Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

The Renesis does NOT run rich

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-13-2010, 04:16 PM
  #26  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Ahh. That's nothing. Take a look at the AT's 1/2 table:





8.27:1
Attached Thumbnails The Renesis does NOT run rich-clipboard01.jpg  
Old 05-13-2010, 04:19 PM
  #27  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
I don't even run the safest FI base calibrations that rich.
Obviously, Mazda was very concerned with knock on the AT at high load/high RPM.
Old 05-13-2010, 04:19 PM
  #28  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,523
Received 1,490 Likes on 839 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Sorta.
Though the stoichiometric ratio is the usual target for cruise, you will actually get slightly better mileage a bit rich of that point (around 13.8:1 for gasoline).
why is that ?
Old 05-13-2010, 04:22 PM
  #29  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
@MM, ah standard units is what to check if you wants ATR to display the same - duh.

holy freaking wow! thats RICH
Old 05-13-2010, 04:23 PM
  #30  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by Brettus
why is that ?
i think it will have something to do with flamefront speed
Old 05-13-2010, 04:29 PM
  #31  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Stoich produces "ideal" combustion theoretically, but a point richer produces more torque.
The additional torque is generally greater, as a percentage, than the fuel used.
MBT>stoich
It is flame speed and combustion efficiency. At stoich, there is still a lot of left over oxygen.


BTW - In reviewing the tables above, keep in mind that "commanded" values don't always equal "output" values.
Mazda was less concerned with "nailing" the MAF calibration than we are since they had such a wide deviation to deal with.

Last edited by MazdaManiac; 05-13-2010 at 04:31 PM.
Old 05-13-2010, 04:40 PM
  #32  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac

BTW - In reviewing the tables above, keep in mind that "commanded" values don't always equal "output" values.
Mazda was less concerned with "nailing" the MAF calibration than we are since they had such a wide deviation to deal with.
the same reasoning i threw the disclaimer here
still though, its rich
Old 05-13-2010, 06:47 PM
  #33  
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Brettus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Y-cat-o NZ
Posts: 20,523
Received 1,490 Likes on 839 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Stoich produces "ideal" combustion theoretically, but a point richer produces more torque.
The additional torque is generally greater, as a percentage, than the fuel used.
MBT>stoich
It is flame speed and combustion efficiency. At stoich, there is still a lot of left over oxygen.
.
is it a waste of time tuning for that or are there some real mileage gains (more than a few %) ?
Old 05-13-2010, 07:16 PM
  #34  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Well, If you can make it happen consistently, it's good for 20 - 40 highway miles per tank.
YMMV
Old 05-14-2010, 05:02 AM
  #35  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Well, my mileage is fantastic! I spend a lot of time cruising north of 6,000rpms and i still get 20+ And at american highway speeds I can get better than 25 pretty easily. My only relavent mods are coils, cat delete, and tune.

and FWIW my compression is nice and balanced, but a bit on the low side. IMO this car can make 30mpg. I've had 27 a few times. I think with the addition of the right choice in wheels, clutch/fly/PP, removing the 120lbs in my trunk, and a few other minor things - that this car could make 30

Last edited by paulmasoner; 05-14-2010 at 05:05 AM.
Old 05-14-2010, 12:34 PM
  #36  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
HiFlite999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Well, If you can make it happen consistently, it's good for 20 - 40 highway miles per tank.
YMMV
A 15% gain sounds about right in a cruising situation. My airplane engine charts show that for a given horsepower output, that's the difference in fuel flow between the "best economy" and "best power" mixture settings. The two roughly correspond to lambdas of 1.15 and 0.85. The reason that the difference doesn't scale by 115/85=35% is that for a given rpm and manifold pressure (related to MAF) the lean setting will result in less power, therefore requiring a higher MP (more throttle) to maintain the same output power.

Are the tables only divided into the 1-2-3 and 4-5-6 pieces? Is there a way to do a 1-2-3, 4-5, and 6 map? If so, it would leave an option of creating a cruising-only 6th gear map where one could push the lean limit.

Perhaps another way to eliminate lambdas under 12.5 or so would be to water/meth inject, to get a higher octane for detonation-prevention. However that would require a fairly sophisticated method of determining when that injection should occur.
Old 05-14-2010, 12:39 PM
  #37  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
HiFlite999's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: MI
Posts: 2,254
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by paulmasoner
Well, my mileage is fantastic! I spend a lot of time cruising north of 6,000rpms and i still get 20+ And at american highway speeds I can get better than 25 pretty easily. My only relevant mods are coils, cat delete, and tune.
It would be very interesting if you could share what tables you are using now to achieve that!
Old 05-14-2010, 12:40 PM
  #38  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by HiFlite999
Are the tables only divided into the 1-2-3 and 4-5-6 pieces? Is there a way to do a 1-2-3, 4-5, and 6 map? If so, it would leave an option of creating a cruising-only 6th gear map where one could push the lean limit.
No, they are in groups of two - 1/2, 3/4 & 5/6.

However, there are some tricks that can be done with the MAF curve and the way it overlays with the fuel maps.
Also, the overall "engine Ve" table allows you to trim certain conditions.
Old 05-14-2010, 02:06 PM
  #39  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
you'd have to ask that^^ man, and i doubt he's telling

Originally Posted by HiFlite999
It would be very interesting if you could share what tables you are using now to achieve that!
but i'll bet, being the curious person he seems, that he will go looking at my calibrations in his records now
Old 05-14-2010, 08:00 PM
  #40  
120,000+ miles tick tock
 
FoxRacer600RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: FL,VA,WV
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by paulmasoner
Well, my mileage is fantastic! I spend a lot of time cruising north of 6,000rpms and i still get 20+ And at american highway speeds I can get better than 25 pretty easily. My only relavent mods are coils, cat delete, and tune.

and FWIW my compression is nice and balanced, but a bit on the low side. IMO this car can make 30mpg. I've had 27 a few times. I think with the addition of the right choice in wheels, clutch/fly/PP, removing the 120lbs in my trunk, and a few other minor things - that this car could make 30
i personally got 28 mpg average driving from wv to fl from what cobb ap said and i was running stock tune ....the 8 had 88000 miles, aem cai with cat knocked out and exotic speed exhaust dont remeber how old the plugs were but coils had only 3000 miles aprox.....also i was doing about 80 the whole way in 6th gear and whats that about 4500 rpm or close to it
Old 05-14-2010, 09:00 PM
  #41  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,719
Received 2,006 Likes on 1,635 Posts
Classic arrgh ...
Old 05-14-2010, 09:07 PM
  #42  
120,000+ miles tick tock
 
FoxRacer600RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: FL,VA,WV
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
Classic arrgh ...
???
Old 05-14-2010, 09:32 PM
  #43  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Have you asked your spark plugs lateley?

They will tell you PIG RICH.
Old 05-15-2010, 06:30 AM
  #44  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
Classic arrgh ...
Originally Posted by FoxRacer600RR
???
i think he may be referring to the OP
Old 05-15-2010, 06:32 AM
  #45  
Asshole for hire
iTrader: (1)
 
paulmasoner's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Colfontaine, Belgium
Posts: 3,214
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by FoxRacer600RR
i personally got 28 mpg average driving from wv to fl from what cobb ap said and i was running stock tune ....
OE tune? now THAT is impressive
Old 05-15-2010, 06:40 AM
  #46  
Illudium Q-36 Space Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PCB
Posts: 6,364
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
WV to FL is mostly downhill.... I got 40MPG last time I did it in a Tercel mind you.... but still.

All the Fuel Maps can have a cruising area set up - since the load and RPM create the scales.

Even in 3rd gear, a load of less than 30% constitutes cruising in most situations...
Old 05-18-2010, 07:02 PM
  #47  
120,000+ miles tick tock
 
FoxRacer600RR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: FL,VA,WV
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Kane
WV to FL is mostly downhill.... I got 40MPG last time I did it in a Tercel mind you.... but still.

All the Fuel Maps can have a cruising area set up - since the load and RPM create the scales.

Even in 3rd gear, a load of less than 30% constitutes cruising in most situations...
lol down hill true, and 28 is huge for me. im used to 12-15
Old 05-18-2010, 09:37 PM
  #48  
the enemy in the mirror
 
secret8gent's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: billerica, ma
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
No, they are in groups of two - 1/2, 3/4 & 5/6.

However, there are some tricks that can be done with the MAF curve and the way it overlays with the fuel maps.
Also, the overall "engine Ve" table allows you to trim certain conditions.
doesn't that depend on the year? early cars had three maps, newer ones had less IIRC.

(I'm just going by what some older builds of ATR offered, but I assume it follows the stock pcm logic)

Old 05-18-2010, 09:45 PM
  #49  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by secret8gent
doesn't that depend on the year? early cars had three maps, newer ones had less IIRC.

(I'm just going by what some older builds of ATR offered, but I assume it follows the stock pcm logic)
You are correct.

The 2006 and up have them grouped 1/2/3 & 4/5/6.
Old 05-18-2010, 10:20 PM
  #50  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,719
Received 2,006 Likes on 1,635 Posts
Nothing a mixture of regular and E85 won't solve ....


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: The Renesis does NOT run rich



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:34 PM.