Notices
RX-8 Multimedia/Photo Gallery Share your pics,videos or links to them.

9.5" rims on the front ...nice!

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 07-11-2006, 09:38 AM
  #1  
The Prototype
Thread Starter
 
DailyDriver2k5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
9.5" rims on the front ...nice!

Nice to see, that the 8 can handle 9.5" in the front.....





I wonder if this guy is a member of the RX8club? The 8 looks nice with deep dish rims in the front and back, accents the fender flares nicely.
Old 07-11-2006, 09:53 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
alfy28's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
yah i really like those wheels.
Old 07-11-2006, 11:38 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
nranly's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 34
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
What do you think that does for the handling of the car?
Old 07-11-2006, 11:45 AM
  #4  
Shink'd Out for 2006
 
time4akshun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Morris Plains, NJ
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Wow. Nice looking.
Old 07-11-2006, 12:03 PM
  #5  
RX8 HA HA
 
XDEEDUBBX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Gardena Cali 310
Posts: 11,772
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
infact you can even fit 10's in the back with the correct offset..
Old 07-11-2006, 12:14 PM
  #6  
The Prototype
Thread Starter
 
DailyDriver2k5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 1,793
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by nranly
What do you think that does for the handling of the car?

It probally makes the 8 nuetral again, same width rims/tires. With a staggered setup , it promotes understeer when the 8 or any car that didn't come from the factory with a staggered setup as factory spec. But if you drive your car everyday and not on a track, you will hardly notice any diffrence from a stock setup. I noticed it one time when i was doing 83 mph on a 35 mph onramp, the onramp that i use time and time again to begin my morning commute, the front started to push inwards a little with my staggered setup.
Old 07-11-2006, 12:15 PM
  #7  
drivelinestore.com
 
lazi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: OC
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
looks good
Old 07-11-2006, 12:33 PM
  #8  
ay bay bay
 
presequel's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: 626, CA
Posts: 252
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by XDEEDUBBX
infact you can even fit 10's in the back with the correct offset..
yep i have 10 on the back.
Old 07-11-2006, 12:51 PM
  #9  
Storm Trooper
 
Moostafa29's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Freakmont, CA
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Quite a few people have 9.5in all around. I'll be doing the same as soon as the rims come to the US. These do look good though.
Old 07-11-2006, 01:27 PM
  #10  
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 6,527
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
sooo heavy.
Old 07-11-2006, 02:29 PM
  #11  
Shink'd Out for 2006
 
time4akshun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Morris Plains, NJ
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by SayNoToPistons
sooo heavy.
Knew that was coming. Not convinced bout this heavyness debate. I mean if the rims weight 10 pounds more than stock all the way around and the driver weighs 40 pounds less than me on my light stock setup. Aren't we even anyway??

Not convinced with this staggered = heavy nonsense. Just dont think it matters. Staggered = Effect on steering? That, I buy, but the weight issue is a moot point for me for the reason I stated above...

Time
Old 07-11-2006, 02:39 PM
  #12  
Registered User
 
gr8thandling's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 73
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
can u guys tell me wats staggered mean
wats offset of the rims should be cuz im plannin on buyin new rims
wats offset
Old 07-11-2006, 04:33 PM
  #13  
Boost needed
 
IZoomZoomI's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: San Jose, CA
Posts: 2,557
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by time4akshun
Knew that was coming. Not convinced bout this heavyness debate. I mean if the rims weight 10 pounds more than stock all the way around and the driver weighs 40 pounds less than me on my light stock setup. Aren't we even anyway??

Not convinced with this staggered = heavy nonsense. Just dont think it matters. Staggered = Effect on steering? That, I buy, but the weight issue is a moot point for me for the reason I stated above...

Time

actually you're going to have to a little bit more research there. There is a difference in sprung weight and unsprung weight. There are plenty of articles/tests posted in the wheels/suspension section that is stickied.
Old 07-11-2006, 04:46 PM
  #14  
Storm Trooper
 
Moostafa29's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Freakmont, CA
Posts: 3,908
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by time4akshun
Knew that was coming. Not convinced bout this heavyness debate. I mean if the rims weight 10 pounds more than stock all the way around and the driver weighs 40 pounds less than me on my light stock setup. Aren't we even anyway??

Not convinced with this staggered = heavy nonsense. Just dont think it matters. Staggered = Effect on steering? That, I buy, but the weight issue is a moot point for me for the reason I stated above...

Time
You should really try driving the same car with heavy rims and lightweight rims. I drove IzzI's car when he had his stock rims, and when he got some lightweight rims, and I could feel a pretty big difference. Car felt much lighter. I don't know how changing to a staggered set up would effect handling, but the car was not build for it, so I'd leave it the same on all 4 wheels unless you're purely going for looks.
Old 07-11-2006, 05:28 PM
  #15  
Registered
 
oreo's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: San Juan, PR
Posts: 242
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Staggered = Diferent wheel sizes front and rear (9.5 wide front, 10 rear) also 17" diameter front 18" diameter rear is considered staggered.

Unsprung weight vs sprung weight:
Unsprung weight is anything north of the suspension (wheels, tires, brake calipers, control arms, away bars, ect.) This weight does not ger transfered as the car's balance changes therefore it's dead weight on the car at all times.

think of it this way: how easy was it to lift the front wheel of your old bicycle, spin it and stop it with one finger. Now try doing it with a motorciycle wheel, then try doing it with your car's wheels. Get the point.

oh yea, and search on the suspension threads. there is a LOT of good stuff on wheels, ofsets, and how they affect our cars handling.
Old 07-11-2006, 06:37 PM
  #16  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
NgoRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA, Rowland Hts.
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
staggered set up adds more weight to the back. and in the case of handling, stagger gives more grip to the rear because of the wider tires. in our car, it will cause more understeer.
Old 07-11-2006, 08:29 PM
  #17  
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 6,527
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
Originally Posted by time4akshun
Knew that was coming. Not convinced bout this heavyness debate. I mean if the rims weight 10 pounds more than stock all the way around and the driver weighs 40 pounds less than me on my light stock setup. Aren't we even anyway??

Not convinced with this staggered = heavy nonsense. Just dont think it matters. Staggered = Effect on steering? That, I buy, but the weight issue is a moot point for me for the reason I stated above...

Time
they said what i was going to say.
Old 07-11-2006, 08:46 PM
  #18  
if your not 1st your last
 
Kel Rx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Jersey & Peru
Posts: 4,889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
nice not a fan of those axis wheels
staggered is the ****
20x9 & 20x10 for the Haters!!
Old 07-11-2006, 09:49 PM
  #19  
IfYerNotWasted..TheDayIs
 
TragicallyHip's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: NewBrunswick
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This guy is definetely a member of the boards, he goes by ToM18nY...
He says they are 20x9 front, 20x10 rear... As opposed to 9.5's in the front, but whatever...
He's got a pretty sweet system in there too

Custom Kicker System

Last edited by TragicallyHip; 07-11-2006 at 10:15 PM.
Old 07-11-2006, 10:29 PM
  #20  
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 6,527
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
cant wait till everyone moves on to new cars in 10 yrs.
Old 07-11-2006, 10:46 PM
  #21  
if your not 1st your last
 
Kel Rx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Jersey & Peru
Posts: 4,889
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
^
curious who that comment is to ?
Old 07-11-2006, 10:55 PM
  #22  
Registered User
 
kartweb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 511
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by DailyDriver2k5
It probally makes the 8 nuetral again, same width rims/tires. With a staggered setup , it promotes understeer when the 8 or any car that didn't come from the factory with a staggered setup as factory spec. But if you drive your car everyday and not on a track, you will hardly notice any diffrence from a stock setup. I noticed it one time when i was doing 83 mph on a 35 mph onramp, the onramp that i use time and time again to begin my morning commute, the front started to push inwards a little with my staggered setup.
Try adding a little more castor to balance it out. Castor changes the weight jacking a bit as it pushes the inside tire down and lifts the outside tire up a bit - that tends to offset the front sway bar a bit and takes a bit of weight off the inside rear. With Ltd Slip it reduces the binding on the back tires. Binding is what happens when a live (or semi-live with a Ltd Slip) axle goes through a turn. The flip side is over about 100 MPH or so the front end will feel a bit twitchier. Probably not too bad on a long wheelbase car like the RX8.
Old 07-11-2006, 10:55 PM
  #23  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
NgoRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA, Rowland Hts.
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
10 years? never! i'm not selling.
Old 07-12-2006, 11:05 AM
  #24  
Shink'd Out for 2006
 
time4akshun's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Morris Plains, NJ
Posts: 503
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Neither am I!!... RX for life!

Originally Posted by NgoRX8
10 years? never! i'm not selling.
Old 07-12-2006, 02:44 PM
  #25  
Wheels, not rims!!
iTrader: (8)
 
SayNoToPistons's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: LA
Posts: 6,527
Received 67 Likes on 56 Posts
lol we'll see .


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: 9.5" rims on the front ...nice!



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:46 PM.