I scraped my RB Catback on a speed bump on stock suspension so im sure its possible, damn massive speedbumps in Hartford, CT avoid NY's favorite suburb at all costs.
|
Yes, the exhaust pipe does sit lower. I'm estimating it 3 inches from the ground where it connects to the y-section of the muffler. I'm also dropped on MS springs.
Check this thread to see how much of an improvement this exhaust/midpipe added to my Greddy turbo kit. Definitely recommend it, especially if your turboed. |
can anyone get another vid of this exhaust? My a few revs and a drive off? That dyno video is great, but I was wondering if there was another one that maybe gave a better idea of what it would sound like on an everyday basis. Oh yeah, this request is for non turbo cars too, as I would imagine a turbo car would be a lot quieter.
-Matt |
Originally Posted by adrian-1
Yes, the exhaust pipe does sit lower. I'm estimating it 3 inches from the ground where it connects to the y-section of the muffler. I'm also dropped on MS springs.
Check this thread to see how much of an improvement this exhaust/midpipe added to my Greddy turbo kit. Definitely recommend it, especially if your turboed. -Nathan |
just thought i'd weigh in here...I took my car to PFsupercars today to have it dyno'd. the base run was with the turboxs system on and I pulled 194hp on the dynojet. Can't compare it to stock but i dont think that my car would have gotten those numbers without the mods. Anyway after tuning i got around 205 on the dynojet...I think nathan used a dynapak so i thought i'd show the difference. I'll have the dyno sheets to post soon enough if anyone wants to see them or thinks they're relevant
|
Originally Posted by Armaant
just thought i'd weigh in here...I took my car to PFsupercars today to have it dyno'd. the base run was with the turboxs system on and I pulled 194hp on the dynojet. Can't compare it to stock but i dont think that my car would have gotten those numbers without the mods. Anyway after tuning i got around 205 on the dynojet...I think nathan used a dynapak so i thought i'd show the difference. I'll have the dyno sheets to post soon enough if anyone wants to see them or thinks they're relevant
beers |
I was having pfsupercars tune my Cz since i have no clue how to do it. It's the upgraded version with emanage glod(idk if we tuned in stage 1 or 2 we couldnt figure out the difference so any insight would be nice). So all together I have the revi+duct,cz,TXS race pipe and TXS muffler.
|
Nice numbers!
|
Originally Posted by Armaant
the base run was with the turboxs system on and I pulled 194hp on the dynojet. Can't compare it to stock but i dont think that my car would have gotten those numbers without the mods. Anyway after tuning i got around 205 on the dynojet...I think nathan used a dynapak so i thought i'd show the difference.
|
Originally Posted by adrian-1
(25hp gain from exhaust/testpipe and 10hp gain from tuning.. so it should show +35hp gain from stock). Good numbers there.
EDIT: conservative gain from TXS race pipe + exhaust = 21whp High end with TXS system= 34whp |
Originally Posted by G8rboy
Any idea if the midpipe mates up to the Greddy SP2 catback without issue?
Thanks! |
Originally Posted by mlane302
can anyone get another vid of this exhaust? My a few revs and a drive off? That dyno video is great, but I was wondering if there was another one that maybe gave a better idea of what it would sound like on an everyday basis. Oh yeah, this request is for non turbo cars too, as I would imagine a turbo car would be a lot quieter.
-Matt TurboXS video The sound should be louder in a NA car. |
Here's a picture of my old Borla and the other is the turboXS. TurboXS does hang alittle lower.
|
im using this na and i love it going to get on the dyno sometime this week
|
Originally Posted by toca
(Post 1173116)
im using this na and i love it going to get on the dyno sometime this week
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:39 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands