RX-8 listed in Motor Trend June 2008 Article 135i v EVO X
#1
2005 Black RX-8 GT 6M
Thread Starter
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: San Jose Area
Posts: 6,350
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
RX-8 listed in Motor Trend June 2008 Article 135i v EVO X
The BMW 135i beat the EVO X, because it was an all around wonderful car to drive.
However, on one page, it listed other four seat sports coupes/cars for comparison to the 135i and EVO X.
The RX-8 was listed along the Audi TT 3.2 Quattro, Ford Mustang GT, and Subaru Impreza WRX STI and the two tested cars. Glad that 8 was listed, but it showed HP and torque numbers and, of course, the 8 didn't look too good on paper. But at least it was mentioned.
The column categories were engine, power, torque, layout (rwd, awd), doors/passengers and MRSP.
MT got a 135i 6-speed automatic 0-60 in 4.7 seconds and 1/4 mile in 13.3 @ 105.6MPH!!!
However, on one page, it listed other four seat sports coupes/cars for comparison to the 135i and EVO X.
The RX-8 was listed along the Audi TT 3.2 Quattro, Ford Mustang GT, and Subaru Impreza WRX STI and the two tested cars. Glad that 8 was listed, but it showed HP and torque numbers and, of course, the 8 didn't look too good on paper. But at least it was mentioned.
The column categories were engine, power, torque, layout (rwd, awd), doors/passengers and MRSP.
MT got a 135i 6-speed automatic 0-60 in 4.7 seconds and 1/4 mile in 13.3 @ 105.6MPH!!!
Last edited by CarAndDriver; 05-09-2008 at 01:05 AM.
#7
Registered
Me too, i will be happy with the 250hp, as long they keep it weight light. but then again this is mazda who makes a well balance car.
#8
#9
Void Where Prohibited
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mineola, TX
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#10
Registered Car Nut
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Bay Area, No. California
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
Last year Car and Driver did a comparo ...350Z, Shelby Mustang, TT and RX8. The TT was a 2.0 turbo with DSG. They claimed the TT was 100 lbs lighter than the 8. If memory serves the TT was listed at 2960, 8 listed at 3060. The 8 won the comparo, TT 2nd, 350Z 3rd and Mustang last.
#13
Registered Car Nut
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: East Bay Area, No. California
Posts: 57
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
yeah, the v6 quattro would definitely be heavier. The 8 was picked first bcuz it was more fun to drive, outstanding handling. The handling on the Mustang was compared to a live axle truck from the 70's.
#14
Registered
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like
on
1 Post
You would think the next rotary car with the 16X HAS to have at least 250hp. Why would they develop a new rotary engine and have the same power as the current one. Couple that with direct injection, more low end, and maybe a little lighter and you have a winner.
I also saw that the new 370Z may start around $35,000. If that is the case, they are pricing themselves out of the market for an affordable sports car. That new RX7 or whatever it becomes is supposed to start under $30,000.
I also saw that the new 370Z may start around $35,000. If that is the case, they are pricing themselves out of the market for an affordable sports car. That new RX7 or whatever it becomes is supposed to start under $30,000.
#17
Void Where Prohibited
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mineola, TX
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#19
The Mustang is not nearly that bad. Someone hasn't driven a 70's truck in a while....
#20
Void Where Prohibited
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Mineola, TX
Posts: 3,046
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes
on
0 Posts
#21
As for the live rear-axle, my understanding is that it is there to cut costs.
#22
You could also say the 8 is slow as a snail compared to the mustang. But that doesn't make the 8 as slow as a snail.
#23
how about...
How about:
Same MPG. Additional 6gallons to the tank. Near bulletproof oil delivery & cooling so noon of the 03-08 gremlins occur?
6gallons totalling about 20.5? overall should net around 340 Miles to a trip, which i think is acceptable. Realistically I don't think we'll see a better mpg unless they start using a hybrid type technology similar to what F1 is using... electric for ontap torque, and charges during breaking & coasting...
Same MPG. Additional 6gallons to the tank. Near bulletproof oil delivery & cooling so noon of the 03-08 gremlins occur?
6gallons totalling about 20.5? overall should net around 340 Miles to a trip, which i think is acceptable. Realistically I don't think we'll see a better mpg unless they start using a hybrid type technology similar to what F1 is using... electric for ontap torque, and charges during breaking & coasting...
#24
I guess Mustangs would be great any place where the roads are only straight and there are no turns. Though you could probably just make a go-kart too.
#25
Of course you'd have to qualify that the Mustang was faster "on a straight line" because you'd kill yourself trying to drive as fast as an RX-8 in the twists.
I guess Mustangs would be great any place where the roads are only straight and there are no turns. Though you could probably just make a go-kart too.
I guess Mustangs would be great any place where the roads are only straight and there are no turns. Though you could probably just make a go-kart too.
and again, by that logic you can say the 8 would be great on roads that only have curves, no straights.
I thought the 8 was pretty confy cruising down the highway though.
Have you driven the new mustang?
they are 2 different cars, no need to rag on one or the other. Both do what they do.
Last edited by Shoafb; 05-28-2008 at 03:21 PM.