Notices
Series I Trouble Shooting This is the place to learn more about or discuss any issues you're having with your RX-8
View Poll Results: What is your in town gas mileage?
9-12
14.08%
13-15
29.58%
16-18
32.39%
18 or more
23.94%
Voters: 142. You may not vote on this poll

MPG Discussion / Complaints

Old Apr 3, 2004 | 07:59 AM
  #276  
Pavehawk's Avatar
PermaGrin += 1
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 122
Likes: 0
From: Austin, TX
Mine's been running anywhere from 16.7 to 20.0 through 2700 miles.
Reply
Old Apr 3, 2004 | 10:24 AM
  #277  
Spf006's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 28
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore's Inner Harbor
Something I've found interesting:

Up until last weekend, I've been experiencing between 14-17 mpg even in intercity driving...up through ~5000 miles.

Last weekend I spent two days driving the car HARD around VIR at the Mazda Drivers' event. I don't even want to think about my mileage during the event, however...

On the drive home (~300miles from Danville, VA back to B'more, MD) and EVER SINCE, i've been experiencing 18-22 mpg on the same daily commute between Baltimore and Washington, DC.

My conclusions: the engine wants to be run and possibly doesn't really "break-in" until it has been run hard. Those seals might need a good jolt to seriously seat them.

Anybody else, perhaps with technical expertise, care to weigh in on the possible reasons behind this?

Cheers,
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2004 | 02:22 AM
  #278  
PhineasFellOff's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
As promised, I have just posted a thread with the incredibly high mileages I got from 20 tanks during my trip across the country.

Please check out the thread in the Discussion forum.
Reply
Old Apr 9, 2004 | 02:41 PM
  #279  
Rotary Nut's Avatar
Thread Starter
"...I'm a Dapper Dan man"
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 840
Likes: 1
From: Newport News, Va
Updated

Turned the big 5K today.! Whoo hooo!

I hope to see a marked improvement on this new tank.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 11:01 AM
  #280  
Rotary Nut's Avatar
Thread Starter
"...I'm a Dapper Dan man"
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 840
Likes: 1
From: Newport News, Va
Thumbs down Went down a notch!

Updated.

Also changed the oil and the brown condensation was no longer present on the dipstick!
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 11:30 AM
  #281  
Ole Spiff's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
From: Inland Empire, SoCalif
To SPF006

After reading your post, I was thinking perhaps the computer in the car is much more involved in day-to-day driving than might be expected? It may have nothing to do with "break-in" but may actually be a constant monitoring of driving conditions by the computer.

I've always gotten decent mileage with my 8 (I bought mine in July of 2003) but I've always driven it "vigorously" and never babied it. Did you drive "for mileage" before this weekend event? Maybe the rotary 8 being unlike any other car, is also unlike other cars when it comes to mileage and driving habits. I know that rotaries put out much more heat than piston engines. It's possible that the computer cools down the catalytic converter with fuel if it doesn't sense enough 'action' or intake/exhaust flow.

By driving it hard like you did, the computer 'read' the right amount of flow of intake/exhaust and backed off on fuel richness.

I would be curious to see how many who get poor mileage granny drive....

Just an idea....
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 12:15 PM
  #282  
stanfordcole's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 60
Likes: 0
From: Durham, NC
I was getting 16 to 17 miles per gallon mixed driveing when I first got my 8. It now has 4500 miles on it and I am averaging 19 to 20 with mixed driving. I have a 5 or 6 mile commute to work. Its the only time I have felt like I live to close to work. I would love to have a little more time to enjoy driving the car while commuting to work. I drive it conservatively alot of the times but I don't hesitate to get on it a little when I feel the desire. After all thats what I bought the car for. I can't complain about 19 to 20 and if it goes up more then great. If not I'm happy with it.
Reply
Old Apr 22, 2004 | 06:49 PM
  #283  
Chris in MD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: St. Leonard, Maryland
Went on my first road trip - about 800 miles roundtrip. Car now has over 2200. Also got my record 21.69 MPG with Shell 93 - not very judicious with the throttle either, breaking 100 mph several times and probably averaging around 75 most of the tank.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 08:01 PM
  #284  
rchaud98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Thumbs down How

How are you taking these measurements? Any car I've ever driven, the gas needle bounces by an 1/8 both up and down so how are you coming up with decimal numbers for mpg? Is it the same as how you guys say the rx8 goes 0 to 60 in 5.5 seconds by people looking at their watches and counting out loud?? :D
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 08:12 PM
  #285  
rchaud98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Originally posted by CERAMICSEAL
O.K. I'm convinced these cars are really terrible outside of certain ranges. Some cars are getting around what they're supposed to, some close and very few exceeding the rated numbers.
If you're driving this car in a cold climate, in the city, for very short distances, occasionally applying full throttle you probably won't get 20mpg too frequently.
Some folks may have some faulty cars, but the verdict is still not in.

I believe people are just making up numbers as none of these readings are accurate. Hell what if you live in San Francisco and are driving downhill yourf fuel gauge won't be accurate. You want to take REAL readings.


FILL the tank ALLL the way up till it's completely topped off and then fill a seperate container like the ones lawn mowers need and drive around till you run COMPLETELY out of gas and measure your distance and divide by fuel tank size and voila you have your true accurate number.


Kthnx
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 08:51 PM
  #286  
MEGAREDS's Avatar
Goh Mifune
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
From: Green Oaks, IL
Originally posted by rchaud98
I believe people are just making up numbers as none of these readings are accurate.
Kthnx
My readings are very accurate and there is no need to be picky about the way you top-off. Over time the averaged numbers become very precise. Here are the updated numbers; I'm getting just under 18 mpg with mostly suburban-type driving.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 09:01 PM
  #287  
rchaud98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
range of 24 to 13 is not accurate.

Doo dee DEEET. Please hang up and try your call again...
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 09:39 PM
  #288  
PhineasFellOff's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 248
Likes: 0
Originally posted by rchaud98
I believe people are just making up numbers as none of these readings are accurate. Hell what if you live in San Francisco and are driving downhill yourf fuel gauge won't be accurate. You want to take REAL readings.


FILL the tank ALLL the way up till it's completely topped off and then fill a seperate container like the ones lawn mowers need and drive around till you run COMPLETELY out of gas and measure your distance and divide by fuel tank size and voila you have your true accurate number.


Kthnx
Your method of running the gas to empty won't work because, as we found out in other threads, the car will run out with .8 to 1.0 gallons left in the tank. This means you can't just run the tank out, jot down your miles, and divide by 15.9 gallons. You'd still have to get to a gas station and fill up. As always, the amount of gas you fill up tells you how much was used on the previous tank.
Reply
Old Apr 24, 2004 | 09:42 PM
  #289  
MEGAREDS's Avatar
Goh Mifune
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 850
Likes: 0
From: Green Oaks, IL
rchaud98:
Outliers have no affect on the overall accuracy of the data but can skew the data if you use a small enough set. That's why its important for people wondering what their "true" mileage is to take a large data set, not just one tank.

If you distrust the average, use the median -- in many cases a better way to describe trends in a data set. It is the value of the middle observation, after the observations have been ordered from smallest to largest. In other words, 50% of the observations are above this number, and 50% are below, that is why it is also called "the 50th percentile." In my case, it is the average of two tanks, the tank on December 5, 2003 (18.1mpg) and March 27, 2004 (17.7 mpg), meaning my median is 17.9 ---> precisely the same value as the average.

Last edited by MEGAREDS; Apr 26, 2004 at 08:47 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 04:33 PM
  #291  
rchaud98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Originally posted by JeupRX-8
I get horrible MPG, but I am not complaining; I rag on the biatch so I don't expect good MPG.


Troy J.

True..

To me the rx8 body is the perfect car (handling,looks) it's the engine that's dissapointing... I hope the 2005 model fixes issues such as lost HP, Flooding and mpg. Once those are fixed I'd easily and proudly call the RX8 Car of the year!!!!


http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmp..._ge/gas_prices


U.S. gasoline prices climbed another 3 cents per gallon in the past two weeks on the strength of high crude oil prices, tight capacity and soaring demand, an analyst said Sunday.


geeze....

Last edited by rchaud98; Apr 25, 2004 at 07:47 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 09:23 PM
  #292  
wayneside's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 89
Likes: 0
From: dallas texas sometimes in california
i doubt i get better than 15 mpg...even on a 5 hour drive i had to refill. my 350 has much better gas mileage but the 8 is sooo much nicer to drive daily...
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2004 | 09:41 PM
  #294  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Prior to M, my first tank got 17.x, my second tank was 16.x mpg.

I then got the M flash.

With about 70% highway I have 18.7 mpg on that tank (229 miles, 12.210 gallons).

Still hard to say with my numbers since I've not fully broken in the car, have yet to have an oil change, and my driving the car is pretty random.

I'd like to see around 20-23mpg eventually.

Ah, modest goals.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2004 | 08:15 PM
  #295  
Chris in MD's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 37
Likes: 0
From: St. Leonard, Maryland
rchaud98 - not sure what you are talking about. You fill up the tank, drive for a while, fill up the tank and then divide the miles by gallons added. I can show you the calculation if you want. Not very scientific and probably not consistent enough for lab work but I guarantee with a large enough data set you will get a pretty good average - statistically relavant within a couple tenths.

If you're so concerned about gas mileage buy a Honda Insight dude - 3 cylinders and 66mpg :D
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2004 | 08:37 AM
  #296  
ArvinC's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 190
Likes: 0
From: Baltimore, MD USA
I just finished a...

...trip down to the Eastern Shore of Delaware and Maryland. Trip was 142 miles one-way and I averaged 22 miles per gallon in very relaxed driving. Average speed was 60-65 miles per hour and had no traffic what-so-ever. I do not believe I have the L-flash as yet...definately know I don't have the M-flash! This was the first long-trip I took in my car, but attribute it to finally being broken-in as I turned over the 2500 mile mark.

Arvin
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2004 | 08:52 AM
  #297  
Puppy1's Avatar
Pure Unadulterated Fun
 
Joined: Oct 2002
Posts: 629
Likes: 0
From: Monterey Park, CA
I'm consistantly getting 21mpg in mostly city driving. I have over 16.5k miles and love my car more and more each day. My only complaint is about the service department manager at the dealer in Santa Monica.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2004 | 10:41 AM
  #298  
bowman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
From: SW Missouri
I have been tracking mpg for my current car for the past 3000 miles.

I fill the tank and use the gallons added as the amount used. IMO gas guages are not accurate enough to measure mpg.


As to using the average, median, etc, I ran these numbers over my data.

NOT AN RX-8

Mean 29.62 (aka average) w/ Std Dev 1.23
Mode ~29
Median 29.74

NOT AN RX-8
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2004 | 03:11 PM
  #299  
elite's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: MI
got the flash when the car was about 200 miles so i dont know any more then Im getting 175 to a tank. the performance is laging and i am super pissed but the dealer is saying everthing is fine. this past take ive been doing alot of shifting under 3800 and still gonna get the same 175 for about 13 gallons......

i dont know what to do.....my dealer doesnt eem to say anymore then wait 5000 miles and itll get better..BS!
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2004 | 04:07 PM
  #300  
rchaud98's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 24
Likes: 0
Originally posted by Chris in MD
rchaud98 - not sure what you are talking about. You fill up the tank, drive for a while, fill up the tank and then divide the miles by gallons added. I can show you the calculation if you want. Not very scientific and probably not consistent enough for lab work but I guarantee with a large enough data set you will get a pretty good average - statistically relavant within a couple tenths.

If you're so concerned about gas mileage buy a Honda Insight dude - 3 cylinders and 66mpg :D
What are you getting so uppity about? Jeeze I'm not the one that paid 30,000 for car that puts out 175 whp, gets 14 mpg goes 5-60 mph at 7 seconds and floods without notice.
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:08 AM.