Notices
Series I Trouble Shooting This is the place to learn more about or discuss any issues you're having with your RX-8

4206F Interesting Repair Procdure RANT!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-21-2006, 12:23 AM
  #1  
1935 lbs. FTW!
Thread Starter
 
CosmosMpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
4206F Interesting Repair Procdure RANT!

I actually sat down and read the entire 19 pages of the repair procedure for the 4206F engine recall and a few things popped up that I would like to point out and get some feedback on. There seems to be some flaws or stupid procedures in my opinion especially with the way they're actually testing or NOT thorougly testing engines. Basically if you think your car is running fine they will probably give you new plugs, reflash and kick you out the door.

1. If you take your car in and tell them it has been driving fine, no lack of power or extremely low idles then they will not even do the diagonstic tests to see if your engine needs to be replaced. The decision tree in the procedure skips this all together unless you complain now or have previously complained. Only if you have previously complained and you have ALREADY RECEIVED A REPLACEMENT ENGINE will they do a volt test. If previously complained and they did nothing you will be getting a new motor. However, if it was fine before and you're complaining now then they will do a road test but not a voltage test to objectively determine if your engine is bad. If they do road test your car they will drive it AT LEAST 20 minutes.

2. There are seperate FLASH part numbers for every model year and transmission and a different flash for each for CA and Federal (all states besides CA) cars. No two model years/transmissions/federal/CA cars share the same flash part number. MAKE SURE they give you the correct one via door sticker.

3. They should test the cat via diagonstic computer for every car. When you take it in make sure you get the actual #'s for this test, don't just take their word for it. According to the procdure if the ratio is LOWER than 4.6:1 then your cat is fine, but if it is above you should get a replacement.

4. The whole thing should take only 1-2 hours according to the repair procedure and I also added up the time for each step. I had to leave my car there the entire day so far and they haven't even started on it yet.

5. According to the procedure the rental car is only pre-approved for TWO DAYS. If for some reason your dealer sucks then make sure they call Mazda North America to get approval for continued rental so you don't run the risk of possibly getting stuck to foot the extra rental car bill. Just a precaution.

Last edited by CosmosMpower; 09-21-2006 at 12:25 AM.
Old 09-21-2006, 12:21 PM
  #2  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
2. There are seperate FLASH part numbers for every model year and transmission and a different flash for each for CA and Federal (all states besides CA) cars. No two model years/transmissions/federal/CA cars share the same flash part number. MAKE SURE they give you the correct one via door sticker.
they cant give you the wrong one. thats not the way the tool works.
Old 09-21-2006, 01:26 PM
  #3  
1935 lbs. FTW!
Thread Starter
 
CosmosMpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by zoom44
they cant give you the wrong one. thats not the way the tool works.
What do you mean, why would mazda list every p/n for each flash in the procedure if the computer automatically scanned the car and knew what year/location it was in and uploaded the new flash file?
Old 09-21-2006, 02:38 PM
  #4  
Metatron
iTrader: (1)
 
StealthTL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: A Pacific Island.
Posts: 7,280
Received 173 Likes on 130 Posts
Cool #'s.....

Not possible to flash the wrong car with the wrong # flash, anymore than they could give you the download for a Mazda 3.

They only list the numbers for the tech to make out the sticker.

S
Old 09-21-2006, 02:51 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by CosmosMpower
I actually sat down and read the entire 19 pages of the repair procedure for the 4206F engine recall and a few things popped up that I would like to point out and get some feedback on. There seems to be some flaws or stupid procedures in my opinion especially with the way they're actually testing or NOT thorougly testing engines. Basically if you think your car is running fine they will probably give you new plugs, reflash and kick you out the door.

1. If you take your car in and tell them it has been driving fine, no lack of power or extremely low idles then they will not even do the diagonstic tests to see if your engine needs to be replaced. The decision tree in the procedure skips this all together unless you complain now or have previously complained. Only if you have previously complained and you have ALREADY RECEIVED A REPLACEMENT ENGINE will they do a volt test. If previously complained and they did nothing you will be getting a new motor. However, if it was fine before and you're complaining now then they will do a road test but not a voltage test to objectively determine if your engine is bad. If they do road test your car they will drive it AT LEAST 20 minutes.

2. There are seperate FLASH part numbers for every model year and transmission and a different flash for each for CA and Federal (all states besides CA) cars. No two model years/transmissions/federal/CA cars share the same flash part number. MAKE SURE they give you the correct one via door sticker.

3. They should test the cat via diagonstic computer for every car. When you take it in make sure you get the actual #'s for this test, don't just take their word for it. According to the procdure if the ratio is LOWER than 4.6:1 then your cat is fine, but if it is above you should get a replacement.

4. The whole thing should take only 1-2 hours according to the repair procedure and I also added up the time for each step. I had to leave my car there the entire day so far and they haven't even started on it yet.

5. According to the procedure the rental car is only pre-approved for TWO DAYS. If for some reason your dealer sucks then make sure they call Mazda North America to get approval for continued rental so you don't run the risk of possibly getting stuck to foot the extra rental car bill. Just a precaution.
4. the time it takes to do the repairs has nothing to do with how they shedule the car into the shop. its a function of how many techs/man hours vs the number of cars/type of jobs they have in line before you. example, we took in 4 rx8's yesterday. we have one tech doing all of the recalls.
Old 09-21-2006, 02:58 PM
  #6  
1935 lbs. FTW!
Thread Starter
 
CosmosMpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by j9fd3s
4. the time it takes to do the repairs has nothing to do with how they shedule the car into the shop. its a function of how many techs/man hours vs the number of cars/type of jobs they have in line before you. example, we took in 4 rx8's yesterday. we have one tech doing all of the recalls.
Right, I guess the point of me posting this is that my dealer told me there was no wait and to bring the car in first thing in the morning. I brought it in and then found 7 other RX8's back in service. If it really only takes 2 hours to do each car as stated by the procedure mine should be done today.
Old 09-21-2006, 03:02 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by CosmosMpower
Right, I guess the point of me posting this is that my dealer told me there was no wait and to bring the car in first thing in the morning. I brought it in and then found 7 other RX8's back in service. If it really only takes 2 hours to do each car as stated by the procedure mine should be done today.
Old 09-21-2006, 03:06 PM
  #8  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
because they have to use the correct part number for their warranty claim.
Old 09-21-2006, 03:38 PM
  #9  
1935 lbs. FTW!
Thread Starter
 
CosmosMpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by zoom44
because they have to use the correct part number for their warranty claim.
True, but that doesn't automatically eliminate any chance for human error. Unless it's 100% systematic and the computer read the car and knows which p/n to use then there could be a mixup especially when there are 4 flashes for just manual transmission cars.
Old 09-21-2006, 10:46 PM
  #10  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by CosmosMpower
I actually sat down and read the entire 19 pages of the repair procedure for the 4206F engine recall and a few things popped up that I would like to point out and get some feedback on. There seems to be some flaws or stupid procedures in my opinion especially with the way they're actually testing or NOT thorougly testing engines. Basically if you think your car is running fine they will probably give you new plugs, reflash and kick you out the door.

1. If you take your car in and tell them it has been driving fine, no lack of power or extremely low idles then they will not even do the diagonstic tests to see if your engine needs to be replaced. The decision tree in the procedure skips this all together unless you complain now or have previously complained. Only if you have previously complained and you have ALREADY RECEIVED A REPLACEMENT ENGINE will they do a volt test. If previously complained and they did nothing you will be getting a new motor. However, if it was fine before and you're complaining now then they will do a road test but not a voltage test to objectively determine if your engine is bad. If they do road test your car they will drive it AT LEAST 20 minutes.

2. There are seperate FLASH part numbers for every model year and transmission and a different flash for each for CA and Federal (all states besides CA) cars. No two model years/transmissions/federal/CA cars share the same flash part number. MAKE SURE they give you the correct one via door sticker.

3. They should test the cat via diagonstic computer for every car. When you take it in make sure you get the actual #'s for this test, don't just take their word for it. According to the procdure if the ratio is LOWER than 4.6:1 then your cat is fine, but if it is above you should get a replacement.

Yes, I agree!

They never road tested my vehicle.

I do believe they checked the battery. It only takes a few minutes.

And I certainly hope they testd the for the vaccum leak.

And to boot no rental car and no tank of gas.

No anti sieze on plugs either!
Old 09-21-2006, 11:41 PM
  #11  
1935 lbs. FTW!
Thread Starter
 
CosmosMpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Razz1
Yes, I agree!

They never road tested my vehicle.

I do believe they checked the battery. It only takes a few minutes.

And I certainly hope they testd the for the vaccum leak.

And to boot no rental car and no tank of gas.

No anti sieze on plugs either!
YIKES, your dealer really dropped the ball. If they didn't road test your vehicle then they didn't vaccum test it. They should've paid for rental, a tank of gas and washed your car. I'd complain to Mazda corporate and make them fix it.

If you read through the actual repair PDF the only time they will road or vaccum test it is if you complained or are currently complaining that the car runs like crap and loses power. They wrote the decision tree to bypass any engine testing if you say the car runs fine.
Old 09-22-2006, 05:12 AM
  #12  
Lubricious
 
Nubo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by CosmosMpower
YIKES, your dealer really dropped the ball. If they didn't road test your vehicle then they didn't vaccum test it. They should've paid for rental, a tank of gas and washed your car. I'd complain to Mazda corporate and make them fix it.

If you read through the actual repair PDF the only time they will road or vaccum test it is if you complained or are currently complaining that the car runs like crap and loses power. They wrote the decision tree to bypass any engine testing if you say the car runs fine.
So, complain! Pretty simple.
Old 09-22-2006, 09:24 AM
  #13  
1935 lbs. FTW!
Thread Starter
 
CosmosMpower's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Dallas, TX
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Nubo
So, complain! Pretty simple.
I know but many people don't know, just trying to inform the public to do so if you want them to actually test your engine thorougly.
Old 09-22-2006, 09:32 AM
  #14  
Registered
 
ken-x8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by Razz1
...No anti sieze on plugs either!
How do you know there's no anti sieze?
Old 09-22-2006, 12:01 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
Pololo_RX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Funny,

I just went through this today. I took my car last Wednesday to get a rear lens replaced and they asked me if I wanted to do the recall at the same time.. I said... suuureee...

10 minutes went by and the service guy said, after asking me questions about my car and such, "do you want to drive a CX-7 for a couple of days?" .. Suuure...

Today I went to pick up my car... They said everything is fine... Tires are pretty much gone and the report said... "Tires are fine".... yeah right...I went ok.. let me see.. "what made you think my engine is fine?" , what are the vacumm readings? did you replace the cat? "No"... ok what are the readings for the cat? They had no data to backup their findings, not even a written down statement with the test numbers....

Bottom line, I ended up leaving my car there for the weekend... wasn't even washed...

We'll see what they say on Monday. Manager said he'll do the tests himself...

Carlos

Last edited by Pololo_RX8; 09-22-2006 at 01:45 PM.
Old 09-22-2006, 10:27 PM
  #16  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by CosmosMpower
True, but that doesn't automatically eliminate any chance for human error. Unless it's 100% systematic
thats what i said the first time- the tool doesnt allow for flash the wrong file- it cant even find the wrong file. even on the older tool it was impossible to accidentally flash the wronf file- you had to repeatedly over ride the tool to force it to do so. you cant do that now. it simply wont find anything else but the newest file for your car.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
galognu
Rotary Swaps
138
11-16-2020 05:20 AM
dezau
RX-8 Racing
10
03-09-2016 09:50 AM
nferguson88
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
1
10-06-2015 12:45 PM
JCTaylor
New Member Forum
3
09-30-2015 07:31 PM
urbanvoodoo
RX-8 Discussion
2
09-30-2015 12:41 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 4206F Interesting Repair Procdure RANT!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:05 AM.