I dont think there is a good bolt in solution. I thought of the shane intake as it has room to slide back and fourth in the larger tube and it may have the room to push forward some.
So a modded AEM/mazda speed unit the best bet? |
Originally Posted by skc
(Post 4122716)
The plastic pipe from the air box slides over the TB and the white foam is designed to provide a seal. There is a size differential between the TB and intake pipe. There is no room for a reducer unless the maf pipe is reduced in size.
I'd choose a cheep and flexible coupling from china. the autobarn88 ones are useless for boost but have got the flexibility you want to stop transmitting vibrations from the engine to the chassis. next best would be a SFS as they are flexible but very expensive to cut up for a test. |
let me come in here.
You have to remember that with a supercharger you are dealing with things a little different than a turbo. A SC is a positive displacement pump--right. This means it is going to push a certain amount of air through it regardless. But we dont want boost all the time. So we have a bypass valve. Now while the bypass valve does it job--its recirculating this pumped air--right? Ok when it does this many times a second it causes a pulses. These pulses affect the maf and thats the reason we have to have a higher idle speed--Pettit guys idle at 1.2K. Higher the rpm makes these pulses occur very close together--smoothing them out. So it doesnt affect the maf as much. Now if you have the TB closer to the SC this will intensify this pulse which will have a more profound affect on the maf during decel and the maf trying to adjust at idle. You could try a screen between the TB and the maf also--but i dont think that will work? But worth a try. Petti has a maf pipe he can sell you. Just be sure to get cold air to whatever filter you get--the sc will have a longer life if you do. Hot underhood air is hard on a SC. |
Originally Posted by olddragger
(Post 4123274)
..
Now while the bypass valve does it job--its recirculating this pumped air--right? Ok when it does this many times a second it causes a pulses. These pulses affect the maf and thats the reason we have to have a higher idle speed--Pettit guys idle at 1.2K. Higher the rpm makes these pulses occur very close together--smoothing them out. |
I thought SC's need a higher idle speed because they drain power from the engine :dunno:
|
perhaps instead of pulses a better word would be "waves". There are lobes on the sc shaft and as each each one of those lobes grab air it pumps. The valve? No it doesnt open and shut.
Turbos also grab air with their compressor wheels--but they have many more blades ( versus the sc rotors) and they rotate at a much faster rpm. Their blades grab less air individually than a SC lobe and they dont have this affect.. No superchargers dont idle faster because of the mechanical drive--actually they only take about 1/2 hp to turn when they are off boost. The corvette sc engine idles like normal for example--maybe 100 rpm more than the non s.c. one. od |
Originally Posted by hoss -05
(Post 4122843)
I dont think there is a good bolt in solution. I thought of the shane intake as it has room to slide back and fourth in the larger tube and it may have the room to push forward some.
So a modded AEM/mazda speed unit the best bet? |
Originally Posted by olddragger
(Post 4123445)
No superchargers dont idle faster because of the mechanical drive--actually they only take about 1/2 hp to turn when they are off boost. The corvette sc engine idles like normal for example--maybe 100 rpm more than the non s.c. one.
od |
my SC easily idles below 1000rpm. I'm not sure how much hp it consumes but I would hazard a guess that due to a 9.49:1 internal step-up it could be more than a twin-screw.
|
Originally Posted by Brettus
(Post 4123400)
I thought SC's need a higher idle speed because they drain power from the engine :dunno:
I just need to adjust the intake and MAF placement and then I am in supercharged RX8 heaven |
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
(Post 4123451)
No it has a long narrow air filter inside, so to do that you will have to shorten the filter and at that diameter it will not have enough surface area. Building a custom full 3.5" diameter intake is not that hard. :dunno:
Do you think a re-tune will be required after completing a change in intake system or does the ecu adjust itself automatically. |
Originally Posted by skc
(Post 4123629)
My car idles perfectly at the stock idle rate so I am happy to leave it at that level.
I just need to adjust the intake and MAF placement and then I am in supercharged RX8 heaven |
ug yes i am a little confused?
|
Look you are making this way too difficult. You need a minimum amount of straight tube flow length before and after the MAF. This is well documented on the forum. Same for a flow straightening screen or two. You currently don't gave that and I don't think you can achieve it with the air filter in the engine bay due to the relocated TB position. Aside from that the preferred tube is 3.5" OD x 0.063" wall (3.375" ID). A weld on MAF bung can be easily purchased. Then you need to get a suitable size filter positioned in the front bumper and whatever else is needed to make the rest of the piping happen. Don't try to over think/complicate it beyond that.
. |
Originally Posted by rotarenvy
(Post 4123633)
then why are you trying to change the MAF? if it will idle like std then I doubt you have a MAF issue.
And when it idles from here it is perfect and I do not need a higher RPM to keep it going. I am sure MAF relocation and longer tubes should resolve this problem. |
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
(Post 4123679)
Look you are making this way too difficult. You need a minimum amount of straight tube flow length before and after the MAF. This is well documented on the forum. Same for a flow straightening screen or two. You currently don't gave that and I don't think you can achieve it with the air filter in the engine bay due to the relocated TB position. Aside from that the preferred tube is 3.5" OD x 0.063" wall (3.375" ID). A weld on MAF bung can be easily purchased. Then you need to get a suitable size filter positioned in the front bumper and whatever else is needed to make the rest of the piping happen. Don't try to over think/complicate it beyond that.
. |
Originally Posted by skc
(Post 4123699)
I am sure MAF relocation and longer tubes should resolve this problem. Doubtful but worth doing for best maf operation . |
This particular problem is well documented since the early FI days. Perhaps a few people have forgotten.
. |
true---also some have found that the neutral switch on the trans is bad and that was causing some of their problems--but at times mine still doesnt want to catch without a little blip.
Look at your tune also. You may be injecting a little gas after throttle lift. Some tuners do that to try and help cool the combustion chamber. |
1 Attachment(s)
Took the car to the track today as everything was working well. However, as soon as I got on the track one of the seals blew out causing hesitation above 5000 rpm. Drove the car in at the end of the session and discovered the seal had popped out.
Also of concern is that oil was being blown out of that same location. This would mean that oil is traveling through the inter cooler and then into the engine. People reported seeing black smoke on gear changes. It was a very hot day with ambient at 95F and the oil peaked at 230F. |
Hmm Ill have to put in a bit of liquid gasket into that seal when I install mine.
|
It survived its first track day. The unit was readjusted recently as it was hitting the fire wall. Perhaps, this realignment may have disturbed the seal.
What are your thoughts on the oil blowing out of that seal. |
Hey SKC
Gave me a fright there, thought you meant a engine seal component. What i can say is, with the limited knowledge of your S/C setup, have a look at your intake side of things and see how much oil is in that pipe. I saw first hand a promaz turbo setup, with a badly setup catch can, gushing engine oil out when the I/C pipes were removed. (car was not started), meaning that much oil was in those pipes! Combined with tracking environment and running in boost you could very well have been blowing oil through causing the seal to pop out, and your engine burning extra engine oil causing the black smoke. Regards Jason |
I cant help but wonder if it is your SC pressurized engine oil lines that were later changed by Mark to a closed SC oiling system.... I wish you would have set your car up that way from the start. Those lines were known to cause many issues and that was the reason he changed it to a closed set up.
|
2 things.
1-on track with an FI engine it is best to go out with the oil level a tad down from full. Same for the SC oil level. 2- you have to have a great catch can set up--it doesnt need vacuum. Use a big line (big as you can within reason:) The little stock one is not big enough. For a back yard fix before going out you can also break the seal that the oil dipstick has--just pull it back a little--but it COULD blow some oil out --probably wouldnt --but it could. You are obviously getting blowby in the engine--that in itself is not necessarily something to be concerned about. Just be sure to change oil after a track event! its going to be a bitch cleaning the intercooler:)? |
Originally Posted by olddragger
(Post 4128817)
2 things.
1-on track with an FI engine it is best to go out with the oil level a tad down from full. Same for the SC oil level. 2- you have to have a great catch can set up--it doesnt need vacuum. Use a big line (big as you can within reason:) The little stock one is not big enough. For a back yard fix before going out you can also break the seal that the oil dipstick has--just pull it back a little--but it COULD blow some oil out --probably wouldnt --but it could. You are obviously getting blowby in the engine--that in itself is not necessarily something to be concerned about. Just be sure to change oil after a track event! its going to be a bitch cleaning the intercooler:)? I will try lowering the oil a bit next time as the G Reddy sump has extra volume anyway. I also decided to seal up the oil filler cap to prevent oil leaking. This may have also created extra pressure within the system causing the vacuum seal to let go. The concern I have at the moment is that there is a weakness in the seal so in the long term that will need a redesign. |
3.5" custom intake setup :)
http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/6346211001/ All I used from the AEM was the MAF housing and screens. I got all my piping from here: http://www.rotary-works.com/mm5/merc...gory_Code=APIP I even cut everything with a chop saw and used Emory cloth to debur and smooth the cut pieces. |
are you sure that is enought air filter for you
|
Originally Posted by olddragger
(Post 4129382)
are you sure that is enought air filter for you
Eventually I will remount the inter cooler and use the intake funnel and a filter with a 6" flange. |
its a neat looking air filter set up. Great find on the filter. The picture is a little bright so I cant see if there are any pleats in it? Pretty sure there is. the flow rate may be OK--it just looks small.
Now you do know that the entire top portion of the front support beam can be cut off? That beam is internally sepatarated by a steel plate that goes down the middle of it. Just cut a little above halfway up and all the way across and it makes the beam 1/2 as wide as it now is. That gives you a LOT more room. |
Originally Posted by olddragger
(Post 4129568)
its a neat looking air filter set up. Great find on the filter. The picture is a little bright so I cant see if there are any pleats in it? Pretty sure there is. the flow rate may be OK--it just looks small.
Now you do know that the entire top portion of the front support beam can be cut off? That beam is internally separated by a steel plate that goes down the middle of it. Just cut a little above halfway up and all the way across and it makes the beam 1/2 as wide as it now is. That gives you a LOT more room. Yes it is pleated. Oh now you tell me :lol: |
That is what I am looking to do in the near future.
|
We finally managed to diagnose the cause of the seal failure in the dog bone. It seems that under boost the pipe gets pushed back causing a leak. The solution is to machine a piece of metal that sits against the plenum to stop the dog bone piece from sliding back causing boost leak.
We hope to get this done sometime in January so I can finally get full boost. I think this issue has existed from the beginning as I now know what the engine sounds and feels like when there is a boost leak. I am sure I had similar sounds when I first took the car to the track. With this issue resolved the car will feel more powerful. |
Its already a beast, when are you upping the psi?
|
Originally Posted by skc
(Post 4149357)
We finally managed to diagnose the cause of the seal failure in the dog bone. It seems that under boost the pipe gets pushed back causing a leak. The solution is to machine a piece of metal that sits against the plenum to stop the dog bone piece from sliding back causing boost leak.
We hope to get this done sometime in January so I can finally get full boost. I think this issue has existed from the beginning as I now know what the engine sounds and feels like when there is a boost leak. I am sure I had similar sounds when I first took the car to the track. With this issue resolved the car will feel more powerful. |
Originally Posted by hoss -05
(Post 4149363)
If you make a second one Ill send you some $$ and an address. :worship:
|
Originally Posted by shr3da
(Post 4149361)
Its already a beast, when are you upping the psi?
In the meantime I will keep running the car and doing track days until the inevitable happens. |
What is this "dog bone" that you speak of?
|
Originally Posted by skc
(Post 4149368)
I have to resolve these minor issues first. I also have to be a bit realistic about more power as my car has over 100 000 km and at some stage in the near future it will fail. It may be best to wait for a rebuild, with ported exhaust, ceramic seals, nitrate plates, balance, etc before I start looking for more power.
In the meantime I will keep running the car and doing track days until the inevitable happens. Thats probably a good idea. If only we had a magic ball which told us our engine expiry. Rowan just rebuild jasons motor cost him 8 or 9k. |
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
(Post 4149386)
What is this "dog bone" that you speak of?
https://www.rx8club.com/picture.php?...ictureid=29972 https://www.rx8club.com/picture.php?...ictureid=29973 |
I have said it before, but I will say it again--that sure is a good looking kit.
Curious why you want to go with ceramic seals? They are easier on the housings, but they break also. Read up on some things and it seems, and I am not an expert, that our apex seals have a weak fulcum point by being shorter than say the turbo FD's? By changing to a taller seal this strengtens that area. No long term results are in but those that have had this done--so far so good. Its lodgical to me. Of course bad detonation is going to blow it anyway. A little knock may not. As many have said --get the best tune you can( watch the timing), neg decel timing is now being talked about as is rpm delta tables also. Run the best octane you can get and then get some gas that has more, either by additives or race gas--if you are tracking or staying is high boost in the higher gears. Add a rock solid ignition system, do race maintanence, some premix, and watch your temps. Doing all that --why spend the money on ceramic seals. If anything we need ceramic side seals! Not for the wear, but to better handle the heat they see. |
Originally Posted by shr3da
(Post 4149388)
Thats probably a good idea. If only we had a magic ball which told us our engine expiry. Rowan just rebuild jasons motor cost him 8 or 9k.
Hopefully i will get a few more years worth of driving before the rebuild. so far it has served me well for over 8 years and 5 years of regular track days. |
Originally Posted by hoss -05
(Post 4149391)
I believe this is the one he is talking about. It could have a tighter fit.
So the solution is to place a machined piece of metal on the plenum side to stop it from sliding back thus preventing the boost leak. |
Rowan is extreme rotaries. Nice guy very professional. So many machines in his workshop.
|
He is on my short list of world class builders, just wish he wasn't on the wrong continent, lol. You won't wrong there.
|
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
(Post 4149816)
He is on my short list of world class builders, just wish he wasn't on the wrong continent, lol. You won't wrong there.
|
New part installed and boost leak is gone. However, engine sputters under high load at high rpm i.e rev to 1st to 9000rpm when I take second gear the car bogs and sputters.
i will try injector cleaners and hopefully it helps. I did change the spark plugs as they where very dirty, they had only done around 1000km before the last clean. I think the dirty spark plugs where due to the boost leak. The next cause could be coils, so I have to go through a process of elimination skc |
could be many things---go down the list.
glad the boost leak is fixed. been meaning to ask--how does that uim fit onto the lim? |
Originally Posted by olddragger
(Post 4193709)
been meaning to ask--how does that uim fit onto the lim?
I hope this answers your question. |
Originally Posted by olddragger
(Post 4193709)
could be many things---go down the list.
glad the boost leak is fixed. been meaning to ask--how does that uim fit onto the lim? |
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:32 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands