Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Shifting at 8k really needed?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 10-08-2009, 01:51 PM
  #1  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
TX Shifting at 8k really needed?

In another thread there is some discussion about the angle of the ends of the eccentric shaft on the bearings at high RPM. It got me thinking, is shift all the way up to red line really needed?

I would like to confirm on a dyno/strip/whatever, if shifting that high is needed for both power and for keeping the revs up when banging through the gears. I know there are other variables but just thought it would make an interesting discussion.
Old 10-08-2009, 01:58 PM
  #2  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
I generally shift around 8200, but my power curve is not typical.

I have found myself on the Auto-X course, bouncing off the rev limiter to avoid shifting in and out of gears excessively.

Since the typical RX-8 sorta runs out of puff around 8500, that is probably high enough.
I don't know if the high RPM benefits outweigh the potential detriments, but I think the typical driver is not going to see any damage from just letting her rip from time to time.
Its the racers that keep her at 8000+ for loooooong periods of time that have something to think about.
Old 10-08-2009, 02:18 PM
  #3  
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
 
kersh4w's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DC Area
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
the real reason to shift at 9300rpm (especially when drag racing) is not staying higher up there for a longer period of time... but when you shift, you shift at a higher horsepower point.
Old 10-08-2009, 02:30 PM
  #4  
Registered
 
PhillipM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: UK
Posts: 863
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When our engine first went on a dyno the peak power (with a stock map) was about 8.4krpm and dropped off rapidly thereafter, I don't know what it's like on the stock gearing but with our short ratio 'box then changing at ~8.8k would have been best.

As it is, we've more power up top now, but the engines' not stock.
Old 10-08-2009, 03:37 PM
  #5  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
needed for what?
It all depends, but personally since i am not in a competitive race and dont plan on being in one with my DD--i limit myself to no higher than 8K. A lot of times I shift at 7.5. But we all know our tachs are off?
I dont think in my case that the benefits outweigh extra strain on the drivetrain.
Sure sounds good though!
OD
Old 10-08-2009, 11:05 PM
  #6  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,731
Received 2,015 Likes on 1,642 Posts
If you ever get your car on a real dyno instead of your booty dyno you can calculate all that out
Old 10-08-2009, 11:42 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
kersh4w is on the right track. You want to use the maximum amount of power under the HP curve. Usually at 9k the engine makes more power than it would than at say 6k. If you were planning on using 6-8.5k vs. 6.5-9k, the later would mean more power under the curve. Simple math. In most dynos I've seen power drops off a bit at 9k as compared to 8.5k, but not massively so.
Old 10-08-2009, 11:53 PM
  #8  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Usually at 9k the engine makes more power than it would than at say 6k
Really?
Old 10-09-2009, 12:01 AM
  #9  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,731
Received 2,015 Likes on 1,642 Posts
http://www.datsuns.com/Tech/whentoshift.htm
Old 10-09-2009, 12:06 AM
  #10  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
Sweet. I'll have to figure that out.
Old 10-09-2009, 12:07 AM
  #11  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,731
Received 2,015 Likes on 1,642 Posts
You'll have to get a real dyno test first ....
Old 10-09-2009, 01:21 AM
  #12  
Registered User
 
alan23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 66
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I normally shift at 9-9.2k rpm on the track.

If I shift at 8k rpm, my timing will be slower by about 2sec.
The most obvious being the straights when the speed differential is about 5kph slower at 190+kph region

However, if shifting at such a high rpm is so damaging to the renesis, I seriously should consider shifting early to preserve the engine.

my 2 cents
Old 10-09-2009, 07:50 AM
  #13  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by TeamRX8
You'll have to get a real dyno test first ....
Yeah if the weather clears up I may get it done tomorrow.
Old 10-09-2009, 11:34 AM
  #14  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
i like a flat torque curve
OD
Old 10-09-2009, 02:26 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Snrub
Usually at 9k the engine makes more power than it would than at say 6k.
Originally Posted by 9krpmrx8
Really?
...You're the one who asked.

BTW: I don't think it makes sense to dyno a virtually stock car to find out that you have 5-10hp more than stock due to a mid-pipe. There will be far more varience in the type of dyno, procedure, etc. than there will be with your car compared to others. Your power curve won't be significantly different either. If there is a difference it's due to a problem with the car or dyno varience.

Last edited by Snrub; 10-09-2009 at 02:36 PM.
Old 10-09-2009, 05:57 PM
  #16  
Lubricious
 
Nubo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Watch and learn.

[EMBED]<object width="425" height="344"><param name="movie" value="http://www.youtube.com/v/o1pVm1haIjk&hl=en&fs=1&"></param><param name="allowFullScreen" value="true"></param><param name="allowscriptaccess" value="always"></param><embed src="http://www.youtube.com/v/o1pVm1haIjk&hl=en&fs=1&" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true" width="425" height="344"></embed></object>[/EMBED]
Old 10-09-2009, 08:10 PM
  #17  
Are we having fun yet?
 
DAC17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Conn., USA
Posts: 188
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice... Of course, remember that the speedo is reading in KPH.
Old 10-09-2009, 09:52 PM
  #18  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
Also remember its not his car--trans was taking a beating there and I would be afraid of his engine temps after about 3 laps. Obviously a oem car.
Sorry but it looks to me that he really had some sloppy moments. Too much steering wheel input and did you notice some speed rate change in the higher band?
OD
Old 10-09-2009, 10:45 PM
  #19  
SARX Legend
Thread Starter
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
BTW: I don't think it makes sense to dyno a virtually stock car to find out that you have 5-10hp more than stock due to a mid-pipe. There will be far more varience in the type of dyno, procedure, etc. than there will be with your car compared to others. Your power curve won't be significantly different either. If there is a difference it's due to a problem with the car or dyno varience.
Yes but you have to get a baseline. I just wanna see if my new motor is up to spec.
Old 10-10-2009, 09:16 AM
  #20  
Registered
 
Snrub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: London, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 346
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Losing an engine clearly causes one distress (been there, done that with my old FC). However, it's pretty hard for a Mazda manufactured short block to not be up to spec unless it's something very obvious. Compression is a metric by which this is judged. There's no reason for compression to not be up to par unless the engine has undergone significant wear. Performance due to a semi-newish short block and the OEM ECU are more or less static. The long block with the VDI functionality, etc. are more likely to be potential issues.

As for the baseline, what are you hoping to acheive? Unless you're planning on converting the car to a race car, you've done the modifications that make sense. The car does not respond well to modifications. Some half decent power gains can with a tuned exhaust and by sacrificing the volume of the exhaust, but most people don't really want to do this on the street. The mid-pipe is the biggest bang and the best bang for the buck mod you can do and you've already done it.

I guess what I'm trying to say is just enjoy your car and drive it.
Old 10-10-2009, 04:38 PM
  #21  
Lubricious
 
Nubo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by olddragger
Also remember its not his car--trans was taking a beating there and I would be afraid of his engine temps after about 3 laps. Obviously a oem car.
Sorry but it looks to me that he really had some sloppy moments. Too much steering wheel input and did you notice some speed rate change in the higher band?
OD
Maybe he had TCS on? Lol. The car will shrug off briefly excessive steering inputs and just scrub some speed, in my narrow experience. But mostly I was referring to the shift points. Holding until just before fuel cutoff puts you close to 7000 rpm after the shift and the engine set for max power, which is better than landing at 6500, imho.
Old 10-10-2009, 04:49 PM
  #22  
Hit & Run Magnet
iTrader: (3)
 
kersh4w's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: DC Area
Posts: 6,690
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
^ yep.

teamrx8 posted a nice link if you go turbocharged and dramatically change the power curve.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theblinkof
Series I Trouble Shooting
33
10-04-2023 05:24 PM
Carbon8
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
42
02-27-2020 08:39 AM
WranglerFan
New Member Forum
4
11-05-2017 09:35 AM
Dokuji
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
11-01-2016 02:51 PM
akagc
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
08-11-2015 07:07 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Shifting at 8k really needed?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM.