Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

Silent cold air intake upgrade

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 12-03-2010, 02:40 PM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
andreasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Silent cold air intake upgrade

I have been looking inot the different options in regards to air intake upgardes but my major requirement is for an upgrade that will not be very noisy and offer performance improvement.

Now, I know that RX8's stock intake is very well designed and I've read that most upgrades will not provide significant improvement however, most of the articles I've read are rather old and I would like to ask if there are any news in regards to this.

So, is there any upgrade that will provide significant performance improvement with no significant or at least minimal noise increase?

Anyone tried this one: ?
http://www.rx8blog.com/sr-motorsports-rx8-intake/

Your suggestions are apreciated but please remember that I don't want to be noisy.
Old 12-03-2010, 02:43 PM
  #2  
Turbo Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
the only thing you can do that would be an even slight increase over stock and still remain quite would be to drop a K&N filter in the stock intake box
Old 12-03-2010, 02:51 PM
  #3  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
andreasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RWD+LSD=Zoom
the only thing you can do that would be an even slight increase over stock and still remain quite would be to drop a K&N filter in the stock intake box
Right, I forgot to ask about this one. Is it really worth it? That one doesn't need replacement but instead you have to clean and wash it if I remember correctly. Am I correct?

Then, will it offer significant improvement?
Old 12-03-2010, 02:56 PM
  #4  
Turbo Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
the K&N filters are a lot less restrictive then the large paper filters. Being able to clean it for continuous use is just a bonus
Old 12-03-2010, 03:06 PM
  #5  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
andreasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I remember there was another option with a cone-type filter in enclosure that replaces stock (to keep noise down) but I don't remember if it was K&N or other brand. I remember it was the best option to replace stock with major improvement.
Old 12-03-2010, 03:09 PM
  #6  
Turbo Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
that would be the racing beat revi intake
Old 12-03-2010, 03:16 PM
  #7  
Time for boost...
iTrader: (24)
 
RX8Soldier's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 5,414
Likes: 0
Received 15 Likes on 14 Posts
there still aren't any real modifications that will get you more hp. The prices are too high for only a VERY slight increase (IF any).
Old 12-03-2010, 03:16 PM
  #8  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
andreasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Exactly. Thanks. I forgot the name. So, which one would be the best option, racing beat revi intake or K&N filter?
Old 12-03-2010, 03:20 PM
  #9  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by RWD+LSD=Zoom
the K&N filters are a lot less restrictive then the large paper filters. Being able to clean it for continuous use is just a bonus
Yep, so much less restrictive that they allow about twice as much dirt in your engine.
Old 12-06-2010, 11:10 AM
  #10  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
andreasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I am thinking about taking the Racing Beat REVi Intake upgrade but I am wondering if the benefit in performance will be significant. Since the stock intake is very well designed, does this upgrade offer significant improvement? Is it worth its money?
Old 12-06-2010, 11:13 AM
  #11  
Turbo Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
the racing beat intake is on the pricey side and its not going to be as quiet as stock.
Old 12-06-2010, 11:24 AM
  #12  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
andreasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RWD+LSD=Zoom
the racing beat intake is on the pricey side and its not going to be as quiet as stock.
I've played some youtube videos with Revi intake and as far as I can understand from the sound, it is louder but not that much to be annoying. However, I admit that from a youtube video you cannot tell too much.

I could accept a slide increase in noise at about 20-25%. Will that be in this range or louder? and will it offer enough performance improvement, worth to sacrifice the cost o fnoise?
Old 12-06-2010, 12:26 PM
  #13  
I zoom therefore I am.
 
laythor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 4,919
Received 12 Likes on 11 Posts
intakes offer little if any improvement over stock, most lose power on the dyno. You change the intake for the sound or if you plan on going FI in the future.
Old 12-06-2010, 12:33 PM
  #14  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
andreasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by laythor
intakes offer little if any improvement over stock, most lose power on the dyno. You change the intake for the sound or if you plan on going FI in the future.
Thanks.
Old 12-06-2010, 01:00 PM
  #15  
Turbo Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
In your case I wouldnt recommend changing to something else. It seems like you would be doing it just to do it.

You wont notice a gain and the sound will increase. Based on what you are looking for, I would say stay with the stock intake.
Old 12-06-2010, 01:36 PM
  #16  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
andreasy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 181
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RWD+LSD=Zoom
In your case I wouldnt recommend changing to something else. It seems like you would be doing it just to do it.

You wont notice a gain and the sound will increase. Based on what you are looking for, I would say stay with the stock intake.
Well, I guess you are right. If that's the case, I'm staying with stock and saving some money.
Old 12-06-2010, 01:46 PM
  #17  
Registered Lunatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Tamas's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: SF Bay Area, California
Posts: 3,575
Received 37 Likes on 32 Posts
Keeping the stock intake is probably the best route. If anything then maybe replacing the VFAD and the sock tube with the Racing Beat duct makes the most sense, provided you fabricate a coupler that achieves an airtight seal between the duct and the stock intake box.
I remember someone used a hacked-up VFAD assembly to do that.
Old 12-06-2010, 01:49 PM
  #18  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Tamas
I remember someone used a hacked-up VFAD assembly to do that.
That's the way I did it.
Old 12-06-2010, 02:07 PM
  #19  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
TX

Originally Posted by andreasy
Thanks.
that said, there is a dyno comparison of the Injen CAI and the Racing Beat Revi CAI and the Revi more 10 more WHP than the Injen but there was not a dyno graph of a run with the stock intake so you can't really say the revi gained HP over stock, it might have just recouped HP lost by the Ijen in the first place.
Old 12-06-2010, 02:23 PM
  #20  
Charles Bundy
iTrader: (5)
 
Grace_Excel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Sherman Oaks, CA
Posts: 2,395
Received 7 Likes on 5 Posts
Originally Posted by alnielsen
That's the way I did it.
Not that I want to buy the duct, but I'm always interested in how it looks.
Old 12-06-2010, 02:24 PM
  #21  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
SleepeR1st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: gone
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts
Originally Posted by alnielsen
That's the way I did it.
Best way also, it's like recycling!
Old 12-06-2010, 02:28 PM
  #22  
Turbo Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Chris's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Tampa, FL
Posts: 2,496
Likes: 0
Received 14 Likes on 10 Posts
the duct is a good idea to get cooler air from outside.
Old 12-06-2010, 02:39 PM
  #23  
SARX Legend
iTrader: (46)
 
9krpmrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: San Antonio, Texas
Posts: 33,784
Received 452 Likes on 366 Posts
This is what I did, I have noticed lower IAT's but I don't have any definitive data nor have I taken the time to do any testing. I made this using the factory intake duct off of a 2010 GT auto and a generic autozone intake tube that fit in the factory end very, very snug. The diameter of the 2010 Auto tube is much larger than the 6 speed VFAD tube.

http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/4983369555/http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/4983369555/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/9krpmrx8/, on Flickr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/4983965392/http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/4983965392/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/9krpmrx8/, on Flickr

http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/4983967772/http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/4983967772/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/9krpmrx8/, on Flickr

Last edited by 9krpmrx8; 12-06-2010 at 02:43 PM.
Old 12-06-2010, 02:53 PM
  #24  
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
SleepeR1st's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: gone
Posts: 387
Likes: 0
Received 27 Likes on 19 Posts
Cheaper than the Revi Ram Air Duct, which you cant even use anyways. Cool beans.
Old 12-06-2010, 02:58 PM
  #25  
Registered
iTrader: (4)
 
alnielsen's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Buddhist Monastery, High Himalaya Mtns. of Tibet
Posts: 12,255
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by SleepeR1st
Cheaper than the Revi Ram Air Duct, which you cant even use anyways. Cool beans.
The Revi has a much wider opening to funnel the air in. This would be cheaper.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Silent cold air intake upgrade



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:18 AM.