Notices
RX-8 Racing Want to discuss autocrossing, road-racing and drag racing the RX-8? Bring it here. This is NOT a kills/street racing forum.

Eccentric front UCA bushings positioned downward for more camber gain?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 02-22-2017, 11:35 AM
  #1  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
hufflepuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 541
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Eccentric front UCA bushings positioned downward for more camber gain?

Based on tire wear and pryro data, I am installing whiteline front upper control arm (UCA) bushings in an effort to gain more camber. However, I started thinking about how to position them.


Full inboard would give the greatest static camber gain without a change in camber gain rate.


BUT, if I install the eccentric hole downward, that would impact static camber very little, but introduce a more aggressive gain rate as the car rolls.


Has anyone tried installing with the holes downward so that braking camber isn't affected as much, but the car gets a nice camber gain in the corners?
Old 02-22-2017, 07:57 PM
  #2  
Registered
 
gigglehurtz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Rochester, NY
Posts: 56
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
That's an interesting idea. You'd have to measure the camber curves before and after to make a determination if the change was significant, or do some controlled testing at a track.

One problem is that under dive, you'll still get an increase in camber, unless you're stiffly sprung or have a lot of damping. You may also increase brake dive by changing the anti-dive geometry in the front suspension.
Old 03-02-2017, 12:52 PM
  #3  
Registered
 
Nadrealista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Here
Posts: 668
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts
Originally Posted by hufflepuff
Based on tire wear and pryro data, I am installing whiteline front upper control arm (UCA) bushings in an effort to gain more camber. However, I started thinking about how to position them.


Full inboard would give the greatest static camber gain without a change in camber gain rate.


BUT, if I install the eccentric hole downward, that would impact static camber very little, but introduce a more aggressive gain rate as the car rolls.


Has anyone tried installing with the holes downward so that braking camber isn't affected as much, but the car gets a nice camber gain in the corners?
I was just looking at these.

are you going to be at these TD events?
4/22 SPJ

5/6 DOM
Old 03-03-2017, 06:07 AM
  #4  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
hufflepuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 541
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Not those two. But i'm planning on the TD 17 June SPS and June 23 DR events. I'll be doing mostly NASA, with some SCCA/Chin/HOD/Trackdaze events this year.
Old 04-14-2017, 02:55 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
Nadrealista's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Here
Posts: 668
Received 30 Likes on 25 Posts
did you install these offset camber bushings yet? how did you orient them in the end?
Old 04-14-2017, 04:04 PM
  #6  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
hufflepuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 541
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
For now I have the holes fully outboard for max camber. I only have my lower control arm eccentric bolts at the half way point and I'm at -2.5 with a 13.5" ride height.
Old 04-14-2017, 08:30 PM
  #7  
pcs
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
pcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
how much negative camber did you gain from the bushings? and have they moved on you at all since hitting the track?
Old 04-14-2017, 08:46 PM
  #8  
pcs
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
pcs's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 445
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
are they these?

Whiteline KCA421

they barely look offset (if they are)... or am I looking at the wrong ones?
Old 04-14-2017, 09:05 PM
  #9  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
hufflepuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 541
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Yes those are correct. They claim to gain you 0.5 degrees either way.

With the upper offset bushings​ maxed and the LCA eccentrics maxed, my car looked helladumb and broken... Probably about 4 degrees negative at 13.5" ride height.
Old 04-15-2017, 01:29 AM
  #10  
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 13,718
Received 334 Likes on 289 Posts
Originally Posted by hufflepuff
For now I have the holes fully outboard for max camber. I only have my lower control arm eccentric bolts at the half way point and I'm at -2.5 with a 13.5" ride height.

Fully outbound? Don't you want the uppers in and the lowers out?....
Old 04-15-2017, 05:53 AM
  #11  
Registered
Thread Starter
 
hufflepuff's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: Mid Atlantic
Posts: 541
Received 49 Likes on 36 Posts
Originally Posted by dannobre
Fully outbound? Don't you want the uppers in and the lowers out?....
when the UCA holes are rotated fully outboard, that moves the UCA fully inboard, increasing camber
Old 04-15-2017, 08:41 AM
  #12  
Modulated Moderator
iTrader: (3)
 
dannobre's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Smallville
Posts: 13,718
Received 334 Likes on 289 Posts
Originally Posted by hufflepuff
when the UCA holes are rotated fully outboard, that moves the UCA fully inboard, increasing camber
LOL. Wasnt awake when I read that 😐



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:50 PM.