Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Using a front O2 sensor for the rear O2 sensor slot (briefly)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 03-09-2012, 04:19 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Using a front O2 sensor for the rear O2 sensor slot (briefly)

Anyone know if running a front O2 sensor in the rear O2 sensor slot for literally a couple days would cause a CEL?

I know it's largely just emissions, and I know it's not inherently a "problem" from a mechanical perspective. I just have to reinstall my OEM cat for the compression test, and the rear O2 is seized in the BHR midpipe. I have a front O2 sensor that I can put in the OEM cat's rear O2 sensor position, but if it will cause a CEL then it's going to put blinders on the dealer when all I want is a compression test to confirm what I suspect is a failing coolant and/or oil seal.

I also know that there is a price difference in front vs rear O2, which suggest differences in design, so perhaps differences in information read? Even if it's "different", if that difference is still something that the ECU is kosher with, it works for me for now.


Just no clue on this, and don't really have time to "test" it before taking it in.
Old 03-09-2012, 04:27 PM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
They are electrically incompatible.
They are entirely different types of sensors and have different connectors.
Old 03-09-2012, 04:32 PM
  #3  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Bleh. Thanks.
Old 03-09-2012, 04:35 PM
  #4  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Actually, the connectors ARE identical. But I assume that doesn't change the "different type" bit.

Attached Thumbnails Using a front O2 sensor for the rear O2 sensor slot (briefly)-imag0141.jpg  
Old 03-09-2012, 04:50 PM
  #5  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Got the rear O2 out of the midpipe. Made another MacGuyver bar. Course, then it took me another 5 minutes to get the sensor out of the socket.
Old 03-10-2012, 01:05 AM
  #6  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
isn't the front wide band and the rear one narrow ? or something like that.
Old 03-10-2012, 11:59 AM
  #7  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,719
Received 2,007 Likes on 1,636 Posts
if it were that simple Mazda would have saved the money and done it that way to begin with
Old 03-10-2012, 02:15 PM
  #8  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Understood, and agreed. I wasn't implying that using a front as the rear was the better option. The front is clearly more complicated than the front. The question was pretty much just a question of "for a few days, will a front O2 sensor return an appropriate signal to the ECU to avoid a CEL." I could easily see a situation where Mazda could have used a wide band O2 for the rear position as well, but decided to use a narrow and much less complicated/expensive O2 sensor for the rear simply because of cost, and in theory swapping the rear is viable, unlike swapping the front.

MM answered that satisfactory, and I went back to getting the rear O2 free from the midpipe. I did get it free and swapped over.

However, on the way to the dealer this morning, popped a CEL for "O2 Bank 1 Sensor 2 heater circuit voltage low" So the heat of the midpipe tune probably fried it anyway, and the AP was masking that. Rendered the whole deal a moot point


Unrelated, the dealer confirmed low compression and is submitting the warranty paperwork Monday to see if MNAO will cover it.
Old 03-10-2012, 05:29 PM
  #9  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by RIWWP
Understood, and agreed. I wasn't implying that using a front as the rear was the better option. The front is clearly more complicated than the front. The question was pretty much just a question of "for a few days, will a front O2 sensor return an appropriate signal to the ECU to avoid a CEL." I could easily see a situation where Mazda could have used a wide band O2 for the rear position as well, but decided to use a narrow and much less complicated/expensive O2 sensor for the rear simply because of cost, and in theory swapping the rear is viable, unlike swapping the front.

MM answered that satisfactory, and I went back to getting the rear O2 free from the midpipe. I did get it free and swapped over.

However, on the way to the dealer this morning, popped a CEL for "O2 Bank 1 Sensor 2 heater circuit voltage low" So the heat of the midpipe tune probably fried it anyway, and the AP was masking that. Rendered the whole deal a moot point


Unrelated, the dealer confirmed low compression and is submitting the warranty paperwork Monday to see if MNAO will cover it.


You are having low compression too? Since when?
Old 03-10-2012, 07:14 PM
  #10  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps


You are having low compression too? Since when?
Probably for 40,000 miles now.

Cat full clogged at about 55k, and it's never really felt right since. 3 compression tests done within the 4 months after cat replacement resulted in horrible failure that the dealer called passing, just barely passing at another dealer who told me to bring it back in a month or two, and then adequately passing. In that order.

It's still never been quite back to what it used to be and always felt slightly "off". I also started leaving a smoke show at a nearby intersection when starting from cold if I didn't let it warm up completely at idle first. Incredibly predictable. Same elapsed time after starting up cold. New ignition, MM tune vs stock, cat vs midpipe, new O2 sensors... nothing made a difference as far as that smoke was concerned.

I figured the cat failure slightly warped the housing, and I had a very slow coolant/oil leak into the housing that would get shoved out into the header during start, and then would cook off quickly as soon as the exhaust hit the right temp. I always knew there was a bit of oil mixed in, but had always been guessing that it was fuel, possibly a leaky injector. One member shoved his face into the plume of smoke to "analyze" it (something I was never brave enough to do), and said it was loaded with fuel. Considering it looked similar to a very brief seafoaming, I left it chalked up to that.

It's been running "acceptably" pretty much this whole time. Including my SS13 trip that averaged 19.9mpg and had all those tanks over 22 or 23mpg. Even as short as 3 weeks ago, I got 21mpg on a road trip. Still pulled plenty hard.

But, I knew something was changing for the worse. I could feel the idle getting worse, hearing differences in the engine, etc... A bit over 3 weeks ago I replaced the plugs, and one was covered in a goopy substance that 9k said looked like the coolant and oil mix he had on his coolant failure, which was enough for me. Over the past week, I realized that the smoke on startup was getting much worse quite quickly, and was gaining more and more of a blue tint to it, and wouldn't fade as quickly, so I knew it was about done. Just took a bit to get the time to pull the midpipe and reinstall the cat to get it back in to the dealer.

Front: 5.7, 6.3, 5.7
Rear: 6.7, 6.4, 6.7
Unknown cranking speed, but my cold start hasn't really slowed much and on the upgraded starter, so I suspect I'm still around 250rpm.


So, i've probably been under spec in the front rotors for maybe 20,000 miles or so. At about 95,500 on the odometer, so knew I couldn't postpone any longer, and it's fairly good timing since I barely drive it now that I take the train to NY and work from home the rest.


I am probably going to get some flak for letting it go this long, but I'm comfortable with it. If nothing else, who knows how long my reman will last, and if it's only got 30,000 miles of lifespan, I'd rather get it at 95.5k than 71k.
Old 03-10-2012, 09:35 PM
  #11  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
I see. hmm 5.7 and 5.7 and 6.3? that seems like an apex failure. or there is a tiny "crack" on the apex seal. either way those numbers means failed.

where u got ur test from ?
Old 03-10-2012, 10:02 PM
  #12  
Registered
Thread Starter
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
I'm going to decline to say for now. I'll wait for the warranty to be approved and everything
Old 03-10-2012, 10:18 PM
  #13  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
there is something called "PM" u know

I don't work for Mazda, u know it.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Carbon8
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
42
02-27-2020 08:39 AM
tjohnmeyer
Series I Trouble Shooting
12
09-28-2017 05:03 PM
Learners_Permit
Series I Interior, Audio, and Electronics
8
09-27-2015 07:38 PM
drlubell
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
0
09-26-2015 11:58 PM
Forevermore
Series I Trouble Shooting
6
09-20-2015 01:04 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Using a front O2 sensor for the rear O2 sensor slot (briefly)



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:55 AM.