Define "rice"
#102
NOT SEARCHING
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by wakeech
gimme a break, moogle and i got into a little debate about this: in short, i win, Vielside is a joke.
"they have a wind tunnel"... and?? any PhD's in fluid dynamics employed there?? have they ever produced aerodynamic numbers and disclosed to the public?? please. it's all style, with big *** holes punched in it. produce proof, and i will believe.
some are functional, vielside is not. high style for the show-car crowd, but not the height of high speed engineering (it's the motors, not the aero of the cars that's making all the difference)
btw, fibreglass will never be lighter than the stock panels (unless it's too flimsy to use in world speed records). polyurethane (the very pricey stuff) can be, though, as can aluminum, well done (ie, not rice) carbon fibre, and other materials as well...
"they have a wind tunnel"... and?? any PhD's in fluid dynamics employed there?? have they ever produced aerodynamic numbers and disclosed to the public?? please. it's all style, with big *** holes punched in it. produce proof, and i will believe.
some are functional, vielside is not. high style for the show-car crowd, but not the height of high speed engineering (it's the motors, not the aero of the cars that's making all the difference)
btw, fibreglass will never be lighter than the stock panels (unless it's too flimsy to use in world speed records). polyurethane (the very pricey stuff) can be, though, as can aluminum, well done (ie, not rice) carbon fibre, and other materials as well...
#105
BLAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SHOWOFF
Yeah I guess Auto Exe wind tunnel tests all of their kits for "style"
I doubt that many, if any, of these companies optimize their bodykits for aerodynamics, they appear a little to extreme to be aerodynamically efficient. But they looks cool, so that's what matters
I have offered my services to many car companies in the aerodynamics departments, and I have never heard back.
Originally Posted by SHOWOFF
#106
I have a simple definition of "rice". It's a mod that improves neither appearance nor performance nor comfort. It serves one function only: "LOOK AT ME! BECAUSE HEY, ATTENTION FOR A BAD REASON IS STILL ATTENTION!"
And ricers are NOT the modern version of hot rodders / gearheads / whatever you want to call them. No, their closest relatives on the aftermarket family tree would be the minitruckers, which was real big 10 years ago and seems like it's fizzled out a lot since then. Murals of ugly naked broads are out and faux performance is in.
Disclaimers: Not everyone who mods an import is a ricer. If you do something to actually increase performance, it is not rice by my definition above. And there is nothing wrong with making improvements to a car's appearance. And yes, there was/is plenty of tacky crap going way back in the days of custom rods and such.
And ricers are NOT the modern version of hot rodders / gearheads / whatever you want to call them. No, their closest relatives on the aftermarket family tree would be the minitruckers, which was real big 10 years ago and seems like it's fizzled out a lot since then. Murals of ugly naked broads are out and faux performance is in.
Disclaimers: Not everyone who mods an import is a ricer. If you do something to actually increase performance, it is not rice by my definition above. And there is nothing wrong with making improvements to a car's appearance. And yes, there was/is plenty of tacky crap going way back in the days of custom rods and such.
#107
Registered User
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 624
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Haven't read through these 8 pages or "RICE" and not sure if anyones added this.
A perfect example of rice is any exhaust or intake that goes on the 8.
FULL STOP.
Exhaust is made for better flow, this thing is loud, its big, it stands out but doesn't do its job, and that is to make the damn thing more powerful, it doesnt.
A perfect example of rice is any exhaust or intake that goes on the 8.
FULL STOP.
Exhaust is made for better flow, this thing is loud, its big, it stands out but doesn't do its job, and that is to make the damn thing more powerful, it doesnt.
#108
NOT SEARCHING
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by RXP33D
Haven't read through these 8 pages or "RICE" and not sure if anyones added this.
A perfect example of rice is any exhaust or intake that goes on the 8.
FULL STOP.
Exhaust is made for better flow, this thing is loud, its big, it stands out but doesn't do its job, and that is to make the damn thing more powerful, it doesnt.
A perfect example of rice is any exhaust or intake that goes on the 8.
FULL STOP.
Exhaust is made for better flow, this thing is loud, its big, it stands out but doesn't do its job, and that is to make the damn thing more powerful, it doesnt.
#109
NOT SEARCHING
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by BaronVonBigmeat
I have a simple definition of "rice". It's a mod that improves neither appearance nor performance nor comfort. It serves one function only: "LOOK AT ME! BECAUSE HEY, ATTENTION FOR A BAD REASON IS STILL ATTENTION!"
And ricers are NOT the modern version of hot rodders / gearheads / whatever you want to call them. No, their closest relatives on the aftermarket family tree would be the minitruckers, which was real big 10 years ago and seems like it's fizzled out a lot since then. Murals of ugly naked broads are out and faux performance is in.
Disclaimers: Not everyone who mods an import is a ricer. If you do something to actually increase performance, it is not rice by my definition above. And there is nothing wrong with making improvements to a car's appearance. And yes, there was/is plenty of tacky crap going way back in the days of custom rods and such.
And ricers are NOT the modern version of hot rodders / gearheads / whatever you want to call them. No, their closest relatives on the aftermarket family tree would be the minitruckers, which was real big 10 years ago and seems like it's fizzled out a lot since then. Murals of ugly naked broads are out and faux performance is in.
Disclaimers: Not everyone who mods an import is a ricer. If you do something to actually increase performance, it is not rice by my definition above. And there is nothing wrong with making improvements to a car's appearance. And yes, there was/is plenty of tacky crap going way back in the days of custom rods and such.
You used to be able to slap a big carburetor on a car and open up the exhaust and have a fast car. Or cram the biggest engine you could find into your car in an afternoon with a do-it-yourselfer's tool box and a buddy's help, but now you can't even get modern cars running right witout a dyno and some ability to tune it.
Hell even tuners like SHM (sean hiland motorsports) known for their Mustang tuning abilities are tuning cars like RSX's.
Small displacement cars with big HP are the thing of the future. Hell I was tuning my 1st DSM car in 1992 over 12 years ago. That was back when I was using Allied Signal turbos off of over the road diesel trucks.
#110
BLAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by SHOWOFF
The days of the big V-8 Muscle car are OVER.
Different strokes for different folks 'showoff'
I would never ever consider buy an economy car and making it 'unique' I would however, consider buying a modern muscle car.
#111
NOT SEARCHING
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by shigginsrx8
Why?
Different strokes for different folks 'showoff'
I would never ever consider buy an economy car and making it 'unique' I would however, consider buying a modern muscle car.
Different strokes for different folks 'showoff'
I would never ever consider buy an economy car and making it 'unique' I would however, consider buying a modern muscle car.
Mustang- Don't get me started, might as well be
Firebird/TA- Dead
Magnum- WTF? It's a glorified station wagon. It'll lose it's "pizazz" soon enough
If there is soooo much demand for these cars then why are the "Big 3" killing them off?
#112
NOT SEARCHING
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Olathe, KS
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by shigginsrx8
Why?
Different strokes for different folks 'showoff'
I would never ever consider buy an economy car and making it 'unique' I would however, consider buying a modern muscle car.
Different strokes for different folks 'showoff'
I would never ever consider buy an economy car and making it 'unique' I would however, consider buying a modern muscle car.
Mustang- Don't get me started, might as well be
Firebird/TA- Dead
Magnum- WTF? It's a glorified station wagon. It'll lose it's "pizazz" soon enough
If there is soooo much demand for these cars then why are the "Big 3" killing them off?
A lot of the guys I work with have teenage kids in the 13-14 year old range. You know what they all want to have for their 1st car. Ususally a sport compact. I really don't hear any of them asking their parents for a Mustang or a Camaro. These kids are the future, they will be on the showroom floors of America in a few years buying their first new car. The only 2 door V-8 muscle car they can choose from is the Mustang. Trust me they are not beating down the doors trying to get one. The middle aged guy is the typical buyer on that car. The Magnum isn't marketed at the youth market, the SRT-4 is.
#113
Originally Posted by SHOWOFF
So wrong. We'll see in 10 years when this stuff is STILL around. The days of the big V-8 Muscle car are OVER. Who cares if Dodge has intro'd the HEMI. Their Magnum will follow the ways of everything else they build, it will be hot for a while and then it wil look dated as all of their products end up. I used to be a big muscle car head but I realized those cars are becoming a thing of the past.
I am not saying that performance modifications ("tuning", "hot rodding", etc.) are the exclusive realm of traditional V8 muscle cars by any means. There are plenty of guys making RX-7's, Supras, Miatas, Z's, etc. faster. Those are not ricers. "Rice", by my humble definition, is mods that don't make the car faster, but don't make the car look better either. They are faux performance mods that look like dog ****.
Originally Posted by SHOWOFF
Camaro- dead
Mustang- Don't get me started, might as well be
Firebird/TA- Dead
Magnum- WTF? It's a glorified station wagon. It'll lose it's "pizazz" soon enough
If there is soooo much demand for these cars then why are the "Big 3" killing them off?
A lot of the guys I work with have teenage kids in the 13-14 year old range. You know what they all want to have for their 1st car. Ususally a sport compact. I really don't hear any of them asking their parents for a Mustang or a Camaro. These kids are the future, they will be on the showroom floors of America in a few years buying their first new car. The only 2 door V-8 muscle car they can choose from is the Mustang. Trust me they are not beating down the doors trying to get one. The middle aged guy is the typical buyer on that car. The Magnum isn't marketed at the youth market, the SRT-4 is.
Mustang- Don't get me started, might as well be
Firebird/TA- Dead
Magnum- WTF? It's a glorified station wagon. It'll lose it's "pizazz" soon enough
If there is soooo much demand for these cars then why are the "Big 3" killing them off?
A lot of the guys I work with have teenage kids in the 13-14 year old range. You know what they all want to have for their 1st car. Ususally a sport compact. I really don't hear any of them asking their parents for a Mustang or a Camaro. These kids are the future, they will be on the showroom floors of America in a few years buying their first new car. The only 2 door V-8 muscle car they can choose from is the Mustang. Trust me they are not beating down the doors trying to get one. The middle aged guy is the typical buyer on that car. The Magnum isn't marketed at the youth market, the SRT-4 is.
(If you want to say that the younger crowd isn't real hot on the whole retro style trend--yeah, I'll agree. I think the Mustang and/or a resurrected Camaro would have a lot of appeal if they just had a more forward-looking style to them. I think Ford has forgotten that the original Mustang was actually a somewhat futuristic Italian-looking type car, not a retro-machine. For it's price tag, I think the Mustang GT is plenty competitive however.)
Kids want a sport compact, there's a surprise. A very, very stupid movie comes out, aimed at the high school demographic, in which (mostly) economy cars clad in tacky fiberglass crap and big sparkly bling are portrayed as being too fast and too furious. Wow, slick marketing and hollywood pulp influence gullible youths, film at 11.
Let's be honest, most kids driving a riced out civic or cavalier or what have you are driving it because it's what they can afford. Or their parents are willing to pay.
Last edited by BaronVonBigmeat; 11-18-2004 at 07:38 PM.
#115
Normality is Obscene
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: AL/GA...you pick
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
i always kinda thought of my Integra as pushing the rice envelope...but i tell ya...after FI and Nitrous..it wasn't much of an economy car anymore..
i did get smarter though...i purchased a 95 300zx SMZ for my second car...
i did get smarter though...i purchased a 95 300zx SMZ for my second car...
#116
BLAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
While I have respect for the amount of work that went into a car like that, I just can't respect the actual car, IMO. With FI and nitrous that car was probably pushin a ton power through the front wheels, it just seems *** backwards to me. That is my single biggest complaint with tuners today. If I were a kid right now, I would be petitioning car companies to make an affordable RWD car, to hell with this FWD bs. A RWD civic type R would be a sweet little car.
The coolest sport compact I ever saw was a a Toyota? Starlet, I think. Anyhow, it was naturally rwd, about the size of a golf. That thing just looked like a blast to drive.
300zx though, thats good **** right there.
The coolest sport compact I ever saw was a a Toyota? Starlet, I think. Anyhow, it was naturally rwd, about the size of a golf. That thing just looked like a blast to drive.
300zx though, thats good **** right there.
#117
I think the degeneration of this thread proves my point very succinctly. Rice is, as proven here, anything that you don't like Can we all move along now? I'll go back to spending *MY* money on what *I* like.. not what you don't like or think is useless
#119
Normality is Obscene
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: AL/GA...you pick
Posts: 1,053
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yes shiggins you're right...i was 18 when i first started on that car and now that i'm much older it just seems silly to me that i spent that much money and time on something of that nature...have you ever seen a FWD with slicks on the front? it is hilarious...i'll try and dig up some more pics from when it was actually at the track doing runs...these are 10-12 year old pics so it's hard to find them in the chaos that is our attic...but this car..being as it was...put my shop on the map when I opened it...and then i purchased the 300...now that really did my shop wonders until I almost was killed when a DOT truck sent a shovel through the gas tank...
#121
Registered User
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Walnut, CA
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by webba_az
I hope I don't **** too many people off here... but the overall feel I get from this site is that it's average reader is probably 10-15 years older than I am (I'm 26) and they like one specific look (stock or MS only) and everything else is crap and disgusting and they will flame the pee out of you if you disagree.. this is why I generally don't get involved with these discussions
MikeB, are the meets still running, and how are they now? Dull? Exciting?
#122
BLAAAAAAAHHHHH!!!!
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Chicago
Posts: 367
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
hmmm, I don't know man. I am sure some people on this site are like that, but I don't think the majority would 'hate on' a car because it doesn't have mazdaspeed parts.
For myself, I wouldn't show too much interest in a car that is all stickered up with a giant wing at 22's, but anything else will probably catch my attention. I think the problem is that there really aren't too many aftermarket parts out there for the 8's yet, at least as far as performance goes. It is hard to be different when there aren't a lot of different parts available, and the quality of some of the available aftermarket stuff is suspect at best. That is why I believe so many have a hard on for MS parts.
I will say this, some of the appearance mods out there are, to put it nicely, function follows form. That just isn't appealing to a lot of people, especially someone like me who has a doctorate in fluids and doesnt really did the 2f2f mentality.
For myself, I wouldn't show too much interest in a car that is all stickered up with a giant wing at 22's, but anything else will probably catch my attention. I think the problem is that there really aren't too many aftermarket parts out there for the 8's yet, at least as far as performance goes. It is hard to be different when there aren't a lot of different parts available, and the quality of some of the available aftermarket stuff is suspect at best. That is why I believe so many have a hard on for MS parts.
I will say this, some of the appearance mods out there are, to put it nicely, function follows form. That just isn't appealing to a lot of people, especially someone like me who has a doctorate in fluids and doesnt really did the 2f2f mentality.
Last edited by shigginsrx8; 11-19-2004 at 06:55 PM.
#123
shiggins, I understand the "functions follows form".. but if all we wanted to do was go fast, why are we driving cars? We should have street bikes, no? The way the 8 is styled stock is a great deal of style over substance.. but that's part of the package.. I just want my package to be different, bigger and better than everyone elses..
Hrm.. that sounded awful penile.. *shrug*
Hrm.. that sounded awful penile.. *shrug*
#124
Originally Posted by SHOWOFF
The days of the big V-8 Muscle car are OVER.
#125
Originally Posted by webba_az
shiggins, I understand the "functions follows form".. but if all we wanted to do was go fast, why are we driving cars? We should have street bikes, no? The way the 8 is styled stock is a great deal of style over substance.. but that's part of the package.. I just want my package to be different, bigger and better than everyone elses..
Hrm.. that sounded awful penile.. *shrug*
Hrm.. that sounded awful penile.. *shrug*
Granted, there is a certain amount of a gray area between "racey" looking and "ricey" that not everyone will agree on. And then there are some things which are just flagrant rice-a-roni. Like a giant aluminum wing on a four-door FWD automatic economy sedan (corolla, cavalier, civic). Or the front end kits with ridiculous amounts of fins, scoops, and creases for no apparent reason. No, no, no.
Last edited by BaronVonBigmeat; 11-20-2004 at 08:32 AM.