When 20's is not enough...
#78
X-Sapper
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: where angle's fear to tread
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
you want to head out to California? or are youi talking about rotorfest in New Jersey?
naw it isnt' off subject...as long as we cruise to the event on some DUBS
naw it isnt' off subject...as long as we cruise to the event on some DUBS
#80
X-Sapper
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: where angle's fear to tread
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hehe i wasn't aware you were into that sort of thing?
(gives high five to abbid) :D
hehe don't you always have an audience? (by the way how do you like my productivity as a government employee?)
(gives high five to abbid) :D
hehe don't you always have an audience? (by the way how do you like my productivity as a government employee?)
#81
liar! you were totally aware i was into that sort of thing. im very impressed by your work ethics. hey, if ur slacking at your job, it'll make mine much easier on monday...since you're competition and all and yes, cali. in october. what size rims are on my rsx?
#82
X-Sapper
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: where angle's fear to tread
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i dont' remember what's on the rsx..i think the type s has 17's....the regular crappy one has like 16's or something. hmm i don't think i can go to cali i am poor..and i am doing my work..i'm already at my quota :D hehe i got skills baby.
oo so you are into that sort of thing...sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet :D
oo so you are into that sort of thing...sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet :D
#83
well, h*ll, i better be into this sort of stuff if i have to keep up with u and your previous "car-cop" experience. i'll have to check the rsx-s brochure, its at my aptmnt. im glad you're working at work? this just isn't as much fun as when abbid is watching...hey....u thinking what im thinking?
#85
yeah, well, imagine the one thing you've wanted b4 that im NOT gonna give you...unless its with abbid and ur never living the car-cop thing down! how big were the rims on the jellybean (is that the car u were in?)? (just trying to keep with the thread subject buddy!)
#86
X-Sapper
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: where angle's fear to tread
Posts: 2,392
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
jelly-bean was kicking 14's baby...i was rolling deep back in the day...soo all i got to do is get abbid a plane ticket huh? LOL i kid i kid.
well love i'm leaving work catch you later. :D
well love i'm leaving work catch you later. :D
#88
Us heavy mazda 6 family sedans owners decided to actually test this whole argument. We took the cars to a drag strip, and actually swapped wheels between runs.
rx8 18x8 225/45/18 bridgestone (stock)
verse
rx7 16x8 225/50/16 Toyo Trampios (Old V-rated tire)
(Demonstration of gearing difference effect, and weight effect)
The left car is the Mazda 6i ATX.
Rx8 Wheels Run 1 [18x8]
Rx8 Wheels Run 2
Rx7 Wheels Run 1 [16x8]
Rx7 Wheels Run 2 [16x8]
I know you fella's can do the math.
The sticky is also sitting at the top of the forum, with articles, links, dyno's, 0-60, track times, and 1/4 miles as additional supporting evidence. Just wanted to show that people don't just sit here and talk about **** without any data behind it. Some people do go out and test these arguments.
https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-wheels-tires-brakes-suspension-55/effects-wheel-size-weight-performance-51865/
rx8 18x8 225/45/18 bridgestone (stock)
verse
rx7 16x8 225/50/16 Toyo Trampios (Old V-rated tire)
(Demonstration of gearing difference effect, and weight effect)
The left car is the Mazda 6i ATX.
Rx8 Wheels Run 1 [18x8]
Rx8 Wheels Run 2
Rx7 Wheels Run 1 [16x8]
Rx7 Wheels Run 2 [16x8]
I know you fella's can do the math.
The sticky is also sitting at the top of the forum, with articles, links, dyno's, 0-60, track times, and 1/4 miles as additional supporting evidence. Just wanted to show that people don't just sit here and talk about **** without any data behind it. Some people do go out and test these arguments.
https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-wheels-tires-brakes-suspension-55/effects-wheel-size-weight-performance-51865/
#89
Originally Posted by crossbow
Us heavy mazda 6 family sedans owners decided to actually test this whole argument. We took the cars to a drag strip, and actually swapped wheels between runs.
rx8 18x8 225/45/18 bridgestone (stock)
verse
rx7 16x8 225/50/16 Toyo Trampios (Old V-rated tire)
(Demonstration of gearing difference effect, and weight effect)
The left car is the Mazda 6i ATX.
Rx8 Wheels Run 1 [18x8]
Rx8 Wheels Run 2
Rx7 Wheels Run 1 [16x8]
Rx7 Wheels Run 2 [16x8]
I know you fella's can do the math.
The sticky is also sitting at the top of the forum, with articles, links, dyno's, 0-60, track times, and 1/4 miles as additional supporting evidence. Just wanted to show that people don't just sit here and talk about **** without any data behind it. Some people do go out and test these arguments.
https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=51865&page=1
rx8 18x8 225/45/18 bridgestone (stock)
verse
rx7 16x8 225/50/16 Toyo Trampios (Old V-rated tire)
(Demonstration of gearing difference effect, and weight effect)
The left car is the Mazda 6i ATX.
Rx8 Wheels Run 1 [18x8]
Rx8 Wheels Run 2
Rx7 Wheels Run 1 [16x8]
Rx7 Wheels Run 2 [16x8]
I know you fella's can do the math.
The sticky is also sitting at the top of the forum, with articles, links, dyno's, 0-60, track times, and 1/4 miles as additional supporting evidence. Just wanted to show that people don't just sit here and talk about **** without any data behind it. Some people do go out and test these arguments.
https://www.rx8club.com/showthread.php?t=51865&page=1
#90
It's Not Funny...
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 68
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Just from observation I have a few comments to make, trying not to be involved. I think what most people think of the RX8 is obviously a sports/performance car, when 20" wheels usually form to more of a luxury vehicle style. After seeing those pictures, I honestly say that it doesn't look that bad according to size. I dont really like the 'looks' of them. Most people on this forum are on this forum for this being a sports car, looking for performance. In this case most people here would not have to think too long to know that such a big wheel would not give you any gains. Im sure you will find plenty of praises on that setup. Just probably not here.
#91
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by crossbow
Us heavy mazda 6 family sedans owners decided to actually test this whole argument. We took the cars to a drag strip, and actually swapped wheels between runs.
#92
Pur,
The trampios were on the rx7 rims. If anything that was an additional disadvantage towards the smaller wheels. The trampios were quite old, and quite outdated (The compound felt like a rock), vs the rx8 potenza's with about 5-8k miles on them. But your right, there are a bunch of variables involved...but this is at least an example done by local mazda guys.
Having autocrossed in a 6 with a variety of wheel and tire sizes, I'd have to say going from a set of 18x8's, to a set of lighter 16x8's (12-15 lb a corner drop off) is roughly equivilant to going from a maxima to a miata in terms of vehicle agility and nimbleness. Then of course I know I don't have to tell you that .
The trampios were on the rx7 rims. If anything that was an additional disadvantage towards the smaller wheels. The trampios were quite old, and quite outdated (The compound felt like a rock), vs the rx8 potenza's with about 5-8k miles on them. But your right, there are a bunch of variables involved...but this is at least an example done by local mazda guys.
Having autocrossed in a 6 with a variety of wheel and tire sizes, I'd have to say going from a set of 18x8's, to a set of lighter 16x8's (12-15 lb a corner drop off) is roughly equivilant to going from a maxima to a miata in terms of vehicle agility and nimbleness. Then of course I know I don't have to tell you that .
#93
Has been a funny thread. Beside the obvious argument of the bigger wheels not making a difference, (not gonna mention the ugly factor on the pics) but also comments like my wider tires give better bad weather handling, This has been a thread littered with ignorance. I guess the best comment was from JO (lol, he named himself that, like it wasn't obvious) that others in school must say something about the car. Kinda takes the fun out of everyone arguing with a kid still in school But he did ask for it.
#94
haha. Page 7.
oh oh guys, you're so entertaining, and it's free.
I think i didn't made myself clear (my bad. English is not my first language.)
Ok, please read this carefully:
1. I KNOW that 20's cannot be better in term of performance that lighter wheels. I'm not stupid and i know that lighter is the vehicule, better is. I used to made montain bike competitions, and a Titanium bike weighting 21lbs is way better than a 30lbs bike. Difference is HUGE when climbing.
2. BUT (and please pay attention) i'm not convinced that 20's will ruin de ride. In any way. This mean that i don't give a S**T if i lose 0.1 seconds on 0-60 mph. My car is still fast enough to get speeding ticket, and the bracking is excellent and beyond most cars allowed on the road.
3. You guys are plain maniacs about performance ? You absolutely want to get the most feeling for your bucks ? ...And still playin' around with this MAZDA (it's a Mazda, did you noticed it ? Mazda doesn't spell F-E-R-R-A-R-I) ? Hey...c'mon. Save your bucks and buy yourself a Suzuki GSXR 1300. You'll know what real feeling is.
4. Please don't bother me with tiny-stupid differences as "0-60 mph in 6.1 sec" compared to "0-60 mph in 6.3 sec". Anything above 5 seconds it's just....a daily driver.
5. I didn't measured the differences. Anyway, i don't care. What is important it's the feeling i have when i'm sitting in the car. I FEEL that i didn't lose enough of "performance" to put back the 18's stockers. PERIOD.
6. I still want to be in your picky club. Please don't ban me.
oh oh guys, you're so entertaining, and it's free.
I think i didn't made myself clear (my bad. English is not my first language.)
Ok, please read this carefully:
1. I KNOW that 20's cannot be better in term of performance that lighter wheels. I'm not stupid and i know that lighter is the vehicule, better is. I used to made montain bike competitions, and a Titanium bike weighting 21lbs is way better than a 30lbs bike. Difference is HUGE when climbing.
2. BUT (and please pay attention) i'm not convinced that 20's will ruin de ride. In any way. This mean that i don't give a S**T if i lose 0.1 seconds on 0-60 mph. My car is still fast enough to get speeding ticket, and the bracking is excellent and beyond most cars allowed on the road.
3. You guys are plain maniacs about performance ? You absolutely want to get the most feeling for your bucks ? ...And still playin' around with this MAZDA (it's a Mazda, did you noticed it ? Mazda doesn't spell F-E-R-R-A-R-I) ? Hey...c'mon. Save your bucks and buy yourself a Suzuki GSXR 1300. You'll know what real feeling is.
4. Please don't bother me with tiny-stupid differences as "0-60 mph in 6.1 sec" compared to "0-60 mph in 6.3 sec". Anything above 5 seconds it's just....a daily driver.
5. I didn't measured the differences. Anyway, i don't care. What is important it's the feeling i have when i'm sitting in the car. I FEEL that i didn't lose enough of "performance" to put back the 18's stockers. PERIOD.
6. I still want to be in your picky club. Please don't ban me.
#95
J08,
It was 0.536 seconds in the 1/4 mile. (Were not talking 0-60 here) Thats roughly equivilant to 400-500 lbs off the car, or adding an additional 50 bhp. Ask Charles if he'd like another 0.5 seconds off his 1/4 mile time .
Its all there in the timing slips (You did ask for proof)...though thats a comparison between 16's and 18's. There are variances, but even if you threw out 50% of the difference, thats still a .25 second gain. Thats still pretty substaintal (your talking car lengths over a stock car).
The differences get larger the larger the diameter of the wheel. (The tire weight becomes more of a rotational intertia problem the farther its moved away from the hub).
I just think that its important to point out, that when everyone on the forum argues over the simple exhaust/intake bolt ones, and which one is best (revi and hymee!! ha!), were talking fractions of a difference compared to the effect of the wheels/tires on the car.
It was 0.536 seconds in the 1/4 mile. (Were not talking 0-60 here) Thats roughly equivilant to 400-500 lbs off the car, or adding an additional 50 bhp. Ask Charles if he'd like another 0.5 seconds off his 1/4 mile time .
Its all there in the timing slips (You did ask for proof)...though thats a comparison between 16's and 18's. There are variances, but even if you threw out 50% of the difference, thats still a .25 second gain. Thats still pretty substaintal (your talking car lengths over a stock car).
The differences get larger the larger the diameter of the wheel. (The tire weight becomes more of a rotational intertia problem the farther its moved away from the hub).
I just think that its important to point out, that when everyone on the forum argues over the simple exhaust/intake bolt ones, and which one is best (revi and hymee!! ha!), were talking fractions of a difference compared to the effect of the wheels/tires on the car.
Last edited by crossbow; 06-06-2005 at 06:45 AM.
#96
Ride Naked!
Originally Posted by JO8
2. BUT (and please pay attention) i'm not convinced that 20's will ruin de ride. In any way. This mean that i don't give a S**T if i lose 0.1 seconds on 0-60 mph. My car is still fast enough to get speeding ticket, and the bracking is excellent and beyond most cars allowed on the road.
......
......
I have two sets of tires/wheels: My everyday 18" wheels with Avon 550s in 225/45, and my auto-x Kosei K1 TS 17" wheels with Kumho MXs in 255/40. The weight difference is around 8 lbs per tire/wheel combination. I also ride on TEIN Basic coilovers. Even my wife can tell the difference in ride quality. Sharp bumps are much less noticable with the lighter 17" setup even though the MXs have a stiffer sidewall then the 550s. I too would have been skepticle if I hadn't experienced the ride difference first hand.
So, you can be happy and go on believing what you want to while the rest of us continue to "give a S**T" about 60' times and slalom speeds. :p
#97
Registered User
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: SF Bay Area
Posts: 1,286
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I think we can end this thread now; it's pretty much beaten to death. Can we all agree on the following three items?
Really that's all there is to say.
- All other things being equal, larger rims have a negative effect on a car's overall performance.
- Some people can feel that loss of performance.
- JO8 can not.
Really that's all there is to say.
Last edited by PUR NRG; 06-06-2005 at 12:04 PM.
#100
Originally Posted by scottmhr1
Has been a funny thread. Beside the obvious argument of the bigger wheels not making a difference, (not gonna mention the ugly factor on the pics) but also comments like my wider tires give better bad weather handling, This has been a thread littered with ignorance. I guess the best comment was from JO (lol, he named himself that, like it wasn't obvious) that others in school must say something about the car. Kinda takes the fun out of everyone arguing with a kid still in school But he did ask for it.