Silent cold air intake upgrade
I have been looking inot the different options in regards to air intake upgardes but my major requirement is for an upgrade that will not be very noisy and offer performance improvement.
Now, I know that RX8's stock intake is very well designed and I've read that most upgrades will not provide significant improvement however, most of the articles I've read are rather old and I would like to ask if there are any news in regards to this. So, is there any upgrade that will provide significant performance improvement with no significant or at least minimal noise increase? Anyone tried this one: ? http://www.rx8blog.com/sr-motorsports-rx8-intake/ Your suggestions are apreciated but please remember that I don't want to be noisy. |
the only thing you can do that would be an even slight increase over stock and still remain quite would be to drop a K&N filter in the stock intake box
|
Originally Posted by RWD+LSD=Zoom
(Post 3805806)
the only thing you can do that would be an even slight increase over stock and still remain quite would be to drop a K&N filter in the stock intake box
Then, will it offer significant improvement? |
the K&N filters are a lot less restrictive then the large paper filters. Being able to clean it for continuous use is just a bonus
|
I remember there was another option with a cone-type filter in enclosure that replaces stock (to keep noise down) but I don't remember if it was K&N or other brand. I remember it was the best option to replace stock with major improvement.
|
that would be the racing beat revi intake
|
there still aren't any real modifications that will get you more hp. The prices are too high for only a VERY slight increase (IF any).
|
Exactly. Thanks. I forgot the name. So, which one would be the best option, racing beat revi intake or K&N filter?
|
Originally Posted by RWD+LSD=Zoom
(Post 3805845)
the K&N filters are a lot less restrictive then the large paper filters. Being able to clean it for continuous use is just a bonus
|
I am thinking about taking the Racing Beat REVi Intake upgrade but I am wondering if the benefit in performance will be significant. Since the stock intake is very well designed, does this upgrade offer significant improvement? Is it worth its money?
|
the racing beat intake is on the pricey side and its not going to be as quiet as stock.
|
Originally Posted by RWD+LSD=Zoom
(Post 3808242)
the racing beat intake is on the pricey side and its not going to be as quiet as stock.
I could accept a slide increase in noise at about 20-25%. Will that be in this range or louder? and will it offer enough performance improvement, worth to sacrifice the cost o fnoise? |
intakes offer little if any improvement over stock, most lose power on the dyno. You change the intake for the sound or if you plan on going FI in the future.
|
Originally Posted by laythor
(Post 3808374)
intakes offer little if any improvement over stock, most lose power on the dyno. You change the intake for the sound or if you plan on going FI in the future.
|
In your case I wouldnt recommend changing to something else. It seems like you would be doing it just to do it.
You wont notice a gain and the sound will increase. Based on what you are looking for, I would say stay with the stock intake. |
Originally Posted by RWD+LSD=Zoom
(Post 3808442)
In your case I wouldnt recommend changing to something else. It seems like you would be doing it just to do it.
You wont notice a gain and the sound will increase. Based on what you are looking for, I would say stay with the stock intake. |
Keeping the stock intake is probably the best route. If anything then maybe replacing the VFAD and the sock tube with the Racing Beat duct makes the most sense, provided you fabricate a coupler that achieves an airtight seal between the duct and the stock intake box.
I remember someone used a hacked-up VFAD assembly to do that. |
Originally Posted by Tamas
(Post 3808531)
I remember someone used a hacked-up VFAD assembly to do that.
|
Originally Posted by andreasy
(Post 3808388)
Thanks.
|
Originally Posted by alnielsen
(Post 3808535)
That's the way I did it.
|
Originally Posted by alnielsen
(Post 3808535)
That's the way I did it.
|
the duct is a good idea to get cooler air from outside.
|
This is what I did, I have noticed lower IAT's but I don't have any definitive data nor have I taken the time to do any testing. I made this using the factory intake duct off of a 2010 GT auto and a generic autozone intake tube that fit in the factory end very, very snug. The diameter of the 2010 Auto tube is much larger than the 6 speed VFAD tube.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/4983369555/http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/4983369555/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/9krpmrx8/, on Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/4983965392/http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/4983965392/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/9krpmrx8/, on Flickr http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/4983967772/http://www.flickr.com/photos/9krpmrx8/4983967772/ by http://www.flickr.com/people/9krpmrx8/, on Flickr |
Cheaper than the Revi Ram Air Duct, which you cant even use anyways. Cool beans.
|
Originally Posted by SleepeR1st
(Post 3808645)
Cheaper than the Revi Ram Air Duct, which you cant even use anyways. Cool beans.
|
All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:49 PM. |
© 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands