Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

NEW tires, Kumho or Bridgestone

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Aug 28, 2006 | 10:16 PM
  #26  
zaglo6204's Avatar
mine's better
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: Aiken, SC
i am enjoying my brand spankin' new MXs lots.... sticky & quiet (doubt the quiet will last long, but we'll see)
Reply
Old Aug 28, 2006 | 11:58 PM
  #27  
c41250n's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Dec 2005
Posts: 1,257
Likes: 0
From: Daly City Ca.
falken 452, not too expensive and has very good traction!
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 12:39 AM
  #28  
CarAndDriver's Avatar
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
From: San Jose Area
I'd either get the A/S Avons, BFGoodrich KDW2s or the Falkens.

Okay, I changed my mind after reading more and more about them. Get the Kumhos and put the saved money into other mods.

Last edited by CarAndDriver; Oct 25, 2006 at 12:27 AM.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 05:11 PM
  #29  
climacus's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 600
Likes: 0
From: Toronto ON
I've driven a RX-8 with Kuhmo Ecsta (not sure which model, probably 712?) and the steering feel is definitely not as good as the OEM Dunlop. Not sure if it's an alignment specific issue on that car or if the tire just has less steering feedback. Keep this in mind when you look for new tires.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 09:57 PM
  #30  
musclecarconvrt's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Climacus, since you don't remember what kind of Kumhos they were I gather it wasn't even your car. I am on my second set of Kuhmo Ecsta MX 245/40 18 ZR and I must say they are much better than the original Potenza E040. Better grip, smoother ride, less/no tramlining, and way less noise.
Reply
Old Aug 29, 2006 | 10:36 PM
  #31  
Murray16's Avatar
Wannabe Guru
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 211
Likes: 0
From: St. Catharines, Ontario, Canada.
I bought a new set of Kuhmo MX's in April when I took my car out of storage. Phenominal tires. I have no grips about them whatsoever. I believe at the time the were $165 a tire for 245/40-18's. Worth every penny and more.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 12:53 PM
  #32  
iridearocket's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2004
Posts: 153
Likes: 0
Those Bridgestones will peel off pretty quick... they have the worst tread life of all sport performance tires. Yoko ES100, Kumho, Dunlop Direzza's are all longer lasting summer tires in the cheaper price range.

The Dunlop Direzza is their drift tire. Darn good performance with excellent durability.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 04:11 PM
  #33  
aRX7-7-8's Avatar
RedZoomZoom
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 18
Likes: 0
From: Plano, Texas
Another vote for the Yokohama AVS ES100s. I selected the 245/40x18 on the stock rims, and really like the handling. They seem to do well in the occassional wet, but I haven't had much opportunity to really test that during our drought. Tire Rack reviews and owner surveys have also helped me decide.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 04:17 PM
  #34  
DaveCM203's Avatar
DaveCm
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 670
Likes: 0
From: Central North Carolina
I put the Dunlop Direzza on my 8. I have about 1,000 miles on it so far and I am still unsure of the tire. After increasing the tire pressure 2 pounds all around, they defenantly have a better feel now. They seem to have great grip, but my confidence is not that high with them. I think it is because under any kind of cornering (including following a Camry through some twisties) they make a lot of noise. They sound like they are fighting for traction when they are not. Under very hard cornering it is a little confusing. The feel is realy good but they sound like they will break at any secound. I am hoping that as the tires continue to break in, they will get better.

Oh, the steering response of them is very light and they look realy good on the car.

Has anyone else tried them?
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 04:52 PM
  #35  
kwescott's Avatar
One ball, corner pocket
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 2,053
Likes: 1
From: Fontucky, right next to Patriotville
Direzzas definately make a lot of noise. I currently have 12000 miles on my 19 inch tires and plenty of tread left...still look fairly new. But then again, I got over 35000 miles on my stock Potenzas and was still able to sell them to a forum member for 200 bucks because they still had a lot of tread life remaining....

I loved the Potenzas. Kuhmo's aren't that bad...I think you may have a better deal with them over most tires.
Reply
Old Aug 30, 2006 | 10:54 PM
  #36  
CarAndDriver's Avatar
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
From: San Jose Area
Originally Posted by aRX7-7-8
Another vote for the Yokohama AVS ES100s. I selected the 245/40x18 on the stock rims, and really like the handling. They seem to do well in the occassional wet, but I haven't had much opportunity to really test that during our drought. Tire Rack reviews and owner surveys have also helped me decide.
I had AVS ES100s on a different car and they lasted over 30K miles, but they were just city and highway miles. I don't think they were the stickiest rubber I've ever had though. But the warranty and cost were great.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 09:24 AM
  #37  
morkusyambo's Avatar
Dongbag extrordinare
 
Joined: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,090
Likes: 0
From: Away from the fruits of my labor
I drove my bridgestones down to the wear-bars in 20k miles. I have now driven my Kumho SPTs to their wear-bars in around 26k miles. The RE040s were definately more planted than the Kumhos. However, our car handles great simply because the way the suspension is set up. Oh, a 3000 pound curb weight and 50/50 weight distribution also help a little. If you want to save money go with the Kumhos. If you track your car, or treat the street as your own personal track, spend a little more money for some softer rubber.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 07:53 PM
  #38  
musclecarconvrt's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
The best Kumhos are the MX tires. Get the 245/40 18 ZR and they will grip much better than the Bridgestone RE040s and cost a heck of a lot less. Oh, I got 30k miles out of my last set of Kumhos. Great tire for the price.
Reply
Old Sep 2, 2006 | 11:40 PM
  #39  
gc1bflyr's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
At approx. 20K miles, I replaced the OEM Bridgestones with 225/45 BF Goodrich KDWs - ERROR. They were very grippy, particularly in the wet. But the noise level was hideous and made worse by a resonance at approx 20, 45 and 80 mph. I now have the Kumho SPTs and the road noise is gone. Much quieter than than even the OEM Bridgestones. Turn in feel is a little vague. They feel equal to the KDWs in the dry when at the limit (my limit). They are very good in the rain. Road trips are a joy again.

Last edited by gc1bflyr; Sep 2, 2006 at 11:41 PM. Reason: typo
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 12:43 PM
  #40  
MadRonin's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 366
Likes: 0
From: SEPA
My SPTs are probably the best wet handling tire I've ever driven on. Dry handling is good, but not as good as the stock Dunlop 8090s that came with my 8. I've got about 18k my Kumhos and they're really noisy, but I'm probably going to buy another set next spring.
Reply
Old Sep 6, 2006 | 12:50 PM
  #41  
musclecarconvrt's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
MadRonin, consider the MX Kumhos. They are the best street Kumho you can get and are still waaay less money than anything else comparable. I got 30k miles (admittedly bald) out of my last set of them and I'm still loving the new ones I just put back on.
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 09:37 AM
  #42  
wmitz's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 16
Likes: 0
did you consider the BF goodrich t/a kdw2's?
Reply
Old Oct 3, 2006 | 11:23 AM
  #43  
deamicls's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by zaglo6204
i am enjoying my brand spankin' new MXs lots.... sticky & quiet (doubt the quiet will last long, but we'll see)
Actually, I have MXs and they are dead quiet compared to the RE040 with the same mileage. I have 12k miles on mine and there is about 3 mm left of tread on the inside of the tires......completely due to my driving hehehe.
Reply
Old Oct 24, 2006 | 10:57 PM
  #44  
vdelvec's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 137
Likes: 0
If the damn stock Dunlop 8090's weren;t so freaking expensive to replace, I'd love to just keep buying them everytime I need new tires... but... they're just so unaffordable!
Reply
Old Oct 25, 2006 | 12:29 AM
  #45  
CarAndDriver's Avatar
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
From: San Jose Area
Originally Posted by poolsidenaz
With 31k on my OEM Potenzas, I don't understand all the negativity about them. I love to carve the corners and the grip in the Potenzas is phenomenal. Is it really a savings if you don't get the same performance or same wear on a cheaper tire? Mind you, living in the desert I won't worry about rain or snowy conditions.

I'm not willing to give up performance or wear, and won't settle for less. Not even for $100/tire. Good luck in your search.
31K! The first owner of my car drove those OEM RE040 tires hard. The two front are down to the wear bars and I'm only at 13.6K.
Reply
Old Jan 27, 2007 | 03:12 PM
  #46  
unpocoloco's Avatar
Don't you know I'm loco?
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
I'm attracted to the Kuhmo SPTs because of many good reviews here. But I still wonder - at $120/tire (@ discount tire (they can be found even cheaper on tirerack))...doesn't that seem like TOO good of a deal? Are we all just settling because they have a nice price?
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 08:18 AM
  #47  
musclecarconvrt's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 464
Likes: 0
From: Tennessee
Holy thread revival Bat Man!

Get the Kuhmo MX if you want to spend a little more. It's the best tire they make for the road. I'm on my second set now and I love 'em. Loads of grip, less noise than other more expensive tires, and you can get about 30k miles out of 'em. I paid $165 for mine.
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 08:47 AM
  #48  
Nopstnz's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 939
Likes: 28
From: Port Royal, SC
neither. get yokohama avs es100 in 245/40/18. GREAT tire. Lovin it.

Or if you need something for the track. Falken Azenis 615
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 09:57 AM
  #49  
unpocoloco's Avatar
Don't you know I'm loco?
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
That's strange, I've read the exact opposite about the MX's. Possibly more than once. Here's a sample:
Originally Posted by Ophitoxaemia
245/40/18 kumho mx have worked great for me, were also very good at the track (laguna seca) with no apparent heat fade. the wet traction doesnt blow my mind, but these tires are NOISY!
argh! Seems like the only way to know is to have tried yourself
Reply
Old Jan 29, 2007 | 10:01 AM
  #50  
unpocoloco's Avatar
Don't you know I'm loco?
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 308
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Here's a quote regarding the Yoko's from yours truly:
Originally Posted by t-run/8
Just had a set of yokohama avs es100 in 245/40/18 put on today. They look great but haven't had a chance to test them out handling wise. I think they feel more road than the stock potenzas(rides a little rougher).
Now that you've had more of a chance to try 'em out, is that still a good assessment?
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:30 AM.