tyres as it has a larger molecular structure. Think of your rubber tyre as a membrane with tiny holes in it. Some of the smaller oxygen molecules escape through it which reduces the tyres pressure. This leads to poor mileage, poor handling, and a lesser tyre life.

The nitrogen molecules, being larger, have a more difficult time negotiating their way through the membrane. Hence, a tyre filled with nitrogen only will maintain it's pressure longer. That's why nitrogen is better. But it is dearer, air is free. Buy some good alloy/metal valve caps and stop the loss of air through your valves. Your tyre pressure will be maintained at the correct pressure for longer and you will have all the nitrogen benefits for bugger all cost!

Originally Posted by Gomez
Look, rubber is not impermeable...rubber is porous. Why do rubber balloons filled with helium deflate quicker than balloons inflated with air? "Cos a helium molecule is smaller than an oxygen or nitrogen molecule, the main two components of air. The helium leaks through the balloon skin at a greater rate due to it's reduced molecular size.

Oxygen which makes up approx 20% of air has a smaller molecular structure that of nitrogen, which makes up approx 80% of air. If you put air in a tyre, then the oxygen component of air will be diffused through the porous tyre carcass at a greater rate than that of nitrogen. Ipso facto, a tyre inflated with pure nitrogen will hold it's pressure longer than the same tyre filled with air.
Read the whole thread here.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 02:56 AM
  #10  
EZZY's Avatar
cry me a river...
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 4,475
Likes: 0
From: Syd / Melb
had done the Nitrogen inflation on my TT... to be honest, it doesnt do jack **** on normal traffic jammed daily communit.....
from what i have been told/read, it is lighter than air, due to less/no water content, and therefore will not expand.
it isnt supposed to leak when compared to the normal air.
the main advantage for doing that is if you will be doing lots of long distance driving.....
BJ T-mart charged 20 buck for 4 back in 2003..... and i traded it in for the 8 about 2/2.5 months after
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 11:15 AM
  #11  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,141
unless they pulled a vacuum on the tire and eliminated all the air in the cavity before inserting N2 you probably aren't much better than using air, and over time O2 will actually osmosis through the sidewall, which isn't as solid as you think and nature can't stand an imbalance. And you will eventually need to add pressure for the same reason, what are you going to do then, whip out your charged canister of N2? Moisture isn't the only thing responsible for a a pressure change when hot/cold, you still have the General Ideal Gas Law to contend with PV=nRT

FWIW, helium is even worse ... it's a racing deal and a racing deal only i.e., short term and high maintenance.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 12:52 PM
  #12  
carbonRX8's Avatar
U-Stink-But-I-♥-U
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 2
From: 12 o'clock on the Beltway.
Yeah Fick's second law is a bitch.

And the He suggestion was facetious.

Last edited by carbonRX8; Dec 4, 2005 at 02:02 PM.
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 01:44 PM
  #13  
takahashi's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 9,944
Likes: 2
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by carbonRX8
Yeah Fick's second law is a bitch.

And the He suggestion was a facetious.
At least you will speak funny when you let the air out to lower the tyre's psi.

Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 03:12 PM
  #14  
auzoom's Avatar
Hmmmmmm.........
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 3,564
Likes: 6
From: Melbourne, Australia
Originally Posted by Hymee
"Better" Hehehe - better for the tyre stores $$$$
HA HA...Synical bastard

Andrew
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 08:44 PM
  #15  
xxup's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,028
Likes: 1
From: Brisbane, Australia
Funny I seem to remember that most of the air we breathe anyway is Nitrogen...
Reply
Old Dec 4, 2005 | 09:19 PM
  #16  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Yeah - 78%, apparently. So if we put 2 atmoshperes pressure or air in it, does that mean it end up at 156% nitrogen? j/k Hehehehehe.
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 06:40 AM
  #17  
carbonRX8's Avatar
U-Stink-But-I-♥-U
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 2
From: 12 o'clock on the Beltway.
There is three total atms (cause there is one atm in the tire before you start to fill it), 2 gauge. so that would be 234%
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 01:46 PM
  #18  
Hymee's Avatar
Race Steward
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,430
Likes: 2
From: Brisbane, Australia
Dang, I hate it when I get the math wrong. :p
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 02:47 PM
  #19  
KYLiquid's Avatar
Oil Injection
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,672
Likes: 2
From: Orlando, FL
nitrogen = pro teams use it cause it contains less water wapor, it expands less than air, and provides a more constant air pressure.

remeber this is in a place where every 1/100th of a sec can mean a win or a loss, and gain or lose you tens of thousands of dollars.

On the street i think its pointless to pay extra, if it comes with the package then who cares..
Reply
Old Dec 5, 2005 | 04:59 PM
  #20  
labrat's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 778
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane Australia
Originally Posted by KYLiquid
nitrogen = pro teams use it cause it contains less water wapor, it expands less than air, and provides a more constant air pressure.

remeber this is in a place where every 1/100th of a sec can mean a win or a loss, and gain or lose you tens of thousands of dollars.

On the street i think its pointless to pay extra, if it comes with the package then who cares..
You can get the same effect out of dry compressed air, however, it is more convenient to get dry nitrogen, since it is produced during the separation of oxygen and nitrogen during the liquifaction process. The water vapour gets frozen out first.

There's insufficent difference in the physical properties of nitrogen and air (78%N2, 22%O2) to make any measurable improvement. It's the water vapour which is the problem.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
JimmyBlack
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades
273
Feb 10, 2020 10:23 PM
Azki23
New Member Forum
12
Jun 27, 2018 03:48 PM
WranglerFan
New Member Forum
4
Nov 5, 2017 09:35 AM
garethleeds
Europe For Sale/Wanted
6
Nov 19, 2015 06:32 AM
Forevermore
Series I Trouble Shooting
6
Sep 20, 2015 01:04 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:44 PM.