Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

My car doesn't have 50/50 weight distribution!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-15-2005, 05:43 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
RX8SpdDmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florence, KY
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My car doesn't have 50/50 weight distribution!

I weighed my car tonight at work on a 4-wheel in-floor scale. The results were not exactly as expected.
fyi: The readings were in kilograms and read to the nearest 1/2 kg. I then converted the numbers all to lbs.

Basically, it came out that my overall weight (without me in the car) was 2967.5 lbs with a distribution of 52.5% Front and 47.5% Rear. I do NOT have a spare tire. Could Mazda have been quoting a 50/50 weight distribution ONLY if you had the worthless spare tire!?
Attached Thumbnails My car doesn't have 50/50 weight distribution!-rx-8weightdist.jpg  
Old 12-15-2005, 05:46 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
How much gas was in the car? Typically the measurement is taken with a full tank of gas. What you will find on scales is that each wheel can have very different readings. On some of the RX-7s you would see more than 100 lbs difference just betwen the left and right front wheels.

EDIT: I see now that you were almost full. Those numbers are more balanced than many other cars. Apparently it is a little front heavy.
Old 12-15-2005, 06:05 PM
  #3  
1st time rotorhead
 
RotaryManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2005
Location: Closter, NJ
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your b and b midpipe probalby took 10 pounds off the car, not sure how much of that was in the rear. Also you have the appearance package- that might be a factor.
Old 12-15-2005, 06:14 PM
  #4  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
RX8SpdDmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florence, KY
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaryManiac
Your b and b midpipe probalby took 10 pounds off the car, not sure how much of that was in the rear. Also you have the appearance package- that might be a factor.
No, I don't. I just have the wing (in the rear) and the mud flaps (at each wheel).

The B&B Midpipe is in the middle of the car.
Old 12-15-2005, 07:02 PM
  #5  
Registered User
 
BRealistic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Morristown Tennessee
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=curb%20weight


curb weight
n.

The weight of a fueled automobile with standard equipment but without cargo or passengers.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am surprised that your car's weight was 60 lbs under the official curb weight from Mazda for a base 6 speed manual. It makes me wonder if those scales are that accurate- meaning the tenth of a lb read is false precision. Did you try weighing the car revcersed on the scales to see if the weights matched the previous readings?
Old 12-15-2005, 07:06 PM
  #6  
Storm Trooper
 
Moostafa29's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Freakmont, CA
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I seem to remember someone weighing in around 2880lbs, or something like that. I wanna say it was Xyntax.
Old 12-15-2005, 07:09 PM
  #7  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
read the advertising again- it says near 50 50 and the published distribution by several sources has it at 52 48. ask ikewrx he'll tell you real quick
Old 12-15-2005, 07:36 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
BRealistic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Morristown Tennessee
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Moostafa29
I seem to remember someone weighing in around 2880lbs, or something like that. I wanna say it was Xyntax.

That can't be correct. That's just a 100lbs more than a new Civic EX sedan.
Old 12-15-2005, 07:46 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
QBallz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Visalia, CA
Posts: 522
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm pretty sure that is correct for the Base 6spd, but I don't think that was with a full tank of gas.

* 1 gallon of water equals 8.33 lbs.
* 1 gallon of gasoline equals 5.8 to 6.5 lbs.
* 1 gallon of ethanol equals 6.59 lbs.

Originally Posted by Moostafa29
I seem to remember someone weighing in around 2880lbs, or something like that. I wanna say it was Xyntax.
Old 12-15-2005, 10:21 PM
  #10  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
RX8SpdDmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florence, KY
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BRealistic
http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=curb%20weight


curb weight
n.

The weight of a fueled automobile with standard equipment but without cargo or passengers.


-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

I am surprised that your car's weight was 60 lbs under the official curb weight from Mazda for a base 6 speed manual. It makes me wonder if those scales are that accurate- meaning the tenth of a lb read is false precision. Did you try weighing the car revcersed on the scales to see if the weights matched the previous readings?
Well, I was down a bit of gas. Maybe a little oil, too? I know the scales are good. I've been using them in testing and they were calibrated this year. I work for a major automotive manufacturer, so this isn't a cheapie scale.

The catalytic converter is a very heavy piece. I might have close to a 40lb weight savings there. That definitely would account for the bulk of it.
Old 12-15-2005, 10:30 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
BRealistic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Morristown Tennessee
Posts: 140
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RX8SpdDmn
Well, I was down a bit of gas. Maybe a little oil, too? I know the scales are good. I've been using them in testing and they were calibrated this year. I work for a major automotive manufacturer, so this isn't a cheapie scale.

The catalytic converter is a very heavy piece. I might have close to a 40lb weight savings there. That definitely would account for the bulk of it.
Cheapie or not- it still needs to be calibrated. We have a $250k saw at the plant that can easily be off by inches and 10 degrees if not calibrated regularly.


Did removing the cat make more power? Just ... I am in an area that does not have ANY vehicle inspections........ But I should not even consider going there...
Old 12-15-2005, 10:37 PM
  #12  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
hello??? is this thing on?

read the advertising again- it says near 50 50 and the published distribution by several sources has it at 52 48. ask ikewrx he'll tell you real quick
Old 12-16-2005, 08:17 AM
  #13  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
RX8SpdDmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florence, KY
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BRealistic
Cheapie or not- it still needs to be calibrated. We have a $250k saw at the plant that can easily be off by inches and 10 degrees if not calibrated regularly.


Did removing the cat make more power? Just ... I am in an area that does not have ANY vehicle inspections........ But I should not even consider going there...
Read my statement again. It was calibrated this year. The thing is not often used and it zeros out with no weight on it, which accounts for something.

Yes, I got a bit more power since I removed the cat (~8hp). More then a cat-back system will give you (2-5hp). It's a lot lighter than the cat, and it shoots flames The fumes are suffocating, though, if you're in an enclosed area. They're just really strong, otherwise.

http://www.scottbarton.net/anthony/M...meThrower!.wmv
Attached Thumbnails My car doesn't have 50/50 weight distribution!-rx-8flamewallpaper.jpg  
Old 12-16-2005, 11:45 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
Ole Spiff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Inland Empire, SoCalif
Posts: 382
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Well if you figure a gallon of gas is about 6lbs, and you're missing about 2 gallons according to your numbers, and you add the weight of the spare tire and kit in the back, you're probably missing about 50-60 lbs of weight in the back that Mazda would have used to calculate the distribution.
Old 12-16-2005, 11:57 AM
  #15  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
RX8SpdDmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florence, KY
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Ole Spiff
Well if you figure a gallon of gas is about 6lbs, and you're missing about 2 gallons according to your numbers, and you add the weight of the spare tire and kit in the back, you're probably missing about 50-60 lbs of weight in the back that Mazda would have used to calculate the distribution.
That's what I'm thinking. I'm just a little upset that it only has 50/50 weight distribution if you have the OPTIONAL spare tire kit and a full tank of gas.
Old 12-16-2005, 12:04 PM
  #16  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
RX8SpdDmn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Florence, KY
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by BRealistic
I am surprised that your car's weight was 60 lbs under the official curb weight from Mazda for a base 6 speed manual. It makes me wonder if those scales are that accurate- meaning the tenth of a lb read is false precision. Did you try weighing the car revcersed on the scales to see if the weights matched the previous readings?
The curb weight in Mazda's brocure is 3029 lbs for a 6-speed "with popular options", which might make up more of the 60 lb difference. Also, the scale read to the 1/2 kg and I did straight conversions of every number and rounded to the nearest 1/2 lb. So, the numbers are within a pound of actual.
Old 12-16-2005, 12:10 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Jaguar_MBA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Des Moines, Iowa
Posts: 495
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Relocate the battery to the trunk...that should help some.
Old 12-16-2005, 12:18 PM
  #18  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by zoom44
hello??? is this thing on?

Old 12-16-2005, 01:29 PM
  #19  
Lubricious
 
Nubo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I bet Zoom44 would have some good info
Old 12-16-2005, 01:43 PM
  #20  
Lubricious
 
Nubo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by RX8SpdDmn
That's what I'm thinking. I'm just a little upset that it only has 50/50 weight distribution if you have the OPTIONAL spare tire kit and a full tank of gas.
The difference between a full and empty gas tank is going to move the CG more than the spare tire kit. And since CG changes with fuel level, it's only natural to measure the "official" CG with a full tank. I guess you could measure without fluids, but wouldn't reflect driving conditions. I'd say 52/48 is pretty close. I guess they weren't quite as maniacal about balance as the original Miata guys; I think I read they actually would hang the car by a hook. Notice where the battery (and *cough* spare tire) ended up in the Miata....

If you think you're noticing a difference, I'd say get the spare. I think it's worth the weight. I never realized it was moving me more towards perfect weight balance, but I'll take it

Get the tire, replace the battery with a big honking Optima AGM in the trunk, and I think you'd have the balance plus increased reliability.
Old 12-16-2005, 02:46 PM
  #21  
Consiglieri
 
MadDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: yourI'mgirl
Posts: 1,275
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think I've read somewhere that optimal handling is actually had with something a little different than 50/50. Maybe the 52/48 is actually better.
Old 12-16-2005, 03:01 PM
  #22  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
its a conspiracy!!!! IGNORE ME AT YOUR PERIL i have my finge ron the button and ill use it!!!!
Old 12-16-2005, 07:03 PM
  #23  
Mmmmm... Rotary Donut
 
G8rboy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Lake in the Hills, IL (NW Chicago Burbs)
Posts: 2,376
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 2 Posts
Zoom who?? I keep hearing these faint mumbles from the basement...
Old 12-17-2005, 10:51 AM
  #24  
Registered
 
neit_jnf's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Around
Posts: 1,277
Received 7 Likes on 7 Posts
mazda's advertisement is "near" perfect 50/50 weight distribution in most conditions. Notice how having the driver in the car shifts the weight rearwards.

The weight will shift farther rearwards with 4 people in it, so basically the car stays nearly perfectly balanced regardless of passenger load.
Old 12-18-2005, 12:56 AM
  #25  
Registered
 
Gord96BRG's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 2,845
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Nubo
I guess they weren't quite as maniacal about balance as the original Miata guys
Yes, they were almost exactly as maniacal about weight distribution - despite the advertising copy, the original Miata was never 50/50 either. Just ask all the guys who've corner-weighted their cars!


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: My car doesn't have 50/50 weight distribution!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:33 AM.