Notices
Series I Major Horsepower Upgrades This is the place to discuss Super Chargers and Turbos, Nitrous, Porting, etc

ITB'S Can it be done?

Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 03:22 AM
  #101  
bse50's Avatar
#50
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,521
Likes: 11
From: Caput Mundi
We're trying to delay the throttle bodies using the factory intake manifold's solenoids, it's a pain in the ****!
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 09:12 AM
  #102  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
Originally Posted by bse50
Not really, it mostly depends on the tune.
We're experimenting with this ITB setup to see if we can get rid somehow of the intake that chokes the engine at high rpm (above stock levels) since this is the only way of getting some numbers from the 13b-msp.
I can't believe I never responded to this. While an ITB may work beautifully, this quote is an invalid reason to use them. The intake is not what is holding the Renesis back in terms of power. The factory ports can flow 300 hp n/a and the intake manifold and tb even more so that's not the issue. The real problem with the Renesis in terms of getting big power is the exhaust ports. The intake is fine. The exhaust ports are good for about 260 hp n/a give or take a few regardless of how the intake is designed or ported although I've heard that with efficiency gains inside the engine 280 is possible. That had nothing to do with the intake though.

I'd love to see ITB's. I think it would sound neat and the throttle response could be real nice. Of course the powerband won't be as wide as the factory manifold but depending on the intended application that may be a nonissue anyways.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 03:40 PM
  #103  
bse50's Avatar
#50
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,521
Likes: 11
From: Caput Mundi
Originally Posted by rotarygod
I can't believe I never responded to this. While an ITB may work beautifully, this quote is an invalid reason to use them. The intake is not what is holding the Renesis back in terms of power. The factory ports can flow 300 hp n/a and the intake manifold and tb even more so that's not the issue. The real problem with the Renesis in terms of getting big power is the exhaust ports. The intake is fine. The exhaust ports are good for about 260 hp n/a give or take a few regardless of how the intake is designed or ported although I've heard that with efficiency gains inside the engine 280 is possible. That had nothing to do with the intake though.

I'd love to see ITB's. I think it would sound neat and the throttle response could be real nice. Of course the powerband won't be as wide as the factory manifold but depending on the intended application that may be a nonissue anyways.
Hey rgIt's nice seeing you here
I completely agree with you but, in my opinion, the engine is choked above 9000rpm. The stock pcm should handle 10.000rpm so we were trying to get rid of that high rpm choke in the aux ports basically. Then you know... you think one thing, you try another and we're slowing going on through this route, as an experiment. I love how smooth our stock intake is in terms of flow and power delivery but i really can't keep my hands in my pockets

Giorgio
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 03:49 PM
  #104  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
I like ITB's. They sound awesome and look even better. They are very different in drivability which isn't necessarily a bad thing. I just disagree that the stock intake is a restriction. It isn't. Regardless of rpm, unless you are topping 300 hp I don't see how it is hurting anything.
Reply
Old Oct 15, 2009 | 04:52 PM
  #105  
bse50's Avatar
#50
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 7,521
Likes: 11
From: Caput Mundi
I will take your word for it then. I know that the power band won't be as broad as it is now but in the end who cares
Reply
Old Oct 26, 2009 | 06:18 PM
  #106  
Benjamz's Avatar
Tony says, RX8s are GREAT
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 507
Likes: 2
From: Bay Area.
And my reason for my set-up is because I have to put the s/c where the intake manifold is. But again, mine will be like the Nissan Pulsar GTI-R style where there is a plenuim attached to the ITB's. That is where my MAF goes. I am just re-routing the sytem and adding a TB for each lower intake manifold port where it attaches to the uim.

Unfortunatly mine is on hold until I finsh some RX7 projetcs. I will start mine again in march or april. I hope to have it done by ss next year...lol
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2023 | 06:06 AM
  #107  
chrisharn's Avatar
New Member
 
Joined: Sep 2023
Posts: 1
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by 94MR2-T
Ok Thanks for your input. It was just something I was daydreaming about.
i know this post is nearly 10yrs old but has anyone done this yet using itbs of the existing manifold utilizing the oe primary secondaries 5th 6th etc?? It wouldn't be hard to 3d print an adaptor bt the sensors??
Reply
Old Sep 18, 2023 | 09:38 AM
  #108  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,932
Likes: 2,137
^^only the ones who learned the hard way …

that copied reply was in response to my comment back then, today I’d say it’s a way worse idea than I understood at that time

as per comment #102 several posts above, the OEM intake is not the issue …
.
Reply
Old Nov 23, 2023 | 03:49 PM
  #109  
MilosB's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 238
Likes: 27
Its dificult to discern between facts and feeling besides all the youtube experts promotin all kind of s#it that they do / "invent"...
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
etikoner
New Member Forum
7
Jan 15, 2018 03:25 PM
Thumper3322
Canada Forum
47
Apr 3, 2010 11:40 PM
JB_Rotary
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications
4
Jun 7, 2006 06:23 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 11:07 PM.