Notices
RX-8 Racing Want to discuss autocrossing, road-racing and drag racing the RX-8? Bring it here. This is NOT a kills/street racing forum.

Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 05-22-2008, 02:19 PM
  #76  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
sammytcl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
V-mount radiator/intercooler setup will rotate the radiator 90 degree backward.

How much will it cost?
Old 05-22-2008, 02:38 PM
  #77  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
That depends on how much labor on my part is involved. If you need me to engineer the whole thing, that will be a LOT of money. On the other hand, if you have already figured out how you want to do it and know the dimensions of the radiator you want built it won't cost a whole lot by comparison. However, if the finished rad meets the specs that you submit and it still doesn't fit right, that is your responsibility. I am not being harsh here, just realistic, and you now know what it is I am doing with the BHR stuff and why each revision costs me a LOT of money. Whenever I mess up I hafta eat the cost, too. The latest revision was mostly me just accomodatinig the top-mount turbo guys like the Esmeril and PTP kits. I ate a bunch on that one.

Last edited by Charles R. Hill; 05-22-2008 at 02:40 PM.
Old 05-22-2008, 10:19 PM
  #78  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
It did seem to run a little hotter with rays intercooler, we are problem solving and I am sure Ray will have an answer into how to increase cooling of our charge temps for us pettit guys. This was a beta track test in the south---one of the best places to do this!
Olddragger
Old 05-22-2008, 10:28 PM
  #79  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
After talking over OD's particular situation with Cam, I am leaning toward pointing people to my radiator before using the new intercooler. My reasoning, at this time anyway, is that the factory rad has a difficult enough time flowing air through it and to add a larger heat exchanger just makes matters worse. On the other hand, getting my rad, which flows air through it better, will help improve the efficiency of whatever intercooler/heat exchanger is in front of it. The rads have kicked *** on every car that has them from what my customers tell me. The thing that somewhat puzzles me, except if my above supposition is correct, is that the heat exchanger uses the same core design as my rad.
Old 05-23-2008, 09:09 PM
  #80  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
sammytcl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
After talking over OD's particular situation with Cam, I am leaning toward pointing people to my radiator before using the new intercooler. My reasoning, at this time anyway, is that the factory rad has a difficult enough time flowing air through it and to add a larger heat exchanger just makes matters worse. On the other hand, getting my rad, which flows air through it better, will help improve the efficiency of whatever intercooler/heat exchanger is in front of it. The rads have kicked *** on every car that has them from what my customers tell me. The thing that somewhat puzzles me, except if my above supposition is correct, is that the heat exchanger uses the same core design as my rad.
i totally agree that the intercooler/heat exchanger is making it worse on cooling as most of the air reaches the radiator is already heated up by the intercooler/heat exchanger.

another thing i want to share is the ducting to the radiator. there are huge open spaces on the sides (especially on the driver side) and the bottom of the radiator. i am making some panels to close the bottom and the sides as much as possible to see how much it will help.
Attached Thumbnails Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison-dsc00769.jpg   Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison-dsc00771.jpg   Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison-dsc00772.jpg   Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison-dsc00774.jpg   Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison-dsc00777.jpg  

Old 05-23-2008, 09:26 PM
  #81  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Originally Posted by sammytcl
i totally agree that the intercooler/heat exchanger is making it worse on cooling as most of the air reaches the radiator is already heated up by the intercooler/heat exchanger.
The problem here doesn't seem to be that the heat from the exchanger is overheating the radiator. I believe it to be that the exchanger is blocking airflow from an already somewhat compromised radiator(factory) and the efficiencies of both are then compromised. I'll return to the project in a little bit after I take care of a few cars I am working on/sponsoring.
Old 05-23-2008, 09:35 PM
  #82  
road warrior
 
LionZoo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Oakland and Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,861
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
Originally Posted by sammytcl
V-mount radiator/intercooler setup will rotate the radiator 90 degree backward.

How much will it cost?
If you need help, I'm available...
Old 05-24-2008, 10:37 PM
  #83  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
The problem here doesn't seem to be that the heat from the exchanger is overheating the radiator. I believe it to be that the exchanger is blocking airflow from an already somewhat compromised radiator(factory) and the efficiencies of both are then compromised. I'll return to the project in a little bit after I take care of a few cars I am working on/sponsoring.
yep.

beer
Old 05-27-2008, 10:31 AM
  #84  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
Yep I think a "package design" may be in order---to include a true cai( see the thread i just posted in the Pettit column)
olddragger
Old 05-28-2008, 01:57 AM
  #85  
Zoom Zoom Zooooooomm Psst
 
RXVIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Victoria
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
HI, FWIW I thought I would put in my 2 cents worth.

Background is that I run a Promaz turbo setup (220+ KWrw or 295+ HPrw @ 9-10psi) and track this car occasionally even though it is set up as an everyday drive.

I have no heating issues on the road, even on days in excess of 40oC (96oF).
However on the track under constant boost I find the car is running quite hot, hotter than I’m comfortable with. i.e. Water Temps above 110oC (208oF) and Oil above 130oC (240oF).

It has been my belief that the intercooler has robed my radiator (non stock PWR upgrade) of air flow. In the attempt to assist I placed ducting from the front of the car to behind the intercooler which has certainly helped but no over come the problem.


I’m currently redesigning the undertray to incorporate a “scoop” to collect air from underneath and channel directly to the radiator behind the intercooler.

If I have this mod complete prior to the next track day in June I hope to report the outcome.

Other things I have contemplated are, Greddy Oil Pan, MAZPORT water pump, methanol injection, thermostat mods/change, vented bonnet.
BTW I have already opened up all the blocked grill moulded diamonds and remove the number plate on the track!

I must admit that I'm attempting to modify my driving techniques to some degree changing gear earlier than I used to.
Attached Thumbnails Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison-pict0037.jpg   Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison-pict0033.jpg   Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison-pict0029.jpg   Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison-pict0030.jpg  
Old 05-28-2008, 02:28 AM
  #86  
Banned
iTrader: (3)
 
MazdaManiac's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Under my car
Posts: 16,386
Likes: 0
Received 24 Likes on 21 Posts
Originally Posted by RXVIII
I’m currently redesigning the undertray to incorporate a “scoop” to collect air from underneath and channel directly to the radiator behind the intercooler.
I tried that. It didn't work.

I opened up an 18" wide slot about 4" back from the lip and canted it up about 2".
Seems to have actually raised temps a bit.
I suspect the high/low pressure relationship got tossed.
Old 05-28-2008, 11:05 AM
  #87  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
hint on your oil temps(a little high for us rotaries) --open up the front part of the front fender chad some--i just cut a big unobvious hole in mine and placed a screen over it. It seems to help some--highest oil temps I have ever had is 230F.
Also if you can drive the track under 8Krpms--that helps a lot with temps.
Part of our "problem" may be the a/c condenser.
My ideal set up would be
1-a vertically mounted air water intercooler(same size) with dual fans and shroud,
2- a 1 gallon coolant tank with a cool can relocated away from the front of the car, 3- stainless finned connecting hoses,
4- a larger fluidyne radiator(i like fluidyne and Be Cool products),
5- an electric water pump( i have been wanting one for years!!) with time delay, 6- 6- better radiator shroud,
7- a 180F thermostat,
8- a vented hood
9- a little bigger oil coolers with thermostat.
Charles Hill or Mazsport needs to get busy!
and I need to make more money
olddragger
Old 05-28-2008, 11:31 AM
  #88  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
Well, Denny, I got plenty busy on the radiator a long time ago and they are available. See how much Be Cool will charge you to make one. I know I did.

Last edited by Charles R. Hill; 05-29-2008 at 12:02 AM.
Old 05-28-2008, 04:42 PM
  #89  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
sammytcl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
I tried that. It didn't work.

I opened up an 18" wide slot about 4" back from the lip and canted it up about 2".
Seems to have actually raised temps a bit.
I suspect the high/low pressure relationship got tossed.

at least for people who has aftermarket radiator, close the bottom gap between the undercover and the bottom of the radiator. factory radiator has a around 1.5" thick foam to seal that gap. i think a lot of air actually goes through the gap rather than the radiator core, especially at higher speed when the pressure difference becomes more significant:

Attached Thumbnails Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison-louver.gif  
Old 05-28-2008, 08:36 PM
  #90  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
I know Ray-- it would be much more than yours and not anymore effective, radiator wise.But they can deliver a custom make with a custom twin fan/shroud combo that totally seals the front for about 2K. Needless to say i will not be getting one from them! if I get a new radiator it will be from you!
hey Get us a thermostat!!!
OD
Old 05-29-2008, 12:02 AM
  #91  
Owner of BHR
iTrader: (7)
 
Charles R. Hill's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 4,101
Received 45 Likes on 32 Posts
I thought Mazmart was working on a thermostat?
Old 05-29-2008, 12:14 AM
  #92  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by Charles R. Hill
I thought Mazmart was working on a thermostat?
yes,

they were, but have not had a comment about it for a while.. check pm.

beers
Old 05-29-2008, 11:01 AM
  #93  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
for REAL benefit of a effective cooling system, one HAS to put a full open 180F thermostat in!
Has anyone tried to reduce the angle of the radiator? I think we could have a few degrees to play with.
OD
Old 06-10-2008, 10:27 PM
  #94  
Zoom Zoom Zooooooomm Psst
 
RXVIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Victoria
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by MazdaManiac
I tried that. It didn't work.

I opened up an 18" wide slot about 4" back from the lip and canted it up about 2".
Seems to have actually raised temps a bit.
I suspect the high/low pressure relationship got tossed.

After a lot of thinking I have decided to change tack. Along the same lines as sammytcl I have looked at closing the gap between my aftermarket radiator and under tray. I have placed foam between them and made a bracket to apply some resistance so that the gap does not open (allowing air to flow under radiator) when travelling at high speed. Also I have made a path (stiff rubber matting) that forces the air from the front grill area over the top of the intercooler into the path of the radiator. This may rob some of the air from the intercooler but I don’t think that has been my problem.

Hope to trial this mod on June 20th.
Attached Thumbnails Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison-pict0075.jpg   Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison-pict0076.jpg   Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison-pict0070.jpg   Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison-pict0071.jpg  
Old 06-12-2008, 10:01 PM
  #95  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
those of us that are running the rb cold air scoop are experiencing(i have come to find out) a very significant recirculation swirl at the TOP of the i/c, a/c and radiator stack. A recirculation swirl like this can decrease the radiator's air flow by over 30%
More to come on a fix--which may mean modifying the rb scoop among other things.
olddragger
Old 06-13-2008, 01:12 AM
  #96  
Zoom-Freakin'-Zoom
iTrader: (5)
 
swoope's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: orlando, fl
Posts: 14,602
Received 35 Likes on 31 Posts
Originally Posted by olddragger
those of us that are running the rb cold air scoop are experiencing(i have come to find out) a very significant recirculation swirl at the TOP of the i/c, a/c and radiator stack. A recirculation swirl like this can decrease the radiator's air flow by over 30%
More to come on a fix--which may mean modifying the rb scoop among other things.
olddragger
nice work denny.. how are you testing it? yarn, tape and a camera???

would be nice if you could use the area in the grill above, that is totally blocked by design.

beers
Old 06-13-2008, 09:54 AM
  #97  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
SMoke/camera test at speed. When the fans turn on it helps,but it still continues. It looks like the rb scoop creates somewhat of a hollow space --so to speak-- that promotes this recirulation swirl. the air backs up in from of the coolers --normal resistance pressure--but because of the shape that is caused by the scoop the swirling starts. Easy fix is to remove the rb scoop.
Also, remember the oldthread from Australia that spoke of their cars running hotter and slower with the rb scoop? This was happening during those long high speed outback drives they we doing.
The challange will be to get cold air into the engine bay/airfilter AND stop this affect. Which way we do this is the question.
I need to add that at low speed driving it is not as pronounced. But over 35mph or so it becomes apparent. Higher the speed the worst it gets.
AND before I die i am going to make the side vents fully functional! The way i am feeling today --i need to get started on it soon.
olddragger
Old 06-20-2008, 08:44 PM
  #98  
Zoom Zoom Zooooooomm Psst
 
RXVIII's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Victoria
Posts: 254
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
OK, hit the track yesterday and can provide feedback on my efforts. I previously mentioned I had placed rubber "scoop" to channel air from front grill area over intercooler onto the radiator and placed foam between bottom of aftermarket radiator and undertray (with reinforcing bracket). However also changed over to Greddy Oil pan.

Observations were that it took longer to heat up and quicker to cool down. Even though was a cold day (15oC or 59oF) temps still reached 110oC (230F) for water and 120oC (248F) for oil.
Note this track has two reasonable straights where I'm under boost all the way reaching 205-215 kmh (127-133 mph) before hard braking.

Improvement was the rate at which it cooled back to 90oC (194F) when I backed off the pace.

I assume extra volume of oil in pan was a help. Still need to get them temps down further escpecially before summer comes around.



Originally Posted by RXVIII
After a lot of thinking I have decided to change tack. Along the same lines as sammytcl I have looked at closing the gap between my aftermarket radiator and under tray. I have placed foam between them and made a bracket to apply some resistance so that the gap does not open (allowing air to flow under radiator) when travelling at high speed. Also I have made a path (stiff rubber matting) that forces the air from the front grill area over the top of the intercooler into the path of the radiator. This may rob some of the air from the intercooler but I don’t think that has been my problem.

Hope to trial this mod on June 20th.
Old 06-21-2008, 07:20 PM
  #99  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
sammytcl's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
thanks for sharing your data.

mine intercooler placement is a little different from yours. it's stock greddy location. the lower opening on the front bumper is still mostly open for direct airflow to the radiator, only the grill area is blocked by the intercooler. the intercooler is also getting direct air flow to ~80% of its surface area.

i will be testing my set up (closed bottom and side gaps) next month (july 14th) on track again expecting ambient temp around 100+ F. all i need is 20-25 mins of wot run while keeping the water temp below 230 F.

Last edited by sammytcl; 06-21-2008 at 07:28 PM.
Old 06-23-2008, 07:21 PM
  #100  
Registered
iTrader: (3)
 
olddragger's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: macon, georgia
Posts: 10,828
Likes: 0
Received 38 Likes on 27 Posts
take the grill out of the front air dam opening(if you can) and remove the rotary symbol. You would be surprised how much that rotary symbol breaks the air flow up.
My bet is the bottom sealing helped.
olddragger


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Overheating - turbo vs na on track comparison



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 09:29 AM.