Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

The Interceptor-X for N/A Cars

Old Jan 3, 2006 | 07:50 PM
  #576  
swoope's Avatar
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 14,603
Likes: 36
From: orlando, fl
Originally Posted by MPG > HP
Per jird20's post - Swoope, how long after testing will it take you to run enough miles to get initial MPG numbers? Kudos to Scott for a great job! I'm sure that many of us would have gladly plunked down an extra $1,600, when we bought the car, to get the HP and MPG improvements promised by your product. The ability to carry forward to FI is a definite +!
i have managed to put 40k miles on it in 2 years, so i think i could have mileage figures real quick.

beers

Last edited by swoope; Jan 4, 2006 at 01:39 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 08:01 PM
  #577  
Sephiroth's Avatar
lurking
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 349
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by toca
why pay 1600 when i can get a hks f con for this car for 1000. and get it tuned for a few hundred more. remember this is not 1600 tuned will still need to spen few hundred to get it tuned
You need to find an exclusive tuner to tune the fcon. the interceptor can be tuned by any rotary tuner
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 08:02 PM
  #578  
colin204's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 427
Likes: 0
From: Austin, Tx
Originally Posted by epitrochoid
not to mention that this can only be purchased and installed by certain shops, and there's only a couple in the US...unless you're talking about getting one used, in which case you're comparing apples to oranges. plus have you ever seen a street rx-8 with a working FCON setup? i haven't. not even a track-only car.
I have the F Con working on my street car, so it is very possible if you have a good pro dealer. There are only a few that are experienced with the RX8.
Reply
Old Jan 3, 2006 | 11:48 PM
  #579  
rotarygod's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2003
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 26
From: Houston
Originally Posted by toca
why pay 1600 when i can get a hks f con for this car for 1000. and get it tuned for a few hundred more. remember this is not 1600 tuned will still need to spen few hundred to get it tuned
$1600 plus a few hundred more to get it tuned? Plug it in and drive off. It's easy and no you wouldn't have to go get it tuned by anyone.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 06:16 AM
  #580  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
carbonRX8 Quote:
um, Not.
247hp x 17%= 41.99

247-41.99= 205.01 rwhp

thats the # scott got, the rx-8 its capable of this hp, the only thing that dont allow the car to get this #'s is the cars ecu tune to save the cat.

Last edited by rotary crazy; Jan 4, 2006 at 06:24 AM.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 06:36 AM
  #581  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
there's no way that a mechanically proper, broken-in RX-8 drivetrain registers a 17% efficiency loss

trying to take a drum roller dyno number and work it backwards to engine output is a load of bullcrap
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 10:15 AM
  #582  
epitrochoid's Avatar
Riot Controller
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
http://www.ls1tech.com/forums/archiv.../t-154395.html

good read. but really, who cares what your crank numbers are? the engine doesn't accelerate the car, the wheels do.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 11:41 AM
  #583  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Scott, did you hold the timing to 30 degrees from 6K to redline?
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 01:27 PM
  #584  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
15% to 20% its whats normally use by allmost every tuner, so 17%.

when the rx-8 was lauch the question of how much rwhp the rx-8 put out was ask to a mazda exc I belive by the guys at rotarynews.com and his answer was 205 rwhp.

the s2000 puts out 205 to 207 rwhp so this means the car does't have 247/250 hp ?

I understand what you are saing if you increase the engine power the % loss most go down, but the only figure I know of to calculate drive train loss is 15 to 20 %.

Last edited by rotary crazy; Jan 4, 2006 at 01:33 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 01:55 PM
  #585  
rkostolni's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 1,294
Likes: 0
From: Virginia/Maryland
I think 15% gives a very rough estimate, but really drive train loss is a constant plus a percentage related to the square of the acceleration of the parts.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 03:33 PM
  #586  
carbonRX8's Avatar
U-Stink-But-I-♥-U
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 2,004
Likes: 2
From: 12 o'clock on the Beltway.
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
247hp x 17%= 41.99

247-41.99= 205.01 rwhp

thats the # scott got, the rx-8 its capable of this hp, the only thing that dont allow the car to get this #'s is the cars ecu tune to save the cat.
Team's post is what I intended, but I would also point out that to say that the car manufacturer made a car that makes x hp because someone mods a car to make x hp is rather nosensical.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 04:19 PM
  #587  
epitrochoid's Avatar
Riot Controller
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 2,142
Likes: 0
From: Orlando, FL
if you guys read the link i posted, you'll see that the percentage figure is more or less static, while the actual number of horsepower lost changes. as the force applied to a gear increases so do the bad forces that generate power robbing heat. if there are more calories of heat being lost in the gears of the transmission and differential, there is less power coming out. if there is 247hp worth of energy going into a series of gears and only 205 coming out, you've lost 42hp to heat. the energy has to go somewhere (some can even be lost to light, but i hope our transmissions don't get that hot)

i think everyone can agree that the drivetrain heats up considerably under spirited driving. in normal driving, when maybe only 80hp is sent through the drivetrain, everything stays pretty cool. when 247hp is sent through the drivetrain, more heat is generated, thus more power is lost. the relationship (ie - percentage effeciency) is constant (at least within a relavent range as at extreme power levels the heat generated cannot be dissapated quickly enough and the gears can bind), and the number of HP lost is increased. if you took your entire drivetrain and melted it into a block, and calculated the power required to accelerate it to a given velocity you'd have a constant value. you have to accelerate X amount of mass at a moment of Y and that does not change regardless of BHP of the motor. however this number is small in comparison to the power lost to heat.

but back on topic...
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 05:26 PM
  #588  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,140
it's been proven that the drum dyno drivetrain losses method is highly unreliable, the only accurate way to measure drivetrain loss on a chassis dyno is to install a torque transducer in the drivetrain and measure the actual efficiency

unfortunately drum roller dynos dominate the market, but if you can then at all costs you need to be on a low-inertia Dynapack or Rototest setup that bolts on in place of the drive wheels if you want good chassis dyno info

some info (Adobe PDF file)

Attached Thumbnails The Interceptor-X for N/A Cars-drivetrainlossestesting.jpg  

Last edited by TeamRX8; Jan 4, 2006 at 05:37 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 06:51 PM
  #589  
r0tor's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 3,754
Likes: 1
From: PA
Originally Posted by epitrochoid
if you guys read the link i posted, you'll see that the percentage figure is more or less static, while the actual number of horsepower lost changes. as the force applied to a gear increases so do the bad forces that generate power robbing heat. if there are more calories of heat being lost in the gears of the transmission and differential, there is less power coming out. if there is 247hp worth of energy going into a series of gears and only 205 coming out, you've lost 42hp to heat. the energy has to go somewhere (some can even be lost to light, but i hope our transmissions don't get that hot)

i think everyone can agree that the drivetrain heats up considerably under spirited driving. in normal driving, when maybe only 80hp is sent through the drivetrain, everything stays pretty cool. when 247hp is sent through the drivetrain, more heat is generated, thus more power is lost. the relationship (ie - percentage effeciency) is constant (at least within a relavent range as at extreme power levels the heat generated cannot be dissapated quickly enough and the gears can bind), and the number of HP lost is increased. if you took your entire drivetrain and melted it into a block, and calculated the power required to accelerate it to a given velocity you'd have a constant value. you have to accelerate X amount of mass at a moment of Y and that does not change regardless of BHP of the motor. however this number is small in comparison to the power lost to heat.

but back on topic...

umm... NO

you don't loose the vast majority of power to heat. Most well lubricated gear sets (excluding worm drives) are about 98% efficient at delivering power - meaning you are losing 2% to friction which will cause heat. Then throw in another percent or two to account for frictional loses in bearings.

The other say 10% of your power is being lost before it hits the wheels because everything in your drivetrain has mass - and all that mass needs to be accelerated. It takes power to accomplish this. Also guess what - the dyno can control the rate at which all this rotating mass is accelerating by controlling the load on the dyno and how fast it lets the tires accelerate... meaning the percentage of drivetrain loses can vary depending on how the dyno is opporated.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 07:37 PM
  #590  
MazsportScott's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mazsport.net
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: In the shop
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
Scott, did you hold the timing to 30 degrees from 6K to redline?
Yes I did, I was doing pulls running between 10 and 38 deg. advance, I also was adjusting the split.

Last edited by MazsportScott; Jan 4, 2006 at 07:48 PM.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 07:40 PM
  #591  
MazsportScott's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mazsport.net
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: In the shop
Originally Posted by chikmag382
Scott,
I know this thread is for N/A cars but I just watched your video of a dyno pull on your website and I was just wondering if you have 2 different pre-programmed values that you will ship the Interceptor with for N/A or for turbo cars.

Holla at your boy,
Whitey
Not at this point, the unit will need to be returned for internal mods. The turnaround will be quick, If I know in advance 24 hours.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 08:09 PM
  #592  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
Thanks
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 08:51 PM
  #593  
FlyingLeggs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
I'm going to have to agree with Epitrochoid (dude I had to look at your sign-on like three times to spell that. Why can't you be Sam or Mack?) Anyway, hp to the wheels is all that matters. Who gives a flip if you crank out 500 if you only lay down 200. Slight embellishment to prove a point.
Epi....didn't you order a plug-in from Scott also? Did you get it yet?
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 08:52 PM
  #594  
FlyingLeggs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
Scott, sorry for not knowing, but I assume that you have a dyno at your shop or you have easy acces to one. How much do you charge to dyno?
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 09:05 PM
  #595  
MazsportScott's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mazsport.net
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: In the shop
I do not have an in house dyno for sound/fume reasons but I use one about ten minutes from my shop. The dyno charge is 125 per hour and my rate is 100 per hour.
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 09:37 PM
  #596  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
I think you need one in your home also - that way you could burn the midnight oil
Reply
Old Jan 4, 2006 | 09:54 PM
  #597  
FlyingLeggs's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 171
Likes: 0
If I wanted to get enough pulls for an accurate reading (3 or 4)? on a stock 8 how long would it take? I would like to get a good base number now before I add a few mods. Is there any tuning at all that you can do without adding a plug-in? Last question guys, no hijacking here.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 01:45 PM
  #598  
davefzr's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 1,473
Likes: 0
From: Diamond Bar, Ca
So whats the latest on this project? Is Scott continuing to perfect the drivability of the car in different situations?
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 01:47 PM
  #599  
Nemesis8's Avatar
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 1
From: Missouri
He told me he is ready to ship at the end of the month, so must be done I guess.
Reply
Old Jan 5, 2006 | 01:48 PM
  #600  
MazsportScott's Avatar
Thread Starter
Mazsport.net
 
Joined: Mar 2005
Posts: 753
Likes: 0
From: In the shop
Originally Posted by FlyingLeggs
If I wanted to get enough pulls for an accurate reading (3 or 4)? on a stock 8 how long would it take? I would like to get a good base number now before I add a few mods. Is there any tuning at all that you can do without adding a plug-in? Last question guys, no hijacking here.
About a hour total time, and the dyno would probably be about $75. With the stock ECU there is no tuning that I can do.
Reply

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:21 AM.