Pettit Super Charger Owners
If it is on order from Snow it'll be another week or so as it is on back-order. Juan is supposed to be getting some, too.
Thread Starter
FI by Pettit-BHR-Cobb AP
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 2
From: Sin City, Nevada
Sigh, no Nitro-Booster from Snow Performance any time soon.
I just got off the phone with Snow, they have no Nitromethane to make Nitro-Booster.
They say there is a worldwide shortage of Nitromethane.
VP Racing seems to have it.....
I think the RC car fuel is looking better by the minute.
Did the RC fuel really fall out of suspension?
It seemed the stuff worked, from the reports here.
(Am I just wishfully thinking?)
They say there is a worldwide shortage of Nitromethane.
VP Racing seems to have it.....
I think the RC car fuel is looking better by the minute.
Did the RC fuel really fall out of suspension?
It seemed the stuff worked, from the reports here.
(Am I just wishfully thinking?)
Thread Starter
FI by Pettit-BHR-Cobb AP
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 2
From: Sin City, Nevada
Thread Starter
FI by Pettit-BHR-Cobb AP
iTrader: (3)
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 2
From: Sin City, Nevada
What will you do with yourself all day if you retire especially with kids still in college
.
I just got off the phone with Snow, they have no Nitromethane to make Nitro-Booster.
They say there is a worldwide shortage of Nitromethane.
VP Racing seems to have it.....
I think the RC car fuel is looking better by the minute.
Did the RC fuel really fall out of suspension?
It seemed the stuff worked, from the reports here.
(Am I just wishfully thinking?)
They say there is a worldwide shortage of Nitromethane.
VP Racing seems to have it.....
I think the RC car fuel is looking better by the minute.
Did the RC fuel really fall out of suspension?
It seemed the stuff worked, from the reports here.
(Am I just wishfully thinking?)
On a different note what is to lean on the A/F the Reason I ask is on my last data logs I got 12.5 and 12.8 with the meth on.
The reason they were different may be because I played with the meth mix.
The 12.5 run was 50/50 the 12.8 run was 30/70 30 water 70 M5
However, one stutter from that meth pump and you could be walking home.
11.5:1 is a better target.
Yeah VP Fuels have it or you can do what I do is buy their M5 that comes with the Nitromethane and Lube premixed in with the methanol.
On a different note what is to lean on the A/F the Reason I ask is on my last data logs I got 12.5 and 12.8 with the meth on.
The reason they were different may be because I played with the meth mix.
The 12.5 run was 50/50 the 12.8 run was 30/70 30 water 70 M5
On a different note what is to lean on the A/F the Reason I ask is on my last data logs I got 12.5 and 12.8 with the meth on.
The reason they were different may be because I played with the meth mix.
The 12.5 run was 50/50 the 12.8 run was 30/70 30 water 70 M5
As MM pointed out, the pump may stutter;
which cuts off the very stuff leaning the mixture.

The question now would be can the pump "over-pump" in a "reverse-stutter"?
No, its the other way around.
The reading is leaner because the water/meth/nitro is displacing fuel.
Remember the stochiometry of meth and nitro. Both carry their own oxygen into the fire.
Nitro will burn without oxidant.
You are reading an AFR based on a 14.7:1 stochiometry.
However, you have introduced two new fuels in unregulated amounts that have 6.7:1 and 1.7:1 stochiometric values.
Even though 12.5:1 is .85 λ for gasoline, its 1.8 λ for meth (very lean) and 7.4 λ for nitro (off-scale lean).
The reading is leaner because the water/meth/nitro is displacing fuel.
Remember the stochiometry of meth and nitro. Both carry their own oxygen into the fire.
Nitro will burn without oxidant.
You are reading an AFR based on a 14.7:1 stochiometry.
However, you have introduced two new fuels in unregulated amounts that have 6.7:1 and 1.7:1 stochiometric values.
Even though 12.5:1 is .85 λ for gasoline, its 1.8 λ for meth (very lean) and 7.4 λ for nitro (off-scale lean).
Last edited by MazdaManiac; Jul 2, 2008 at 03:13 PM.
Well any one that wants to see my last EFI dude data log send me a PM with your email address and I'll send the file. If you don't have the EFI Dude software I can send the data over in .xls
No, its the other way around.
The reading is leaner because the water/meth/nitro is displacing fuel.
Remember the stochiometry of meth and nitro. Both carry their own oxygen into the fire.
Nitro will burn without oxidant.
You are reading an AFR based on a 14.7:1 stochiometry.
However, you have introduced two new fuels in unregulated amounts that have 6.7:1 and 1.7:1 stochiometric values.
Even though 12.5:1 is .85 λ for gasoline, its 1.8 λ for meth (very lean) and 7.4 λ for nitro (off-scale lean).
The reading is leaner because the water/meth/nitro is displacing fuel.
Remember the stochiometry of meth and nitro. Both carry their own oxygen into the fire.
Nitro will burn without oxidant.
You are reading an AFR based on a 14.7:1 stochiometry.
However, you have introduced two new fuels in unregulated amounts that have 6.7:1 and 1.7:1 stochiometric values.
Even though 12.5:1 is .85 λ for gasoline, its 1.8 λ for meth (very lean) and 7.4 λ for nitro (off-scale lean).
I'll do this without the math, the simple way:
Hey munche187, what was the A/F without the methanol/nitromethane mixture injected?



