Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

Bilstein...

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 10:38 AM
  #1  
Red Devil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Bilstein...

I began to look into Bilstein PSS9 coilovers. I also checked a BMW forum, and read some independent opinions from Porsche owners, all seem to really like the PSS9s.

The PSS9 are monotube, 9 way single adjustables. For the RX-8 they are retailing around $1300 from a few vendors that responded to my inquiry.

What was interesting to me, is that if you look at the spring rates of the factory 6spd RX-8, they are:

155 Front
112 Rear

HKS RS Coilovers:
392 Front
280 Rear

Tein Flex:
503 Front
392 Rear

Many of the other available coilovers I've looked into are the same in that they maintain much stiffer springs in the front as compared to the rear. I assume Mazda has done this to prevent dive under hard braking, and to allow weight to be transferred to the rear under acceleration.

Bilstein's PSS9 rates, however are:

370 Front
375-445 Progressive Rear


I'm a bit confused as to why they have done this. Does this make sense to anyone else why Bilstein would have changed the spring bias from front to rear?
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 02:58 PM
  #2  
savedsol's Avatar
Carbonormous
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 882
Likes: 0
From: Chicago, IL
Most real-deal Porsche track racers will tell you the PSS9s are a great street setup but to mild for track. So depends on what you want. As far as your rear bias question, most RWD cars have a softer rear to slide (controllably) around. Too stiff and it'll swing (uncontrollably).
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 03:58 PM
  #3  
zaglo6204's Avatar
mine's better
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 808
Likes: 0
From: Aiken, SC
the progressive part makes it a little tricky... but i do looove my bilstein shocks on my M
Reply
Old Jun 21, 2006 | 04:10 PM
  #4  
Red Devil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Originally Posted by savedsol
Most real-deal Porsche track racers will tell you the PSS9s are a great street setup but to mild for track. So depends on what you want. As far as your rear bias question, most RWD cars have a softer rear to slide (controllably) around. Too stiff and it'll swing (uncontrollably).
That's interesting, I definitely don't want snap oversteer, but rather a progressive predictable loss of grip.

I was also confused by the linear rate in the front and progressive in the rear. Or maybe I just heard them wrong. Either way, I wasn't ready to go out and buy these tomorrow, and the more I think about them the more I lose interest and go back to thinking about HKS.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 08:46 PM
  #5  
Kurt Bob's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 286
Likes: 0
From: Augusta, GA
I'm also considering the PSS9's. Where did you find data on the spring rates? I couldn't find anything on the Bilstein web site.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 09:00 PM
  #6  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
ahh......... if you really want performance go with KW Variant 3 coilovers.

The top off the line for racers.

It will cost you big bucks.
Reply
Old Oct 12, 2006 | 10:13 PM
  #7  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,141
you mean wannabe racers ... real racers use Koni 28 series, Moton, Penske, etc.

but back on topic, Speedsource uses 800# front & rear on their GrandAm cars

I don't know how they do it either I have 600# front, 325# rear, RB front swaybar and tiny OE auto-trans rear swaybar and my car was so spin happy at the National Championships last month that I couldn't do anything with it. We even put 800# front springs in and took the rear bar off and it still was too loose ...

Last edited by TeamRX8; Oct 12, 2006 at 10:20 PM.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2006 | 01:27 PM
  #8  
Red Devil's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 1
From: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Originally Posted by Kurt Bob
I'm also considering the PSS9's. Where did you find data on the spring rates? I couldn't find anything on the Bilstein web site.
I got those numbers directly from Bilstein over the phone.

As a side note, I didn't get these, I got the Tein Flex instead. My car is a daily driver, basically, and does see a few HPDE sessions a year. So they're more than adequate for my purposes.
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 06:35 PM
  #9  
RevURGT3's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
From: San Antonio, TX
I think that the stiffer setting on the front has to do with the weight of the front of the car vs the rear. Maybe? On my 911 and my GT3 my settings were the opposite since most of the weight of the car was on the rear. The RX-8 is more balanced but a little front-biased (as shown in a recent weighing session on the track).
Reply
Old Feb 8, 2007 | 09:35 PM
  #10  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
I don't have a problem with the KW's.

Their 575 front with progressive rear
Reply



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:11 AM.