Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

Correct me if I'm wrong about the gains these NA mods provide.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 08-06-2007, 12:39 AM
  #26  
Power!!
 
shaunv74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunny See attle
Posts: 4,412
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Nice graph. Do you still have the CZ or did you step up to the int-x?
Old 08-06-2007, 12:46 AM
  #27  
Registered User
 
305WANKEL's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 70
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I Would Disagree With Everybody Who Says Intake/exhaust Doesnt Work, I Have A K&n Intake- Re-amemiya Headers- Gutted Stock Cat-greddy Sp2-and A 60 Shot Of Juice, And U Can Ask All The Turbo 8's In South Florida What Has Happened To Them With Me. I Keep Up With Stock Sti's And Evos And I Think Thats Good Comparing Their Numbers And Engine Setups .


Besides, The Car Sounds Like A Porsche, Not Too Loud But Deep- Thats Something Worth Any $$$$
Old 08-06-2007, 01:13 AM
  #28  
Power!!
 
shaunv74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunny See attle
Posts: 4,412
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Yes well the 60-shot of Nitrous probably has something to do with that. Not exactly apples to apples comparison. I'm sure you are reaping improvements from your exhaust over stock when using your nitrous.

I do agree that nitrous itself is a very affordable way to increase power but I would say your other mods support the performance of your nitrous as the primary power adder. I don't know if the OP is interested in nitrous or not.
Old 08-06-2007, 01:33 AM
  #29  
Registered User
 
Fanman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Glendale, CA
Posts: 3,281
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Daemos
Fanman: My last car had no cat...it made boost...it stunk...shot flames...I didn't care CEL light is easy to take care of with a drilled out spark plug fouler, at least it works on most cars. If the stock piping is 2.5" then how do *most* catback exhausts (with 2.5" piping) offer any power increase? The only restriction I can really see would be the cat...and if I just made new piping I'd have a resonator put in I'm not sure at all how a midpipe and exhaust can net 10whp on it's own...when I've seen dynos using intake/header/tune/full 3" exhaust/pullies/flywheel/tune make only 18-20whp more.

The Axialflow is something I'm really interested as it should be slient, less fussy to install, give enough hp, and be tuned by cobb.
The main restriction point is the cat & resonator. There have been dynos run by people on this board that showed a good 6-8 hp of that 10 hp gain is from the cat & resonaotor removal. The cat back exhaust gains a few hp probably by a smoother/straighter design, even if using the same 2.5" piping. Intake, pulley, hi-flow cat, cat back exhaust, ECU re-flash will still only net you about 20 hp TOTAL (not more).


But then every single manufacturer has 20whp off a catback...
Because a big bulk of them are liars. NOBODY has shown these kind've hp gains from their exhausts on independent dynoes. Most showed as some vendors have said about a 2-3 hp gain. Period. They have financial interests in selling you things. And they think they will sell you a lot more if they claim 20 hp for $600 vs. 2 hp for $600. And some ricers will believe them.
Old 08-06-2007, 01:33 AM
  #30  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
Daemos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Location: Canada ---> Australia
Posts: 686
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Chickenwafer: I'm not going to go hardcore NA, just the basics, no porting, while I save up for $$$ or see if there is any FI application I'd want to go with. Where can I find more info on this Mazdaspeed V2? I've honestly never seen a car that is so inconsistent on a dyno, but it's good to know, so I can keep an open mind

*edit* The V2 is the dual canister one? I perfer the V1 with the huge single muffler. Not sure if there are any gains with that one over the v2.

shaunv74: Where is the true exhaust restriction? I assume if 2 members know, then why haven't I found it? The only answers I find are not consistent with each other. Being new here, it makes it hard to tell who is really knowledgeable, and who is not. And yes cooling is a major thing needed if you go FI, I will deal with that before I go FI, but it also depends on the FI application, certain applications should make less heat than others.

Fanman: Why are people saying different things gah. Makes it hard to get information off this forum by searching, as you need to quadruple check any info.

Last edited by Daemos; 08-06-2007 at 01:45 AM.
Old 08-06-2007, 08:14 AM
  #31  
Official Post Whore
iTrader: (2)
 
pdxhak's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Portland,OR
Posts: 10,462
Received 31 Likes on 27 Posts
Originally Posted by Nemesis8
Yep. Now we just need a sticky thread just for proven NA mods
Old 08-06-2007, 08:23 AM
  #32  
Bigus Rotus
iTrader: (3)
 
Nemesis8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Missouri
Posts: 8,573
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by shaunv74
Nice graph. Do you still have the CZ or did you step up to the int-x?
Sold the CZ and waiting on Cobb like allot of us are.
Old 08-06-2007, 09:04 AM
  #33  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by Keef
I would go FI if I new I had the money for an engine rebuild down the road... The only reason forced induction had me scared is because there's more air, more fuel, more heat. And heat from what I understand is what takes a toll on a rotary engine.
My car runs cooler than a stock RX-8 does.


In my perspective, I would rather just use a 50 shot of nitrous sparingly... 50+20=70 more horse power that I can use through 5,000 RPM's and higher. Versus a Greddy 8 that cuts of at 7,000 RPM's
It doesn't cut off at 7000. And you only make more horse power when you go into boost. Otherwise it's exactly like stock.
Old 08-06-2007, 09:06 AM
  #34  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by chickenwafer
Dyno numbers for this car are funky. SOme have speculated it is a cat overheat mode, or the car gets weird when the front wheels aren't moving. There's a bunch of speculation as to why the RX-8 dyno's weird, but we know it does. People have done three pulls on the same day back-to-back-to-back, and ranged from 175-192rwhp. Obviously, dyno's are going to be inconsistent.
I can show you a composite dyno chart with about 8 pulls on it, the tune was being tweaked, but the numbers were exactly the same besides the AFR/timing changes. Maybe some of you guys are using crappy dyno machines
Old 08-06-2007, 10:53 AM
  #35  
Goat rider
 
Trekk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I find it funny how all these people seem to think the cat isn't a worth while upgrade.

N/a mods work, but you are not going to find your self glued to a seat because you let more air in and out of the motor. Most are peak upgrades so they wont offer much of anything till you really rev'd up.
Old 08-06-2007, 11:31 AM
  #36  
I am THAT guy
iTrader: (1)
 
Atilla's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Caca Cali
Posts: 5,994
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
What i would like to know is the difference (in regards to power) in having a highflow cat versus having the cat removed completely.

i was thinking about going with RP supercat but if removing the cat gives a more noticable increase over the supercat then i might do with that...any advice for a 8 that's a DD?
Old 08-06-2007, 11:38 AM
  #37  
Power!!
 
shaunv74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunny See attle
Posts: 4,412
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Most folks that have removed the cat have noticed it's much louder than stock and have had to install a resonator to make it livable as a daily driver. I don't have experience with the difference in power between a resonated mid pipe and a high flow cat. I'm sure there's a few threads out there on this that can be found with some searching.
Old 08-06-2007, 12:00 PM
  #38  
Goat rider
 
Trekk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I can tell you based off my civic. I was doing the sleeper thing so I had a 2.5inch catless pipe that ran to a dynomax super turbo muffler. It was still pretty loud so I added a res and it about cut the sound in 1/2 and the car sounded pretty close to stock again, just a little more *****.

Point is that a Res will cut the sound down a pretty good bit.
Old 08-06-2007, 12:16 PM
  #39  
Nope
iTrader: (9)
 
chickenwafer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Denver
Posts: 3,312
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by mysql101
I can show you a composite dyno chart with about 8 pulls on it, the tune was being tweaked, but the numbers were exactly the same besides the AFR/timing changes. Maybe some of you guys are using crappy dyno machines
Well, my car on a Mustang dyno made some pretty floopy numbers. and so did a few of the other RX-8's there. But then again, one made consistent numbers ranging from 166-170.

I've also seen a lot of others have the same floopy numbers, and others have not. Like I said; it's funky
Old 08-06-2007, 12:30 PM
  #40  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
mine was on a dynojet btw.
Old 08-06-2007, 02:02 PM
  #41  
Power!!
 
shaunv74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunny See attle
Posts: 4,412
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
My experience on a dyno was pretty consistent. Also on a dynojet.



Old 08-06-2007, 02:22 PM
  #42  
幹他媽!
 
Detrich's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2005
Location: San Gabriel Valley, CA
Posts: 2,078
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
correct me if i'm wrong, but the add'l (nominal) hp gains from the mods he mentioned also come at a price of lower MPG...
Old 08-06-2007, 02:33 PM
  #43  
Power!!
 
shaunv74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunny See attle
Posts: 4,412
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
My Racing Beat flywheel did not lower my MPG. Anyone have info. on intake and exhaust/cat removal impact?

In the interest of true transparancy my MPG shortly after installation did suffer but only due to the fact that I just couldn't keep my right foot under control after I installed it.
Old 08-06-2007, 02:38 PM
  #44  
Your mods mean squit
 
stuartm's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Location: Inside your mind
Posts: 102
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
[QUOTE=Daemos;2002280]
shaunv74: Where is the true exhaust restriction? I assume if 2 members know, then why haven't I found it? QUOTE]

Maybe you need to look between the rotors & the manifold
Old 08-06-2007, 02:42 PM
  #45  
Power!!
 
shaunv74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunny See attle
Posts: 4,412
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
I guess I"m being cryptic. The turn from the side exhaust ports out to the exhaust manifold is an abrupt 90 degree turn with no fillet so it causes some turbulent flow and backpressure. Rotarygod and Charles have been trying to smooth these out in his engine rebuild. You can check it out in Charles R. Hill's "Rebuilding my Renesis" thread.
Old 08-06-2007, 03:17 PM
  #46  
RotoRocks Powered
 
rotorocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by Detrich
correct me if i'm wrong, but the add'l (nominal) hp gains from the mods he mentioned also come at a price of lower MPG...
Power always comes at a price of MPG
To get more you burn more fuel. You increase the airflow (intake, exhaust... Whatever) you get more air in, which PCM compensates for with more fuel.

Unless you don't change anything, and just lean out what you already have.
Look at how ritch that AF curve is on the Dyno printout. (I run 11AF at red line under full boost, and they have it in NA.) But that just releases what power potential that fuel has in it already. To get any more, you need to add more.
Old 08-06-2007, 07:29 PM
  #47  
RotoRocks Powered
 
rotorocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Delray Beach, FL
Posts: 1,236
Likes: 0
Received 6 Likes on 6 Posts
Originally Posted by 305WANKEL
I Would Disagree With Everybody Who Says Intake/exhaust Doesnt Work,
Intake don't do anything worth even mentioning. I don't care if you put a god damn platinum compound 10" wide intake from the future with a with Richard Gear's gerbil in it. It won't make any more than 1or 2 HP power.

Neither will Exhaust, on it's own.
5HP that you can possibly gain with removing cat don't count.

Originally Posted by 305WANKEL
I Have A K&n Intake- Re-amemiya Headers- Gutted Stock Cat-greddy Sp2
Good for you. i hope it looks nice an shiny.

Originally Posted by 305WANKEL
A 60 Shot Of Juice, And U Can Ask All The Turbo 8's In South Florida What Has Happened To Them With Me.
I am in South FL.

You outrun a poorly tuned rx8 with greddy and emanage blue driven by a teenager? Congratulations.
I've had nitrous on my car before. I run 75 HP. It doesn't even come close to a properly tuned turbo with 8-9PSI of boost, so stop right there...

Originally Posted by 305WANKEL
I Keep Up With Stock Sti's And Evos And I Think That's Good Comparing Their Numbers And Engine Setups.
Comparing what numbers?
Where would you be with your "Upgrades" without the nitrous shot?

By the way, mine turboed 8 doesn't keep up with them. It blows them right out of the water, along with anything else out there that is in the power range of under around 350hp (Which I am sure
that any decently tuned turboed RX8 could do, just ask Mysql, or MazdaManiac, or MadDog...). But that's besides the point.

Originally Posted by 305WANKEL
Besides, The Car Sounds Like A Porsche, Not Too Loud But Deep- That's Something Worth Any $$$$
Sure thing. It sounds nice. but so it would if you had stock intake with VFAD taken off.

Dude, get real.
I bet the first thing you thought after you put all those mods on was - "FUC*, just got screwed!!! Just threw away a shitload of my money for nothing!" And then you experience a mental shut down and went into the state of denial.
And now you sit here and advertise that useless crap to others, because in your mind it's like this: "I got screwed on this, so now it's their turn."
Old 08-06-2007, 09:58 PM
  #48  
Goat rider
 
Trekk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 587
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dam rotor kind of harsh. Seems most turbo kits cost at least 5k tunned, some going way past that. That 5k could get smoked by some bolt-on's and a bottle pretty easy.
I mean a pretty much stock greddy from what i've seen puts you at around 230ish WHP, and you have n/a guys that are landing right on the 200whp mark(and almost none have a header). Yeah you could always boost more to get hp, or build you own kit!! but most of the people on this forum find putting an intake on a challenge.
Old 08-06-2007, 09:59 PM
  #49  
Has a headache.
 
SE3PSynergy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New York
Posts: 215
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotorocks
Intake don't do anything worth even mentioning. I don't care if you put a god damn platinum compound 10" wide intake from the future with a with Richard Gear's gerbil in it. It won't make any more than 1or 2 HP power.

Neither will Exhaust, on it's own.
5HP that you can possibly gain with removing cat don't count.



Good for you. i hope it looks nice an shiny.



I am in South FL.

You outrun a poorly tuned rx8 with greddy and emanage blue driven by a teenager? Congratulations.
I've had nitrous on my car before. I run 75 HP. It doesn't even come close to a properly tuned turbo with 8-9PSI of boost, so stop right there...



Comparing what numbers?
Where would you be with your "Upgrades" without the nitrous shot?

By the way, mine turboed 8 doesn't keep up with them. It blows them right out of the water, along with anything else out there that is in the power range of under around 350hp (Which I am sure
that any decently tuned turboed RX8 could do, just ask Mysql, or MazdaManiac, or MadDog...). But that's besides the point.



Sure thing. It sounds nice. but so it would if you had stock intake with VFAD taken off.

Dude, get real.
I bet the first thing you thought after you put all those mods on was - "FUC*, just got screwed!!! Just threw away a shitload of my money for nothing!" And then you experience a mental shut down and went into the state of denial.
And now you sit here and advertise that useless crap to others, because in your mind it's like this: "I got screwed on this, so now it's their turn."

problem is, he wasn't attacking anyone yet you come off entirely too condescending and attacking towards him- (not to say you aren't right for the most part.) Honestly, there are a ton of people who know a shitload more than you and I and 90% of the rest of the forum combined but don't go out of their way to be dicks about it.

With his EVO/STi statement, I've hung right with stock evo's around highway speeds on several differrent occassions with only the K&N V2 and AP pulley. Not to say those mods gave me 20 billion horsepower or 0 horsepower but just getting the point across that I'm thinking he meant without his nitrous. The only way he would be needing nitrous in that case would be if he was rockin an AT RX8...
Old 08-06-2007, 10:12 PM
  #50  
Power!!
 
shaunv74's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Sunny See attle
Posts: 4,412
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
So if we're all done measuring our dicks can we get back to giving this guy the information he was looking for.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Correct me if I'm wrong about the gains these NA mods provide.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:29 PM.