Engine Mount Survey (Australian models only)
06-26-2007, 03:30 AM
#1
No conviction recorded
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Engine Mount Survey (Australian models only)
Hi Everyone, im trying to collect some information for consumer affairs and i just need to know who has had their engine mounts replaced, either under warranty or not. If not how muchdid it cost you to replace them.
AUSTRALIAN RX8 OWNERS ONLY PLEASE
This is really important that i get this evidence. I will update you all on what is happening shortly.
cheers guys
James
AUSTRALIAN RX8 OWNERS ONLY PLEASE
This is really important that i get this evidence. I will update you all on what is happening shortly.
cheers guys
James
Last edited by JAT1; 06-26-2007 at 03:46 AM.
06-26-2007, 03:37 AM
#2
3-wheeler
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Phoenix
Posts: 2,734
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I'm scheduled to take my 05 w/ 32,000 miles in to have the OEM mounts updated with the new ones. I was told there was an upgraded mount.
I've been experencing increased vibrations but am not 100% sure the mount has failed. I'll follow up once it's been replaced.
I've been experencing increased vibrations but am not 100% sure the mount has failed. I'll follow up once it's been replaced.
06-26-2007, 03:42 AM
#3
Hmmmmmm.........
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,564
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
James, if you are going to get non-aus responses you might want to clarify where people are.
For the record I had mine replaced under warranty due to sagging (not cracked yet).
For the record I had mine replaced under warranty due to sagging (not cracked yet).
06-26-2007, 05:51 AM
#11
Hmmmmmm.........
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,564
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
Honestly, I dont see why it should be Oz only. As the case being put forward is with consumer affairs (who only have state jurisdiction) then what does it matter if its Oz or worldwide? the more proof of problem the better I say.
06-26-2007, 06:24 AM
#12
No conviction recorded
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Melbourne
Posts: 158
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
for PETE's SAKE, how about anyone post and i will decided if i want to use their example. I am looking for anyone in AUSTRALIA who has had the problem as the issue i have is with MAZDA AUSTRALIA. Consumer Affairs, although a state authority, are looking at the whole picture. Keep the examples flowing. Thanks guys
06-26-2007, 09:08 PM
#13
Buzz Buzz Buzz
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne, Victoria
Posts: 1,931
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I don't know man, most people are still under warranty so you're probably not going to find anyone who'll be willing to do it for you. Unless you can find someone with a car over 3 years old who's had it done after the 3 year warranty do you have any substantiation to make a claim. At the end of the day it's the risk you take when buying a used car.
But like I've said before, good luck with it! You'll need it!
But like I've said before, good luck with it! You'll need it!
06-26-2007, 11:05 PM
#15
New Member
What you need is all RHD cars. Go to the UK forum.
I did not mention how swoope drives that makes every thing in the car
06-27-2007, 12:52 AM
#18
Hmmmmmm.........
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 3,564
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes
on
4 Posts
OK My argument is this. Lets "pretend" it was the clamps that held fuel lines on the fuel tank. After 4 years these start to let go. There is going to be a recall (as has been shown on other vehicles), but in my eyes, they are only doing it as they would get the pants sued off them WHEN that issue leads to an explosion.
Dont get me wrong I am not saying they shouldnt do this but why should it be the case only when there is immediate safety concerns? why not when there is a flaw in design as is the obvious case here?
Dont get me wrong I am not saying they shouldnt do this but why should it be the case only when there is immediate safety concerns? why not when there is a flaw in design as is the obvious case here?
06-27-2007, 01:35 AM
#19
New Member
I know the mount is on the same place. But the master cylinder and the driver's fat *** is not. They may use that as an argument haha
06-27-2007, 01:59 AM
#21
rev it up
No problems here. I have traveled 53 000km. My warranty expired last October. I asked the dealer to look at the possibility of changing the engine mount however, an inspection did not reveal any defect.
I have done several track days over the last few years as well. Maybe I am just lucky or a broken mount may be just around the corner.
skc
I have done several track days over the last few years as well. Maybe I am just lucky or a broken mount may be just around the corner.
skc
06-27-2007, 02:10 AM
#22
'06 Nats coolest car!
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I got my engine mounts replaced under warranty - I remarked about an increased vibration at idle when I put it in for a service - I think it was at about 40,000km.
06-27-2007, 02:21 AM
#23
Culpam Poena Premit Comes
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 1,230
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
06-27-2007, 02:26 AM
#24
Red goes faster
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Melbourne, Australia
Posts: 167
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Mine were done under warranty December 2006, just before i was about to drive to Sydney for christmas - and wow what a difference. The mechanic at Mazda that changed them said "they were F***ed" and now they aren't 
