Notices
Series I Wheels, Tires, Brakes & Suspension

2004 with low loose rear suspension. Need advice.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-27-2010, 01:40 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
MrWigggles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
2004 with low loose rear suspension. Need advice.

I have an early 2004 with 135K miles on it.

The rear of the vehicle has always been lower than the front. (Of the RX-8s I've seen on the road, I've seen a few with this problem.) About a year after I got the car, I got the Racing Beat springs for the front only - the rear is still stock. This lowered the front a little without changing the ride characteristics. The car looked great and handled great for many years. People would often ask me what suspension set-up I had. I will tell them Racing Beat in the front and stock in the rear. "The rear is stock? Wow, that's low for stock." would be the normal reaction.

Slowly, the ride in rear got looser and looser and I found the car bottoming on the bump-stops fairly small bumps. Four months ago, I decided it was time to change shocks around the vehicle (the front was getting pretty loose as well.) I went with KYB Gas-A-Just mono-tubes. That helped for a couple months but now the rear is almost as bad as it was before. I'm looking for options. The performance of my front suspension is perfect. I would not change a thing. I would like to only fix the rear so here's what comes to my mind and you can give your comments (BTW, I do have about 70 pounds of stereo equipment in my trunk):

1. I could go with coil-overs and get exactly the height and feel that I want everywhere, but that would be a pricey option for a car with 135K miles on it. I also think the front is perfect the way it is and I doubt I could find coil-overs simply for the rear. (Also, this is my daily driver so I need non-race coil-overs.)

2. Could I upgrade to the newer RX-8 rear suspension? I know Mazda re-worked the rear suspension a couple years ago. Would it be plug-n-play? Buy the springs and shocks and slap them on. Are the mounts the same height and dimensions on the new RX-8 as my 2004?

3. Do my rear springs simply have fatigue? I could just slap on "new" factory springs designed for my model year and see what happens. That would probably be the most affordable solution, but I have this feeling that it will be just as bad as before. (The rear of my vehicle has been low from day one or almost day one.)

Looking for suggestions. I can provide pictures if they would help.

-Mr. Wigggles
Old 12-27-2010, 01:54 AM
  #2  
mkuhnracing.com
iTrader: (3)
 
TopGear8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Replace everything.... stop replacing just the rears...
Old 12-27-2010, 10:37 AM
  #3  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
MrWigggles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
^

"Four months ago, I decided it was time to change shocks around the vehicle (the front was getting pretty loose as well.)"

Anyone else...
Old 12-27-2010, 12:14 PM
  #4  
mkuhnracing.com
iTrader: (3)
 
TopGear8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Bilstein shocks... RB springs..

Don't buy KYB bullshit.
Old 12-27-2010, 12:19 PM
  #5  
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 13,718
Received 334 Likes on 289 Posts
You have extra weight in the rear with a bias towards stiffer front aftermarket springs....

Surprised it handles decent at all....


Get a set of matching springs at least...
Old 12-27-2010, 01:22 PM
  #6  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
MrWigggles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by dannobre
You have extra weight in the rear with a bias towards stiffer front aftermarket springs....

Surprised it handles decent at all....


Get a set of matching springs at least...
I thought about getting RB springs all the way around but it would (in theory) lower my rear even more by another 0.5" The sound system is only 70 lbs in my trunk (most of which is right behind the rear seat in a stealth install) That weight's equivalent to about the weight of 11 gallons of gas or a stick thin super model in my back seat. It's not a monster stereo system.

-Mr. Wigggles
Old 12-27-2010, 01:59 PM
  #7  
mkuhnracing.com
iTrader: (3)
 
TopGear8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Charlotte, NC
Posts: 6,212
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
You should have never bought just front springs...
Old 12-27-2010, 02:10 PM
  #8  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
MrWigggles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by TopGear8
You should have never bought just front springs...
It is not a completely crazy idea. Racing Beat sells the springs individually specifically for that purpose. I loved the way my car handled and drove for over 6 years and 100K miles with my current set-up.

-Mr. Wigggles
Old 12-27-2010, 08:49 PM
  #9  
Registered
 
EricMeyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Indianapolis, IN
Posts: 684
Likes: 0
Received 11 Likes on 10 Posts
Your symptoms are kinda weird my friend. I would take your car to a Mazda import shop (preferably a shop that works on lots of Miatas or MX-5's). A dealer is fine too. I would go through the entire rear suspension. Having had this problem for a while the cause may have influenced the integrity of other components.

As far as the new suspension goes---don't bother. All the same. You could take an easy route and get a Jiffy Lube oil change and ask the wrench to give it a quick glance once over. Tip him $10 for spending a few minutes. Take a look in your trunk at the top of the rear shock towers and report back what you observe.
Old 12-27-2010, 10:07 PM
  #10  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
longpath's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Stamford, CT
Posts: 629
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have an issue with rear end sag as well; but can't tell if it's just because I have these ridiculous monstrosity speed bumps I have to climb over at the condo where I live at. I've been seriously considering switching to the S2 rear shocks because the spring perch is supposedly moved enough that on my S1 (mine is a 2004) that I'd get additional ride height in the rear without changing anything. I can't see any signs of uneven tire wear or anything else to suggest alignment is off in any way, so I'm not sure; however, I have about 55K miles and am on my original shocks, front and rear.
Old 12-27-2010, 10:52 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
REDRX3RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 713
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
I've been thru this same quandry, and was about to get Bilsteins, and RB's, but the suspension feels very firm; it was just making a whump sound when hiting bumps.

So I realigned it once more, and found that the -1.9 camber I thought was in the back had changed to approx. -2.2 or so.

When I tried for -1.5 rear camber, the mechanic said he could only get it down to -1.65
on the right so we went with that on both rears.

It actually picked up the rear suspension by 1cm higher, the whump went away, and it feels smoother across bumps.

I see a lot of people (ricers) driving around with a rear splay on purpose, so you can eyeball the rear camber, and make sure the rear camber looks straighter than the front.
Old 12-28-2010, 10:18 AM
  #12  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
MrWigggles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by REDRX3RX8
I've been thru this same quandry, and was about to get Bilsteins, and RB's, but the suspension feels very firm; it was just making a whump sound when hiting bumps.

So I realigned it once more, and found that the -1.9 camber I thought was in the back had changed to approx. -2.2 or so.

When I tried for -1.5 rear camber, the mechanic said he could only get it down to -1.65
on the right so we went with that on both rears.

It actually picked up the rear suspension by 1cm higher, the whump went away, and it feels smoother across bumps.

I see a lot of people (ricers) driving around with a rear splay on purpose, so you can eyeball the rear camber, and make sure the rear camber looks straighter than the front.
Sounds very familiar. I get the "whump" sound when I go over fairly minor bumps and if someone sits in the back it is much worse as you can imagine. Last time I had my alignment done, the tech at NTB said my car didn't have a camber adjustment for the rear even though the previous time I went to a different NTB the tech changed my camber from the stock -1.9 to about -1.1 on both sides. I wanted to get my suspension ironed out before I got my car realligned, but maybe the thing to do is go the other route. My camber is definitely negative on the rear (always has been); I just don't know how much.

-Mr. Wigggles
Old 12-28-2010, 10:27 AM
  #13  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
MrWigggles's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,232
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by longpath
I have an issue with rear end sag as well; but can't tell if it's just because I have these ridiculous monstrosity speed bumps I have to climb over at the condo where I live at. I've been seriously considering switching to the S2 rear shocks because the spring perch is supposedly moved enough that on my S1 (mine is a 2004) that I'd get additional ride height in the rear without changing anything. I can't see any signs of uneven tire wear or anything else to suggest alignment is off in any way, so I'm not sure; however, I have about 55K miles and am on my original shocks, front and rear.
It sounds like a pretty good idea. It appears that the spring perch is about a half an inch higher for the S2 factory shocks. I am deducing that from the following. Koni only makes one set of adjustable shocks for all RX-8 model years. They have a disclaimer on Tire Rack if you use them in 2009+ RX-8's:

Note: Rear fitment Twin Tube Low Pressure Gas Standard Adjustable Shock Absorber 2009 and newer models will lower approx. 1/2"
So I would have to think the opposite would be true. If you used stock S2 shocks in your S1 car, you should get 1/2" ride height raise or more. I'm going to look into this as well. It might be a good solution for me. My guess is that the dealer price is not going to be very good for stock shocks.

EDIT: Just checked with Rosenthal Mazda and S2 rear shocks are $395 a piece . I ordered the Bilsteins yesterday from Tire Rack I think I am going to keep those and go that route. (New springs for a 2004 are $79.95 a piece for your info.)

-Mr. Wigggles

Last edited by MrWigggles; 12-28-2010 at 10:43 AM.
Old 12-28-2010, 12:07 PM
  #14  
Registered Toker
iTrader: (2)
 
Ross_Dawg's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Bend, OR
Posts: 5,545
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by MrWigggles
Sounds very familiar. I get the "whump" sound when I go over fairly minor bumps and if someone sits in the back it is much worse as you can imagine. Last time I had my alignment done, the tech at NTB said my car didn't have a camber adjustment for the rear even though the previous time I went to a different NTB the tech changed my camber from the stock -1.9 to about -1.1 on both sides. I wanted to get my suspension ironed out before I got my car realligned, but maybe the thing to do is go the other route. My camber is definitely negative on the rear (always has been); I just don't know how much.

-Mr. Wigggles
Time to go somewhere else for alignments
Old 07-19-2012, 01:01 PM
  #15  
New Member
 
boris.borukhin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ride height drop to 13" possible reassons ???

The spec defines a range of ~1 degree in camber change over 1.9inch range of ride height for the rear suspensions.
since the tire ware and camber have little effect over ride height I see no reason in this height difference of 1.9inch rather than shock absorbers and springs ware.
dose drop from maximum spec height of 15.8 inch to 13 inch is because of shock absorbers and springs ware ?
Is there any other reason for this drop ?
If I replace to new OEM shock absorbers and springs, will the ride height be 15.8 inch ?
thanks,
Boris
Old 07-19-2012, 01:25 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
40w8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 523
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
Originally Posted by boris.borukhin
The spec defines a range of ~1 degree in camber change over 1.9inch range of ride height for the rear suspensions.
since the tire ware and camber have little effect over ride height I see no reason in this height difference of 1.9inch rather than shock absorbers and springs ware.
dose drop from maximum spec height of 15.8 inch to 13 inch is because of shock absorbers and springs ware ?
Is there any other reason for this drop ?
If I replace to new OEM shock absorbers and springs, will the ride height be 15.8 inch ?
thanks,
Boris

My 07 GT was at 13.75 rear and 14.25 front from day one. I didn't want to chase the suspension, so I tracked what I had until I figured out the alignment I wanted; See Red's alignment above.

When the shocks are gone I'll put Bilsteins, but the car is firm and grips well on bumpy or smooth pavement.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Panthersn
New Member Forum
4
07-13-2021 06:30 AM
Redheddude222
New Member Forum
13
08-24-2015 09:14 AM
Bill_Monteith
New Member Forum
13
08-18-2015 07:11 AM
Mr.Durden
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
4
08-12-2015 02:21 PM
dbarber
Series I Trouble Shooting
14
07-25-2015 01:34 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 2004 with low loose rear suspension. Need advice.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:19 PM.