Notices
Series I Tech Garage The place to discuss anything technical about the RX-8 that doesn't fit into any of the categories below.

Any chance for aftermarket Larger Gas Tank?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 03:33 PM
  #1  
Reeko's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Any chance for aftermarket Larger Gas Tank?

Yes, the milage sucks, but is comperable to similar power vehicles (V8 mustangs others...).
But, they put a gastank in for a high MPG vehicle. (Not sure but I think it is 14 Gallon).

This car really needs a 20 gallon (I would settle for 18) tank.
Any chance that a few years out, some aftermarket company might make a larger tank that might fit? (I haven't looked to see how much room is available).

Rick
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 03:37 PM
  #2  
eccles's Avatar
Prodigal Wankler
 
Joined: Nov 2002
Posts: 1,761
Likes: 2
From: Austin, TX
Re: Any chance for aftermarket Larger Gas Tank?

Originally posted by Reeko
I haven't looked to see how much room is available.
Almost zero. About the only way I could see you increasing fuel capacity would be to put an auxilliary tank in the trunk between the rear towers, with a gravity feed to the main tank.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 04:57 PM
  #3  
rxeightr's Avatar
M0D Squad -charter member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Too bad Mazda engineers could not have provided a larger tank so the RX-8 could easily get more than 300 miles.

Guess I have to sacrifice somewhere to get the rest of the package it offers.
Reply
Old Oct 8, 2003 | 07:26 PM
  #4  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
wouldnt it cost a ton it add a extra tank?
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 09:21 AM
  #5  
Chrisbert's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
From: Liberty Hill, TX (Austin)
balance

The engineers probably were considering their goal of 50/50 weight distribution when the chose the tank, among the real-estate concerns.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 01:34 PM
  #6  
wakeech's Avatar
mostly harmless
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
From: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Re: balance

Originally posted by Chrisbert
The engineers probably were considering their goal of 50/50 weight distribution when the chose the tank, among the real-estate concerns.
that, and also overall vehicle mass: tanks are kinda heavy without fuel, and very heavy when full... you don't want to have a Miata with a 50L tank in it (pretend one could fit) 'cause it'd grossly upset the balance and performance of the car when full.
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 01:58 PM
  #7  
Lensman's Avatar
_________________
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge - UK
At $6 per gallon you have no idea how depressing this thread is...
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 03:21 PM
  #8  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
$6 OMG
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 03:29 PM
  #9  
Lensman's Avatar
_________________
 
Joined: Feb 2003
Posts: 1,384
Likes: 0
From: Cambridge - UK
Originally posted by mikeb
$6 OMG
On the plus side: Britain's quite a small place...
Reply
Old Oct 13, 2003 | 06:37 PM
  #10  
rxeightr's Avatar
M0D Squad -charter member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
that, and also overall vehicle mass: tanks are kinda heavy without fuel, and very heavy when full... you don't want to have a Miata with a 50L tank in it (pretend one could fit) 'cause it'd grossly upset the balance and performance of the car when full.
Many car manufacturers are using polyethylene Gas Tanks instead of steel tanks. There is a significant weight savings when using a plastic tank.
Reply
Old Oct 14, 2003 | 08:35 PM
  #11  
elite's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
From: MI
how many miles does this car get?

my v6 eclipse gets 250 a tank with an intake and exhaust..

i think thats on about 14 gallons....

how are the 8s?
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 01:19 AM
  #12  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
8's are averaging anywhere from 13 to 23 I think
mine is getting 19mpg
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 08:36 AM
  #13  
rxeightr's Avatar
M0D Squad -charter member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
I get between 280-310 miles per tank.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 11:01 AM
  #14  
Reeko's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 175
Likes: 0
From: Oregon
Wow you must have a bigger tank then me.

My Fuel warning light ussually comes on at about 220.

Let me ask, when you guys get 280 or more miles on a tank, how many gallons then fit in.

I have yet to get more than 13 gallons, even when the warning light is on.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 04:36 PM
  #15  
mikeb's Avatar
100% Italian
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 9,422
Likes: 0
From: orange,ca
Originally posted by rxeightr
I get between 280-310 miles per tank.

holy sh***

I normally get around 210 when low fuel comes on
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2003 | 09:26 PM
  #16  
rxeightr's Avatar
M0D Squad -charter member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
Let me ask, when you guys get 280 or more miles on a tank, how many gallons then fit in.
Around 14.5 to 15 gallons.
Reply
Old Oct 17, 2003 | 01:42 PM
  #17  
Omicron's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Oct 2001
Posts: 7,966
Likes: 4
From: Boulder County, Colorado
...um...

The fuel capacity of the US spec RX-8 is 15.9 US gallons. See http://www.mazdausa.com/MusaWeb/disp...ehicleCode=RX8
Reply
Old Oct 19, 2003 | 01:28 AM
  #18  
rxeightr's Avatar
M0D Squad -charter member
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 1,498
Likes: 0
From: Alabama
The fuel capacity of the US spec RX-8 is 15.9 US gallons.
Agreed --- and my statement above still stands.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
theblinkof
Series I Trouble Shooting
33
Oct 4, 2023 05:24 PM
fourwhls
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
Feb 20, 2019 05:16 PM
dezau
RX-8 Racing
10
Mar 9, 2016 09:50 AM
Eliseo Esquivel
RX-8 Discussion
2
Sep 30, 2015 08:28 PM
Zube6115
Series I Trouble Shooting
8
Sep 30, 2015 12:57 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:51 AM.