Notices
Series I AT-Specific Performance Mods Discuss engine and transmission modifications for your AT equipped RX-8

AT to MT swap

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 06:17 PM
  #26  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
Wow, congrats on the swap!

Interesting that the driveshafts are exactly the same except material. Does that mean us AT owners could swap to the manual driveshaft and reduce some rotational mass without changing anything else? The connnections, etc all the same?
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 07:04 PM
  #27  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
kevin@rotaryresurrection
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 61
From: east of Knoxville, TN
yes, both ends are exactly the same, as is the length. Only the mass/material differs.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 08:46 PM
  #28  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
Wonder why Mazda did the heavier driveshaft on the AT? To save some money, I guess?
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 08:56 PM
  #29  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
kevin@rotaryresurrection
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 61
From: east of Knoxville, TN
I imagine steel is a good bit cheaper than carbon with plastic/resin covering. I wonder why mazda went that extra mile to do the shaft on the manual cars...a light driveshaft is one of those 0.1% modifications that you do after everything else has been exhausted, in most cases.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 09:03 PM
  #30  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
Does the weight difference between the two feel substantial? I wonder if this would be a worthwhile, noticeable mod for us AT owners if we can find a relatively cheap used one?

Thanks for posting all this info!
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 09:07 PM
  #31  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
kevin@rotaryresurrection
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 61
From: east of Knoxville, TN
I didnt think to weigh them, but the auto is definitely heavier by at least 2-3lb.

Odds are that you could do a before and after test...not knowing which shaft was on during which test...and not be able to tell the difference.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 11:34 PM
  #32  
nvrfalter's Avatar
tonybob failpants
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 2,270
Likes: 0
From: jersey, BITCH
i think yours is the first ive ever seen someone pull off.
Reply
Old Jul 23, 2008 | 11:44 PM
  #33  
Brettus's Avatar
Boosted Kiwi
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 20,830
Likes: 1,775
From: Y-cat-o NZ
is the diff ratio different on an auto ?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 12:58 AM
  #34  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
kevin@rotaryresurrection
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 61
From: east of Knoxville, TN
I checked mine, it is a 4.44 and LSD. I believe they are all the same, but I am not an rx-8 options expert like I am on rx7s. It is easy to check...jack the back end up in the air and put it in neutral. Mark the differential input/driveshaft with a piece of chalk, facing the ground, and do the same for one wheel. Now rotate the input/driveshaft slowly, counting the number of turns it takes to turn the wheel one complete turn. You should be at about 4 and a half.

During this test, also note if both wheels turn the same direction, opposite directions, or only one wheel turns. This tells you if you have an open diff or a limited slip diff, or a worn out limited slip. IF both wheels turn and seem to be locked together, it is LSD. If one wheel turns forward and one wheel turns backward, it is a standard open differential (peg leg). IF one wheel turns and the other doesn't, it is likely an LSD that is badly worn out.

Speaking of that, I need to verify my mph versus the road markers and a stopwatch, but I see no reason why the speedo would be off given that the diff ratios are the same between the models.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 01:36 AM
  #35  
alz0rz's Avatar
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 3
From: NYC
Great read. Good job.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 01:41 AM
  #36  
eddybear's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 213
Likes: 1
From: Jamaica
Needless to say, I almost died when i saw this post, PMMMMMMMMMMM'd!!!!!!!!!!!
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 02:32 AM
  #37  
dshiznit1489's Avatar
Formerly Polak Graphics
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
Thats awesome! One thing though; wouldnt it have just been cheaper to buy a used MT?
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 02:39 AM
  #38  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
kevin@rotaryresurrection
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 61
From: east of Knoxville, TN
possibly, but not really. I got this car about a year and a half ago for 10 grand cash. At the time, even medium mileage 04 MT's were still pulling 16-17 most of the time. I didnt have 16-17 to put into one at the time, and I didn't want to finance one. So it was either buy this auto that fell into my lap at the time, or not have an rx-8. I chose to buy it, figuring I could learn about the cars as I went and develop knowledge that I could use as part of my business later.

even now, I think most MT's still pull 14 grand or more in good shape, and I have a rebuilt motor and trans to show for about the same amount of money spent whereas most of those cars have used engines (or questionable mazda remans) and worn transmissions.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 06:13 AM
  #39  
N rider89's Avatar
^NieL
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 2,560
Likes: 1
From: santa clara ,ca
congrats on the swap. its really interesting because the majority of people wanting to do this swap dont have the skills and knowledge that you do.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 09:58 AM
  #40  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
From what I understand, the base model AT had a different rear end gear ratio, but the sport package on up (or touring, i'm not sure which) had the same 4.44 with LSD as the manual.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 09:59 AM
  #41  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
I didnt think to weigh them, but the auto is definitely heavier by at least 2-3lb.

Odds are that you could do a before and after test...not knowing which shaft was on during which test...and not be able to tell the difference.
Oh well, I was hoping for more of a difference.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 12:57 PM
  #42  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
kevin@rotaryresurrection
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 61
From: east of Knoxville, TN
What would make it not worthwhile, is the fact that you pretty much have to remove the PPF to get the driveshaft out, and that PPF is heavy as a bitch. You want some weight savings? Get a carbon PPF instead of a metal one.

It probably only weighs 40lb, but when you are under a car on your back trying to bench press that ****** for about 45 seconds to get all the bolt holes lined up, and then you take one hand off to try and start a nut, you realize exactly how heavy it is.

And it's not like most rx8s (even modded) make enough ground thumping torque to crack a PPF anyway, unlike some modded rx7s that have done it.

Last edited by RotaryResurrection; Jul 24, 2008 at 01:03 PM.
Reply
Old Jul 24, 2008 | 01:38 PM
  #43  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
kevin@rotaryresurrection
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 61
From: east of Knoxville, TN
Originally Posted by mdw1000
From what I understand, the base model AT had a different rear end gear ratio, but the sport package on up (or touring, i'm not sure which) had the same 4.44 with LSD as the manual.
What was the ratio on it?
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 12:27 AM
  #44  
laulongfei's Avatar
laulongfei
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 194
Likes: 0
From: San Francisco,CA
Hey RotaryResurrection, I just want to say you are awesome for making impossible to possible. Support you all the way for doing all kind of experience on AT rx8
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 02:03 AM
  #45  
secret8gent's Avatar
the enemy in the mirror
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: billerica, ma
I thought the 'mileage' was stored on a CAN module located near the gauges.
You might be able to swap just that part...

But that could've just been hearsay, I'll have to check.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 02:55 AM
  #46  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
kevin@rotaryresurrection
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 61
From: east of Knoxville, TN
IF the mileage were stored on a module in the car, it would still read the same. The mileage must be stored in the cluster itself, since the new cluster has retained it's old mileage each time, even though it was plugged into my car with all my original modules and boxes (I did this before I ever did the swap).
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 05:10 PM
  #47  
secret8gent's Avatar
the enemy in the mirror
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 440
Likes: 0
From: billerica, ma
the module could be in the cluster... (i thought i wrote that... oh well)
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 07:17 PM
  #48  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
kevin@rotaryresurrection
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 61
From: east of Knoxville, TN
The cluster is one integrated micro board, there are many things soldered to the inside of it but I did not see fit to try and remove the needles and jack up the gauges to get to the inside of the board and see what was in there. Bottom line, the cluster is an integrated, sealed, non serviceable unit, except to those very good with electronic boards and soldering. The solder points are so small and close that I couldn't even tell which functions most of the stuff went to...it is very hard to follow the traces compared to older, less complex boards.
Reply
Old Jul 25, 2008 | 11:50 PM
  #49  
mdw1000's Avatar
I'll snap his neck.
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,233
Likes: 2
From: EVOLV-Chicago
Originally Posted by RotaryResurrection
What was the ratio on it?
I think it was a 4.10, but don't quote me on that.
Reply
Old Jul 26, 2008 | 01:42 AM
  #50  
RotaryResurrection's Avatar
Thread Starter
kevin@rotaryresurrection
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 1,415
Likes: 61
From: east of Knoxville, TN
****, I wish mine had a 4.10 in it like the rx7s run. I mainly use mine for cruising and I see no reason for it to be turning 3500-4000 at interstate speed. The 3000-3300 that rx7s turn at similar speeds is bad enough for gas mileage.
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 1 votes, 5.00 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:07 AM.