Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Clutch Drop @3k & 7k Shock Loads?

Old Mar 6, 2004 | 09:49 AM
  #1  
demmis's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Larissa/GREECE
Clutch Drop @3k & 7k Shock Loads?

I did a search and could not find anything but I was wondering if there is a way to quantify the type of shock loading for a 3k compared to 7k cluth drop. Assuming the transmission receives the brunt of the load. Also not sure of how slip verses wheel hop would make a difference. I know the torque at 3k and 7k would come into play but would you relate that to RPM? Any thoughts? I just thought it would be nice to see the difference between the two hopefully showing how terrible a 7k drop is.
Reply
Old Mar 6, 2004 | 07:56 PM
  #2  
GeorgeH's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 3
From: Portland OR
Well, I can't give you an exact answer, but I can take a stab at it using basic physics.

When you are talking about shock loading, you are talking about a system (the driveline in this case) absorbing a significant amount of energy in a short period of time. One way to look at the quantities involved is to look at how much kinetic energy is stored in the spinning rotors at 3,000 and 7,000 rpms.

Normally, the kinetic energy of a rotating mass is proportional to the square of the angular velocity. In otherwords, if you double the engine speed, the amount of kinetic energy stored in the spinning rotors is 4x. So, at 7,000 rpm the engine has 5.44 times as mutch potential to do damage as when it is spinning at 3,000 rpm (yes, I know the rotors spin at 1/3 the crank speed, but the 5.44 ratio is still the same).

Now, this is really sophomoric - there is much more going on, especially when you consider that you are adding throttle to keep the rpms high, so most of the kinetic energy isn't transferred immediatly. The truth is, the actual shock loading is limited by traction - you could launch at 9,000 rpm and the actual shock loads probably wouldn't be much worse than a 7,000 rpm launch- you would just spin the tires more (and be slower because of it).

In the end a good dose of mechanical empathy goes along way towords extending the life of your car.

Anybody else have a better description?

Last edited by GeorgeH; Mar 6, 2004 at 08:09 PM.
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2004 | 08:28 PM
  #3  
OBryanRX8's Avatar
happy rotoring
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: NICHOLASVILLE, KY
what he said
Reply
Old Mar 7, 2004 | 08:29 PM
  #4  
OBryanRX8's Avatar
happy rotoring
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 134
Likes: 0
From: NICHOLASVILLE, KY
great technical description
Reply
Old Mar 8, 2004 | 12:07 AM
  #5  
neit_jnf's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 1,277
Likes: 7
From: Around
There's also clutch friction coefficient an pressure to take into account, these affect the power / shock transmission to the, er, transmission :p
Reply
Old Mar 9, 2004 | 02:24 PM
  #6  
GeorgeH's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 1,666
Likes: 3
From: Portland OR
Yes, clutch engagment time is a crucial variable in defining the shock load. The faster it engages, the heavier the shock. Worst case would be a side-step type engagement.
Reply
Old Mar 21, 2004 | 07:23 AM
  #7  
Kas's Avatar
Kas
- Senior Menber -
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 556
Likes: 0
From: Melbourne,AU
well put.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RevMeHarder
New Member Forum
8
Jun 1, 2026 02:30 PM
OnebaddRx8
Series I Trouble Shooting
24
Aug 25, 2019 11:34 PM
Dokuji
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
Nov 1, 2016 02:51 PM
akagc
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
Aug 11, 2015 07:07 PM


Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:14 PM.