Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

Attention People with the umnitza carbon fiber intake, Must read!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 11-18-2006, 11:23 AM
  #1  
Need'd a Turbo
Thread Starter
 
mike1324a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Attention People with the umnitza carbon fiber intake, Must read!

I have the umnitza carbon fiber intake and I just got dyno tuned yesterday by scott at mazsport. He was raising the numbers slowly and realized the intake might be holding it back some. Well he took it off and changed no timing or fuel and gained 5 horsepower at the wheels!!! We came to the conclusion that the filter elemant of the intake was very poor. I plan on going back to the stock box and getting the racing beat ram air duct until i can find a suitible replacement for that filter. He didnt believe the carbon housing was restrictive bue to its large opening but the filter is garbage! I thaught everyone might want to know this!
Old 11-18-2006, 01:08 PM
  #2  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Yep, that's the report on aftermarket intakes, except racing beat.

Last edited by Razz1; 11-18-2006 at 01:13 PM.
Old 11-18-2006, 02:19 PM
  #3  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,727
Received 2,012 Likes on 1,640 Posts
wrong, he's saying they just pulled the filter element off i.e. ran it without a filter on the end

Razz, please quit parroting that same BS over and over again, m-kay? It can be done ...

not surprisingly really, it doesn't seem to have much filter area, adapting something won't be easy due to the box shape, AEM dri-flo would be nice if it can be adapted/fit


Last edited by TeamRX8; 11-18-2006 at 02:45 PM.
Old 11-18-2006, 03:04 PM
  #4  
Northeast Pimpin'
 
VarneyMazda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 1,155
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What about just a screen over the intake?
probably not good for street driving the rain.
Old 11-18-2006, 03:54 PM
  #5  
Need'd a Turbo
Thread Starter
 
mike1324a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by TeamRX8
wrong, he's saying they just pulled the filter element off i.e. ran it without a filter on the end

Razz, please quit parroting that same BS over and over again, m-kay? It can be done ...

not surprisingly really, it doesn't seem to have much filter area, adapting something won't be easy due to the box shape, AEM dri-flo would be nice if it can be adapted/fit

Correct. We ran it without a filter and gained 5whp. The filter size is bad but the flow is ever worse! I dont I love the housing but i will have to find some kind of filter that will fit in the box but like you said, it wont be easy. Anyone got any ideas?
Old 11-18-2006, 04:01 PM
  #6  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,727
Received 2,012 Likes on 1,640 Posts
based on what I've seen you need a flat plate with a tube extension that will mount up to the inside of that housing and allow a slip-on filter to be clamped on


Last edited by TeamRX8; 11-18-2006 at 04:07 PM.
Old 11-18-2006, 04:57 PM
  #7  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
1stgen8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Da Hills of Va
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have seen k&N filters that look like they will fit. I will do some research and let everyone know.
Old 11-27-2006, 05:54 PM
  #8  
My Goodness My Guinness
 
Moonrover333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The OC, Maryland
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
welp my .02 is this. i have the first gen of this intake with the old big pipe and no screen and i just switched back yo stock box and filter. it feels incredibly slower and choppy powerwise. i don't get it. it may just be a dirty filter tho. ah well i can't trade car in so ill be putting it in again.
Old 11-27-2006, 06:17 PM
  #9  
always preoccupied.
 
ddub's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: Kirkland, WA
Posts: 827
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Razz1
Yep, that's the report on aftermarket intakes, except racing beat.
On every single aftermarket intake for the rx8? Proof? Show me data on every aftermarket intake available that proves your statement or please don't spout off lies.
Old 11-27-2006, 06:22 PM
  #10  
I dont care...
 
otherside's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pleasantville
Posts: 574
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
CAI's suck!
Old 11-27-2006, 07:15 PM
  #11  
the WANKEL made me do it
 
Mazda-Rati's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Pittsburgh
Posts: 317
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Makes one think if the K&N ver.2 is as restrictive since they seem to have the same filter design
Old 11-27-2006, 07:22 PM
  #12  
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
mysql101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: USA
Posts: 8,625
Received 5 Likes on 4 Posts
As long as it sounds louder, what's the problem with losing 5 or more horse power.

Less air flow means less chance of dirt getting into the engine. That's quality stuff.
Old 11-28-2006, 01:25 PM
  #13  
Need'd a Turbo
Thread Starter
 
mike1324a's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I have one of the first that were available and like moonrover, my tube is bigger and it has no screen. An when it comes to horsepower on the 8, 5 matters alot for us N/A people who are uber lacking in power. When i get ahold of that mazsport turbo it will be a different story but right now i have to grasp every little horse i can get.

Last edited by mike1324a; 11-28-2006 at 01:28 PM.
Old 11-28-2006, 03:12 PM
  #14  
My Goodness My Guinness
 
Moonrover333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The OC, Maryland
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
welp after actually paying attention to my car more today. the stock airbox seems to pull a lil harder at speed but from a dead stand still the Simota feels alot better, especially when leaving a stoplite. hmm also i don't see the filter exit being too small. possibly is the huge nosecap. i'll snap some pics for reference
Old 11-28-2006, 03:38 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
The Racing Beat system probably gives the best average power gain (which isn't much) but at the expense of not giving the highest peak gain. the K&N system should actually have a few more on the extreme top end but not as much over the entire powerband. Keep in mind that none of these systems is enough of a gain to feel so any power gains will only be seen on a dyno.
Old 11-28-2006, 03:48 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
Red Devil's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Misinformation Director - Evolv Chicago
Posts: 3,086
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Another reason that I think I'll stick with my K&N panel filter.
Old 11-28-2006, 03:53 PM
  #17  
Baro Rex
iTrader: (1)
 
maxxdamigz's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2006
Location: NJ
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The question is: how much HP do other filters rob? All filters are a flow restriction. If this filter hits you for 5 but another filter hits for 7, this one would actually be better. You have to go dyno the stock air box with and without filter now! The carbon fiber intake box is pretty sexxy looking though.
Old 11-28-2006, 05:38 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
j9fd3s's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 1,382
Likes: 0
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by rotarygod
The Racing Beat system probably gives the best average power gain (which isn't much) but at the expense of not giving the highest peak gain. the K&N system should actually have a few more on the extreme top end but not as much over the entire powerband. Keep in mind that none of these systems is enough of a gain to feel so any power gains will only be seen on a dyno.
i drove a car with a mis-installed SR intake (afm was backwards) and while it didnt run under 4k, it was faster over 4k than it was after we put the stock airbox back into it.

it could also be that the non running, and then sudden take off just felt fast
Old 11-28-2006, 05:50 PM
  #19  
My Goodness My Guinness
 
Moonrover333's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: The OC, Maryland
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
ok here are the pics
this is from the back of intake (looking from engine to filter) and my knee


and a close up of same view


and a side shot of just filter


i think its either the opening of intake or filter size or material that could be holding it up and btw ANY intake without a filter will def show a significant power gain
Old 11-28-2006, 06:06 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
rotarygod's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 9,134
Likes: 0
Received 22 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by maxxdamigz
The question is: how much HP do other filters rob? All filters are a flow restriction.
This is true but you need to put it into perspetive with a frame of reference. Yes all filters are a restriction to flow. However if a filter an flow as much or more air than the engine needs, it isn't a restriction to the engine. You only need as much flow as the engine needs. Anything more doesn't matter.
Old 01-17-2007, 11:30 PM
  #21  
Lasse wankel
 
Lasse wankel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Stockholm,Sweden
Posts: 164
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Red Devil
Another reason that I think I'll stick with my K&N panel filter.
I have tested the K&N filter on a SUN rolling road and power went down 2-3 hp. Even took away the filter element and lost 3 hp. I have ordered the Simota carbon box will have it in a few weeks and put it to the test on my RotoTest dyno. Should be interesting to see the results!

/Lasse
Old 01-17-2007, 11:57 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
rowteree's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 428
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
interesting..i too have a simota intake...makes me wanna get rid of it and put the stocky back on
Old 01-18-2007, 01:23 AM
  #23  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,727
Received 2,012 Likes on 1,640 Posts
their Simota intake cross-section at the MAF fitting is significantly different than OE, that's a big no-no IMO unless you recalibrate the software
Old 01-18-2007, 02:16 AM
  #24  
Registered
 
gr8rx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 224
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I should be getting the intake in a few days from moonrover and I have an apexi power series intake in my other car which according to many tests Ive seen gives the most power filter wise......Im gonna see if I can get that filter to fit in the cf enclosure .........team rx8...what do you mean by the crossection?
Old 01-18-2007, 05:54 AM
  #25  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
1stgen8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Da Hills of Va
Posts: 662
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rowteree
interesting..i too have a simota intake...makes me wanna get rid of it and put the stocky back on
I got rid of mine and custom made my own CAI using 3.5" pipe and a better filter. Right away I could feel the difference in my car. I think those intakes are pretty pieces of junk. The pipe size and filter are the problem on those intakes.

page 3.....
https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-aftermarket-performance-modifications-23/custom-cai-wish-me-luck-103093/


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Attention People with the umnitza carbon fiber intake, Must read!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 03:07 AM.