Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

Mazda's 'RENESIS' Wins 'International Engine of the Year 2003'

 
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 06-03-2003, 10:06 PM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
 
boowana's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 400
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Mazda's 'RENESIS' Wins 'International Engine of the Year 2003'

For your information June 4, 2003


Mazda's 'RENESIS' Wins 'International Engine of the Year 2003'



Mazda's new-generation rotary engine, "RENESIS," which powers Mazda's all-new RX-8 sports car, has been named "International Engine of the Year 2003."

Established in 1999, the International Engine of the Year Awards are hosted by Engine Technology International every year with the winner selected by a majority vote of 50 motoring journalists from 22 countries around the world. Engines are evaluated based on the criteria of drivability, performance, economy, refinement, and the successful application of advanced engine technology. There are a total of eight awards for the eight capacity classes of all current production engines between sub 1-litre to above 4-litre capacities, and three special awards of "Best New Engine of 2003," "Best Fuel Economy," and "Best Performance Engine." The "International Engine of the Year" is selected from among the winners of the eight engine capacity classes. With an impressive 44 out of 50 votes, the RENESIS clearly outshone this year's competition to claim the honor of "International Engine of the Year." In addition, Mazda's new-generation rotary engine also won the "2.5-litre to 3-litre" Capacity Class Award and "Best New Engine of 2003."


Mazda's new-generation rotary engine 'RENESIS'

Nobuhiro Hayama, executive officer and general manager of the Powertrain Development Division said, "Mazda firmly believes in the virtues of the rotary engine and we have spent many years developing rotary technologies. This award recognizes the significant technical innovation achieved through the ingenuity and enthusiasm of our engineers after overcoming many challenges. We will continue to pursue developments in engineering to further advance the rotary engine's potential."

The rotary engine performs the four processes of intake, compression, combustion, and exhaust in succession by turning a triangular-shaped rotor in the cocoon-shaped combustion chamber to generate power. In comparison with the reciprocating engine, it excels in features such as "compact size and light weight," "flat torque performance," and "less vibration and low noise." Through the introduction of innovative technologies for the rotary engine such as the use of "side-exhaust and side-intake ports" and the new sequential dynamic air intake system, the RENESIS delivers a high power output for a naturally aspirated engine. In addition, the engine demonstrates significantly improved fuel economy and reduced emissions when compared with previous rotaries.

Mazda has developed and introduced a series of insightful cars, such as the Cosmo Sports in 1967 and successive RX-7s, utilizing the intrinsic technical benefits of the rotary engine. The development of the RENESIS, from design to production, represents the sum of its extensive experience with rotary engine technologies. The company has created a new page in rotary history with this innovative engine designed specifically to power the four-door four-seater Mazda RX-8, a totally new concept in sports car design.

The award ceremony will be held on June 4 in Stuttgart, Germany.

Outline of RENESIS engine (for Mazda RX-8 Type S/Japanese specifications)
-Type: Rotary engine, two-rotor, water-cooled
-Total Displacement: 0.654L x 2
-Maximum Output (JIS net): 184kW (250PS)/8,500rpm
-Maximum Torque (JIS net): 216N·m (22.0kg-m)/5,500rpm
boowana is offline  
Old 06-04-2003, 12:29 AM
  #2  
mostly harmless
 
wakeech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
*thumbs nose at rotary nay-sayers, and bitchers of fuel economy and torque*

Last edited by wakeech; 06-04-2003 at 12:32 AM.
wakeech is offline  
Old 06-04-2003, 02:38 AM
  #3  
Registered User
 
gord boyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Here is a prediction on my personal record:
Next year's Award will be Hybrid Synergy Drive
for "Torque on Demand" AND 15% MPG improvement
(and 30% less emmissions than squeaky clean current Prius).

Congrats to Mazda for this years' Award!
gord boyd is offline  
Old 06-04-2003, 11:58 AM
  #4  
Careful, I bite!
 
DisneyDestroyer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 287
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
The put it in the "2.5-litre to 3-litre" class, despite listing its characteristics as "Total Displacement: 0.654L x 2" which makes 1.3-litre. What's up with this?
DisneyDestroyer is offline  
Old 06-04-2003, 12:31 PM
  #5  
Registered
 
DrKillJoY's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Houston
Posts: 1,107
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
here is the link...

http://www.ukintpress.com/engineoftheyear/ieoty.html

as far as the reason it is classed as a 2.5-3.0l motor...

....Traditional swept volume measurements are confused when tackling rotary engines. A rotary engine has three chambers created by the gap between the rotor itself and the rotor housing, as opposed to a the chamber between the head and piston in a reciprocating engine. The motion of the rotor moves the chamber itself (with the mixture contained in the chamber) from the inlet port, compresses the mixture, moves the chamber in line with the spark plugs to ignite the mixture, then moves the mix to an exhaust port... there are three chambers doing this constantly. So it's a very different process to a traditional reciprocating engine. That said, in motorsport and as far as many government bodies are concerned, a rotary engine in displacement is consider to be the equivalent of a reciprocating engine of double the capacity. In this case, RX7s are generally consider to be the equivalent of a 2.6 litre piston motor. On a four stroke there's only one intake stroke for every two revolutions, so from a breathing standpoint, displacement is how much combustion chamber volume gets sucked in over two revolutions. for a rotary, with one intake stroke per revolution, that means measuring two combustion chambers per rotor, not one, like mazda says. each chamber in a 13b displaces 654cc, so by mazda's two-stroke method, a 13b is 1308cc.

i hope my cut and paste from the internet helps.
DrKillJoY is offline  
Old 06-04-2003, 12:35 PM
  #6  
Registered User
 
MRocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Nice nice! Anyone else here think that when the 8 comes out it will win Motor Trend's car of the year?
MRocks is offline  
Old 06-04-2003, 06:03 PM
  #7  
Registered
 
cueball's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: North Kingstown, RI
Posts: 1,022
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by MRocks
Nice nice! Anyone else here think that when the 8 comes out it will win Motor Trend's car of the year?
That is not necessarily a good thing. The PT Cruiser and T-Bird both won car of the year and look at how well they are doing.

On the other hand it would give us more ammo against all those rotor nay-sayers.
cueball is offline  
Old 06-04-2003, 06:17 PM
  #8  
Registered User
 
Sharky's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It's a tough balancing act. We want it to be popular enough so Mazda keeps making it but on the other hand we want it to be exclusive enough so you don't see one on every street corner. It seems a very fine line indeed...
Sharky is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 12:02 PM
  #9  
Love to rev!
 
Quick_lude's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Mississauga - Ontario
Posts: 1,081
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by wakeech
*thumbs nose at rotary nay-sayers, and bitchers of fuel economy and torque*
Not to be a "nay-sayer" :p but was the fuel economy test done in a "real" world? I doubt it.. Good for Mazda though! Maybe more money and research will be put forward to the rotary development..
Quick_lude is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 03:13 PM
  #10  
mostly harmless
 
wakeech's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2002
Location: Greater Vancouver Area, BC
Posts: 3,440
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by Quick_lude

Not to be a "nay-sayer" :p but was the fuel economy test done in a "real" world? I doubt it.. Good for Mazda though! Maybe more money and research will be put forward to the rotary development..
oh i don't care what the fuel consumption rates are... if they match the FD, than it's 1 or 2 mpg lower than the next best competitor, and i say "sucks to you bitchers of fuel economy", as it's one of the lowest costs of a car (and not something you should really be concerned about if you like going quickly), not to mention it's a performance machine first... fuel economy is just a comprimize you have to be willing to make... well, at least i am.
wakeech is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 03:43 PM
  #11  
Registered User
 
ed hall's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: London, UK
Posts: 128
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
fuel consumption is important. I'm not a tree hugger, but the rest of the world is concerned about fuel consumption and pollution emissions.

The Mazda rotor, for what it is, compares well against motors double its size and that is good enough for me.

The world summit on the environment held in South Afirca late last year demonstarted that the world actually cares about the air we breath...except of course the USA, which could not be bothered to even attend.

Well well, so **** happens...but I do care and I hope Mazda does too!
ed hall is offline  
Old 06-05-2003, 05:47 PM
  #12  
I Am Rotary Powered
 
Jerome81's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: San Francisco, California
Posts: 258
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
MT's car of the year award is garbage. They've picked some pretty bad cars over the years (Chevy Citation?? I think...)

While the T Bird and PT are indeed good cars, I certainly don't think the T Bird is anything that changes the landscape of the american road. It is a good, solid car, but it was nothing ground breaking at all. no new engine technology, no new trannies, no new gagets. Nothing.

Automobile's Automobile of the Year I feel is a much more prestigious award, and I can definitely see Mazda winning that one. Heck, I wonder if Mazda6 might also be up for that award or if it was included last year.

The car will definitely be a C&D 10Best.
Jerome81 is offline  
Old 06-07-2003, 07:19 AM
  #13  
Registered User
 
gord boyd's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2002
Posts: 156
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I agree with Ed Hall. Geopolitics are a new factor and
we'd get fewer guys & gals shot up if we'd moderate reliance on MidEast.

I'm beginning to "change my eyes" (Proust) and I want to be part of the change. You have to live here in the midEast to be
infuriated with SUV owners. And now Hummers can be written off in one year against US businesses!
gord boyd is offline  
Old 06-09-2003, 09:38 AM
  #14  
Registered User
 
MRocks's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2003
Location: NY
Posts: 101
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally posted by cueball1029

That is not necessarily a good thing. The PT Cruiser and T-Bird both won car of the year and look at how well they are doing.

On the other hand it would give us more ammo against all those rotor nay-sayers.
Is the Cruiser really doing that bad? Did the T-Bird really win? Have I been living under a rock? Well the T-Bird is really impractical compared to the 8 so I don't think the same fate will happen to that.
MRocks is offline  
Old 09-19-2004, 04:33 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
Rob Tomlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
So who did they give the award to for 2004?
Rob Tomlin is offline  
Old 09-19-2004, 05:43 PM
  #16  
Registered User
 
moatz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Nottingham, UK
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The Toyota Hybrid Synergy Drive used in the Toyota Prius.

The Renesis still won the 2.5-3 litre class.

See http://www.ukintpress.com/engineofth...egories04.html for more details.
moatz is offline  
Old 09-19-2004, 06:06 PM
  #17  
Registered User
 
Rob Tomlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Cool.

Thanks moatz
Rob Tomlin is offline  
 
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
vapor2
West For Sale/Wanted
11
11-03-2020 03:38 PM
escapedan
RX-8 Racing
58
02-10-2020 06:11 PM
mr. GrandGame
New Member Forum
5
03-23-2016 10:16 AM
akagc
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
7
08-11-2015 07:07 PM
AussieGray
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
0
07-16-2015 03:58 AM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Mazda's 'RENESIS' Wins 'International Engine of the Year 2003'



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 05:29 AM.