Notices
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications Discussion of power adding modifications

3 sec 0-60 RX-8? Meet Electrocharger™

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 01-22-2006, 02:04 PM
  #26  
Go Texas Longhorns!
 
brillo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2003
Location: Houston, Texas
Posts: 1,818
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
a sub 4 sec 0-60 requires more than power. It also requires a prefect setup of tires, suspension setup and drivetrain design. I've seen 500whp cars that can't do a sub 4 sec 0-60. at some point, the design and balance of the whole car becomes an issue.

Look at the Ferarri F430. its faster to 60 than a Z06, with less power and torque.
Old 01-22-2006, 02:59 PM
  #27  
Momentum Keeps Me Going
Thread Starter
 
Spin9k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Originally Posted by globi
If the electric motor would drive a supercharger instead of the crank you'd might get 120 HP from that 30 HP motor, which is probably still not enough to reduce the 1/4 mile time by 3 seconds.
Skipping the ElectrochargerTM, but considering the Knight product - he says they use:

- Drive System consists of one 8HP electric motor
- The core of our ESC™ 350c is a centrifugal type supercharger
- Max Recommended PSI 5 PSI on a stock engine
- Maximum 455 CFM

So how much HP could this produce for us? I'm lost in the calculations. Thanks.

Last edited by Spin9k; 01-22-2006 at 03:03 PM.
Old 01-22-2006, 04:52 PM
  #28  
Registered
iTrader: (5)
 
Richard Paul's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Chatsworth Ca
Posts: 2,433
Likes: 0
Received 16 Likes on 9 Posts
Originally Posted by Spin9k
Skipping the ElectrochargerTM, but considering the Knight product - he says they use:

- Drive System consists of one 8HP electric motor
- The core of our ESC™ 350c is a centrifugal type supercharger
- Max Recommended PSI 5 PSI on a stock engine
- Maximum 455 CFM

So how much HP could this produce for us? I'm lost in the calculations. Thanks.

227 HP at the flywheel
For a good piston engine 300+
Figure 1.5 cfm per HP on a piston engine
The rotary is less efficient and needs 2 cfm per HP.

Now what will happen with his blower is that it will flow more CFM at a lower pressure. That is if he is quoting 455 at 5 psi
If he is saying it will free flow 455 then it will just do 0psi on our engine.
You need the whole compressor map for these things.

If he is saying the former then some power could come from it but again I don't know what he is quoting.
Either way it is not the right compressor for your needs.
Old 01-22-2006, 07:24 PM
  #29  
No respecter of malarkey
iTrader: (25)
 
TeamRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,756
Received 2,025 Likes on 1,649 Posts
Originally Posted by globi
TeamRX8 I hate to be nitpicking, but since you asked for it; this is what guy321 wrote:
3 seconds is 1.5 second less than 4.5 seconds, or is it not?.
Well I hate to be nitpicky right back at you but the thread title says "3 Sec 0-60 RX-8" and the thread I was replying to didn't quote the same one you used, so how did you expect me to know WTF some off the cuff comment was directed at

Old 01-22-2006, 08:59 PM
  #30  
Wut da F Y'all lookin' @!
 
Hornet's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Germany
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by Richard Paul
I take it that this aux power producing module drives back through the crank pulley? What sort of belt drive will it take to deliver this power to the pulley.

Next problem is that the power has to go through a crank (e-shaft for u) to the flywheel. Therefore that shaft has to hold torque that it was never designed for. You might get away with it on a 500 inch Chevy or a Chrysler Hemi but not with much less. Just for one spot you can relate to think of the flange that the flywheel bolts to can it live without shearing off?

How about on a piston engine there is little overlap on the throw to the mains. When you get to the last throw all the power has to pass through that part of the structure. Add a lot of power to the front of the crank and if it doesn't twist the crank snout off ot still has to go throgh all the other arms.

Now with the small block Chevy the newest custom race cranks have a big block snout on them. This is just because they drive the power steering and the drysump pump along with the water pump and alt. So if the stock snout has problems with that what will happen here. Oh, we are talking billet steel custom cranks having this problem not cast iron factory ones.

Think what would happen putting this on a Honda?
Those are my instant thought on this. They need to get more practical.
Got a question!

If the Electrocharger thing were to kick in when things are already spinning or if power were to come on in a linear increase would it be less stressful on those parts?

I'm thinking along the lines of (imagine if you will that you are in a very fast car), when you take off from a standstill your head might snap back more violently than if you were already rolling when you start accelerating. I'm still curious myself about the complete workings of this thing.

On another aspect of this thing I saw people mentioning the amount of time this thing would provide it's boost for. In their F.A.Q. section they mentioned it can provide boost for as long as a continuous 2 minutes.

http://www.sigmaautomotive.com/elect...rocharger2.php
Old 01-22-2006, 09:15 PM
  #31  
Momentum Keeps Me Going
Thread Starter
 
Spin9k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Colorado
Posts: 5,036
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
I hadn't seen this FAQ. Certainly they confront the bearing load and stress item directly in their FAQ and this was created by a bunch of engineering students... it is tempting to believe ... they can't be spouting all this detail without some basis in fact ... can they?

If only there was a real product .. and the gap from 2004 to now is troubling...
Old 01-22-2006, 09:50 PM
  #32  
Registered
 
globi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 664
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spin9K
- Drive System consists of one 8HP electric motor
- The core of our ESC™ 350c is a centrifugal type supercharger
- Max Recommended PSI 5 PSI on a stock engine
- Maximum 455 CFM
As Richard already mentioned it probably doesn't deliver enough max flow to increase HP at max rpm, but probably would deliver some nice extra low end power.
Also, since its only powered by a 8HP electric motor you probably can't expect that it will deliver more than 30 extra HP even if the supercharger perfectly suits the engine.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
RXFEVER
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
38
08-29-2018 10:14 AM
RXFEVER
West For Sale/Wanted
17
09-11-2016 02:51 PM
czr
RX-8 Parts For Sale/Wanted
4
09-13-2015 11:37 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 3 sec 0-60 RX-8? Meet Electrocharger™



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:30 AM.