RX8Club.com
Register FAQ Members List Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read Used CarsVendor Directory

Go Back   RX8Club.com > Series I Tech & Performance > Major Horsepower Upgrades

Welcome to RX8Club.com!
Welcome to RX8Club.com,

You are currently viewing our forum as a guest, which gives you limited access to view most discussions and access our other features. By joining our community, at no cost, you will have access to start new topics, reply to conversations, privately message other members (PM), respond to polls, upload content and access many other special features. Registration is free, fast and simple, so please join RX8Club.com today!


View Poll Results: Where is best mounting location for a turbo
On the exhaust manifold 24 44.44%
In the engine bay - in front of engine 16 29.63%
Rear mounted 12 22.22%
other 2 3.70%
Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll

Reply
 
Thread Tools Rate Thread Display Modes
Old 01-19-2008, 03:39 PM   #1
Brettus
K1W1 300 club founder
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: NZ
Posts: 8,088
Turbo placement - where is best ?

Been looking at all the various kits available trying to analyse where is the best place to put a turbo on the 8 so I thought it would be worth discussing.
Some initial thoughts ......

On manifold :
pros
*stealth
*Lower centre of gravity
*less heat to the engine bay

cons
*size of turbo able to be fitted
*more prone to road damage (stones etc)
*no bling factor
*hard to get to to work on
*some suggestion that exhaust ports get overheated ?

In engine bay:
pros
*Bling - looks nice
*Easy to get to for repair and tweaking
*can fit any size turbo you want

cons
*excessive heat in the engine bay
*lots of extra exhaust pipework to crack and leak
*possibility of frying electrics close to turbo

Rear mounted:
pros
*takes heat away from engine area
*long pipework for extra cooling
*adds weight to rear - better than adding it to front

cons
*easily damaged pipework and turbo
*Difficulty running pipes of decent diameter
*not as efficient ?
*rare
*Intake air - difficulty getting clean/dry air
This ad is not displayed to registered and logged-in members.
Register your free account today and become a member on RX8Club.com!
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mawnee View Post
I will now be offering my Turbo kit to the public! This kit is capable of producing 900 crank HP. It is possible that I may have at one time in some way perhaps hit these numbers in my own car. I will niether confirm nor deny, nor comment on said numbers. However my kit may or may not, though probably not(though you could get lucky!) contain a turbo capable of these numbers.

Last edited by Brettus; 01-20-2008 at 01:22 PM.
Brettus is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 04:14 PM   #2
turborx8
Boost 4 Life
 
turborx8's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (1)
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Ottawa, Canada
Posts: 1,447
Send a message via ICQ to turborx8 Send a message via AIM to turborx8 Send a message via MSN to turborx8
The pros for the manifold mounted turbo are very important and the cons don't bother me.
turborx8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 04:29 PM   #3
NgoRX8
stock
 
NgoRX8's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA, Rowland Hts.
Posts: 9,458
Send a message via AIM to NgoRX8
best is very relative. Lower center of gravity and balance would be the deal for most. I'd like an in ur face turbo though, lol. My car isn't set up to handle for the most part anyways...
NgoRX8 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 04:33 PM   #4
dannobre
Back is Back...Front next
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 5,780
From an installation point of view...there are advantages to the "in your face" installs. After putting in a Mazport Type 1 kit.....I realize the type 3 Kit would be a lot easier to fit the Turbo in
__________________


dannobre is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 05:37 PM   #5
staticlag
Moderator
 
staticlag's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,362
I'm going to have to go with rear mounted.

__________________
SOLD - 2004 Winning Blue RX8
MS Suspension, RB Swaybars, Autoexe Strut Tower Bar, FEED 4.77 gears, RPF-1s...

RX8 Owner FAQ!!! (New 1-26-09) http://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=163824

My Research/Photography/RX8 Blog - http://fullframe.vividomaha.com

Last edited by staticlag; 01-19-2008 at 05:49 PM.
staticlag is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 05:45 PM   #6
romycha1
Registered User
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio --> San Diego
Posts: 876
Send a message via AIM to romycha1
Quote:
Originally Posted by staticlag View Post
I'm going to have to go with rear mounted.

Setup up correctly you could have a ~95% efficient intercooler system and zero turbo lag. Ease of access to turbo and wastegate, and better balance.

I'm thinking one 3" pipe with a resonator going back to feed 2 stock greddy size turbos hung from the stock exhaust mounts in place of the muffler. With those two turbos there would be no need for a muffler, just in one end, and then a short 4" of tube and right out the stock exhaust ports.

Run some 1.5" inch tube from each turbo near the stock fuel rail area to an inter cooler then to the manifold.

Would put down some serious numbers.
Hmmmm... a twin remote turbo ....
romycha1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 06:20 PM   #7
bsteimel
Nice !!!
 
bsteimel's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: West Chester, PA
Posts: 382
Quote:
Originally Posted by staticlag View Post
I'm going to have to go with rear mounted.

I didn't catch that episode before that setup was really cool. God they make it look so easy on that show. I highly doubt that tuning on an Rx8 could be as easy as that, haha.
__________________
VR 2004 RX8 GT 80k miles, 6MT, Red/Black Interior, NAV, AVelectronics Nav Switch, RB screens, Mazsport Fan Mod, RB Gauge Pod, Purchased August, 2006.
"Personally, I don't like EVs, I love the sound of an engine and the smell of oil - I'm old fashioned like that, but now is a good time to be a stylist." Mazda chief designer = awesome
bsteimel is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 07:28 PM   #8
swoope
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (4)
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 13,817
i wonder who voted for rear mounted?????

beers
__________________
Thanks, Mr. moody sardonic expert on so many things. Potentiated 09 Banned

All the stuff???? All I need is rum dude; everything else takes care of itself! Kane 09
swoope is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 09:50 PM   #9
mysql101
Plays with fire
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Florida
Posts: 8,854
Send a message via AIM to mysql101
manifold. Only con is its hard to work on. The air is hotter there and will spool fastest.
__________________

Turbocharged RX8 - 307 whp, 245 ft-lb torque @ 9 PSI, ??? @ 12 PSI with Satan's Hairdryer. Videos, Pictures, Rebuild.
Currently NA, with a 3.6 second 0-60
mysql101 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 10:21 PM   #10
TrochoidMagic
is adjusting valve lash
 
TrochoidMagic's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hollywooood!
Posts: 899
i think its logical to use a rear mounted turbo if a kit comes for the 8.
reason is the pros of that set-up will REALLY benefit the 8 in terms of heat and reliability... 8's can't run huge turbo's and are not meant to be boosted fuckin high with stock high comp rotors anyways... so this is what will save the 8 from all those poorly tuned fi 8's from an early death...

i already know those with the current greddy kits or anything else thats manifold mounted may disagree... however, i don't have a turbo and i think somewhat my opinion are not biased.

so if they did come with a rear mounted turbo kit by the time my warranty is over...i just may consider one with that set-up. for the right price of courses.

i mean, whats so bad about the rear mounted??? longer tubes? drop of 1 psi?
from what i recall... the t18z or the small greddy turbo still has room left to be boosted higher, right? and speaking in all modesty, i would not run the 8 with boost to make the 8 over 300whp. so this may be good.

someone make a kit!
__________________
lbs.removed:stock-42lbs/6oz.(11/08) target:-100a lighter car is a faster car!
TrochoidMagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 10:47 PM   #11
staticlag
Moderator
 
staticlag's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,362
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrochoidMagic View Post
i think its logical to use a rear mounted turbo if a kit comes for the 8.
reason is the pros of that set-up will REALLY benefit the 8 in terms of heat and reliability... 8's can't run huge turbo's and are not meant to be boosted fuckin high with stock high comp rotors anyways... so this is what will save the 8 from all those poorly tuned fi 8's from an early death...

i already know those with the current greddy kits or anything else thats manifold mounted may disagree... however, i don't have a turbo and i think somewhat my opinion are not biased.

so if they did come with a rear mounted turbo kit by the time my warranty is over...i just may consider one with that set-up. for the right price of courses.

i mean, whats so bad about the rear mounted??? longer tubes? drop of 1 psi?
from what i recall... the t18z or the small greddy turbo still has room left to be boosted higher, right? and speaking in all modesty, i would not run the 8 with boost to make the 8 over 300whp. so this may be good.

someone make a kit!
someone is already making a kit http://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=126645

the direct cons of a remote or rear mounted turbo setup is cost. Thats a lot of piping that you are going to have to pay to get fabricated.

And if you watched the video, lubrication is also a problem that needs to be addressed.
__________________
SOLD - 2004 Winning Blue RX8
MS Suspension, RB Swaybars, Autoexe Strut Tower Bar, FEED 4.77 gears, RPF-1s...

RX8 Owner FAQ!!! (New 1-26-09) http://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=163824

My Research/Photography/RX8 Blog - http://fullframe.vividomaha.com
staticlag is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 11:23 PM   #12
romycha1
Registered User
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: San Antonio --> San Diego
Posts: 876
Send a message via AIM to romycha1
Ummm.. his kit is already made.. just upgrading it...

But I like the whole top-mount action.. it's easy on the eyes and easy to get to.
romycha1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-19-2008, 11:41 PM   #13
StealthTL
Super Moderator
 
StealthTL's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Waaay North.....
Posts: 5,458
Rear mounted has the additional con of having NO access to clean air for the intake - I've only seen bastardized efforts at locations, even the best of them is in a wheellwell - awful!


S
__________________
Mobil1 is expensive, but no oil costs more......
StealthTL is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2008, 12:33 AM   #14
TrochoidMagic
is adjusting valve lash
 
TrochoidMagic's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hollywooood!
Posts: 899
^^how i felt... too bad there is "always" a trade-off.
__________________
lbs.removed:stock-42lbs/6oz.(11/08) target:-100a lighter car is a faster car!
TrochoidMagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2008, 12:49 AM   #15
TrochoidMagic
is adjusting valve lash
 
TrochoidMagic's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hollywooood!
Posts: 899
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthTL View Post
Rear mounted has the additional con of having NO access to clean air for the intake - I've only seen bastardized efforts at locations, even the best of them is in a wheellwell - awful!


S
this is so mind boggling. sure there's some way of having a better air-box location. even in the trunk?...hmmm...nah.
we need a pic of a stripped car.
__________________
lbs.removed:stock-42lbs/6oz.(11/08) target:-100a lighter car is a faster car!
TrochoidMagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2008, 01:23 AM   #16
TrochoidMagic
is adjusting valve lash
 
TrochoidMagic's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hollywooood!
Posts: 899
yeah...i guess a lil further back from the manifold is the best place. as long as it can be far enough back to not vent heat back into the engine...
just noticed...what if your cat blew out? for those who choose to stay with a cat...your turbo is fucked with the rear mount...bad idea.
__________________
lbs.removed:stock-42lbs/6oz.(11/08) target:-100a lighter car is a faster car!
TrochoidMagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2008, 03:21 AM   #17
kersh4w
Hit & Run Magnet
 
kersh4w's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (3)
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DC Area
Posts: 6,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by StealthTL View Post
Rear mounted has the additional con of having NO access to clean air for the intake - I've only seen bastardized efforts at locations, even the best of them is in a wheellwell - awful!


S
i know you know more than me.. so bear with me. but i dont think so. im sure some sort of roof mounted (or side mounted behind the rear door windows or thereabouts) air ducts could be built. supercars do it all the time.

the real problem i see is that you would be exposing the turbo directly to the street. and as i use my 8 as a dd, i just dont see that as plausible. but maybe its fine.
__________________

Speed is money. How fast can you afford to go? - TeamRX8
need a better shift feel, pedal going squeaky on you, want faster shifts? Race Roots clutch brackets.
rx8 service manual
Quote:
Originally Posted by mysql101 View Post
how strong of a transmission do you need with 120 torque?!
kersh4w is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2008, 03:26 AM   #18
TrochoidMagic
is adjusting valve lash
 
TrochoidMagic's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: hollywooood!
Posts: 899
Quote:
Originally Posted by kersh4w View Post
i know you know more than me.. so bear with me. but i dont think so. im sure some sort of roof mounted (or side mounted behind the rear door windows or thereabouts) air ducts could be built. supercars do it all the time.

the real problem i see is that you would be exposing the turbo directly to the street. and as i use my 8 as a dd, i just dont see that as plausible. but maybe its fine.
i'm sure in the case of that sts corvette, if it was a hard-top version, some scoop or whatnot could've been fabbed up to use an airbox in the trunk.
kinda like a turbo mr2 style...if you think about it...the concept is similar.
__________________
lbs.removed:stock-42lbs/6oz.(11/08) target:-100a lighter car is a faster car!
TrochoidMagic is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-20-2008, 10:51 AM   #19
diabolical1
i'm the undead
 
diabolical1's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 210
i've grown accustomed to seeing in front of the engine. i think it's cool for a couple of reasons. having access to it and having more size options are among the most important of the reasons. access was my biggest complaint for my MR2 and i suspect sizing may be an issues with my current Rx-7 project. i won't be turbocharging my current Rx-8, but i might in a future project and i think the front placement is the ideal solution for my concerns.
__________________
1984 Mazda Rx-7 (in gestation once again)
2004 Mazda Rx-8
Quote:
Originally Posted by ricky356 View Post
...and i would put money on it you have neither an 8 or 350....or any friends for that matter. and your mom cant stand the thought she birthed you.
diabolical1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-21-2008, 12:39 AM   #20
staticlag
Moderator
 
staticlag's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,362
Quote:
Originally Posted by TrochoidMagic View Post
yeah...i guess a lil further back from the manifold is the best place. as long as it can be far enough back to not vent heat back into the engine...
just noticed...what if your cat blew out? for those who choose to stay with a cat...your turbo is fucked with the rear mount...bad idea.

True, i forgot about that, I wonder how the STS turbo handles that

Likely you would have to get a metal core cat to make it work.
__________________
SOLD - 2004 Winning Blue RX8
MS Suspension, RB Swaybars, Autoexe Strut Tower Bar, FEED 4.77 gears, RPF-1s...

RX8 Owner FAQ!!! (New 1-26-09) http://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=163824

My Research/Photography/RX8 Blog - http://fullframe.vividomaha.com
staticlag is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 01-22-2008, 12:35 PM   #21
rotorocks
RotoRocks Powered
 
rotorocks's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 1,226
Send a message via ICQ to rotorocks Send a message via Yahoo to rotorocks
Quote:
Originally Posted by staticlag View Post
True, i forgot about that, I wonder how the STS turbo handles that

Likely you would have to get a metal core cat to make it work.
Mine blew, nothing happened.
That cat is dual core, remember? 1rst half burns and clogs the second half. You are done. no more boost, no more GO, Turbo is safe and sound.

Ask me how I know


There is nothing wrong with hanging the turbo in the back.
The intake placement is also not an issue. intake filter sitting inside the rear fender is perfect. It is about 2-3" higher than your tail pipe tips, there is never water there even at high speed hitting a huge puddle, and the air up there is as clean as it gets anywhere else, plus it is truly cold.

Ask me how I know

There is no risk of exposing the pressure pipe. 2" alluminized steel pipe fits perfectly well on the other side of the differential (parralel to exhaust) held with the cross braces. It is no more exposed to anything than your exhaust pipes.

turbo itself is not afraid of water, and you have much higher chances of ripping apart your muffler (and you don't see it happening anywhere do you?), than damaging that turbine, by banging it on something.

By the way all of this questions and issues were addressed long ago in my "another turbo" thread, where the initial build took place more than a year ago (and almost 30,000 miles)

Vlad
__________________
I offer Int-X street tuning sessions to RX8 owners. PM for Info.
Stage II RotoRocks Mid-mounted Turbo
rotorocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2008, 06:26 PM   #22
ShAdOwFoX
Soon to be born.....
 
ShAdOwFoX's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: AC<-->NYC
Posts: 264
correct me if im wrong but the Mazsport type 2 is a front mount engine bay turbo while the type 1 and 3 are on the manifold right?
ShAdOwFoX is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-23-2008, 09:53 PM   #23
Daemos
Registered User
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada
Posts: 674
rotorocks: Could you show me where the filter sits (with a picture) I'm VERY interested in your kit, I'm just wondering if I should get a custom box w/ duct built (or maybe you might incorporate one into your design) for the filter.
Daemos is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-24-2008, 12:10 PM   #24
rotorocks
RotoRocks Powered
 
rotorocks's Avatar
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Coral Springs, FL
Posts: 1,226
Send a message via ICQ to rotorocks Send a message via Yahoo to rotorocks
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daemos View Post
rotorocks: Could you show me where the filter sits (with a picture) I'm VERY interested in your kit, I'm just wondering if I should get a custom box w/ duct built (or maybe you might incorporate one into your design) for the filter.


See where the oil pump is located, above the exhaust tip?
Exactly in the same spot but on the opposite side, currently I have stuffed the intake filter. If you ever looked under that fender, you'll see how big, clean and secure of a place that pocket is.
__________________
I offer Int-X street tuning sessions to RX8 owners. PM for Info.
Stage II RotoRocks Mid-mounted Turbo

Last edited by rotorocks; 01-28-2008 at 12:55 AM.
rotorocks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 01-26-2008, 02:23 AM   #25
Turblown
Boost Monger
 
Trader Score: (0)
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Phoenix AZ
Posts: 97
Send a message via AIM to Turblown
Wow.......... My eyes hurt
Turblown is offline   Reply With Quote


Reply

Tags
control, cooling, fan, kit, mazport

Thread Tools
Display Modes Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump

Similar Threads
Thread Thread Starter Forum Replies Last Post
V1? & Placement? JRH13NJ RX-8 Discussion 30 11-18-2007 11:39 PM
wideband o2 placement 6dmnbg The Tech Garage 1 02-09-2007 05:32 AM
Gauge Placement cretinx Interior, Audio, and Electronics 26 05-05-2005 03:12 PM
Speaker placement? Johnnyma45 Interior, Audio, and Electronics 2 05-02-2005 12:59 AM
ignition placement P00Man RX-8 Discussion 3 05-12-2003 09:13 PM


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:34 PM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.7.5
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
All content Copyright © 2007 by Internet Brands, Inc.