Notices
RX-8 Racing Want to discuss autocrossing, road-racing and drag racing the RX-8? Bring it here. This is NOT a kills/street racing forum.

RX8 vs s2000

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-03-2005, 03:22 AM
  #76  
Registered
 
PedalFaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RatedR_RX-8
for a car that has had several years of development to take on a car that just came out you have to keep in mind that it could be a little 1 sided. Also since every test i have seen or read about the rx-8 holds its ground and keeps up with the s2k which tells me that with more development the rx could easily catch up to and surpass the s2k in stock trim.
Your development comment only applies if modifications are taken into account -- obviously development isn't a factor if you compare stock cars as the original poster requested. I would expect that some of the more experienced people who have driven both cars and offered their opinions on the subject will have taken modification potential into consideration.

Despite your statement to the contrary, I've never seen a test where the RX-8 keeps up with the S2000; it's always close, but never completely even. For SCCA Stock class autocross, the RX-8 will definitely benefit from better shocks, but that won't change the fact that it will still have a much softer suspension, a worse power-to-weight ratio, and rather more weight than the S2000.

The SAC and SEB evidently feel that the S2000 is the superior car for Stock class competition, given that it's now in AS while the RX-8's still in BS. On top of that, I think most consider the S2000 a contender in AS, while the jury's still out on the RX-8 in BS.

I don't know why this is such a difficult conversation. Admitting that other cars are faster than the RX-8 is not the same as admitting that other cars are "better" than the RX-8. The fact that other cars are faster doesn't make the RX-8 less of a car.

Steve
Old 02-03-2005, 10:52 AM
  #77  
RX8 ADDICTED!!!
 
Tigster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 1,108
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aoshi Shinomori
A lot of people are swapping out the Yamaha motor(almost positive the GT-S motor is made by Yamaha) for the K20A(RSX) motor. It responds a lot better to modding and damn that car gets fast. The F20C(S2000) is not quite as responsive to mods as the K20A.

Edit: should have looked at your name, you probably know all these engine codes. But your suggestion is something Lotus should look in to :p
Personally I think the S2000 motor would be the way to go, my Dad has a vortec supercharger S2000, aem, 4:44 gears, 550 cc injectors and that thing flies. I don't think the Elise with how light the car is could hold down that much power. It would be fun to drive but the power in my opinion would greatly surpass the handling of the car.
Old 02-03-2005, 05:04 PM
  #78  
Registered User
 
Banannie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PedalFaster
This again comes back to whether this is a question about street driving or competition driving. In the latter case, the comparison of off-cam power (or off-lobe, or whatever it is in a rotary ) isn't nearly as important since you will very rarely find yourself out of the powerband.

As an aside, though, the initial question was "which will handle better?", whereas the answers have tended towards "which will be faster?" On the handling front, both cars have their weaknesses in stock form. The '00-'03 S2000s are fairly nervous at the limit due to excessive amounts of rear bump steer; they can be driven really quickly, but a lot of people get spooked by the looseness. This problem's fixed to a large extent in the '04-'05 cars; Honda arguably actually overcompensated, as the cars are delivered with zero camber in front, which makes them somewhat pushy. On the bright side, all S2000s are fairly stiff, have good body control / damping, and have unbelievablely good turn-in.

I have much less experience in RX-8s, but from my seat time and talking to other experienced drivers who have driven the car, I'd say it's considerably more forgiving in stock form than at least the early S2000s. Its failing is its lack of body control -- soft springing and damping means it tends to move around a lot in corners and over bumps, and in repeated transitions (e.g. slaloms), it can be a handful when it gets completely unsettled.

The S2000 has a definite learning curve to it -- I think most people would go faster right after jumping into an RX-8 than they would in an S2000. Give an experienced driver time in the S2000, though, and they'll outrun the RX-8.

Steve
- looking forward to the first West Coast B Stock confrontation in under five weeks
What he said :D

(this from someone who sold her 2-month-old RX8 for her fifth S2000)

Annie
968 co-pilot, you're all going down, let the trash talking begin!
Old 02-03-2005, 07:21 PM
  #79  
Registered User
 
fastmike's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Seattle
Posts: 176
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
AH!
I accept the challenge.
Loser changes the others tires???
LOL!
FM
Old 02-03-2005, 07:28 PM
  #80  
Registered User
 
Banannie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Dude, you make Shelbi change your tires, how likely is it you'll change ours? Yeah, like THAT'S gonna happen!!!
Old 02-03-2005, 09:06 PM
  #81  
www.TeamWTF.org
 
clyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Banannie
someone who sold her 2-month-old RX8
Why?
Old 02-03-2005, 09:40 PM
  #82  
Registered User
 
124Spider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PNW
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by clyde
Why?
Just guessing here, but it might have something to do with this
Old 02-03-2005, 09:54 PM
  #83  
"Call me Darkman"
 
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This thread is full of whining babies...........first off who cares if an s2000 can beat the rx8 stock for stock........I don't!!!! They are in different classes and were made to suite different consumers.......and to top it off they are not even in the same price range.....

I'll tell you one thing tho,,,,the s2000 will have some serious competition with the mazdaspeed miata which i believe is still less $$$$....hence the true roadster
Old 02-03-2005, 09:58 PM
  #84  
www.TeamWTF.org
 
clyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by S2k
Just guessing here, but it might have something to do with this
Wouldn't a vid of one of her own S2K Nationals winning runs be a better example?

Not following, though...
Old 02-03-2005, 10:02 PM
  #85  
Registered User
 
124Spider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PNW
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
I'll tell you one thing tho,,,,the s2000 will have some serious competition with the mazdaspeed miata which i believe is still less $$$$....hence the true roadster
Thinking of myself as a car enthusiast rather than a car chauvinist, I was very pleased to see the Mazdaspeed Miata hit the market (the more attractive choices, the merrier). Imagine my surprise, then, when they were practically giving them away at the end of the year (and probably still are). You could get any of a large number of leftover '04s for under $20,000! For reasons I cannot begin to understand, the Mazdaspeed Miata, which should have been a rousing success, neatly filling the gap between the cars like the normal Miata or the MR2 Spyder and the cars like the S2000 and the Boxster, is going begging.
Old 02-03-2005, 10:17 PM
  #86  
Registered
 
PedalFaster's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
This thread is full of whining babies...........first off who cares if an s2000 can beat the rx8 stock for stock........I don't!!!!
The original poster did.

Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
the s2000 will have some serious competition with the mazdaspeed miata which i believe is still less $$$$....
The Mazdaspeed came, tried, and got rocked -- both in sales (as noted by S2k above) and in performance (which, unlike the normally aspirated Miatas, is worse than you'd think based from the stats).

I was as hopeful as anyone that the Mazdaspeed Miata could have stood up to the S2000 for nearly $10k less, but it didn't turn out that way. The RX-8's probably faster around both a track and an autocross course.

Hopefully the oft-rumored Mazdaspeed RX-8 will be a different story...

Steve
Old 02-03-2005, 10:23 PM
  #87  
"Call me Darkman"
 
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by S2k
Thinking of myself as a car enthusiast rather than a car chauvinist, I was very pleased to see the Mazdaspeed Miata hit the market (the more attractive choices, the merrier). Imagine my surprise, then, when they were practically giving them away at the end of the year (and probably still are). You could get any of a large number of leftover '04s for under $20,000! For reasons I cannot begin to understand, the Mazdaspeed Miata, which should have been a rousing success, neatly filling the gap between the cars like the normal Miata or the MR2 Spyder and the cars like the S2000 and the Boxster, is going begging.
The reason that the mazdaspeed miata wasn't a popular sale is because mazda already leaked news of the redesigning of the roadster........which will have similar #'s non-turboed....we will soon see but nevertheless all roadster sales are slower due to the economy and practicality.....
Old 02-03-2005, 10:30 PM
  #88  
"Call me Darkman"
 
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PedalFaster
The original poster did.

The Mazdaspeed came, tried, and got rocked -- both in sales (as noted by S2k above) and in performance (which, unlike the normally aspirated Miatas, is worse than you'd think based from the stats).

I was as hopeful as anyone that the Mazdaspeed Miata could have stood up to the S2000 for nearly $10k less, but it didn't turn out that way. The RX-8's probably faster around both a track and an autocross course.

Hopefully the oft-rumored Mazdaspeed RX-8 will be a different story...

Steve
ya it was a disapointment ....Imo the s2000 and miata still have catching up to do with the elise......stock for stock that is

I'd take a turboed first gen miata any day for a purpose track car :p
Old 02-03-2005, 10:52 PM
  #89  
Registered User
 
124Spider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: PNW
Posts: 759
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by clyde
Wouldn't a vid of one of her own S2K Nationals winning runs be a better example?
Yeah, but I didn't have a video of one of hers. This guy's a national champion, B Stock 2003, so I thought that would convey the idea.
Old 02-04-2005, 06:01 AM
  #90  
Not ******
iTrader: (1)
 
John V's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Posts: 987
Received 64 Likes on 59 Posts
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
The reason that the mazdaspeed miata wasn't a popular sale is because mazda already leaked news of the redesigning of the roadster........which will have similar #'s non-turboed....we will soon see but nevertheless all roadster sales are slower due to the economy and practicality.....
Careful. That same car is also rumored to be significantly heavier. A 2300lbs, 140hp Miata is going to be a lot more fun than a 2800lb, 170hp Miata.

The B Stock battle is certainly going to be fun this year, and it's the race I have a horse in. But what I'm really looking forward to is the S2000 / C4 Corvette battle. THAT will be a good one.. :D
Old 02-04-2005, 10:11 AM
  #91  
Registered User
 
Banannie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Ok, just to clear things up, yes, running the Saini/Pokorny-mobile at Nationals (and winning, which was cool considering the first time I drove the car was up to the start line) made me want another S2K. I'm a Honda gal, and LOVE the S2K. I've owned many many cars and a majority have been Honda/Acura products.

As for the RX8, I didn't like how high-maintenance the rotary was, it wasn't a convertible, hated the MPG, it wasn't a convertible, was worried about reliability, it wasn't a convertible, didn't particularly like that it was a bit soft (**in comparison to the S2K**), it wasn't a convertible, so basically, it wasn't a S2K. I wanted a S2K. Nuff said!

Anyway, I've driven some awesome S2000's - the aforementioned Saini/Pokorny-mobile, and Andy & Heather Howe's (ex-Andy McKee-mobile). S2Ks rock. I set up my RX8 some and autocrossed it a few times before selling it. It's fun, but soft and was a bit on the pushy side (no, I didn't have shocks, but I had a bar, alignment, and fresh Hoosiers). I think the S2K will beat the RX8 in all categories except practicality. And who needs that? Then two weeks ago I drove Steve's 968. He he he he he he he..... as I said, y'all are going DOWN!
Old 02-04-2005, 10:46 AM
  #92  
"Call me Darkman"
 
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Banannie
Ok, just to clear things up, yes, running the Saini/Pokorny-mobile at Nationals (and winning, which was cool considering the first time I drove the car was up to the start line) made me want another S2K. I'm a Honda gal, and LOVE the S2K. I've owned many many cars and a majority have been Honda/Acura products.

As for the RX8, I didn't like how high-maintenance the rotary was, it wasn't a convertible, hated the MPG, it wasn't a convertible, was worried about reliability, it wasn't a convertible, didn't particularly like that it was a bit soft (**in comparison to the S2K**), it wasn't a convertible, so basically, it wasn't a S2K. I wanted a S2K. Nuff said!

Anyway, I've driven some awesome S2000's - the aforementioned Saini/Pokorny-mobile, and Andy & Heather Howe's (ex-Andy McKee-mobile). S2Ks rock. I set up my RX8 some and autocrossed it a few times before selling it. It's fun, but soft and was a bit on the pushy side (no, I didn't have shocks, but I had a bar, alignment, and fresh Hoosiers). I think the S2K will beat the RX8 in all categories except practicality. And who needs that? Then two weeks ago I drove Steve's 968. He he he he he he he..... as I said, y'all are going DOWN!
Where you all from? I'd love to battle your precious s2k with my old beat up '94 rx7 r2,,,,,and bring the 968 too!!!I already have a 2001 911 turbo,and a modded nsx on my kill list so if you got some $$$$ to lose lmk ill come down and show you the difference between quick and fast....btw s2k's are slow hun but your right it is a convertable......please stop trying to big up a 14 second race car.....lol my rx8 was bought for daily driving purposes only.....If i wanted to inject the $10,000 diff. for race purposes you would have your hands full with my 8 but that is what my 7 is for........so go by an elise if you like convertables and want real handling and speed.......at 2800lbs the s2000 is a pig for a convertable roadster!!!!
Old 02-04-2005, 10:59 AM
  #93  
Registered User
 
Banannie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
dude, go back to the street kill forums

W're not saying that the S2K or RX8 is the be-all of sports cars. This thread is for a comparison of the two, in *stock form* (or in a few of our cases, SCCA Solo II Stock Class form).
Old 02-04-2005, 11:16 AM
  #94  
www.TeamWTF.org
 
clyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Banannie
As for the RX8, I didn't like how high-maintenance the rotary was, it wasn't a convertible, hated the MPG, it wasn't a convertible, was worried about reliability, it wasn't a convertible, didn't particularly like that it was a bit soft (**in comparison to the S2K**), it wasn't a convertible, so basically, it wasn't a S2K. I wanted an Accord. Nuff said!
Say no more. I get ya... You wanted an Accord coupe and you're going to cut the roof off. :D

Anyway, I've driven some awesome S2000's - the aforementioned Saini/Pokorny-mobile, and Andy & Heather Howe's (ex-Andy McKee-mobile). S2Ks rock. I set up my RX8 some and autocrossed it a few times before selling it. It's fun, but soft and was a bit on the pushy side (no, I didn't have shocks, but I had a bar, alignment, and fresh Hoosiers). I think the S2K will beat the RX8 in all categories except practicality. And who needs that? Then two weeks ago I drove Steve's 968. He he he he he he he..... as I said, y'all are going DOWN!
Well, when that P-car breaks at some event and you're scambling to find a ride, just let us know if we're there. Ron and Steve can find their own rides...we don't need the competition.
Old 02-04-2005, 11:19 AM
  #95  
"Call me Darkman"
 
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Banannie
dude, go back to the street kill forums

W're not saying that the S2K or RX8 is the be-all of sports cars. This thread is for a comparison of the two, in *stock form* (or in a few of our cases, SCCA Solo II Stock Class form).
Im talking about racing on a track...... but yes an s2k is better stock for stock.....considering all the multi purposes the rx8 has, im surprised that s2k still can't destroy it on a track......but this comparison is silly b/c we r still comparing apples and oranges
Old 02-04-2005, 11:37 AM
  #96  
www.TeamWTF.org
 
clyde's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 747
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DARKMAZ8
but this comparison is silly b/c we r still comparing apples and oranges
Even if the cars are night and day different, the questions can still apply for someone that is trying to decide between the two of them.

Talking about apple and oranges...I bought a BMW 325xiT (AWD station wagon) a few years ago. The one other car on the short list at the end was a C5 Corvette. Go figure...
Old 02-04-2005, 11:54 AM
  #97  
Registered User
 
bmcc49er's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 544
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Banannie
Ok, just to clear things up, yes, running the Saini/Pokorny-mobile at Nationals (and winning, which was cool considering the first time I drove the car was up to the start line) made me want another S2K. I'm a Honda gal, and LOVE the S2K. I've owned many many cars and a majority have been Honda/Acura products.

As for the RX8, I didn't like how high-maintenance the rotary was, it wasn't a convertible, hated the MPG, it wasn't a convertible, was worried about reliability, it wasn't a convertible, didn't particularly like that it was a bit soft (**in comparison to the S2K**), it wasn't a convertible, so basically, it wasn't a S2K. I wanted a S2K. Nuff said!

Anyway, I've driven some awesome S2000's - the aforementioned Saini/Pokorny-mobile, and Andy & Heather Howe's (ex-Andy McKee-mobile). S2Ks rock. I set up my RX8 some and autocrossed it a few times before selling it. It's fun, but soft and was a bit on the pushy side (no, I didn't have shocks, but I had a bar, alignment, and fresh Hoosiers). I think the S2K will beat the RX8 in all categories except practicality. And who needs that? Then two weeks ago I drove Steve's 968. He he he he he he he..... as I said, y'all are going DOWN!


Did you not know it wasn't a convertible when you bought it? What clued you in finally?
Old 02-04-2005, 12:08 PM
  #98  
Registered User
 
RatedR_RX-8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Des Moines,WA
Posts: 29
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Your development comment only applies if modifications are taken into account --

Despite your statement to the contrary, I've never seen a test where the RX-8 keeps up with the S2000; it's always close, but never completely even.

I don't know why this is such a difficult conversation. Admitting that other cars are faster than the RX-8 is not the same as admitting that other cars are "better" than the RX-8. The fact that other cars are faster doesn't make the RX-8 less of a car.

Steve[/QUOTE]


when you say "if modifications are taken into account" i wonder if you mean through people modifying their own cars or through specialty cars (ie. Mazdaspeed) I was refering to fine tuning aspects of the car so that the ones you see on show room floors and buy straight from the lot are more finely tuned as to get every bit of performance possible from the car before you start to put aftermarket parts on. Now correct me if im wrong but when i have read about new model s2ks coming out there have always been some kind of refinement to extract more performance potential, and all im saying is that given a couple of years the rx-8 may be a level to give the s2k a really good run for its money stock to stock.

As for the second statement i may have chosen the wrong way to explain it but i in no way meant to say that the cars were completely even. But all the tests that i have read in car and driver and other magazines of the sort say that in terms of handling and other areas the rx-8 doesn't get blown out of the water like most people seem to claim and that, yes, the rx-8 always finishes close but never even with the s2k

Like you said just cause the s2k still beats the rx-8 ,not excessivly like a lot of people make it sound like, it doesn't mean that the rx-8 sucks and is a lesser car, because after all to each his/her own and this is forum is a prime example of how there are people that are die hard honda/s2k fans, mazda/rx-8 fans, and everything else in between. It all comes down to what the person buying the car wants, how much they want to spend, and what they are happy with when they test drive.

I guess in the end all im trying to say is don't judge a book by its cover and say the s2k is the car to end all cars because it out preforms the rx-8 in tests and comparisons.
Old 02-04-2005, 12:13 PM
  #99  
Registered
 
Rotator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Toronto
Posts: 208
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So the 8's roof isn't removable? Dang! :D
What does an old tired wheezing 7 have to do with a stock 8 vs S2000?

My dad can beat up your dad!

Curious - What cars make up the various classes of A-Stock and B-Stock?
Old 02-04-2005, 12:17 PM
  #100  
"Call me Darkman"
 
DARKMAZ8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Toronto/Florida
Posts: 2,034
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rotator
So the 8's roof isn't removable? Dang! :D
What does an old tired wheezing 7 have to do with a stock 8 vs S2000?

My dad can beat up your dad!

Curious - What cars make up the various classes of A-Stock and B-Stock?
same as the tired old 968 she mentioned :p

and my mom can beat up your mom! :D

Last edited by DARKMAZ8; 02-04-2005 at 12:32 PM.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: RX8 vs s2000



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 10:29 AM.