Notices
RX-8 Racing Want to discuss autocrossing, road-racing and drag racing the RX-8? Bring it here. This is NOT a kills/street racing forum.

RX8 vs 350Z vs 370Z

Old 12-03-2008 | 05:41 PM
  #26  
mwood's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by tomsn16
Street racing of any kind is not a sport...and those are the only kind words I can think of for street racing.
Couldn't agree more...stupid activity that, best case, just raises all of our insurance rates...worst case, I don't even want to discuss.
Old 12-03-2008 | 05:44 PM
  #27  
tomsn16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Nashville,Tn
Originally Posted by Cito
The weight is definitely a concern...what seems even more of a concern is the lack of camber adjustment.

It would be nice if Nissan would pay a little bit of homage to the grassroots folks and throw in some type of camber adjustment as an option as part of a Nismo package.

Well, maybe that wouldn't be so great for the RX8 folks given that it would really address one of the major areas of weakness in the car.
Cito, you are on target.Most see three autox weaknesses for the Z's....past,present and maybe future:

1. Weight
2.Front camber
3.VLSD

Question remains for the 370....will 332 HP and shorter wheelbase compensate for the inherent weaknesses??????

Last edited by tomsn16; 12-03-2008 at 06:54 PM.
Old 12-03-2008 | 06:18 PM
  #28  
chiketkd's Avatar
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by tomsn16
Scale curb weights reported to date are indicating the 370Z is not the light weight some thought it would be:

Jason...................Base model = 3289 3/4 tank + 30 fuel topoff = 3319
Road&Track....................Base with Sport package and full tank = 3373
Edmunds...Base with Sport Package no mention if tank was full= 3359
Motortrend...Base with Sport Pkg no mention if tank was full = 3355

In race trim the Base with Sport Pkg will be very close to 500 lbs heavier than the RX8 rockets...2800 vs approx 3280.
Added one more...
Old 12-03-2008 | 07:35 PM
  #29  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by tomsn16
Street racing of any kind is not a sport...and those are the only kind words I can think of for street racing.
Don't feed the troll.
Old 12-04-2008 | 07:19 AM
  #30  
tomsn16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Nashville,Tn
Another potential weight problem for the 370 is the F to R weight distribution.The specs say 53/47 for 350 and 54/46 for the370.
Limited scale data indicates that the 370 may be 56/44 ....more nose heavy would not be good.Will not change the Chart until we see more data.
Old 12-04-2008 | 07:58 AM
  #31  
Bunique's Avatar
Ground Assault
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 501
Likes: 0
From: SoCal Bound
Originally Posted by just4rx8
i wonder why the rx8 is no match for the 350z becuase i get smoked at the red light by 350z all the time
I usually stop at red.
Old 12-04-2008 | 10:51 AM
  #32  
ULLLOSE's Avatar
05-08 SCCA BS Natl Champ
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 1
From: Coto de Caza, CA
Originally Posted by tomsn16
Another potential weight problem for the 370 is the F to R weight distribution.The specs say 53/47 for 350 and 54/46 for the370.
Limited scale data indicates that the 370 may be 56/44 ....more nose heavy would not be good.Will not change the Chart until we see more data.
And with a light exhaust and heavy front bar, the numbers will only get worse.
Old 12-04-2008 | 12:33 PM
  #33  
tomsn16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Nashville,Tn
RX8 weight distribution......just noticed that the '09 is listed at 52/48. Anyone know if 50/50 is correct for the '04 and if not what is it? Anyone have any scale data for F to R?
Old 12-04-2008 | 12:47 PM
  #34  
ULLLOSE's Avatar
05-08 SCCA BS Natl Champ
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 1
From: Coto de Caza, CA
Originally Posted by tomsn16
RX8 weight distribution......just noticed that the '09 is listed at 52/48. Anyone know if 50/50 is correct for the '04 and if not what is it? Anyone have any scale data for F to R?
The early cars were touted as being 50/50, but I know with a 1/4 tank of fuel and light exhaust it is not. I want to say in race trim mine is 52/48, but I have not looked in years and could be off.
Old 12-04-2008 | 12:48 PM
  #35  
chiketkd's Avatar
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
From: Charlottesville, VA
Jim,

I forgot to record the numbers, but I weighed my car on the SCCA's corner scales on the flat concrete at the Toledo airport (Toledo Pro Solo) and my car weighed a total of 2,860lbs then (2,830 on HPT's scales) but I remember calculating the F/R weight distn and it was around 51% F/ 49% R. Don't have the actual numbers though...
Old 12-04-2008 | 01:06 PM
  #36  
tomsn16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Nashville,Tn
Jason/Chike...thanks for weight dist data.
Chike,do you run stock exhaust and do you recall your HPT fuel load?
Old 12-04-2008 | 01:20 PM
  #37  
chiketkd's Avatar
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by tomsn16
Jason/Chike...thanks for weight dist data.
Chike,do you run stock exhaust and do you recall your HPT fuel load?
Jim,

I weighed my car after our Day 2 runs at HPT.

Shawn and I run a custom 8.1lbs race exhaust and our fuel load was just under an indicated 1/4 tank (at the end of the runs on a co-driven car). Wheels are OZ Ultraleggeras with 245 V710's, and the FSB was the stock one at Nats this year.
Old 12-04-2008 | 01:48 PM
  #38  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
The F/R distribution skews slightly rearward when the driver is in the car. I think it was always 52/48 unladen, but that probably also changes depending on what options you have.
Old 12-04-2008 | 02:20 PM
  #39  
chiketkd's Avatar
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 0
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by LionZoo
The F/R distribution skews slightly rearward when the driver is in the car. I think it was always 52/48 unladen, but that probably also changes depending on what options you have.
The figures we're putting together are w/o a driver in the car. I have a base model with a spoiler.

However, my RX-8 is an '06 model, which is ~20lbs heavier than the '04-'05 RX-8's as the earlier cars came with a smaller battery and starter. So Jason, Carter, etc. can get their cars down to 2,800lbs, but owners of base model '06+ RX-8's like Harvey, Fossum and myself will be in the 2,830-2,840lbs range.

Theoretically, if I switched to the first gen SSR's and 245 A6's I could get my car down to 2,815lbs.
Old 12-04-2008 | 02:51 PM
  #40  
dothackRAVE's Avatar
<3 Rotary
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 527
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by just4rx8
i wonder why the rx8 is no match for the 350z becuase i get smoked at the red light by 350z all the time
Driving skill >>>>> Power.

Suspension setup > Power.

Lightweight > Power.

All of the above applies to autocross and many other forms of motorsport.

Street racing from stop light to stop light is setting yourself up to fail, since driving skill and suspension are out of the equation, and the 350 has enough power to carry its weight in a straight line.

Just stop embarrassing yourself. Don't street race. You will never find your limit on the streets...

Head down to a track a few times, and you'll soon see that street racing has no real appeal.
Old 12-04-2008 | 05:24 PM
  #41  
tomsn16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Nashville,Tn
Originally Posted by LionZoo
The F/R distribution skews slightly rearward when the driver is in the car. I think it was always 52/48 unladen, but that probably also changes depending on what options you have.
Think you are correct on both counts.The 52/48 looks like the best estimate for race trim wt dist. Since driver wt is a variable we will continue the chart without driver.
Old 12-04-2008 | 07:18 PM
  #42  
LionZoo's Avatar
road warrior
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 3
From: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Originally Posted by chiketkd
The figures we're putting together are w/o a driver in the car. I have a base model with a spoiler.

However, my RX-8 is an '06 model, which is ~20lbs heavier than the '04-'05 RX-8's as the earlier cars came with a smaller battery and starter. So Jason, Carter, etc. can get their cars down to 2,800lbs, but owners of base model '06+ RX-8's like Harvey, Fossum and myself will be in the 2,830-2,840lbs range.

Theoretically, if I switched to the first gen SSR's and 245 A6's I could get my car down to 2,815lbs.
Not quite familiar with B Stock rules; I thought it allowed a battery change? Am I wrong?
Old 12-04-2008 | 07:24 PM
  #43  
ULLLOSE's Avatar
05-08 SCCA BS Natl Champ
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2005
Posts: 2,478
Likes: 1
From: Coto de Caza, CA
Originally Posted by LionZoo
Not quite familiar with B Stock rules; I thought it allowed a battery change? Am I wrong?
Must be OE equivalent for your year/model.
Old 12-05-2008 | 03:41 PM
  #44  
tomsn16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Nashville,Tn
Chart edited for latest race trim weight distributions and related calculations.
Old 12-05-2008 | 04:34 PM
  #45  
Blackout04RX's Avatar
Need for Speed Satisfied
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 343
Likes: 0
From: Monroe, CT
I am thinking that those weight numbers are off, I know Nissan spent alot of time working on this fact. And the new suspension is awesome. I drove the new 370, its a whole other beast compared with the 350. I would watch out for those of you into autoX. You could see the Z puttin down solid performances
Old 12-05-2008 | 05:39 PM
  #46  
tomsn16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Nashville,Tn
Originally Posted by Blackout04RX
I am thinking that those weight numbers are off, I know Nissan spent alot of time working on this fact. And the new suspension is awesome. I drove the new 370, its a whole other beast compared with the 350. I would watch out for those of you into autoX. You could see the Z puttin down solid performances
You may be very correct on the performance of the 370 as that is yet to be seen.However,the data we are putting together in the Chart is based on actual measurements,weights,etc as we get them because we do not trust any OEM specs...much of it is marketing driven and we are only interested in true numbers.
Old 12-06-2008 | 12:41 AM
  #47  
pianoman's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 42
Likes: 0
From: Aurora/Montgomery IL
Lest we not forget....no more heel toe action needed in the 370....but we'll see how well that system really works on the track...

Just to throw something else in the mix... The Sti... well over 2800lbs and their handling is pretty darn good. You can even get upgraded steering racks available from 10:1-12:1 ratio's!! don't sneeze and drive...

Anyone else keeping there eye on the new Hyundai Gen coupe?

An auto-x acquaintance of mine used to run a 78? or 79 Camaro. He ran a few times with a passenger and noticed that the car would handle better with a passenger...so he put his car on the scales and ended up melting down metal and welded it on the rear passenger floorboard to help balance it out and noted quite an improvement on his times...granted its a big ol' V8...power was the least of his problems for adding the extra weight.

My point being I think the 370 despite it's weight, will be a good contender to the 8. God forbid you turbocharge it. The current turbo kit's for the G37's are layin out 500whp at 12psi...Madness I tell you, just madness.
Old 12-06-2008 | 02:38 PM
  #48  
tomsn16's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 132
Likes: 0
From: Nashville,Tn
Anyone know the curb weight results from Car&Driver's 370 test?
Old 12-06-2008 | 08:50 PM
  #49  
PedalFaster's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
From: Seattle, WA
It was just a preview -- they list curb weight as "3350 - 3400 lb", which suggests that they're using Nissan figures as opposed to their own measurements.
Old 12-06-2008 | 11:47 PM
  #50  
mwood's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 1,363
Likes: 0
3400lbs?!!


Last edited by mwood; 12-07-2008 at 12:02 AM.

Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: RX8 vs 350Z vs 370Z



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:15 PM.