Introduction and Congrats to Chris T of KC...lucky dog
#51
aka Cole
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ULLLOSE
I can not come up with any reason why anyone in any class would want you around. Sounds like even you own region does not care for your agenda....
Your money problems are not my problem nor do I care what you can afford. I have more than paid my dues to get where I am, I have slept in my car and driven all night so I could afford to go to events. If you want to do it you find a way. Just like many people get co drivers so they can stretch the dollar.
I do not consider my self a big spender by any means. I spent less than $3k last year to set up our car, this year I have spent $15 dollars on parts and have no intention of spending more. Not that I want to get grouped in with you and whine about money but if we were not a one income family with a young baby I would be all over a SS Porsche, but I run BS in an RX8 because it works as a family car and I can afford to. I did not ask SCCA to create a class for me. I chose to sell my dedicated race car, AS C4, and buy a car that would fit a dual purpose.
Your money problems are not my problem nor do I care what you can afford. I have more than paid my dues to get where I am, I have slept in my car and driven all night so I could afford to go to events. If you want to do it you find a way. Just like many people get co drivers so they can stretch the dollar.
I do not consider my self a big spender by any means. I spent less than $3k last year to set up our car, this year I have spent $15 dollars on parts and have no intention of spending more. Not that I want to get grouped in with you and whine about money but if we were not a one income family with a young baby I would be all over a SS Porsche, but I run BS in an RX8 because it works as a family car and I can afford to. I did not ask SCCA to create a class for me. I chose to sell my dedicated race car, AS C4, and buy a car that would fit a dual purpose.
Appreciate your typical elitist response, similar to one's I've heard in the past from Sipe...and then we have Andy H who is retired at around 50. Yeah, that is a real cross section of typical Solo member incomes.
I seem to recall driving all night to Milwaukee with my son, and then turning around and driving all night again on Sunday....950 miles each way.
Appreciate the opportunity to vent. Frustration level high from banging head against SEB. Carry on loving to hate me. I don't give a darn. I'm that California-raised kid who grew up not smoking, drinking, or doing drugs.....so you can bet peer pressure means nothing to me.
Semi-respectfully,
Cole
#52
Jason, first you tell us not to feed the troll and then you go and do that for two pages?
As best as I can tell, Cole, you want a class that is cheap (for YOU) where you don't have to change tires (bad back) to have a competitive CAR, regardless of YOUR driving. The asinine premise you base this on is the existence of a cheap wheel and tire which fits YOUR CAR that YOU think would be a good spec tire. The tunnel-vision nature of the thing is hysterical. "I don't know about the other cars, we'll make minor adjustments to them so they can be competitive." Oh brother. Whatever happened to reading THE RULES and prepping a car for THE RULES?
And UGH. Why must you insist that STOCK CLASS equals STOCK CARS? Just to make it clear to Cole, B Stock should be changed to B1. B Street Prepared should be called B2. B Prepared should be called B3 and so forth. The word "stock" really confuses Cole.
And setting up for stock class is expensive? Since when? SA Konis, which are on all the winning cars, are less than $600. You don't need the lightweight wheels, there are plenty of guys going fast on the (not that heavy) stock wheels. You don't need the fancy exhaust systems, the ULLLLLLOSE exhaust was like $130 in parts for chrissakes and it's not even necessary. You don't even need a swaybar on this car. The 245 Kumhos last a looooong time (we did most of our local events on tires from LAST YEAR!) and if you win KUMHO GIVES YOU MONEY! What a concept! I've won $400 in Kumho money this year with my mediocre *** behind the wheel, that's two tires right there. Travel to events is too expensive? Jeez, get a co-driver, man. Make them change the tires if your back is so bad. Make 'em pay half your costs if you can't afford it.
I do this because it's fun. It sounds like it is not fun for you. Maybe autocrossing is not for you?
As best as I can tell, Cole, you want a class that is cheap (for YOU) where you don't have to change tires (bad back) to have a competitive CAR, regardless of YOUR driving. The asinine premise you base this on is the existence of a cheap wheel and tire which fits YOUR CAR that YOU think would be a good spec tire. The tunnel-vision nature of the thing is hysterical. "I don't know about the other cars, we'll make minor adjustments to them so they can be competitive." Oh brother. Whatever happened to reading THE RULES and prepping a car for THE RULES?
And UGH. Why must you insist that STOCK CLASS equals STOCK CARS? Just to make it clear to Cole, B Stock should be changed to B1. B Street Prepared should be called B2. B Prepared should be called B3 and so forth. The word "stock" really confuses Cole.
And setting up for stock class is expensive? Since when? SA Konis, which are on all the winning cars, are less than $600. You don't need the lightweight wheels, there are plenty of guys going fast on the (not that heavy) stock wheels. You don't need the fancy exhaust systems, the ULLLLLLOSE exhaust was like $130 in parts for chrissakes and it's not even necessary. You don't even need a swaybar on this car. The 245 Kumhos last a looooong time (we did most of our local events on tires from LAST YEAR!) and if you win KUMHO GIVES YOU MONEY! What a concept! I've won $400 in Kumho money this year with my mediocre *** behind the wheel, that's two tires right there. Travel to events is too expensive? Jeez, get a co-driver, man. Make them change the tires if your back is so bad. Make 'em pay half your costs if you can't afford it.
I do this because it's fun. It sounds like it is not fun for you. Maybe autocrossing is not for you?
Last edited by John V; 09-07-2006 at 08:03 AM.
#53
What's next?
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SE Mass
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
To those following along at home, this is how Cole works with statistics to make it seem like he's got a valid point...
Wow! 90% of drivers in Stock are on Street tires. That's a big number! Our local events have about 150 competitors with about 50-75 of them in stock. Wow... 90%!
Wait... what? Notice he never says how many people in his region are actually *IN* his regions stock class.
For sake of simplicity and argument... if it's 10 in his regions stock classes out of 30 total competitors, it means there's about 9 people in the WHOLE of his regions stock classes that want to run street tires in Stock. It could be 5 people for all we know in his stock class... but that doesn't work out to 90%... as 90% only works on factors of 10. You can't have a fraction of a person.
So, will all those people reading this (other than Cole) raise your hands if you have 10 or less people in your regions Stock classes total.
What Cole doesn't realize is that that region is NOT a representative sample of all regions out there, but he founds all his aguments for the ST-Stock class as if it were.
I mean really... only 10 cars in STOCK? 30 cars total? I wish we had small events like that!!
So, if you're reading this at home or work, you can understand why many of us here have had it with Coles rants and 'numbers as proof' that anything he says is automatically suspect to scrutiny. We've delt with him on other forums.
--kC
We have regional stock street tire classes. 90% of stock drivers are on street tires.
Our region has a very small membership of about 30.
For sake of simplicity and argument... if it's 10 in his regions stock classes out of 30 total competitors, it means there's about 9 people in the WHOLE of his regions stock classes that want to run street tires in Stock. It could be 5 people for all we know in his stock class... but that doesn't work out to 90%... as 90% only works on factors of 10. You can't have a fraction of a person.
So, will all those people reading this (other than Cole) raise your hands if you have 10 or less people in your regions Stock classes total.
What Cole doesn't realize is that that region is NOT a representative sample of all regions out there, but he founds all his aguments for the ST-Stock class as if it were.
I mean really... only 10 cars in STOCK? 30 cars total? I wish we had small events like that!!
So, if you're reading this at home or work, you can understand why many of us here have had it with Coles rants and 'numbers as proof' that anything he says is automatically suspect to scrutiny. We've delt with him on other forums.
--kC
Last edited by Imp; 09-07-2006 at 08:19 AM.
#54
What's next?
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: SE Mass
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Lookie what I found....
http://www.sccawiregrass.org/Solo2.html
Event 1
70 Entrants
No one listed as running Street Tires in stock out of 25 competitors in Stock.
Event 2
52 Entrants (25% loss of entrants)
16 out of 23 running Street Tires in stock (that's 70%... not 90%)
Event 3
47 Entrants (10% loss of entrants to event prior, 33% loss of entrants to 1st event)
12 out of 16 running Street Tires in stock (that's 75%... not 90%)
Event 4
39 Entrants (17% loss of entrants to event prior, 45% loss of entrants to 1st event)
12 out of 14 running Street Tires in stock (that's 85%... not 90%)
Notice the number of people running Street tires in stock DECREASED from event 2 and 3 and stayed the same for events 3 and 4. I fail to see where it has increased in popularity for your region Cole. This goes against everything you have said about it gaining.
I see that over the course of the season, they've gone from 25 competitors down to 14 competitors in Stock classes, almost 50% loss in people running in Stock class. Why did people not come back Cole? A 50% loss in retention of stock class entrants to events is not what I would call condusive for the club as a whole.
Nor is losing 45% of entrants in total to an event a good thing over the course of a season.
So, not only have you lost membership attending events, the number of people running street tires in your region DECREASED. (An absolute number is more important than a percentage when trying to prove a point). As it may heppen, because you lost attendance, and the number of people running street tires in stock decreased or stayed the same, the percentage increased of people competing in stock/ST.... but the net is that you LOST people. Your percentages that you came up with never painted the entire picture.
But only after reviewing the total and absolute numbers, and not the percentages, do we find that you're just making **** up. Something many have known or guessed at for a while.
Sorry Cole... your region is not a representative sample of most regions out there.
Your argument has been slammed with contradictory EVIDENCE, somthing you always have seemed to fall short on.
Stop posting about it. Shut up. Leave.
--kC
http://www.sccawiregrass.org/Solo2.html
Event 1
70 Entrants
No one listed as running Street Tires in stock out of 25 competitors in Stock.
Event 2
52 Entrants (25% loss of entrants)
16 out of 23 running Street Tires in stock (that's 70%... not 90%)
Event 3
47 Entrants (10% loss of entrants to event prior, 33% loss of entrants to 1st event)
12 out of 16 running Street Tires in stock (that's 75%... not 90%)
Event 4
39 Entrants (17% loss of entrants to event prior, 45% loss of entrants to 1st event)
12 out of 14 running Street Tires in stock (that's 85%... not 90%)
Notice the number of people running Street tires in stock DECREASED from event 2 and 3 and stayed the same for events 3 and 4. I fail to see where it has increased in popularity for your region Cole. This goes against everything you have said about it gaining.
I see that over the course of the season, they've gone from 25 competitors down to 14 competitors in Stock classes, almost 50% loss in people running in Stock class. Why did people not come back Cole? A 50% loss in retention of stock class entrants to events is not what I would call condusive for the club as a whole.
Nor is losing 45% of entrants in total to an event a good thing over the course of a season.
So, not only have you lost membership attending events, the number of people running street tires in your region DECREASED. (An absolute number is more important than a percentage when trying to prove a point). As it may heppen, because you lost attendance, and the number of people running street tires in stock decreased or stayed the same, the percentage increased of people competing in stock/ST.... but the net is that you LOST people. Your percentages that you came up with never painted the entire picture.
But only after reviewing the total and absolute numbers, and not the percentages, do we find that you're just making **** up. Something many have known or guessed at for a while.
Sorry Cole... your region is not a representative sample of most regions out there.
Your argument has been slammed with contradictory EVIDENCE, somthing you always have seemed to fall short on.
Stop posting about it. Shut up. Leave.
--kC
Last edited by Imp; 09-07-2006 at 09:04 AM.
#55
AA = Autox Anonymous
iTrader: (1)
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 449
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
This has been entertaining to say the least.
Coming from someone relatively new to Solo 2, a one-tour-wonder, I spent my energy just trying to drive better, rather than agonizing over the rules and changing the rules. I still drive on street tire at autox from time to time due to weather/competition level, though that always makes me yearning for R-compound afterwards.
IMHO, nothing is more rewarding than bettering other drivers in similarly-equipped cars (RX-8) based on pure skill and determination. I'll keep trying with my OTS Koni/used V710 on OEM rim/Tanabe front-sway(bought before Koni)/alignment until I stop finding time to gain from one run to the next.
Coming from someone relatively new to Solo 2, a one-tour-wonder, I spent my energy just trying to drive better, rather than agonizing over the rules and changing the rules. I still drive on street tire at autox from time to time due to weather/competition level, though that always makes me yearning for R-compound afterwards.
IMHO, nothing is more rewarding than bettering other drivers in similarly-equipped cars (RX-8) based on pure skill and determination. I'll keep trying with my OTS Koni/used V710 on OEM rim/Tanabe front-sway(bought before Koni)/alignment until I stop finding time to gain from one run to the next.
#57
Registered
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Seattle, WA
Posts: 302
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ULLLOSE
First off let me say every one of you that replied to his post is to blame for yet another useless Cole thread. If you have not learned yet ignore him and he will go away.
#58
Originally Posted by rotor-te-rex
I've never said I was anything but a midpack driver....high 20s out of 36 maybe in a competitive car
Originally Posted by rotor-te-rex
I love rules that permit 6 lb lighter $500 wheels but won't allow 4 lb lighter wheels that have 2 mms too much offset and cost $109.
#59
Originally Posted by rotor-te-rex
The top few drivers can jump in my car and drive it 1-1.5 seconds faster than me. From about 15-20, I think it is more car than driver.....maybe just .5 faster as a driver.
#60
Originally Posted by rotor-te-rex
A lot of quality baby boomer drivers are no longer autocrossing. Have you money spenders driven them away????
2. What big money has gone into my car? A car that got 2 wins and 3 2nd places in national events (and was driven to all but one of those with the tires in the backseat...Ft. Myers some odd circumstances came up that allowed it to get towed by a friend) that were all closer to you than Milwaukee? You could very easily have a very competitive car without spending that much...as has been said over and over again.
#61
Originally Posted by rotor-te-rex
And you wonder why novice drivers don't come back when they show up on street tires.
#62
05-08 SCCA BS Natl Champ
iTrader: (1)
Originally Posted by NoCones
If novices don't come back because they get whomped as novices then good riddance. Being a novice in anything is all about getting whomped and learning how to lessen that whomping. If they want to rationalize their whomping as being caused primarily by someone outspending/outprepping them, so be it.
#64
Sparky!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East Jesus (Murphy, TX)
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by rotor-te-rex
You start out with the premise of spec 17" Falkens no larger than 255 mm....because you know they are cheap! You add minor mods to the contenders as appropriate. Wouldn't most folks wanna pay $125 instead of $240+??? Unless they and their wife are getting earned freebies....
I guess that's what happens when you try to base your idiotic classing idea around YOUR particular favorite tires...
#65
Sparky!
iTrader: (3)
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: East Jesus (Murphy, TX)
Posts: 547
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by ULLLOSE
When I was a novice starting out we had no novice class, no street tire class, I had to run in SS open and let multi time natl champ Kotzian kick my @ss every weekend. You bet I thought he was beating me because my car was not as fast as his.... Then he drove my car and still kicked my @ss. I stuck with it, bought race tires when I could and only five short years later I beat him. imho all this hand holding of novices is a bunch of crap. You either like to autox or you don't, if you need street tire, novice, rwd, manual trans class so you can win a trophy at your first event to feel good about yourself so you will come back again you have bigger problems.
The people who quit because they lose are quitters, plain and simple. The want it handed to them on a plate, and are unwilling to work and sacrifice for success (sound familiar, Cole?) Changing the rules to "dumb them down" and make life easier for the lazy bastards who choose not to work for success is the primary problem with this country today. Thank God for the "elitist" SEB who refuses to dumb it down for the whiners like Cole.
#66
Originally Posted by altiain
+1. No street tire or novice classes when I started either. I showed up to my first National Tour in a DSP Prelude (which had nothing more than an intake and a rear swaybar) on street tires, and came in DFL. Loved every minute of it. Losing inspired me to work harder, learn more, and become a better driver, so I could be the one winning.
The people who quit because they lose are quitters, plain and simple. The want it handed to them on a plate, and are unwilling to work and sacrifice for success (sound familiar, Cole?) Changing the rules to "dumb them down" and make life easier for the lazy bastards who choose not to work for success is the primary problem with this country today. Thank God for the "elitist" SEB who refuses to dumb it down for the whiners like Cole.
The people who quit because they lose are quitters, plain and simple. The want it handed to them on a plate, and are unwilling to work and sacrifice for success (sound familiar, Cole?) Changing the rules to "dumb them down" and make life easier for the lazy bastards who choose not to work for success is the primary problem with this country today. Thank God for the "elitist" SEB who refuses to dumb it down for the whiners like Cole.
#67
Originally Posted by altiain
Except that most of the ST cars that can fit Yokohamas are picking them over the Falkens. So much for cheap street tires. I'd rather pay for V710s any day. They're a hell of a lot more fun to race on.
I guess that's what happens when you try to base your idiotic classing idea around YOUR particular favorite tires...
I guess that's what happens when you try to base your idiotic classing idea around YOUR particular favorite tires...
#68
05-08 SCCA BS Natl Champ
iTrader: (1)
One of the many things Cole does not get is that all of the series that have car adjustments have a full time paid staff that monitors and makes those adjustments. I can tell you as an unpaid SEB member I would not care to waste any more of my time, or money as this year I am out about $400, to do more work. The other problem is the level of talent in autox varies so much by region it is hard to tell what car really needs help and what drivers just are not up to speed. Never going to happen.
Last edited by ULLLOSE; 09-07-2006 at 02:02 PM.
#72
aka Cole
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by HolyCross05
This has been an intresting read. So who's the best AutoX driver in this board anyways?
My bet is on:
Ullose
Goeke
Imp
FastMike
Team RX8
........but better than all of em when he misses cones
G.H.
#73
aka Cole
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Imp
Lookie what I found....
http://www.sccawiregrass.org/Solo2.html
Event 1
70 Entrants
No one listed as running Street Tires in stock out of 25 competitors in Stock.
Event 2
52 Entrants (25% loss of entrants)
16 out of 23 running Street Tires in stock (that's 70%... not 90%)
Event 3
47 Entrants (10% loss of entrants to event prior, 33% loss of entrants to 1st event)
12 out of 16 running Street Tires in stock (that's 75%... not 90%)
Event 4
39 Entrants (17% loss of entrants to event prior, 45% loss of entrants to 1st event)
12 out of 14 running Street Tires in stock (that's 85%... not 90%)
Notice the number of people running Street tires in stock DECREASED from event 2 and 3 and stayed the same for events 3 and 4. I fail to see where it has increased in popularity for your region Cole. This goes against everything you have said about it gaining.
I see that over the course of the season, they've gone from 25 competitors down to 14 competitors in Stock classes, almost 50% loss in people running in Stock class. Why did people not come back Cole? A 50% loss in retention of stock class entrants to events is not what I would call condusive for the club as a whole.
.............................
After reviewing the total and absolute numbers, and not the percentages, do we find that you're just making **** up. Something many have known or guessed at for a while.
Sorry Cole... your region is not a representative sample of most regions out there.
--kC
http://www.sccawiregrass.org/Solo2.html
Event 1
70 Entrants
No one listed as running Street Tires in stock out of 25 competitors in Stock.
Event 2
52 Entrants (25% loss of entrants)
16 out of 23 running Street Tires in stock (that's 70%... not 90%)
Event 3
47 Entrants (10% loss of entrants to event prior, 33% loss of entrants to 1st event)
12 out of 16 running Street Tires in stock (that's 75%... not 90%)
Event 4
39 Entrants (17% loss of entrants to event prior, 45% loss of entrants to 1st event)
12 out of 14 running Street Tires in stock (that's 85%... not 90%)
Notice the number of people running Street tires in stock DECREASED from event 2 and 3 and stayed the same for events 3 and 4. I fail to see where it has increased in popularity for your region Cole. This goes against everything you have said about it gaining.
I see that over the course of the season, they've gone from 25 competitors down to 14 competitors in Stock classes, almost 50% loss in people running in Stock class. Why did people not come back Cole? A 50% loss in retention of stock class entrants to events is not what I would call condusive for the club as a whole.
.............................
After reviewing the total and absolute numbers, and not the percentages, do we find that you're just making **** up. Something many have known or guessed at for a while.
Sorry Cole... your region is not a representative sample of most regions out there.
--kC
Two years ago we were lucky to get 20. But it isn't the street tires. It's my sparkling personality .....or maybe the 60 second course and 6 runs, lots of fun runs, and neat courses I set up.
#74
aka Cole
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by fastmike
Ouch...fourth place...
LOL!
FM
LOL!
FM
Don't know why you never made a serious effort in your girl's Rex!!! You would have kicked booty.
#75
aka Cole
Thread Starter
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Alabama
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Originally Posted by Imp
Sorry Cole... your region is not a representative sample of most regions out there.
--kC
Milwaukee, May 29th, 165 drivers
51 stock drivers on street tires
26 stock drivers on R-tires....probably another 20+ at Peru
Chicago, May 14, 143 drivers
41 stock drivers on street tires
29 stock drivers on R-tires
Detroit, May 7th, 188 drivers
46 stock drivers on street tires
18 SM drivers on street tires
25 stock drivers on R-tires
Wiregrass, April 9th, 47 drivers
12 stock drivers on street tires
4 stock drivers on R-tires
Houston, May 7th, 152 drivers
25 stock drivers on street tires
34 Open stock and 12 X class stock drivers on R-tires
Last edited by rotor-te-rex; 09-07-2006 at 09:20 PM.