An idea to the fix cel for not having a cat - Page 2

Nov 26, 2007 | 02:13 AM

#26

MazdaManiac

Banned

iTrader: (3)

Joined: Oct 2003

Posts: 16,386

Likes: 28

From: Under my car

Brilliant idea!

Nov 26, 2007 | 02:26 AM

#27

Cromax

Buzz Buzz Buzz

Joined: Mar 2005

Posts: 1,931

Likes: 0

From: Melbourne, Victoria

Quote:

Originally Posted by MazdaManiac

Brilliant idea!

I concur.

Nov 26, 2007 | 02:37 AM

#28

paulmasoner

Asshole for hire

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Jun 2006

Posts: 3,214

Likes: 3

From: Colfontaine, Belgium

Quote:

Originally Posted by MazdaManiac

...... but a cheaper way to do it would be to build a voltage "follower" for the rear O2 sensor that simply returns a more-lean signal from the sensor that follows the actual voltage swings.

The EMU can do this with the analog voltage map.

just another one of the reasons i cant see why SO many people choose the Int-X.

Now, my understandings of either piggyback is not even what you would call basic. But from some of the things i HAVE picked up, it doesnt make sense why everyone is not using the EMU. It may be more difficult to hassle with, but it accomplishes everything the Int-X does, plus some benefits. like this for example.... although to me, nothing would trump the EMU's greater granularity and ability to pull off a stock idle.