Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

What are the reasons that Racing Beat is so respected?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-01-2005, 01:28 PM
  #26  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Reactionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bureau13
I was going to jump all over the "too much hype" comment, but everyone pretty much beat me to it. If there's any hype, its coming from their loyal customer base, and you don't get such a base putting out crap. You certainly can't accuse THEM of hype...that would be more appropriate to the companies making obviously outrageous horsepower claims from rushed-to-market products.

The other thing I found amusing about the original post...you want someone to "prove" that the RB exhaust sounds better? HTF can anyone do that? Sound is completely subjective, if you like the RB sound buy the exhaust. If you don't, don't! I did, and I did. It really is that simple.
Well I don't think anyone really jumped all over it. Of course I meant all the hype from consumers out there and gave the example of people here whose perception gets influenced by other people here without hard evidence.

Ok I'll give you the exhaust sound comment and I knew someone would jump on that, but I did qualify with the word "richness." Ask an audiophile about CD sound or performance quality and they will insist their judgments are not subjective.

Regardless, a lot of people here have commented and hyped up the sound of Racing Beat's exhaust. And based on what? Because they truly think the sound is good or because they're jumping on the Racing Beat bandwagon?

Last edited by Reactionary; 02-01-2005 at 01:31 PM.
Old 02-01-2005, 01:36 PM
  #27  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Reactionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by zoom44
First off i trust Racing Beat. why? because ive seen their facility and talked to Jim Langer and Jim Mederer. They are very straight forward about what they do and why. You have a lot of questions and i would suggest that you actually write to Jim Langer and ask them. They will be very happy to.
You say there has been nothing done with the ecu project. thats absolutely wrong. They spent months finding out everything this ecu does and now have the ability to WRITE MAPS TO THE ECU. what other company can do that now? Why arent they selling this ability yet? because they are using this ability to tune for their FI project- another thing you say they dont have. They dont RUSH anything. when they have the FI with tuning done to their standards THEN it will be out for sale. their standards are high. id rather have something built to their standards and it take awhile to come out rather then something from a company who just wants to be first to market(think Typhoon intake).

What have they done in the past? The afore mentioned Mazdaspeed Protoge for one. Tons of good products for RX-7s and Miatas over the years. How about those suspension pieces for the 8? they are damn fine work and just exactly what many people want for their 8 without going overboard. How about land speed records? those impress you?https://www.racingbeat.com/PDF/RBHistory.pdf

ill have more later i need to get to work
Well I didn't say nothing has been done with the ECU project. I said they can't seem to get it done.

At first glance, getting selected by Mazda or Mazdaspeed to do outsourced work is quite impressive for anyone's ego, but again, I'm wondering how much of that has to do with excellence and how much as to do with socio-political prowess and/or image.
Old 02-01-2005, 01:49 PM
  #28  
dmp
RX8 and a Truk....
 
dmp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Location: OKC
Posts: 4,658
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Here's a serious question: Why do you care? Honestly. If you don't care for RB's products, simply don't buy them. Oh, the joys of Capitalism.
Old 02-01-2005, 01:57 PM
  #29  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Reactionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Gord96BRG
It's also probably the only one out there that will last as long as the stock exhaust! Quality construction for a durable product will result in a heavier product - thicker wall tubing, heavier mufflers, stronger brackets, etc.

As others have pointed out - Racing Beat actually engineers their products, they don't just copy a design from someone else for some other car and make it fit, that's it. I'm very impressed with the pieces I've seen from Racing Beat for both the Miata and RX-8 - generally top quality workmanship and materials, and no BS claims.

Regards,
Gordon
This is what I'd like to think and used to assume. Now I question it. Because just look at the springs and shocks. At the Yaw Power website and even people here have said one should never change springs alone without also changing to a matched set of shocks. Yet Racing Beat has done that. If you think about it, that could be quite a compromise. So on second thought, I can see that most consumers are rather mild and probably don't want the whole diehard setup but just want something cheap like slightly lowered springs. So Racing Beat decides to offer what most people want and at a cheap price probably in part because it is good economics for them and probably not because only Racing Beat has the engineering excellence to properly R & D a set of springs without a set of matching shocks.

And is their flywheel an excellent design? I've read the many expert comments on the aftermarket flywheels and it seems that Racing Beat's design may actually be the most questionable independent of conservative design goal or not.

So I appreciate comments like yours from people who have way more expertise than I do. I used to automatically assume everything Racing Beat does is better but after analyzing some of their products in a simple dumbed-down fashion (like the example above in this post), I started wondering. I think we need to actually assess Racing Beat's products more, like what we do to the other companies' products.

Saleen was chosen by Ford. AMG was chosen by Mercedes. Racing Beat was chosen by Mazda. But compare their products and I'm starting to feel a little negative. I think about Saleen and AMG and I begin to feel it's not just an issue of a company that doesn't want to go so extreme as to appreciably lower reliability. It might be more a combination of a consciously chosen business model and limited capability.

Last edited by Reactionary; 02-01-2005 at 02:22 PM.
Old 02-01-2005, 02:05 PM
  #30  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Reactionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by dmp
Here's a serious question: Why do you care? Honestly. If you don't care for RB's products, simply don't buy them. Oh, the joys of Capitalism.
But I do care about their products. I was virtually set on getting the Racing Beat exhaust but then I realized I had jumped on their bandwagon. And I started thinking more about their products.

You got to think about what I'm trying to say here. It makes sense really. The knowledgeable people here have said they do excellent R & D and are honest in person and on the phone. But have we put all that peripheral stuff aside and concentrated solely on their products when they are in front of our eyes and hands? One person said the welds on the exhaust are awesome. That's the type of evidence I want. And this is the type of analysis that I realized needs to be done on Racing Beat products rather than just assuming they are all excellent products like I used to do.

I'm just like you. I want to know which company has the best products and engineering. I just don't want to assume anymore.
Old 02-01-2005, 02:09 PM
  #31  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Reactionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spin9k
I have to say many of the original poster's thoughts have crossed my mind...more than once. I like Racing Beat, don't own their product, maybe it's their name, maybe it's their (appearance of) value for money of what they do offer. They also do offer a kind of warm and fuzzy feeling being around and contributing for so long in the Mazda community.

Still, after visiting their site for over 2+ yrs now watching their 'development' of RX-8 products, I don't think it is unreasonable to ask and review just what is it that they (or anyone else for that matter) have engineered for our car to enhance it from baseline stock.

The fact that really, "not much" is out there in the market (until recently FI) beyond generic type products. that is; springs, coilovers, sway bars, some instakes and exhausts is both troubling and satisfing. Troubling in that it is frustrating not to have truly unique ways to enhance our car over stock, satisfing in that Mazda did such a good job, most are having a hard time figuring out how to "out do" their original engineering.


I guess I would say that I have just about given up on RB coming up with any surprises... but then they bring out lightened rotors, I mean is there a big market for that? It certainly is an odd, if not unique product rollout. Is something to complement it coming next? Where is the continuity... where are their adjustable shocks, or coilovers, or ECU upgrade? I just don't see it that there is any plan, rhime or reason.. at least yet that I see. Sigh...

Exactly.
Old 02-01-2005, 02:17 PM
  #32  
Registered
 
z00m-z00m's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Irvine, Ca
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I won a whole bunch of racingbeat merchandise from some events so i put them on my rx-8. I did so only after visiting their facility and talking to their people. Before that I had them chillen in my garage. Now I have their sway bars on the car and the springs I had on for a while then decided it wasnt my feel. Those are back in the garage but still the company is very responsive and has a reputation for standing by and being part of the rotary community.
Old 02-01-2005, 02:18 PM
  #33  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Reactionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
So I guess I should just give up on the titanium PPF because I don't have a huge catalog or history at this time? I chose the PPF because I didn't see anyone else making them out of Ti and I have a connection in the exotic metals biz. Do ya think RB did the rotors because nobody else has them?

CRH

BTW, the first prototype of the PPF has been test fit on the car. It fits perfectly and requires only one hand to align it and fasten the nuts in place.
Ok here's a thought that comes up even if I don't know jack about engineering. I read that the lightened rotors are barely lightened but that is still significant for racing applications. Fine. But why not build racing rotors from a different material to truly lighten them?

Why would it someone like Charles or Richard Paul or whoever do these before Racing Beat? Because no market for Racing Beat? Well like Charles said, they decided to do the lightened rotors that are barely lighter. So why not make rotors out of a more exotic material like Charles did with his PPF? So it seems that in general Racing Beat is conservative in both thought and materials. Where they dare to cross the envelope in thought, they don't also do it in materials.
Old 02-01-2005, 02:19 PM
  #34  
Mazda Mole
 
Magic8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cincinnati, OH
Posts: 498
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So what's the problem? Not everyone is going to write a review on RB product because no one have no vested interest to satsify your curiosity about RB's product. You will going to have to take a risk like everyone else and purchase the product and review it yourself.

I think everyone is saying with RB that risk is minimal.
Old 02-01-2005, 02:26 PM
  #35  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Reactionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Magic8
So what's the problem? Not everyone is going to write a review on RB product because no one have no vested interest to satsify your curiosity about RB's product. You will going to have to take a risk like everyone else and purchase the product and review it yourself.

I think everyone is saying with RB that risk is minimal.
Good point. I see what you're saying. It's like a logical paradox. In order to assess, you have to first take the risk.
Old 02-01-2005, 02:40 PM
  #36  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Reactionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
They definitely are slow. It's not just about proper R & D.

It just occurred to me that the owners may be living in the 60's and 70's. That may be where the BEAT part of the name comes from, just like BEATNIK. What if they really are a bunch of 60's flower children living like bohemian engineers? If they are all mellowed out from smoking too much marijuana, they may actually be using the wrong drug. Because GReddy and the Japanese companies are probably using cocaine or crystal meth and installing sprinkler systems for their facilities overnight while simultaneously churning out turbos and all kinds of goodies for the RX8.
Old 02-01-2005, 02:50 PM
  #37  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by Reactionary
Ok here's a thought that comes up even if I don't know jack about engineering. I read that the lightened rotors are barely lightened but that is still significant for racing applications. Fine. But why not build racing rotors from a different material to truly lighten them?

Why would it someone like Charles or Richard Paul or whoever do these before Racing Beat? Because no market for Racing Beat? Well like Charles said, they decided to do the lightened rotors that are barely lighter. So why not make rotors out of a more exotic material like Charles did with his PPF? So it seems that in general Racing Beat is conservative in both thought and materials. Where they dare to cross the envelope in thought, they don't also do it in materials.
becuase the rotors would have to be cast. first you have to decide what materials to choose between. then you have to test those materials to see which one works for your application. then have to find someone to create the dies(one would assume something like rotors would be die cast and not sand cast) then you have to find a company that can do the actual casting and finish work. then you have to test those rotors to see if they will stand up to their intended use. if they fail at an unacceptable rate its back to step one. what after market company has the kind of resources to do that kind of manufacturing? its much simpler and less time consuming to modify the existing part to meet your goals.
Old 02-01-2005, 03:07 PM
  #38  
Registered User
 
grapes's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Cape Cod
Posts: 303
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Good responsible company that does their homework before rushing out aftermarket parts.
Old 02-01-2005, 03:32 PM
  #39  
Recovered Modaholic
 
TheDosDog's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Napa, Ca.
Posts: 496
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
[Reactionary] "They definitely are slow. It's not just about proper R & D."


I assume you mean slow to market. Every product I have ordered has arrived timely (usually in 2 days) and the customer service is fantastic. If you send them an email you receive a prompt response. Calls are returned and they know their stuff. I too visited their facility after Sevenstock 7 and met the staff. I didn't see a bunch of beatniks. Some of us just have no patience (like me)
Old 02-01-2005, 03:40 PM
  #40  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I think you are confused. Racing Beat is not to Mazda what AMG is to Mercedes or Saleen is to Ford. That is Mazdaspeed. That is the in house tuner for Mazda. If you look at their product line it is similar to RB's (exhaust, intake, bodykit, etc.). I'm not sure who/where you got that information in regards to their flywheel being questionable. The few people that I know that have it like the way it functions. I personally would have gotten it but I thought I was getting a good deal on another vendor's unit, but after having to buy the couterweight & hardware kit sepearatly it wound up costing me about the same. In having seen the flywheel, I'm not sure what you are talking about as from a visual perspective it seemed like a quality piece. I have the Racing Beat exhaust & I love it. From having seen & heard the Greddy & Borla units I liked the RB unit the best.

The reason why I like Racing Beat products is because there isn't hype behind it's products. In hype I am saying they make outrageous claims behind their products that later turn around to be unsubstantiated. The support that you see for their products here is from people that have/use their products and because of their positive experiences recommend them to other RX8 drivers. That to me is not hype, it's good word of mouth. I have products from another vendor, & I would say they make very good products, but I also would say they have "hype" behind their products because they are claiming 40 hp from a few bolt on parts, that in my dyno & others on this board have proven to be false.

Also, I do have their springs & sway bars on my car. If I tell people that I really like them on my car, and it improves the handling substantially is that hype or just somebody relaying their personal experience ? BTW, their spring design is specially designed to match with the stock shock. Your notion that you have to replace the shock is because in the past some other manufacturers just basically cut their springs/ported over other products from other cars so when it when on your car it was mismatched and you had to get different shocks. When RB designed these springs they started work with the stock RX8 shocks & went from there. It is not a compromise it's was intentional. It is for an aggresive street driver, that occasionally tracks their car vs. the full on race car setting. Also, they are working with Koni to have a coil over setup for people needing more aggressive suspention setups.

Also if you look at their air intake setup (a few of us have seen it), it seems more of a well thought out design then several of the other units outt here right now. Again it is designed specifically for the RX8, as opposed to some of the other units like K&N that initially caused some idle/hesitation issues, and didn't give the hp claims that they were claiming. RB says it will give 2-3 hp, and keep noise down (another issue with the K&N unit). No "hype," No outrageous claims of 8 hp from an air intake. I personally like Greddy (as evidenced by my purchase of many Greddy products for my Turbo kit), and I respect Borla. They make fine products for the RX8, but in my opinion it is no better than what Racing Beat puts out. I think why people assume that Racing Beat products are so good are from previous experiences with their products have given good results, we have dynoed their products (& they were spot on), we have driven with their products, and in looking at the designs of their upcoming products people can see what they are trying to do with their products, and how it follows their philosophy. I'm not sure why you are questioning their products, is it quality ? is it functional ?
Old 02-01-2005, 04:01 PM
  #41  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Reactionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Fanman, I like your comment and Zoom44's comment. I'm just asking questions instead of assuming. I just want to know what really is Racing Beat's capabilities and how good are their products really? And about the springs, I got the idea from Paul Yaw's website as well as many people on this forum.
Old 02-01-2005, 04:03 PM
  #42  
Registered
 
Racing Beat Inc's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Anaheim, CA
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thanks to all for the comments.

Racing Beat has never tried to be the most extreme rotary tuning shop on the planet. I will point-blank tell any visitor that we are not a super tuner, but an R&D and manufacturing firm. We have no interest in tweaking and tuning street cars to produce 700HP… and then watching them explode. We have seen MANY of these tuning shops come and go over the years, we think we know the reason why.

We quickly realized that the RX-8 market is very different than the RX-7 or Miata market, and the typical owner is 1) using their RX-8 as a daily-driver, 2) isn’t willing to sacrifice ride quality or reliability to an extreme level, 3) has just laid out a serious chunk of money, and will be making payments for the next few years, and 4) is living in a state that has emissions laws and wishes to keep his car legal for street use. With that in mind… go ahead and provide me with a list of parts that don’t compromise these realizations. Pretty short list, huh? We decided to start with the most requested parts, and start our development from there.

The RX-8 has only been out for a very short time in the US. Although we could rush out with tons of new parts, any prudent business must actually determine if there is any demand to support the R&D, manufacturing, marketing, and warehousing of these types of parts. Throw in the added mystery of whether Mazda will make any significant changes to the car, thereby relegating these parts for availability to a 1-2 year model coverage, and the risk becomes greater. Sorry guys, our cars are fun, but this a business.

Since the Mazda market is rather small, we have tried to establish our pricing to reflect more “street” pricing, and we do not offer inflated MSRPs that are heavily discounted by retail shops. The last time I checked, some of these similar parts from Japan are tad on the ridiculous side when it comes to pricing, our parts are more modestly priced.

We test our parts in-house and provide these results to support our products, we do not bash or bad-mouth others products even if we have data supporting our findings. The aftermarket community quickly discovers the truth and the word spreads quickly. We don’t have to bash the other guys, you do it for us!

Our work with the RX-8 and Renesis engine continues. To date, we have tested several forced induction systems on the Renesis engine while on the engine dyno. These systems include turbo chargers, roots-type superchargers, hydro-chargers, and axial-flow supercharged systems, all with varying degrees of success and failures. We are still very early in the developmental stages of these projects, and are investigating the practicality of these systems for both street and race usage. (We have no immediate plans to produce a street kit at this time… so don’t start any rumors!)

Sorry if some of our parts take longer than expected to produce. Sometimes we run into problems with vendors, suppliers, or we just plain goof-up and the part doesn’t perform as expected! We do not try and hype the upcoming release of a product, it only makes the sales guys really get mad at me when they have to repeatedly explain the reason for a delay.

As always, I will be glad to answer any question, comment, problem, or criticism that you may have, both in writing and in person. You know how to find me….

Best regards,

Jim Langer
Racing Beat, Inc.
Old 02-01-2005, 04:13 PM
  #43  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Reactionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your reply is very appreciated.
Old 02-01-2005, 04:57 PM
  #44  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by Reactionary
I know Rotary God loves Racing Beat. Ok great, and I'll bet a lot of the people here trust Racing Beat because Rotary God trusts them. But how good is Racing Beat really compared to the other rotary tuner companies out there, including the Japanese companies. One guy in here (I forgot who) has mentioned Paul Yaw, the talk of which faded like the ghost of an Olympic sprinter. Certainly, Yaw doesn't command the popular attention of Racing Beat, but I still wonder how Yaw compares to Racing Beat. And how do all those Japanese companies compare to Racing Beat? Minus all the hype, who really is superior? Who has the superior capabilities?
Thanks Jim. I was waiting for you to chime in.

I get 20000 words so I'm going to use them!

Reactionary: Since you mentioned me specifically, I'll tell you why I trust them and also trust certain others and don't trust many more. Let's go back to some history first.

Racing Beat opened in 1971. That in itself is an accomplishemtn to most other rotary tuners/shops. They played with fuel injection back in 1972. That is 12 years before Mazda themselves did it in a production rotary! They developed supercharged and turbocharged engines back as early as 1974. Mazda didn't release a forced induction rotary until 1984!!! They have 4 land/speed records at Bonneville. In 1974 it was an RX-4 at 160.3 mph with no forced induciton. In 1978 it was a 1st gen RX-7 at 183.9 mph with no forced induction. In 1986 it was a bridgeported twin turbo 2nd gen RX-7 at 238.442 mph! In 1995 after a recovery from a flip at a previous event, in a 3rd gen RX-7 powered by a tri turbo tri rotor peripheral port engine they hit 242 mph. That wasn't even full throttle due to the track conditions being so bad!!! They've built engines for NASA, industrial sesmic drilling test equipment, and military use. That is some big organizations putting their trust in your work. In 1993 their Miata set a Motor Trend Magazine slalom record at 73.6 mph. They have worked closely with Mazda on the development of parts for the Protege MP3. When you get this car from the dealership, it has their suspension and their exhaust on it. All of this is mostly info that you can get from their catalog but it is also documented in books. They have done far more than any of us knows about. that alone should just garnish them with respect but alas we have doubters out there.

Show me another reputable rotary company out there that has all of this for credentials. When someone says Racing Beat isn't good, who are they comparing them too, PFS, Pettit??? While these shops may know what they are doing from a maintanence and knowledge standpoint (nothing wrong with that), none of them has the test equipment, knowhow, or factory support available to them to do what Racing Beat does regardless of what their lower employees or groupies say. Show me another company in the U.S. that sells their own peripheral port housings. Are Racing Beat's exhausts heavy? I'd say yes. Are they going to fall apart tomorrow? Probably not. From a pure upgrade performance standpoint, eBay would seem like a prime place to shop for upgrades. You can get them cheap, everyone has high power claims, it's all lightweight, and it must have been properly designed and tested in order to be sold right? Are you sure? We all know half the stuff on eBay is crap inspite of their claims. I'm not saying that other respected rotary tuners out there are marketing bad products. It's just hard to fathom that someone could possibly insult a company that has more experience and success with these engines than any other rotary company out there. At least in this country they do. I can't speak for Asia and I know they have their own tuners there too.

The fact that there is a company out there that has tons of experience in designing and testing products (everyone and their dog has a rotary powered race car), and who gives real world honest power figures inspite of being lowered than those claimed by others tells me these guys are honest. They were also nice enough to open up their shop to us at Sevenstock and give us tech training and let us play with some parts. We saw the ecu test bench. If you think you can crack it quickly and get a big gain, go try it yourself. People are having a hard time with piggyback units right now because the ecu fights back. They know things about that ecu that we only wish we did, or anyone for that matter. They have the advantage of working with some of the best rotary people in the business. Some of them from Mazda and others on this very forum but for secrecy reasons you won't hear who they are.

This is a company that is far from Beat. In fact that are hard to beat in terms of experience and knowhow. Everyone turns wrenches, replaces parts, builds simple exhausts, mounts a cone filter to a pipe and calls it a performance mod, sells upgraded plug wires, etc... Other companies develop mega horsepower turbo kits. That's great. Use them. Racing Beat will be the first to tell you to if that's what you want. Their sole purpose is to design good solid products that perform as advertised and maintain street legaility if at all possible. They are pretty good at it and their sales of rotary performance parts tops every single other american rotary shop out there. Period.

Now to your comments about Paul Yaw. I first talked to Paul about 10 years ago. I have nothing but the utmost respect for Paul. He knows what he is doing and can do rotary work with the best of them. He inspired me to build my own flow bench and flowtest parts. Some so called rotary experts out there say this is futile. That's a poor excuse for not doing it properly. Paul is more expensive in his porting prices than anyone else out there. What he does is very labor intensive but it is done properly. Anyone can take a die grinder to a housing, make a port larger, and tell you that it flows more. Unfortunately some rotary tuners tell you that bigger is better. I can think of a couple and one of them is very highly regarded by many rotary owners. I'm not speaking of Racing Beat when I say this. Paul can do peripheral ports. They'll cost you more than a PP housing from Racing Beat but they will be done specifically to your needs. This isn't an insult to RB in any way. From a financial standpoint it isn't worth it to RB to do this. Paul does his work on a very limited and one on one basis. He doesn't have much in the way of performance products that he sells to the public. He does intend to but mostly stays busy with individual jobs. He is probably the best when it comes to 1st gen RX-7 carbs. He is also very good when it comes to custom designing and building specialty items. This is in an entire different class from RB and deosn't detract from them one bit. Different people for different specialties. I respect RB but will be the first to say that not everything they sell is for me personally. Nothing wrong with that. My goals and intentions may be different than theirs.

So I wrote another book. As yourself if that "filter on a stick" you bought for your car was actually tested. Ask yourself if all that chrome on that low priced lightweight exhaust you paid for actually made you faster. How much of those products is tested and how much is marketing hype that you believed?

Good work Jim. Keep it coming.
Old 02-01-2005, 04:57 PM
  #45  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Reactionary,

I have no problems with you asking questions. That is what this forum is all about. Instaed of just making rude & stupid comments like some of the other posters on this board, you are asking questions that hopefully can be answered and information shared.

How I define hype is making outrageous claims and/or pricing to that claim. An example for me is HKS. They make some of the best products in the world, and I have great respect for them & love those products, but they also charge $1000 for their exhaust or $600 for their air intake/suction kit. Is it higher quality or better than say the RB, Greddy, etc. ? Personally, I don't think so but it's the "hype" that their product has that allows them to charge that kind of premium. If you have a different thought on what hype means let us know. In this case if RB was charging exhorbitant amounts for their products over their competitors I would understand your hesitations, but i think a big reason why they are popular with the RX group is that they make a quality product, at a competitive price. Their exhaust is on par with Greddy or Borla, or their springs are right there with Tein or JIC.
Old 02-01-2005, 04:59 PM
  #46  
Cam
this space for rent
iTrader: (1)
 
Cam's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Indy
Posts: 1,179
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Racing Beat Inc
Our work with the RX-8 and Renesis engine continues. To date, we have tested several forced induction systems on the Renesis engine while on the engine dyno. These systems include turbo chargers, roots-type superchargers, hydro-chargers, and axial-flow supercharged systems, all with varying degrees of success and failures. We are still very early in the developmental stages of these projects, and are investigating the practicality of these systems for both street and race usage. (We have no immediate plans to produce a street kit at this time… so don’t start any rumors!)


Best regards,

Jim Langer
Racing Beat, Inc.
Jim,

Thanks for posting, the forum members appreciate it.
I must say, this was a a big let down for me. I was hoping RB would be coming out with an FI kit along with an ECU program/reflash. But I can understand the business side as well.

I thought I read earlier that the ECU work/research being conducted was in conjuntion with FI. So if there is not FI in the plans for the future will there not be an ECU modification released either?
Old 02-01-2005, 05:01 PM
  #47  
Administrator
 
zoom44's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Location: portland oregon
Posts: 21,958
Received 115 Likes on 88 Posts
Originally Posted by Racing Beat Inc
Our work with the RX-8 and Renesis engine continues. To date, we have tested several forced induction systems on the Renesis engine while on the engine dyno. These systems include turbo chargers, roots-type superchargers, hydro-chargers, and axial-flow supercharged systems,

Best regards,

Jim Langer
Racing Beat, Inc.
I knew it!!! :D
Old 02-01-2005, 05:19 PM
  #48  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Noted the "axial-flow supercharged" comment also. Definitely encouraging.
Old 02-01-2005, 05:22 PM
  #49  
Kaiten Kenbu Rokuren
 
Aoshi Shinomori's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Central Valley, NY
Posts: 934
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Red Devil
Noted the "axial-flow supercharged" comment also. Definitely encouraging.
I saw that too. Richard, you might have some competiton :p
Old 02-01-2005, 05:25 PM
  #50  
Banned
Thread Starter
 
Reactionary's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
Thanks Jim. I was waiting for you to chime in.

I get 20000 words so I'm going to use them!

Reactionary: Since you mentioned me specifically, I'll tell you why I trust them and also trust certain others and don't trust many more. Let's go back to some history first.

Racing Beat opened in 1971. That in itself is an accomplishemtn to most other rotary tuners/shops. They played with fuel injection back in 1972. That is 12 years before Mazda themselves did it in a production rotary! They developed supercharged and turbocharged engines back as early as 1974. Mazda didn't release a forced induction rotary until 1984!!! They have 4 land/speed records at Bonneville. In 1974 it was an RX-4 at 160.3 mph with no forced induciton. In 1978 it was a 1st gen RX-7 at 183.9 mph with no forced induction. In 1986 it was a bridgeported twin turbo 2nd gen RX-7 at 238.442 mph! In 1995 after a recovery from a flip at a previous event, in a 3rd gen RX-7 powered by a tri turbo tri rotor peripheral port engine they hit 242 mph. That wasn't even full throttle due to the track conditions being so bad!!! They've built engines for NASA, industrial sesmic drilling test equipment, and military use. That is some big organizations putting their trust in your work. In 1993 their Miata set a Motor Trend Magazine slalom record at 73.6 mph. They have worked closely with Mazda on the development of parts for the Protege MP3. When you get this car from the dealership, it has their suspension and their exhaust on it. All of this is mostly info that you can get from their catalog but it is also documented in books. They have done far more than any of us knows about. that alone should just garnish them with respect but alas we have doubters out there.

Show me another reputable rotary company out there that has all of this for credentials. When someone says Racing Beat isn't good, who are they comparing them too, PFS, Pettit??? While these shops may know what they are doing from a maintanence and knowledge standpoint (nothing wrong with that), none of them has the test equipment, knowhow, or factory support available to them to do what Racing Beat does regardless of what their lower employees or groupies say. Show me another company in the U.S. that sells their own peripheral port housings. Are Racing Beat's exhausts heavy? I'd say yes. Are they going to fall apart tomorrow? Probably not. From a pure upgrade performance standpoint, eBay would seem like a prime place to shop for upgrades. You can get them cheap, everyone has high power claims, it's all lightweight, and it must have been properly designed and tested in order to be sold right? Are you sure? We all know half the stuff on eBay is crap inspite of their claims. I'm not saying that other respected rotary tuners out there are marketing bad products. It's just hard to fathom that someone could possibly insult a company that has more experience and success with these engines than any other rotary company out there. At least in this country they do. I can't speak for Asia and I know they have their own tuners there too.

The fact that there is a company out there that has tons of experience in designing and testing products (everyone and their dog has a rotary powered race car), and who gives real world honest power figures inspite of being lowered than those claimed by others tells me these guys are honest. They were also nice enough to open up their shop to us at Sevenstock and give us tech training and let us play with some parts. We saw the ecu test bench. If you think you can crack it quickly and get a big gain, go try it yourself. People are having a hard time with piggyback units right now because the ecu fights back. They know things about that ecu that we only wish we did, or anyone for that matter. They have the advantage of working with some of the best rotary people in the business. Some of them from Mazda and others on this very forum but for secrecy reasons you won't hear who they are.

This is a company that is far from Beat. In fact that are hard to beat in terms of experience and knowhow. Everyone turns wrenches, replaces parts, builds simple exhausts, mounts a cone filter to a pipe and calls it a performance mod, sells upgraded plug wires, etc... Other companies develop mega horsepower turbo kits. That's great. Use them. Racing Beat will be the first to tell you to if that's what you want. Their sole purpose is to design good solid products that perform as advertised and maintain street legaility if at all possible. They are pretty good at it and their sales of rotary performance parts tops every single other american rotary shop out there. Period.

Now to your comments about Paul Yaw. I first talked to Paul about 10 years ago. I have nothing but the utmost respect for Paul. He knows what he is doing and can do rotary work with the best of them. He inspired me to build my own flow bench and flowtest parts. Some so called rotary experts out there say this is futile. That's a poor excuse for not doing it properly. Paul is more expensive in his porting prices than anyone else out there. What he does is very labor intensive but it is done properly. Anyone can take a die grinder to a housing, make a port larger, and tell you that it flows more. Unfortunately some rotary tuners tell you that bigger is better. I can think of a couple and one of them is very highly regarded by many rotary owners. I'm not speaking of Racing Beat when I say this. Paul can do peripheral ports. They'll cost you more than a PP housing from Racing Beat but they will be done specifically to your needs. This isn't an insult to RB in any way. From a financial standpoint it isn't worth it to RB to do this. Paul does his work on a very limited and one on one basis. He doesn't have much in the way of performance products that he sells to the public. He does intend to but mostly stays busy with individual jobs. He is probably the best when it comes to 1st gen RX-7 carbs. He is also very good when it comes to custom designing and building specialty items. This is in an entire different class from RB and deosn't detract from them one bit. Different people for different specialties. I respect RB but will be the first to say that not everything they sell is for me personally. Nothing wrong with that. My goals and intentions may be different than theirs.

So I wrote another book. As yourself if that "filter on a stick" you bought for your car was actually tested. Ask yourself if all that chrome on that low priced lightweight exhaust you paid for actually made you faster. How much of those products is tested and how much is marketing hype that you believed?

Good work Jim. Keep it coming.

This is exactly what I think some of us needed to hear.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: What are the reasons that Racing Beat is so respected?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:23 AM.