Correct me if I'm wrong about the gains these NA mods provide.
#27
I Would Disagree With Everybody Who Says Intake/exhaust Doesnt Work, I Have A K&n Intake- Re-amemiya Headers- Gutted Stock Cat-greddy Sp2-and A 60 Shot Of Juice, And U Can Ask All The Turbo 8's In South Florida What Has Happened To Them With Me. I Keep Up With Stock Sti's And Evos And I Think Thats Good Comparing Their Numbers And Engine Setups .
Besides, The Car Sounds Like A Porsche, Not Too Loud But Deep- Thats Something Worth Any $$$$
Besides, The Car Sounds Like A Porsche, Not Too Loud But Deep- Thats Something Worth Any $$$$
#28
Power!!
Yes well the 60-shot of Nitrous probably has something to do with that. Not exactly apples to apples comparison. I'm sure you are reaping improvements from your exhaust over stock when using your nitrous.
I do agree that nitrous itself is a very affordable way to increase power but I would say your other mods support the performance of your nitrous as the primary power adder. I don't know if the OP is interested in nitrous or not.
I do agree that nitrous itself is a very affordable way to increase power but I would say your other mods support the performance of your nitrous as the primary power adder. I don't know if the OP is interested in nitrous or not.
#29
Registered User
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Fanman: My last car had no cat...it made boost...it stunk...shot flames...I didn't care CEL light is easy to take care of with a drilled out spark plug fouler, at least it works on most cars. If the stock piping is 2.5" then how do *most* catback exhausts (with 2.5" piping) offer any power increase? The only restriction I can really see would be the cat...and if I just made new piping I'd have a resonator put in I'm not sure at all how a midpipe and exhaust can net 10whp on it's own...when I've seen dynos using intake/header/tune/full 3" exhaust/pullies/flywheel/tune make only 18-20whp more.
The Axialflow is something I'm really interested as it should be slient, less fussy to install, give enough hp, and be tuned by cobb.
The Axialflow is something I'm really interested as it should be slient, less fussy to install, give enough hp, and be tuned by cobb.
But then every single manufacturer has 20whp off a catback...
#30
Registered User
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada ---> Australia
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Chickenwafer: I'm not going to go hardcore NA, just the basics, no porting, while I save up for $$$ or see if there is any FI application I'd want to go with. Where can I find more info on this Mazdaspeed V2? I've honestly never seen a car that is so inconsistent on a dyno, but it's good to know, so I can keep an open mind
*edit* The V2 is the dual canister one? I perfer the V1 with the huge single muffler. Not sure if there are any gains with that one over the v2.
shaunv74: Where is the true exhaust restriction? I assume if 2 members know, then why haven't I found it? The only answers I find are not consistent with each other. Being new here, it makes it hard to tell who is really knowledgeable, and who is not. And yes cooling is a major thing needed if you go FI, I will deal with that before I go FI, but it also depends on the FI application, certain applications should make less heat than others.
Fanman: Why are people saying different things gah. Makes it hard to get information off this forum by searching, as you need to quadruple check any info.
*edit* The V2 is the dual canister one? I perfer the V1 with the huge single muffler. Not sure if there are any gains with that one over the v2.
shaunv74: Where is the true exhaust restriction? I assume if 2 members know, then why haven't I found it? The only answers I find are not consistent with each other. Being new here, it makes it hard to tell who is really knowledgeable, and who is not. And yes cooling is a major thing needed if you go FI, I will deal with that before I go FI, but it also depends on the FI application, certain applications should make less heat than others.
Fanman: Why are people saying different things gah. Makes it hard to get information off this forum by searching, as you need to quadruple check any info.
Last edited by Daemos; 08-06-2007 at 01:45 AM.
#33
In my perspective, I would rather just use a 50 shot of nitrous sparingly... 50+20=70 more horse power that I can use through 5,000 RPM's and higher. Versus a Greddy 8 that cuts of at 7,000 RPM's
#34
Dyno numbers for this car are funky. SOme have speculated it is a cat overheat mode, or the car gets weird when the front wheels aren't moving. There's a bunch of speculation as to why the RX-8 dyno's weird, but we know it does. People have done three pulls on the same day back-to-back-to-back, and ranged from 175-192rwhp. Obviously, dyno's are going to be inconsistent.
#35
I find it funny how all these people seem to think the cat isn't a worth while upgrade.
N/a mods work, but you are not going to find your self glued to a seat because you let more air in and out of the motor. Most are peak upgrades so they wont offer much of anything till you really rev'd up.
N/a mods work, but you are not going to find your self glued to a seat because you let more air in and out of the motor. Most are peak upgrades so they wont offer much of anything till you really rev'd up.
#36
I am THAT guy
iTrader: (1)
What i would like to know is the difference (in regards to power) in having a highflow cat versus having the cat removed completely.
i was thinking about going with RP supercat but if removing the cat gives a more noticable increase over the supercat then i might do with that...any advice for a 8 that's a DD?
i was thinking about going with RP supercat but if removing the cat gives a more noticable increase over the supercat then i might do with that...any advice for a 8 that's a DD?
#37
Power!!
Most folks that have removed the cat have noticed it's much louder than stock and have had to install a resonator to make it livable as a daily driver. I don't have experience with the difference in power between a resonated mid pipe and a high flow cat. I'm sure there's a few threads out there on this that can be found with some searching.
#38
I can tell you based off my civic. I was doing the sleeper thing so I had a 2.5inch catless pipe that ran to a dynomax super turbo muffler. It was still pretty loud so I added a res and it about cut the sound in 1/2 and the car sounded pretty close to stock again, just a little more *****.
Point is that a Res will cut the sound down a pretty good bit.
Point is that a Res will cut the sound down a pretty good bit.
#39
Nope
iTrader: (9)
I've also seen a lot of others have the same floopy numbers, and others have not. Like I said; it's funky
#43
Power!!
My Racing Beat flywheel did not lower my MPG. Anyone have info. on intake and exhaust/cat removal impact?
In the interest of true transparancy my MPG shortly after installation did suffer but only due to the fact that I just couldn't keep my right foot under control after I installed it.
In the interest of true transparancy my MPG shortly after installation did suffer but only due to the fact that I just couldn't keep my right foot under control after I installed it.
#44
Your mods mean squit
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Inside your mind
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
[QUOTE=Daemos;2002280]
shaunv74: Where is the true exhaust restriction? I assume if 2 members know, then why haven't I found it? QUOTE]
Maybe you need to look between the rotors & the manifold
shaunv74: Where is the true exhaust restriction? I assume if 2 members know, then why haven't I found it? QUOTE]
Maybe you need to look between the rotors & the manifold
#45
Power!!
I guess I"m being cryptic. The turn from the side exhaust ports out to the exhaust manifold is an abrupt 90 degree turn with no fillet so it causes some turbulent flow and backpressure. Rotarygod and Charles have been trying to smooth these out in his engine rebuild. You can check it out in Charles R. Hill's "Rebuilding my Renesis" thread.
#46
RotoRocks Powered
To get more you burn more fuel. You increase the airflow (intake, exhaust... Whatever) you get more air in, which PCM compensates for with more fuel.
Unless you don't change anything, and just lean out what you already have.
Look at how ritch that AF curve is on the Dyno printout. (I run 11AF at red line under full boost, and they have it in NA.) But that just releases what power potential that fuel has in it already. To get any more, you need to add more.
#47
RotoRocks Powered
Intake don't do anything worth even mentioning. I don't care if you put a god damn platinum compound 10" wide intake from the future with a with Richard Gear's gerbil in it. It won't make any more than 1or 2 HP power.
Neither will Exhaust, on it's own.
5HP that you can possibly gain with removing cat don't count.
Good for you. i hope it looks nice an shiny.
I am in South FL.
You outrun a poorly tuned rx8 with greddy and emanage blue driven by a teenager? Congratulations.
I've had nitrous on my car before. I run 75 HP. It doesn't even come close to a properly tuned turbo with 8-9PSI of boost, so stop right there...
Comparing what numbers?
Where would you be with your "Upgrades" without the nitrous shot?
By the way, mine turboed 8 doesn't keep up with them. It blows them right out of the water, along with anything else out there that is in the power range of under around 350hp (Which I am sure
that any decently tuned turboed RX8 could do, just ask Mysql, or MazdaManiac, or MadDog...). But that's besides the point.
Sure thing. It sounds nice. but so it would if you had stock intake with VFAD taken off.
Dude, get real.
I bet the first thing you thought after you put all those mods on was - "FUC*, just got screwed!!! Just threw away a shitload of my money for nothing!" And then you experience a mental shut down and went into the state of denial.
And now you sit here and advertise that useless crap to others, because in your mind it's like this: "I got screwed on this, so now it's their turn."
Neither will Exhaust, on it's own.
5HP that you can possibly gain with removing cat don't count.
Good for you. i hope it looks nice an shiny.
You outrun a poorly tuned rx8 with greddy and emanage blue driven by a teenager? Congratulations.
I've had nitrous on my car before. I run 75 HP. It doesn't even come close to a properly tuned turbo with 8-9PSI of boost, so stop right there...
Where would you be with your "Upgrades" without the nitrous shot?
By the way, mine turboed 8 doesn't keep up with them. It blows them right out of the water, along with anything else out there that is in the power range of under around 350hp (Which I am sure
that any decently tuned turboed RX8 could do, just ask Mysql, or MazdaManiac, or MadDog...). But that's besides the point.
Dude, get real.
I bet the first thing you thought after you put all those mods on was - "FUC*, just got screwed!!! Just threw away a shitload of my money for nothing!" And then you experience a mental shut down and went into the state of denial.
And now you sit here and advertise that useless crap to others, because in your mind it's like this: "I got screwed on this, so now it's their turn."
#48
Dam rotor kind of harsh. Seems most turbo kits cost at least 5k tunned, some going way past that. That 5k could get smoked by some bolt-on's and a bottle pretty easy.
I mean a pretty much stock greddy from what i've seen puts you at around 230ish WHP, and you have n/a guys that are landing right on the 200whp mark(and almost none have a header). Yeah you could always boost more to get hp, or build you own kit!! but most of the people on this forum find putting an intake on a challenge.
I mean a pretty much stock greddy from what i've seen puts you at around 230ish WHP, and you have n/a guys that are landing right on the 200whp mark(and almost none have a header). Yeah you could always boost more to get hp, or build you own kit!! but most of the people on this forum find putting an intake on a challenge.
#49
Has a headache.
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Intake don't do anything worth even mentioning. I don't care if you put a god damn platinum compound 10" wide intake from the future with a with Richard Gear's gerbil in it. It won't make any more than 1or 2 HP power.
Neither will Exhaust, on it's own.
5HP that you can possibly gain with removing cat don't count.
Good for you. i hope it looks nice an shiny.
I am in South FL.
You outrun a poorly tuned rx8 with greddy and emanage blue driven by a teenager? Congratulations.
I've had nitrous on my car before. I run 75 HP. It doesn't even come close to a properly tuned turbo with 8-9PSI of boost, so stop right there...
Comparing what numbers?
Where would you be with your "Upgrades" without the nitrous shot?
By the way, mine turboed 8 doesn't keep up with them. It blows them right out of the water, along with anything else out there that is in the power range of under around 350hp (Which I am sure
that any decently tuned turboed RX8 could do, just ask Mysql, or MazdaManiac, or MadDog...). But that's besides the point.
Sure thing. It sounds nice. but so it would if you had stock intake with VFAD taken off.
Dude, get real.
I bet the first thing you thought after you put all those mods on was - "FUC*, just got screwed!!! Just threw away a shitload of my money for nothing!" And then you experience a mental shut down and went into the state of denial.
And now you sit here and advertise that useless crap to others, because in your mind it's like this: "I got screwed on this, so now it's their turn."
Neither will Exhaust, on it's own.
5HP that you can possibly gain with removing cat don't count.
Good for you. i hope it looks nice an shiny.
I am in South FL.
You outrun a poorly tuned rx8 with greddy and emanage blue driven by a teenager? Congratulations.
I've had nitrous on my car before. I run 75 HP. It doesn't even come close to a properly tuned turbo with 8-9PSI of boost, so stop right there...
Comparing what numbers?
Where would you be with your "Upgrades" without the nitrous shot?
By the way, mine turboed 8 doesn't keep up with them. It blows them right out of the water, along with anything else out there that is in the power range of under around 350hp (Which I am sure
that any decently tuned turboed RX8 could do, just ask Mysql, or MazdaManiac, or MadDog...). But that's besides the point.
Sure thing. It sounds nice. but so it would if you had stock intake with VFAD taken off.
Dude, get real.
I bet the first thing you thought after you put all those mods on was - "FUC*, just got screwed!!! Just threw away a shitload of my money for nothing!" And then you experience a mental shut down and went into the state of denial.
And now you sit here and advertise that useless crap to others, because in your mind it's like this: "I got screwed on this, so now it's their turn."
problem is, he wasn't attacking anyone yet you come off entirely too condescending and attacking towards him- (not to say you aren't right for the most part.) Honestly, there are a ton of people who know a shitload more than you and I and 90% of the rest of the forum combined but don't go out of their way to be dicks about it.
With his EVO/STi statement, I've hung right with stock evo's around highway speeds on several differrent occassions with only the K&N V2 and AP pulley. Not to say those mods gave me 20 billion horsepower or 0 horsepower but just getting the point across that I'm thinking he meant without his nitrous. The only way he would be needing nitrous in that case would be if he was rockin an AT RX8...