New supercharger
#28
Registered
For as much more money as a Z06 is it sure as hell better be faster than an RX-8! Why do people always want to make worthless ridiculous comparisons between cars? This is like saying my Civic is slower than an RX-8 so Honda needs to step up their game to be competitive. They aren't even in the same class. If you like the Z-06 that much, go buy one. Mazda has a niche market with the RX-8. They don't have to do crap. My car will never be as fast as an F-16. I'm not about to trade up.
#30
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hmm let me see :
Mazda RX8 = $30,000-$35000
Corvette Z06 = $65000-$70000
Yeah, that's a good comparison.
If you want more hp then swap the Greddy for the upcoming PTP unit. 350+ rwhp.
Mazda RX8 = $30,000-$35000
Corvette Z06 = $65000-$70000
Yeah, that's a good comparison.
If you want more hp then swap the Greddy for the upcoming PTP unit. 350+ rwhp.
#31
Humpin legs and takin nam
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Clearwater, Fl
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RM is only promising 270 - 280 RWHP... the 740 is MAX for the BLOWER.. not on our car.. That's what the article/chart says. It's just a tiny bit misleading.
Originally Posted by Greddyturbo1
P.S Maybe it's wishful thinking on my part , Because even though I love my RX8 the 284 rwhp I have, is just not enough with today's cars... I drove my friends Corvette's ZO6 and that damn car would kill the RX8. With all the new sport cars out and coming out the RX8 is left behind by many.
I would prefer to keep my 8 , but I'am getting anxious again for more power, And the ZO6 sure has it. I still prefer the looks of my Rx8 with all the modes I did..
I would prefer to keep my 8 , but I'am getting anxious again for more power, And the ZO6 sure has it. I still prefer the looks of my Rx8 with all the modes I did..
#32
Go Texas Longhorns!
Originally Posted by Fanman
What upgrades ? So far no real upgrades for the Renesis to make the engine more bulletproof. There were rumors that some ceramic apex seals were out, but to date nobody has them on their car.
One of the things we learned at sevenstock, and it was a theme across the board from various shops and rotary experts, (Mazdatrix, Rob Goldman, Rick Engman) is that the stock apex seals are plenty strong.
Mazda has invested 30+ years and God knows how much money in getting the apex seals right. I bet more development $$$ has gone into the apex seals than all other projects combined.
The problem with people popping them is not the seals, its the TUNING. There are people pushing 500+ WHP through stock seals and having no issues what so ever. The key is a properly tuned and managed engine.
Several aftermarket FI folks have even commented that the Renesis is even more durable. Pettit drove around with their car detonating due to a broken air-to-water intercooler pump and didn't blow the engine.
don't waste money trying to upgrade your seals. Take the $2,000+ and get a good ECU and get it properly dyno tuned.
Last edited by brillo; 11-16-2005 at 11:35 AM.
#34
Registered
It's not so much a matter of wants but a matter of what I can afford. Pretty sure the trade in value on my car(s) wouldn't put much of a dent in the price of an F-16.
#36
Originally Posted by rotarygod
For as much more money as a Z06 is it sure as hell better be faster than an RX-8! Why do people always want to make worthless ridiculous comparisons between cars? This is like saying my Civic is slower than an RX-8 so Honda needs to step up their game to be competitive. They aren't even in the same class. If you like the Z-06 that much, go buy one. Mazda has a niche market with the RX-8. They don't have to do crap. My car will never be as fast as an F-16. I'm not about to trade up.
1.Why do people make worthless ridiculous comparisons
I didnt' make these comparisons, Mazda did when they said this was a true sports car. Should we compare the RX8 to civics then..
2. So I guess your thinking is then, the 350z is not in the corvette's league or can't be competitive with the corvette...
3. They don't have to do crap, well then Mazda shouldn't say it's a true sports car then...
4. Your blowing this all out of proportion.. Bad day hey..
#37
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: El Centro, Ca.
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Greddyturbo1
Rotarygod,
1.Why do people make worthless ridiculous comparisons
I didnt' make these comparisons, Mazda did when they said this was a true sports car. Should we compare the RX8 to civics then..
2. So I guess your thinking is then, the 350z is not in the corvette's league or can't be competitive with the corvette...
3. They don't have to do crap, well then Mazda shouldn't say it's a true sports car then...
4. Your blowing this all out of proportion.. Bad day hey..
1.Why do people make worthless ridiculous comparisons
I didnt' make these comparisons, Mazda did when they said this was a true sports car. Should we compare the RX8 to civics then..
2. So I guess your thinking is then, the 350z is not in the corvette's league or can't be competitive with the corvette...
3. They don't have to do crap, well then Mazda shouldn't say it's a true sports car then...
4. Your blowing this all out of proportion.. Bad day hey..
#38
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: El Centro, Ca.
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Richard Paul
I'm just asking that someone teach me how you get more CFM IN WITHOUT ADDING PRESSURE.
#39
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Virginia/Maryland
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
I disagree. A bigger turbo will deliver a greater mass of oxygen because it will be operating in a more efficient area. But the volume (or cfm) will be the same for the same psi.
#40
Who the hell is comparing the RX-8 or the Z to a Z06!?! The new Z06 is a super high performance car bordering on supercar performance. The Z or RX-8 is not in the same league as any new vette period.
AFAIC the RX-8 is NOT a true sports car, more like a sport sedan. The Z coupe is NOT a true sports car either, its a sport coupe, i don't know what to classify the vert. The miata is, the S2k is, Boxster is, and it prety much ends right there. IMO the Z06 is NOT a true sports car, its a beast!
AFAIC the RX-8 is NOT a true sports car, more like a sport sedan. The Z coupe is NOT a true sports car either, its a sport coupe, i don't know what to classify the vert. The miata is, the S2k is, Boxster is, and it prety much ends right there. IMO the Z06 is NOT a true sports car, its a beast!
#42
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Greddyturbo1
Rotarygod,
1.Why do people make worthless ridiculous comparisons
I didnt' make these comparisons, Mazda did when they said this was a true sports car. Should we compare the RX8 to civics then..
2. So I guess your thinking is then, the 350z is not in the corvette's league or can't be competitive with the corvette...
3. They don't have to do crap, well then Mazda shouldn't say it's a true sports car then...
4. Your blowing this all out of proportion.. Bad day hey..
1.Why do people make worthless ridiculous comparisons
I didnt' make these comparisons, Mazda did when they said this was a true sports car. Should we compare the RX8 to civics then..
2. So I guess your thinking is then, the 350z is not in the corvette's league or can't be competitive with the corvette...
3. They don't have to do crap, well then Mazda shouldn't say it's a true sports car then...
4. Your blowing this all out of proportion.. Bad day hey..
2A. The 350Z stock to stock will get absolutely massacred by a stock Corvette, let alone a Z06...so yes, you can't compare the 2. Anymore than you can compare an RX8 to a Corvette. To get equal performance would involve a hell of a lot more than simply strapping on a turbo or SC kit.
#43
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by brillo
Save a few extreme circumstances (and I'm talking Abel's drag car here), there is ABSOLUTELY no reason to upgrade the stock apex seals to ceramic or any larger type of seal.
One of the things we learned at sevenstock, and it was a theme across the board from various shops and rotary experts, (Mazdatrix, Rob Goldman, Rick Engman) is that the stock apex seals are plenty strong.
Mazda has invested 30+ years and God knows how much money in getting the apex seals right. I bet more development $$$ has gone into the apex seals than all other projects combined.
The problem with people popping them is not the seals, its the TUNING. There are people pushing 500+ WHP through stock seals and having no issues what so ever. The key is a properly tuned and managed engine.
Several aftermarket FI folks have even commented that the Renesis is even more durable. Pettit drove around with their car detonating due to a broken air-to-water intercooler pump and didn't blow the engine.
don't waste money trying to upgrade your seals. Take the $2,000+ and get a good ECU and get it properly dyno tuned.
One of the things we learned at sevenstock, and it was a theme across the board from various shops and rotary experts, (Mazdatrix, Rob Goldman, Rick Engman) is that the stock apex seals are plenty strong.
Mazda has invested 30+ years and God knows how much money in getting the apex seals right. I bet more development $$$ has gone into the apex seals than all other projects combined.
The problem with people popping them is not the seals, its the TUNING. There are people pushing 500+ WHP through stock seals and having no issues what so ever. The key is a properly tuned and managed engine.
Several aftermarket FI folks have even commented that the Renesis is even more durable. Pettit drove around with their car detonating due to a broken air-to-water intercooler pump and didn't blow the engine.
don't waste money trying to upgrade your seals. Take the $2,000+ and get a good ECU and get it properly dyno tuned.
#44
Registered
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: El Centro, Ca.
Posts: 422
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rkostolni
I disagree. A bigger turbo will deliver a greater mass of oxygen because it will be operating in a more efficient area. But the volume (or cfm) will be the same for the same psi.
Let me give you an example using a FD.
a FD with the stock turbo running at 15 psi will make about 350whp with all the bolts on mods and ECU.
take the same FD and put a GT40R run it at 15psi and you will see 400whp.
Last edited by hondasr4kids; 11-17-2005 at 02:30 AM.
#45
Go Texas Longhorns!
Originally Posted by Fanman
I agree with you about the tuning & fuel delivery. When I made that statement it was when people were quoting the 725 hp figure for this supercharger. At that hp level...I would say that you need major engine strengthening.
#46
Registered
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Milwaukee Wi.
Posts: 997
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Sephiroth
Who the hell is comparing the RX-8 or the Z to a Z06!?! The new Z06 is a super high performance car bordering on supercar performance. The Z or RX-8 is not in the same league as any new vette period.
AFAIC the RX-8 is NOT a true sports car, more like a sport sedan. The Z coupe is NOT a true sports car either, its a sport coupe, i don't know what to classify the vert. The miata is, the S2k is, Boxster is, and it prety much ends right there. IMO the Z06 is NOT a true sports car, its a beast!
AFAIC the RX-8 is NOT a true sports car, more like a sport sedan. The Z coupe is NOT a true sports car either, its a sport coupe, i don't know what to classify the vert. The miata is, the S2k is, Boxster is, and it prety much ends right there. IMO the Z06 is NOT a true sports car, its a beast!
#47
Registered
iTrader: (5)
Originally Posted by hondasr4kids
Bigger turbo will delivery more air at the same PSI than a small one. That's how you get more CFM without adding more pressure. Then the problem is lag.
OK, you have this hole to fill called an engine. It is just so big inside. So you get a compressor that will flow so much air at so much psi.
Now I go out and get a bigger one that flows even more air at a lower psi. Mine has more efficiency then yours or anyone elses. Mine is made by Mother Nature. It's called ambiant pressure. It has all the CFM in all the World. If you can get more CFM in without raising pressure then mine will take all the air in and around the world in. It will take everything with it including you into the engine.
GET IT?
And a Z06 will run within a few tics of a 575 Ferrari. Do we compare the 8 to those next?
Last edited by Richard Paul; 11-17-2005 at 10:16 AM.
#48
Originally Posted by Roaddemon
That's how I see it too, but that's old fashion thinking. Nowadays all the above mentioned cars are all considered sportscars by the magazine professionals. The Z06 is in a league all by itself but they call it a sportscar too. Seems alot depends on size style and wieght distribution when classifying these as sportscars.
#49
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Virginia/Maryland
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by hondasr4kids
There is not I disagree or agree, it just how it works. The only way you are going to deliver more oxygen, is if you add a oxygen tank. The compressor gets it's air or Oxygen from the ambient air, so explain how the oxygen level will increase? The bigger the compressor the more CFM it will move even at the same psi.
Let me give you an example using a FD.
a FD with the stock turbo running at 15 psi will make about 350whp with all the bolts on mods and ECU.
take the same FD and put a GT40R run it at 15psi and you will see 400whp.
Let me give you an example using a FD.
a FD with the stock turbo running at 15 psi will make about 350whp with all the bolts on mods and ECU.
take the same FD and put a GT40R run it at 15psi and you will see 400whp.
The reason you will get more oxygen into the engine with a larger turbo is because at higher boost levels the larger turbo will be operating at a higher efficiency than a smaller turbo. So it will heat the air less and the result will be more dense air, hence more oxygen molecules per cubic foot.
PV-nRT, if you heat a gas (air) up, and keep its pressure the same the volume will increase, -> It becomes less dense. So 1 cu ft. box of air sealed up with the air at 100 degrees has less oxygen in it then then a 1 cu. ft. box that was sealed up at 50 degrees.
Look at a compressor map for a big turbo and a small turbo, you will see that once the boost/cfm passes its sweet spot, the efficiency will go down and heat will go up. With a big turbo that sweet spot is located at higher boost and cfm levels.
Last edited by rkostolni; 11-17-2005 at 10:50 AM.
#50
Registered
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Virginia/Maryland
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
The best comparison I can make is its equivalent to a wire with a voltage applied to it. The wire is the engine, it has a certain resistance to current, much like the engine has a resistance to air flow. For a certain voltage (psi), a certain specified current (AIR) will flow determined by I=V/R. In order to move more current (air), you have to increase the force pushing it, or (psi).
So for a given engine, turbo A capable of flowing more cfm than turbo B will not necessarily do so, even though it could, without the turbo applying additional force to the air.
But the advantage of the larger turbo is that it can apply the greater force (PSI) without heating up the air as much.
So a GT30 will flow the same CFM as the T618Z on the Renesis at 10psi, because the Renesis resistance to flow is unchanged, the force applied by the turbo to move the air is the same (10psi). But, the GT30, will have a greater Mass flow rate because it is more efficient at that point. So it will heat the air less -> More oxygen ->More HP.
2 Notes:
1. The bigger turbo will flow more cfm than a smaller turbo at the same psi, if the smaller turbo has reached its surge limit.
2. The smaller turbo will have an efficiency advantage at lower boost/CFM levels though. So the larger turbo is not necessarily better, it just depends what your boost and cfm requirements are.
So for a given engine, turbo A capable of flowing more cfm than turbo B will not necessarily do so, even though it could, without the turbo applying additional force to the air.
But the advantage of the larger turbo is that it can apply the greater force (PSI) without heating up the air as much.
So a GT30 will flow the same CFM as the T618Z on the Renesis at 10psi, because the Renesis resistance to flow is unchanged, the force applied by the turbo to move the air is the same (10psi). But, the GT30, will have a greater Mass flow rate because it is more efficient at that point. So it will heat the air less -> More oxygen ->More HP.
2 Notes:
1. The bigger turbo will flow more cfm than a smaller turbo at the same psi, if the smaller turbo has reached its surge limit.
2. The smaller turbo will have an efficiency advantage at lower boost/CFM levels though. So the larger turbo is not necessarily better, it just depends what your boost and cfm requirements are.
Last edited by rkostolni; 11-17-2005 at 11:23 AM.