Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Differential gear ratio?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 21, 2009 | 09:28 PM
  #101  
subatomicparticle's Avatar
Thread Starter
Can I get a Baum!!
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 31
Likes: 0
From: Dekalb, Illinois
Originally Posted by RX8-Frontier
No it's not. It's a FORCE applied at a DISTANCE... ("Leverage" is just a distance)





Technically speaking... horsepower does NO work...

Horsepower is a RATE at which WORK gets done. It's not the actual WORK itself...

(But if you wanted to find out how much WORK got done, you'd use the HORSEPOWER curve for your calcs)



If 'ya get right down to it... WORK actually is physically done by TORQUE (fuel/air/sparky go boom, applying a force at a distance to make things go spinny...). However, the RATE at which that WORK gets done is HORSEPOWER (a force applied at a distance during a period of time).

ACCELERATION is the result of WORK being done to the car... So it's pretty simple, really... Do you want to talk about FORCES, or RATES? You have to talk apples and apples, here... So talking RATES means you talk about HORSEPOWER and the RATE OF ACCELERATION.

So if you want to know how FAST WORK will get done, you want to talk about HORSEPOWER. TORQUE won't tell you how quickly the WORK can be done; only how much FORCE is gonna' be added at any second.

RG:

Unfortunately, you're not quite there when talking about what is doing the actual WORK. HORSEPOWER can't do work; it's a RATE at which WORK gets done. TORQUE is the actual force, applied at an actual distance, and if the car is turned on, then it's being done over an actual amount of time. This is the WORK being done by the engine.

BUT, that doesn't tell you how quickly it's being done; for that, you need to talk HORSEPOWER (which you already know, and some others haven't quite gotten there, yet.), which adds the last physical property, revolutions of the engine, into the conversation.

Everybody else, pay attention!

RG is 100% right that HORSEPOWER is what's important in discussing acceleration rates. Torque is NOT a RATE, and therefore is NOT going to give you any information regarding how fast a car accelerates!
Bravo, I couldn't explain it that well or form that as a comprehendable thought but that is what I was trying to get at some of my comparisons may have been off but all i was saying was that you need torque to move a car.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 12:04 AM
  #102  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,603
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
wow,

i got really board at about page 3.

rg, so glad you are back!!!!

so, to make this simple and provoke thought..

there is a difference between quick and fast!!

quick is tq, and a low rear gear, fast is what is at the end of the long straight should be areo dependent.. has nothing to do with tq, and a lot to do with rear gear..

beers
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 12:44 AM
  #103  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,603
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
Hmmmm....... I am thinking about swapping from the factory 4.44 to a 4.10 to make my car quicker.

I also swapped from a three-speed to a two-speed trans back in the day and cut a whole second off my e.t.

i think any fi rx8 would be better off with a 4.10 or even a 3.90! sure is might not be quicker in the .25 mile. (but i bet a lot it would be ) but every day, and on a track! sweet..

beers
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 09:56 AM
  #104  
rotary.enthusiast's Avatar
The Local Idiot
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 406
Likes: 0
From: Big D, Texas
Even on an NA car 1st is pretty steep... but I don't know that I'd go quite so far as to call it useless (at least not with good tires). It all depends on what you're doing with the car. I think the stock gearing is pretty good for a lot of autocross courses.

When FI gets thrown into the mix I would definitely start looking for a lower rear gear though.
Reply
Old Jan 22, 2009 | 10:25 AM
  #105  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
At most autocrosses once you get it into second you leave it there. Rarely do you ever need to shift. The occasional 3rd gear might happen but I've never seen anyone downshift into first and actually be quicker than just staying in second.
Reply
Old Jan 30, 2009 | 08:18 PM
  #106  
Socket7's Avatar
ಠ_ಠ
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,228
Likes: 6
From: Under the Dumbarton Bridge
This thread brought a smile to my face. Glad to have you back RG.

What I think is irrelevant. I just happen to agree with what is.
I'm gonna have to use this quote...
Reply
Old Jan 31, 2009 | 08:11 AM
  #107  
04RX8man's Avatar
Rotary Powered Countryboy
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 4,811
Likes: 1
From: Pittsburgh
ahh what a great thread!!!! haha
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 11:29 AM
  #108  
renesisgenesis's Avatar
mod edit
 
Joined: Jan 2009
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Eugene, Oregon
did you know it's possible to be traveling at zero velocity, but still be accelerating?
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 12:47 PM
  #109  
staticlag's Avatar
The Professor
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,479
Likes: 7
From: Omaha, NE
Originally Posted by renesisgenesis
did you know it's possible to be traveling at zero velocity, but still be accelerating?
negative, acceleration is the derivative of velocity. Meaning that there has to be a change in velocity over time for there to be any acceleration.

What you just said is exactly the same as saying="its possible to not be moving, and yet have velocity"
Reply
Old May 13, 2009 | 04:15 PM
  #110  
kennyfrc1's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 244
Likes: 0
5 pages of senseless argument and the fact remains the same that a 4.777 diff will make your car accelerate faster.

A swap from 3.42 to 4.10 in my vette made my 1/4 mile 8/10 faster with no added power.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theblinkof
Series I Trouble Shooting
33
Oct 4, 2023 05:24 PM
nowakm99
Series II Technical and Trouble shooting
1
Oct 9, 2015 07:10 AM
Luke.s
New Member Forum
4
Sep 30, 2015 05:57 PM
Zube6115
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
Sep 30, 2015 12:57 PM
juicemantwon
New Member Forum
3
Sep 26, 2015 12:30 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:53 AM.