Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Code P-0661 Intake Manifold Tuning Valve Control Low Bank 1a

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-05-2013, 05:52 AM
  #26  
skc
rev it up
 
skc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Brisbane Australia
Posts: 1,590
Received 11 Likes on 11 Posts
I keep getting this code recently. The majority of my valves are disconnected by the tuner due to the supercharger.

It seems to appear when I start the car after it has warmed up. when driving from a cold start it generally does not come on.

Generally the car drives fine and reuns really well at the higher rpm. Idle can be lumpy some times however good 90% of the time.

I have also noticed a odd crackling sound coming from the throttle body which is intermittent.
Old 04-11-2013, 01:44 PM
  #27  
Aging Cold Warrior
 
O_Bollox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: In an Altered State
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
CEL caused by bad solenoid

Originally Posted by titaneum_grey
I have the new solenoid but have yet to put it in because I am not having any issues with performance, except for the CEL. my 8 still runs the way it always has. I am not getting any power loss, rough idling or flooding issues. Since I found the better way to search I have gone from finding 3 threads on the subject to 25 threads. at first I thought I was bound to find a definitive answer in one of them. what I have found is that most threads end when people find there fix but they seldom log back in to let people know if they work. I have checked all my connections and yet my code keeps clearing itself for a few days and then comes back. I'm thinking it could be a chafed or partially cut wire in the harness. as long as my 8 is still running fine I will wait till I have warmer weather to start taking it apart. I will post what ever I find
FWIW: The problem has not resurfaced since I had the solenoid replaced @ 4 months ago.
Old 04-11-2013, 05:29 PM
  #28  
Grey Boy
Thread Starter
 
titaneum_grey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
Posts: 236
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by O_Bollox
FWIW: The problem has not resurfaced since I had the solenoid replaced @ 4 months ago.
That’s great!
Personally my CEL comes and goes with the same code periodically, and with no other symptoms like rough idling. I did notice, yesterday, that my auxiliary port in the center consol has no power. Don’t know how long it's been out or if it has anything to do with the CEL and code. I don't really think so but who knows at this point. I still have no operational symptoms so I have yet to installed the new soleniod.
Glad things worked out for you.

Last edited by titaneum_grey; 04-11-2013 at 05:31 PM.
Old 04-13-2013, 07:03 PM
  #29  
Aging Cold Warrior
 
O_Bollox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: In an Altered State
Posts: 11
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by titaneum_grey
That’s great!
Personally my CEL comes and goes with the same code periodically, and with no other symptoms like rough idling. I did notice, yesterday, that my auxiliary port in the center consol has no power. Don’t know how long it's been out or if it has anything to do with the CEL and code. I don't really think so but who knows at this point. I still have no operational symptoms so I have yet to installed the new soleniod.
Glad things worked out for you.
IMHO; It's a function of operating efficiency. I noticed no difference in drivability before or after the repair. Puts one in mind of the check engine light on 80's BMWs which came on regularly( to be reset at the dealer for a fee ) that reset tools were offered in the back pages of Road & track or Car & Driver! ;^))

All the best
Old 04-13-2013, 07:54 PM
  #30  
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
 
ShellDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 4,200
Received 229 Likes on 153 Posts
Gentlemen,

There is a bunch of wrong data in this thread. You're right, P0661 refers to the solenoids, but they are not rotor specific. the banks are solenoid specific. One is for your SSV, one is for your VDI, and one is for your air pump.

And the only attachment in the thread that illustrates it is a thumbnail, WTF?



Your SSV opens with your secondary injectors. The VDI is an air resonance thing that kicks in way up around 7000. Air pump only fires on cold startup.

There ya have it. Nothing to do with rotors.

I suspect somewhere in the numerous posts that were pruned from this threat that these details were alluded to in one fashion or another.

Please try to be a little more responsible about what you post. Frothy / milky substance on dipstick TSB has absolutely nothing to do with your solenoids. It's primarily a vacuum routing change for a completely different set of vacuum lines.

Last edited by ShellDude; 04-13-2013 at 07:57 PM.
The following users liked this post:
Nuke It (11-26-2018)
Old 04-14-2013, 04:16 PM
  #31  
Grey Boy
Thread Starter
 
titaneum_grey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
Posts: 236
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by ShellDude
Gentlemen,

There is a bunch of wrong data in this thread. You're right, P0661 refers to the solenoids, but they are not rotor specific. the banks are solenoid specific. One is for your SSV, one is for your VDI, and one is for your air pump.

And the only attachment in the thread that illustrates it is a thumbnail, WTF?



Your SSV opens with your secondary injectors. The VDI is an air resonance thing that kicks in way up around 7000. Air pump only fires on cold startup.

There ya have it. Nothing to do with rotors.

I suspect somewhere in the numerous posts that were pruned from this threat that these details were alluded to in one fashion or another.

Please try to be a little more responsible about what you post. Frothy / milky substance on dipstick TSB has absolutely nothing to do with your solenoids. It's primarily a vacuum routing change for a completely different set of vacuum lines.
The rotor info was straight from the dealer’s tech, so it was thought to be beyond reproach. Always good to replace wrong info with correct. Thank you. The pruning you referred to was that of other members, trolls as they were called, who ranked on us for being wrong but wouldn’t share how or why. It seemed that were more interested in slamming people then helping. It got so bad that a moderator stepped in, and is the reasons I haven't bothered with the site for help much any more.
this makes much more sense, as the boost of power at high RPMs is not consistent in my 8.

Last edited by titaneum_grey; 04-14-2013 at 04:24 PM.
Old 04-14-2013, 04:50 PM
  #32  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
oh man, coming from someone who claim he found the "complete" solution ... but then when it's not, what to do ahhh shoot ... post removed/edited and act innocent ?

SPOON FEEEEEEEEEEEED ! PLZ !!!!!

Last edited by nycgps; 04-14-2013 at 05:05 PM.
Old 04-14-2013, 08:04 PM
  #33  
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
 
ShellDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 4,200
Received 229 Likes on 153 Posts
Originally Posted by titaneum_grey
The rotor info was straight from the dealer’s tech, so it was thought to be beyond reproach.
That was your first mistake. Hopefully you've learned from it.

Originally Posted by titaneum_grey
... trolls as they were called, who ranked on us for being wrong but wouldn’t share how or why...
It's because you refused to do a simple task such as research real root cause. It took me 20 seconds to find the full image diagram. Someone even posted early on the actual mazda code description but you ignored it to it seems.
Old 04-15-2013, 07:30 AM
  #34  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by ShellDude
That was your first mistake. Hopefully you've learned from it.



It's because you refused to do a simple task such as research real root cause. It took me 20 seconds to find the full image diagram. Someone even posted early on the actual mazda code description but you ignored it to it seems.
forget it ... he found the complete solution ... not

but his ego ... grr
Old 04-15-2013, 10:50 AM
  #35  
Grey Boy
Thread Starter
 
titaneum_grey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
Posts: 236
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by ShellDude
it is because you refused to do a simple task such as research real root cause. It took me 20 seconds to find the full image diagram. Someone even posted early on the actual mazda code description but you ignored it to it seems.
You are partially correct in the reason nycgps began bashing my threads; it was actually on the preceding thread which was eventually deleted because he harassed every one who posted on it. However, I had spent hours researching the code, and I came up with nothing helpful. It wasn’t that I wasn’t making the effort. I was doing it wrong. But he didn’t allude to that fact so I had no clue and could not understand why he kept flaming every post. Finally I just considered him an *** and tried to ignore is posts because I recognized that he never offered any help,,, just BS and criticism. It was not until deep into this thread, and continuing to try to research that I stumbled upon the post that tells us how to search this site correctly. I also ,then, found the diagram you posted above. you will find it earlier in this thread. There were so many posts I still haven’t gotten through them all. I still haven’t found what I am looking for, and to tell you the truth, his repeated harassment stopped me from bothering with this site anymore. I log in only when I get a reply to this post. The posts a moderator removed were all his. I never claimed or deleted any claim to have a complete solution or resolution. Otherwise I wouldn’t still be looking. I posted info I have found and hope it helps some one else, that’s all. I have no problem with being wrong and welcome correction and new information. The goal was the solution. I never got there. Most people report having idling problems with this code and replacing the solenoid seems to have worked. I don’t notice the same problems so I haven’t installed it yet. Your info helps and sends me in a new direction. Not saying its not already out there. Maybe I mist it or maybe I just never found it. Anyways, thanks for taking the time to post it.

Last edited by titaneum_grey; 04-15-2013 at 10:55 AM. Reason: spelling
Old 04-15-2013, 12:26 PM
  #36  
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
 
ShellDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 4,200
Received 229 Likes on 153 Posts
Sorry dude, I don't do "wall of text" posts. I had to stop somewhere around line 3 because my brain was starting to spasm.

You really should reconsider your stance on nycgps. He's one of our most respected members and does a lot to help out his rotary brothers.

Like any other brotherhood he does set a bar for entry.
Old 04-15-2013, 01:13 PM
  #37  
Grey Boy
Thread Starter
 
titaneum_grey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
Posts: 236
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by ShellDude
Sorry dude, I don't do "wall of text" posts. I had to stop somewhere around line 3 because my brain was starting to spasm.

You really should reconsider your stance on nycgps. He's one of our most respected members and does a lot to help out his rotary brothers.

Like any other brotherhood he does set a bar for entry.
The monitor who removed his posts from this thread said similar things about him, but still agreed that he was out of line.
He and I have gone at it since he flamed me with his first post, but mostly because he flamed any others who posted on that thread. His posts are all I have to view him with and they are no help and all flame. When he gives me something else to consider him with I will gladly do so. However, I don't think it is My opinion of him that is the problem.

Sorry for the "wall" I try to be through.
I have corrected this threads opening post to reflect the info you offered.
Thanks again.

Last edited by titaneum_grey; 04-15-2013 at 01:21 PM. Reason: opps, lol
Old 04-15-2013, 01:23 PM
  #38  
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
 
ShellDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 4,200
Received 229 Likes on 153 Posts
You've got it backwards... he owes you nothing. On the other hand as an inactive, typically non contributing, member the owness is on you to distinguish yourself from the sheep.

Something that this thread certainly didn't reflect when I stumbled upon it the other day.
Old 04-15-2013, 01:37 PM
  #39  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
I don't see any objection to how the OP has handled this thread, as he hasn't been asking to be spoon fed and has been respectful. Once pointed to the best search method, he took everything in hand, found a solution, and followed up in his thread posting his solution. At no point has he been disrespectful or inflammatory. He is even responding to the harsher side of existing members a fair bit more calmly than most do, and more calmly than most of the people targeting him would.

It appears that the people that have a problem with him only have a problem with the fact that he is at the beginning of his self education. You can choose to either assist that, ignore him completely, or slam him for what he doesn't yet know.

Continuing to pursue the latter will not go favorably for anyone here.
Old 04-15-2013, 03:47 PM
  #40  
weeeeeeeeee
iTrader: (12)
 
ShellDude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Outside Philadelphia
Posts: 4,200
Received 229 Likes on 153 Posts
Fair enough, RIWWP. I'm certainly not one to stand on a pedestal and judge.
Old 07-09-2013, 10:43 PM
  #41  
Registered
 
Alterego667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bay Area California
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hello everyone

Will this let's say let your car overheat.
I've had this code for couple months today was 102 outside.
Driving home from work in traffic it started to overheat if the valve doesn't make the intake open or close then would this help car overheat.

On way down from little hill Heater was on full blast an coasted in neutral it went back to normal.
Then turned on the AC again and it was fine all the way home.

So will this cause that?????
Old 07-10-2013, 10:56 AM
  #42  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
^^Tell me how does an intake valve not opening can cause a car to overheat. You have a bigger problem than ur valve not working, might wanna flush ur cooling system with higher distilled water content.

For the record, op didnt solve anything, when me other member told him he was wasting everyone's time, he start talking crap, obviously he was wrong and wouldnt man up afterwards, Blah

Last edited by nycgps; 07-10-2013 at 11:02 AM.
Old 07-10-2013, 08:44 PM
  #43  
Registered
 
Alterego667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bay Area California
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If the valve is closed and not enough air is getting into where it needs to go no air flow will cause an overheat. Just curious if anyone else has had that problem.
It was driving up a hill with AC on in traffic then got the RPM's up to pass people and the temp was getting higher.
Once at the top turned on heaters and it cooled down then put AC back on and it was fine all the way home. That code listed here is the only code i have and my coolant was changed with a new radiator from dealer last summer and new overflow tank. only thing not changed was the thermostat. Which I have never put in yet.

I changed the top Sol valve but need to do the bottom 2.
It controls the intake valve if its closed then no air looks like to me........
Old 07-11-2013, 05:08 AM
  #44  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Originally Posted by Alterego667
If the valve is closed and not enough air is getting into where it needs to go no air flow will cause an overheat. Just curious if anyone else has had that problem.


*facepalm*

It was driving up a hill with AC on in traffic then got the RPM's up to pass people and the temp was getting higher.
Once at the top turned on heaters and it cooled down then put AC back on and it was fine all the way home. That code listed here is the only code i have and my coolant was changed with a new radiator from dealer last summer and new overflow tank. only thing not changed was the thermostat. Which I have never put in yet.

I changed the top Sol valve but need to do the bottom 2.
It controls the intake valve if its closed then no air looks like to me........
all your questions will be answer IF you can study your car a bit more.
Old 07-11-2013, 06:58 PM
  #45  
Registered
 
Alterego667's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Bay Area California
Posts: 51
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
All I have been doing is studying my car.
The overheat only happened one Time before going up hill when it's hot Lake Tahoe .
The next Time was that a couple days ago.
It was only 2 times in a year.

It has been fine ever since with AC on and everything. That's why I asked on this thread since its the only code I have. Was thinking about thermostat next it's original????
Old 07-12-2013, 04:24 AM
  #46  
Out of NYC
iTrader: (1)
 
nycgps's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Planet Earth
Posts: 19,881
Received 32 Likes on 30 Posts
Start your own thread, cuz i can tell you your issue has NOTHING to do with thr code you have.

YOu will get more answers that way
Old 08-07-2013, 09:37 AM
  #47  
Grey Boy
Thread Starter
 
titaneum_grey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
Posts: 236
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by nycgps
^^Tell me how does an intake valve not opening can cause a car to overheat. You have a bigger problem than ur valve not working, might wanna flush ur cooling system with higher distilled water content.

For the record, op didnt solve anything, when me other member told him he was wasting everyone's time, he start talking crap, obviously he was wrong and wouldnt man up afterwards, Blah
well at least your consistent. you keep harping on me being wrong but never once have you explained how or why. Still, I am willing to listen if you would just explain yourself and leave out all the antagonizing slander and hype.
Old 08-07-2013, 09:38 AM
  #48  
Grey Boy
Thread Starter
 
titaneum_grey's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Long Island, N.Y.
Posts: 236
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Finally got around to doing the wrench work and installed the solenoid. reset all codes after and waiting to see if they come back.

Last edited by titaneum_grey; 08-07-2013 at 09:39 AM. Reason: spelling
Old 08-07-2013, 11:40 AM
  #49  
Rotary Evolution
 
Karack's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Central FL
Posts: 853
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
just replace the solenoid, i have been seeing them fail quite a lot recently.

they only fail when you test then with the engine/solenoid fully warmed up, if you test it while the engine is cool it will likely pass but barely leaving you thinking it is a simple wiring issue which it isn't.

the part is about $125 and usually is in stock at your local dealer.
Old 08-07-2013, 11:44 AM
  #50  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
RIWWP's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Pacific Northwest
Posts: 16,684
Likes: 0
Received 240 Likes on 110 Posts
His last post commented that he installed it already.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Code P-0661 Intake Manifold Tuning Valve Control Low Bank 1a



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:24 PM.