Notices
Series I Do It Yourself Forum Wanna save some coin or time/money in the shop? Read up on Do-It-Yourself custom mods and repairs & post your own here.

DIY: Throttle body bypass mod

Thread Tools
 
Rating: Thread Rating: 8 votes, 4.75 average.
 
Old Apr 19, 2007 | 04:50 PM
  #126  
djaaron07's Avatar
Burbank, CA
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 4
Likes: 0
From: Burbank, Ca
I just re-routed my coolant to the flux capacitor !!!
Reply
Old Apr 23, 2007 | 10:27 PM
  #127  
RxJaye's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Lexington KY
Just to clear up the reason why some manufactures run coolant through the throttle body. It is for emissions, The same reason cars run a min 195 degree thermostat. The less dense air means less fuel, less fuel means more complete fuel mixture burns. More complete fuel mixture burns mean less emissions coming from the tail pipe. For those that don't know, the rotary engine was always bad on fuel mileage and emissions, Emissions was the reason the RX-7 was not sold here for years. If you take the coolant out of the throttle body it is kinda like the old trick of putting a lower thermostat in, Colder air=dense air. Dense air=more air, More air=more fuel, more fuel=more power. more fuel also = less mpg, more emissions. So please stop with the stupid BS of icing T-body plates.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 01:26 PM
  #128  
Nubo's Avatar
Lubricious
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area, California
Originally Posted by RxJaye
Just to clear up the reason why some manufactures run coolant through the throttle body. It is for emissions, The same reason cars run a min 195 degree thermostat. The less dense air means less fuel, less fuel means more complete fuel mixture burns. More complete fuel mixture burns mean less emissions coming from the tail pipe. For those that don't know, the rotary engine was always bad on fuel mileage and emissions, Emissions was the reason the RX-7 was not sold here for years. If you take the coolant out of the throttle body it is kinda like the old trick of putting a lower thermostat in, Colder air=dense air. Dense air=more air, More air=more fuel, more fuel=more power. more fuel also = less mpg, more emissions. So please stop with the stupid BS of icing T-body plates.
As someone previously noted, the amount of heat transfer from a small coolant line into hundreds of CFM of air is minimal. They are not trying to heat the air, they are trying to warm the throttle body. To begin with, the shape of the throttle body does not promote efficient heat transfer into the air. Does not make sense as an emmissions measure either. The fuel/air ratio is precisely controlled by the ECU. Trying to create a leaner mixture by such an imprecise method as running coolant through the throttle body, makes no sense when the ECU already controls the mixture precisely. And, btw, would immediately compensate for any minor heating the throttle body heating would do. And also consider that the engineers deliberately designed a fresh-air intake -- for the express purpose of getting COLDER/DENSER air into the engine! The effect of the VFAD on intake temperature easily outweighs the effect of throttle body heating by a factor of a thousand times. And, limiting power as you suggest, even if it worked that way, would not limit emmissions. The driver would just push down the pedal a bit more to get the desired power.

Before you call BS on the icing issue, take time to read some of the references.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 07:01 PM
  #129  
Ro-T8's Avatar
give 'er some stick!
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 7
Likes: 0
From: State of Denial
Yep - emissions reasons are BS. Higher combustion temps yeild higher emissions (well, NOx / SOx anyway, CO comes down with combustion temp...). Read any combustion textbook. Also, absolutely not enough heat transfer area to conduct heat to the air (the TB is not designed like a radiator). The "coolant" was there to keep the TB hot.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 09:02 PM
  #130  
RxJaye's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Lexington KY
It took you guys 2 years to come up wityh this BS. It is emissions related, ask anyone with a history in Vehicle performance.... Sorry im just a Master Technician, i have no idea what im talking about. Collage training, Factory training and accually working on cars everyday shouldnt make my opinion any more valid, Just the simple fact that I understand how a car works does. But if you guys want to debate it for another couple of years go ahead, I find it amusing.
Reply
Old Apr 25, 2007 | 09:25 PM
  #131  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by RxJaye
It took you guys 2 years to come up wityh this BS. It is emissions related, ask anyone with a history in Vehicle performance.... Sorry im just a Master Technician, i have no idea what im talking about. Collage training, Factory training and accually working on cars everyday shouldnt make my opinion any more valid, Just the simple fact that I understand how a car works does. But if you guys want to debate it for another couple of years go ahead, I find it amusing.
The days of carburetted engines are long gone. There is only one reason for the coolant going through the throttle body these days - it's to prevent the throttle body being blocked due to a mix of condensation, humidity and cold temperatures.
Reply
Old Apr 26, 2007 | 10:21 PM
  #132  
RxJaye's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Lexington KY
Carburation? No one said anything about a carb. Anyway, Ill let you all debate on this for another couple of years. I stand by my explaination, because it is right. By the way the heat of the engine compartment would thaw out a throttle body if it was to freeze anyway, but they dont. Thats just ignorance.
Reply
Old Apr 27, 2007 | 02:57 PM
  #133  
Nubo's Avatar
Lubricious
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 3,425
Likes: 4
From: SF Bay Area, California
Here's an alternative explanation of what the coolant line may be for -- activation of the FIAV (fast idle air valve). I don't know if this has been mentioned. I will still stand by my assertion that the purpose is NOT to warm the incoming air, because that is just physically impossible given the amount of flow and the surfaces involved.

Anyway, this FIAV thing makes a lot of sense.

http://www.stealth316.com/2-3s-tb.htm

So, it would seem that blocking the line isn't going to give you performance boost, but might give you idle problems.

What say you, Master Technician?

Last edited by Nubo; Apr 27, 2007 at 03:02 PM.
Reply
Old Apr 28, 2007 | 12:26 AM
  #134  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
That's for Piston engines. Our's is controlled by the ECU.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 07:54 AM
  #135  
h-khunterkiller's Avatar
for hire
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 172
Likes: 0
From: broward
Originally Posted by RxJaye
Just to clear up the reason why some manufactures run coolant through the throttle body. It is for emissions, The same reason cars run a min 195 degree thermostat. The less dense air means less fuel, less fuel means more complete fuel mixture burns. More complete fuel mixture burns mean less emissions coming from the tail pipe. For those that don't know, the rotary engine was always bad on fuel mileage and emissions, Emissions was the reason the RX-7 was not sold here for years. If you take the coolant out of the throttle body it is kinda like the old trick of putting a lower thermostat in, Colder air=dense air. Dense air=more air, More air=more fuel, more fuel=more power. more fuel also = less mpg, more emissions. So please stop with the stupid BS of icing T-body plates.
that makes more sense than anything else cause the car is not always sold in old climax and there is no way the throttle is going to freeze here in florida
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 07:59 PM
  #136  
RxJaye's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Lexington KY
all cars are controled by ecu or pcm now. fuel injection requires a computer. Aisian auto manufactures are big on coolant heating the incoming air charge by heating the throttle body. this is an easy inexpensive way to save on fuel milage and to help with emissions. idle air valve is controled by a stepper motor ever heard of an IAC? it is PCM controled the pcm uses IAT, MAF, ETC, O2 sensors to adjust the fuel injector pulse width to be as lean as possible without causing damage and keep idle up. The RX-7 used 40% more fuel at idle then the 8, and the 8 get crap for gas milage, so anything will help. Its not hard to understand if you think about it. Im not guessing here by the way like most of you guys.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 08:05 PM
  #137  
RxJaye's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Lexington KY
And by the way if your thottle body freezes up the car wont even start, so the cold coolant wont be able to warm up to thaw out your "frozen" throttle body. Another thing if you have a problem with water getting on the throttle body where it could possibly freeze you have worse problems than just a frozen throttle body. The reason airplanes used this is because in upper atmosphere things are cold, especially traveling a couple hundred MPH or so, plus there is alot of condensation in the air up there so things can freeze. Like i said use your brain its common sense people.
Reply
Old Apr 30, 2007 | 08:46 PM
  #138  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
Throttle bodies don't "freeze up". That is a carburettor behavior because of the presence of fuel. Since there is no significant drop in temperature across the TB (venturi effect), the only real reason for heating the intake charge is emissions.
Also, the RX-8 doesn't have an IAC.

Last edited by MazdaManiac; Apr 30, 2007 at 08:52 PM.
Reply
Old May 1, 2007 | 04:04 AM
  #139  
sosonic's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 792
Likes: 2
Nubo-
Here's an alternative explanation of what the coolant line may be for -- activation of the FIAV (fast idle air valve). I don't know if this has been mentioned. I will still stand by my assertion that the purpose is NOT to warm the incoming air, because that is just physically impossible given the amount of flow and the surfaces involved.

Anyway, this FIAV thing makes a lot of sense.
http://www.stealth316.com/2-3s-tb.htm

So, it would seem that blocking the line isn't going to give you performance boost, but might give you idle problems.

What say you, Master Technician?


all cars are controled by ecu or pcm now. fuel injection requires a computer. Aisian auto manufactures are big on coolant heating the incoming air charge by heating the throttle body. this is an easy inexpensive way to save on fuel milage and to help with emissions. idle air valve is controled by a stepper motor ever heard of an IAC? it is PCM controled the pcm uses IAT, MAF, ETC, O2 sensors to adjust the fuel injector pulse width to be as lean as possible without causing damage and keep idle up. The RX-7 used 40% more fuel at idle then the 8, and the 8 get crap for gas milage, so anything will help. Its not hard to understand if you think about it. Im not guessing here by the way like most of you guys.


Originally Posted by RxJaye
all cars are controled by ecu or pcm now. fuel injection requires a computer. Aisian auto manufactures are big on coolant heating the incoming air charge by heating the throttle body. this is an easy inexpensive way to save on fuel milage and to help with emissions. idle air valve is controled by a stepper motor ever heard of an IAC? it is PCM controled the pcm uses IAT, MAF, ETC, O2 sensors to adjust the fuel injector pulse width to be as lean as possible without causing damage and keep idle up. The RX-7 used 40% more fuel at idle then the 8, and the 8 get crap for gas milage, so anything will help. Its not hard to understand if you think about it. Im not guessing here by the way like most of you guys.

So if the "theory" of what RxJaye and Nubo are saying are correct than...

1. Would you not see a difference in idle rpm after the throttle mod?

2. Also, would you not see an overall difference in gas usage before and after this mod?

Since a number of people have done this mod, they can give information about the above 2.

Everyone that has done this mod, what do you think?
Reply
Old May 1, 2007 | 07:31 AM
  #140  
Phil's 8's Avatar
FI by Pettit-BHR-Cobb AP
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 3,026
Likes: 2
From: Sin City, Nevada
Originally Posted by sosonic
So if the "theory" of what RxJaye and Nubo are saying are correct than...

1. Would you not see a difference in idle rpm after the throttle mod?

2. Also, would you not see an overall difference in gas usage before and after this mod?

Since a number of people have done this mod, they can give information about the above 2.

Everyone that has done this mod, what do you think?
1. No decernable difference
2. No difference
Reply
Old May 1, 2007 | 04:53 PM
  #141  
RxJaye's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 130
Likes: 0
From: Lexington KY
I forget the Rx8 has ETC and doesnt need IAC for idle. But you should have no idle issues since it is pcm controlled. There will be fuel milage concerns but very minute. More noticable if you put a lower thermostat in.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 07:55 PM
  #142  
canaryrx8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,325
Likes: 2
can someone point me to where the bottom hose is again? if I'm facing the engine, is it the one kinda' buried beneath the throttle body to the left a litte? Obviously the top was a piece of cake, just want to make sure I'm yanking the correct hose from the bottom. (pretty sure I may have the right one, it's the only one connected and has the same heat blanket type covering as the top, just would like to verify first) Thanks!!
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 08:10 PM
  #143  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
Originally Posted by canaryrx8
can someone point me to where the bottom hose is again? if I'm facing the engine, is it the one kinda' buried beneath the throttle body to the left a litte? Obviously the top was a piece of cake, just want to make sure I'm yanking the correct hose from the bottom. (pretty sure I may have the right one, it's the only one connected and has the same heat blanket type covering as the top, just would like to verify first) Thanks!!
I would tell you to search, but you're already posting in the thread with the info you seek.. so I guess I'll point you to the right post ... on this very page:

https://www.rx8club.com/showpost.php...&postcount=121
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 08:17 PM
  #144  
canaryrx8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,325
Likes: 2
kickass, I had the right one, just making sure car's too hot to play anyway, so I'll be finishing this up this evening, thanks again :thumbup:
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 08:17 PM
  #145  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
Has it really gotten so bad that people ask for direction in an existing thread that already has ALL of the answers?
I've run into this a couple of times this week already and its frightening.
Is it something in the water?
It is bad enough when newbs post new threads about obviously available stuff, but for an established forum member to screw up that bad means there is something else at play.

Maybe its just hand-holding...
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 08:18 PM
  #146  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
don't worry so much, even if you pick the wrong one, what's the worse that could happen?
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 10:06 PM
  #147  
John Corbitt's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 197
Likes: 1
From: Ocala, FL
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
Throttle bodies don't "freeze up". That is a carburettor behavior because of the presence of fuel. Since there is no significant drop in temperature across the TB (venturi effect), the only real reason for heating the intake charge is emissions.
Also, the RX-8 doesn't have an IAC.
Throttle bodies can ice up. Just let some air out of a dive tank and see how cold the valve can get. Carburetors are more likely to experience icing because the phase change from liquid to gas takes heat energy out of the surrounding air in addition to venturi cooling. Fuel injected aircraft have "alternate air for freezing tb and air filters. As mentioned many times, the drop in pressure also causes a drop in temperature. This is most likely to occur at lower power settings at temps just above freezing. Most jet engines have a limitation that states " if the static air temperature is 8 degrees C, or less, in visible moisture, Cowl anti icing must
be turned on." There is no fuel any near the cowl(intake) of a jet engine. It is less likely to occur in a car since throttle position is constantly changing. Aircraft throttle plates tend to be set and stay there for a long period of time. I have had a piston engine develop ice. It got my attention as the engine sputtered as it swallowed chunks of Ice. The outside temp over Miami was about 5 C at 10,000 ft.

I wouldn't worry about it in our cars since they are at wide open throttle on a regular basis.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 10:41 PM
  #148  
09Factor's Avatar
Original Turbo 'd Auto !!
 
Joined: Mar 2004
Posts: 2,136
Likes: 5
From: Surprise, Arizona
MM, To answer your question about all of the "dumb" questions lately, It's the heat causing the "dumbness"...around here..

as for Mr Corbitts comments: I had a Bug whose carb would ice over. That was in Chicago with humidity. I rarely get to WOT the car. I run out of road too quickly.

The majority of us that did this mod live in hot arid environments.
I see intake temp of 120-170 degrees and coolant temps of 205-212.

just trying to keep as much heat out of the intake air that I can.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 10:49 PM
  #149  
MazdaManiac's Avatar
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Oct 2003
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 28
From: Under my car
Originally Posted by John Corbitt
Throttle bodies can ice up. Just let some air out of a dive tank and see how cold the valve can get.
Now, scale the manifold of a dive bottle up to the volume of an automotive throttle body and calculate how much flow is happening there.

I doubt any normal driving scenario will yield a 3000 PSI difference across the TB.
That would be one hell of a turbo.
Reply
Old Jun 22, 2007 | 11:58 PM
  #150  
canaryrx8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 4,325
Likes: 2
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
It is bad enough when newbs post new threads about obviously available stuff, but for an established forum member to screw up that bad means there is something else at play.
or maybe I've never done this type of mod before, have no clue which hose, and couldn't tell from the pics I was looking at. thanks for the help, much appreciated
Reply


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 8 votes, 4.75 average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 04:51 AM.