Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

Facelifted RX8 revealed!!!!

 
Thread Tools
 
Rate Thread
 
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 07:27 PM
  #1026  
MP3Guy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jayk
Like any argument it all really depends on your perspective. An EVO only does 60 in about 5.2 seconds, which is only .3 seconds faster than an fd, and only .8 seconds slower than an 8. All tiny almost imperceptible numbers, but would you really try to argue that your 8 is as fast as an EVO? You could definetly say that the tiny imperceptible difference makes no difference to you, but shrugging away the acceleration of the rx-7 over the rx-8 based on 0-60 and quarter mile times is absurd.

Having raced EVO's and 8's on the track, I can tell you that the EVO is dramatically faster than the rx-7 between 100mph and 155mph. And the rx-7 is dramatically faster than the 8 between 100mph and 155.

Most of us could care less about racing.
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 08:00 PM
  #1027  
kinchu007's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by MP3Guy
Most of us could care less about racing.

Haha...a true car enthusiast...Motor Trend was made for you! Go get em tiger!
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 08:20 PM
  #1028  
Icemark's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 755
Likes: 0
From: Rohnert Park CA
Originally Posted by MP3Guy
Most of us could care less about racing.
You forgot that most of us could care less about Evos' too. If we wanted boxy sedans based off of FWD economy cars we would have bought them.
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 09:05 PM
  #1029  
chiketkd's Avatar
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by MP3Guy
Your results may vary.......

From Rotary News:

We at RotaryNews have been following the threads on the RX-8 forum about the fact that the RX-8 was not making advertised horsepower on the dyno. We have also been in contact with some of the folks in Mazda about the issue. They were fully aware of the issue, and researched it fully. They have released their findings today.
As of today, August 22nd, 2003, the revised US-Spec Horsepower Rating of the RX-8 is 238 HP for the Manual 6port RENESIS, and 197 HP for the 4port Automatic RENESIS. The performance numbers advertised ARE NOT CHANGING. They have done many tests, in house, with magazines, and outside third parties, and they are still observing RX-8's that will do 0-60 in 5.9-6.0 seconds and quarter mines in 14.5 (best observed 1/4 mile run at Pomona Raceway was 14.48 at 96.1 MPH)


From an Edmunds recap:
The third RX-7 did generate some astounding numbers. Road & Track had an R1 blitzing from zero to 60 in 5.5 seconds with the quarter being consumed in 14.0 seconds at 98.5 mph. Motor Trend had it doing those same tricks in 5.3 seconds and 13.9 seconds at 99.7 mph. This was one seriously fast car.

But rough-riding, high-performance, close-coupled two-seaters (even the less brutal "Touring" model was still ultrastiff) weren't big sellers in the '90s as insurance rates on such vehicles went up and the market's preference for SUVs became obvious. "Pound for pound, dollar for dollar," wrote Road & Track, "the new RX-7 shines with some of the brightest sports cars in the world. Mazda is sticking its corporate neck out here, coming to market with a more specialized, higher-priced car at a time when two-seater sales — not to mention automotive sales in general — are feeble. Let's hope this lightweight rotary rocket can send that trend packing."



All in all, I would stop pining away like a dog that lost it's owner for the RX-7. And at a cost of over $10,000 more in 1995 dollars, well, let's just say there's a reason the car has much better demand used than it did new. Help yourself.
Very good points IMHO. Definitely shows that stock-for-stock in "standardized" straight line acceleration tests, the two cars aren't light-years apart.

However, with that said, I'm an autocrosser and while both cars have similar multi-link front and rear suspensions, the lighter weight and higher hp/tq output of the FD RX-7 puts that car in Super Stock with the Z06, Elise/Exige, 911 GT3, etc., while the RX-8 is in B-stock with the 350Z, E36 M3, Z4, etc. Handling wise, these cars are vastly different.

Just my $0.02...
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 10:22 PM
  #1030  
spooledUP7's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Camarillo, Ca
Originally Posted by jayk
Like any argument it all really depends on your perspective. An EVO only does 60 in about 5.2 seconds, which is only .3 seconds faster than an fd, and only .8 seconds slower than an 8. All tiny almost imperceptible numbers, but would you really try to argue that your 8 is as fast as an EVO? You could definetly say that the tiny imperceptible difference makes no difference to you, but shrugging away the acceleration of the rx-7 over the rx-8 based on 0-60 and quarter mile times is absurd.

Having raced EVO's and 8's on the track, I can tell you that the EVO is dramatically faster than the rx-7 between 100mph and 155mph. And the rx-7 is dramatically faster than the 8 between 100mph and 155.
100% on your side, numbers don't mean squat compared to how the car feels.
However I don't understand the R&T numbers for the FD when I ran a 13.8 @ 99mph on a blown motor with 130K on the chassis. Even at the last breath of my FD's motor - to where it took an act of god and gallon of ATF to start - the FD felt MILES faster than my RX-8... MILES! Once the new motor was in, it was a rocket ship compared to the 8, and it felt like one.
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 10:24 PM
  #1031  
spooledUP7's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Camarillo, Ca
Originally Posted by chiketkd
Very good points IMHO. Definitely shows that stock-for-stock in "standardized" straight line acceleration tests, the two cars aren't light-years apart.

However, with that said, I'm an autocrosser and while both cars have similar multi-link front and rear suspensions, the lighter weight and higher hp/tq output of the FD RX-7 puts that car in Super Stock with the Z06, Elise/Exige, 911 GT3, etc., while the RX-8 is in B-stock with the 350Z, E36 M3, Z4, etc. Handling wise, these cars are vastly different.

Just my $0.02...
It surprises me that an 8 can be in the same class as the M3 (at least the E46). The E46 feels much faster although maybe not as agile.
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 10:26 PM
  #1032  
spooledUP7's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Camarillo, Ca
Originally Posted by MP3Guy
Most of us could care less about racing.
I'd like to opt out of the "Most of us" crowd thank you.
Old Jan 24, 2008 | 11:20 PM
  #1033  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
That's a fast run 14.41 if it's stock.

Most people here get 15.5 or 15.
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 07:45 AM
  #1034  
pbuck1's Avatar
pbuck1
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 155
Likes: 0
From: Cottage Grove ,WI
2009 MazdaSpeed RX-8

Just found pics of the Speed RX-8 .
"The Mazdaspeed concept maximizes the new face lift of the RX-8, tuning the look and performance with aero upgrades, and suspension tweaks. The exterior is treated with 20 inch chrome, large diameter wheels wrapped with Yokohama tires, the rims let just enough of the larger blue brake calipers peek through. Other exterior parts include an taller rear spoiler, black-background tail lamps, side stills, and revised side fender treatment. The sport tuning suspension will allow the car to corner better, and faster under high-performance driving. The interior has large racing bucket seat and with off-white covering, and blue stitching. The center stack is improved upon, allowing for a large center display with with integrated audio, and Sat-Nav and engine performance readouts. Other interior bits are available too, completing the package. "
Attached Thumbnails Facelifted RX8 revealed!!!!-200801_168549.jpg   Facelifted RX8 revealed!!!!-200801_168550.jpg   Facelifted RX8 revealed!!!!-200801_168551.jpg   Facelifted RX8 revealed!!!!-200801_168552.jpg  
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 07:58 AM
  #1035  
spooledUP7's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: Camarillo, Ca
Originally Posted by pbuck1
Just found pics of the Speed RX-8 .
"The Mazdaspeed concept maximizes the new face lift of the RX-8, tuning the look and performance with aero upgrades, and suspension tweaks. The exterior is treated with 20 inch chrome, large diameter wheels wrapped with Yokohama tires, the rims let just enough of the larger blue brake calipers peek through. Other exterior parts include an taller rear spoiler, black-background tail lamps, side stills, and revised side fender treatment. The sport tuning suspension will allow the car to corner better, and faster under high-performance driving. The interior has large racing bucket seat and with off-white covering, and blue stitching. The center stack is improved upon, allowing for a large center display with with integrated audio, and Sat-Nav and engine performance readouts. Other interior bits are available too, completing the package. "
Hmm, doesn't look like much has changed from 20 pages in. ;-)
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 09:48 AM
  #1036  
chiketkd's Avatar
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by spooledUP7
It surprises me that an 8 can be in the same class as the M3 (at least the E46). The E46 feels much faster although maybe not as agile.
Re-read my post. The E36 M3 is in B-stock, not the E46 (that's in A-stock with the Boxster S, STi, Evo, C4 vette, etc.).
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 03:54 PM
  #1037  
MP3Guy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by kinchu007
Haha...a true car enthusiast...Motor Trend was made for you! Go get em tiger!

Let us examine the pathologies exhibited in this response.

First, I doubt if 3% of all RX-8s sold in this country will ever get any time on a track. And that's for a number of reasons, including the fact that many people don't live anywhere near one.

Second, it doesn't make anyone less of an enthusiast if they don't.

Lastly, I gather from your remark that you race to prove your manhood. If that is the case, some couch time might be more beneficial than track time.

Just a suggestion.

Last edited by MP3Guy; Jan 25, 2008 at 03:57 PM.
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 03:54 PM
  #1038  
SlayerRX8's Avatar
'03 Dodge Viper
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 842
Likes: 2
From: University of Maryland
Originally Posted by pbuck1
Just found pics of the Speed RX-8 .
"The Mazdaspeed concept maximizes the new face lift of the RX-8, tuning the look and performance with aero upgrades, and suspension tweaks. The exterior is treated with 20 inch chrome, large diameter wheels wrapped with Yokohama tires, the rims let just enough of the larger blue brake calipers peek through. Other exterior parts include an taller rear spoiler, black-background tail lamps, side stills, and revised side fender treatment. The sport tuning suspension will allow the car to corner better, and faster under high-performance driving. The interior has large racing bucket seat and with off-white covering, and blue stitching. The center stack is improved upon, allowing for a large center display with with integrated audio, and Sat-Nav and engine performance readouts. Other interior bits are available too, completing the package. "
I love how they call it "Mazdaspeed", but they don't make it any faster. lol
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 03:56 PM
  #1039  
MP3Guy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by spooledUP7
100% on your side, numbers don't mean squat compared to how the car feels.
However I don't understand the R&T numbers for the FD when I ran a 13.8 @ 99mph on a blown motor with 130K on the chassis. Even at the last breath of my FD's motor - to where it took an act of god and gallon of ATF to start - the FD felt MILES faster than my RX-8... MILES! Once the new motor was in, it was a rocket ship compared to the 8, and it felt like one.
"Feel" - or the kinesthetic response you experience with your car- accounts for a great deal of one's experience of it. Which is why the reality of the numbers often don't square with the experience of the car in your hands.
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 03:59 PM
  #1040  
shaunv74's Avatar
Power!!
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 4,412
Likes: 3
From: Sunny See attle
Originally Posted by pbuck1
The exterior is treated with 20 inch chrome, large diameter wheels wrapped with Yokohama tires,
Rollin on DUBS!!:
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 04:58 PM
  #1041  
jayk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MP3Guy
Let us examine the pathologies exhibited in this response.

First, I doubt if 3% of all RX-8s sold in this country will ever get any time on a track. And that's for a number of reasons, including the fact that many people don't live anywhere near one.

Second, it doesn't make anyone less of an enthusiast if they don't.

Lastly, I gather from your remark that you race to prove your manhood. If that is the case, some couch time might be more beneficial than track time.

Just a suggestion.
It is a perfectly valid response to say that you don't care about racing. That is why I said it depends on your perspective. If you don't intend to push your car to its limit on the track then, sure, .5 seconds means nothing.

But if you are going to push your car to its limits, then there is a world of difference between the straight-line performance of the 3rd gen seven and the 8. And by straight-line I mean the backstraight of VIR, not quarter-mile.

And fwiw - I see more 8's on track-days than 7's, so I don't think you really speak for all 8 owners.
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 05:12 PM
  #1042  
MP3Guy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 589
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by jayk
It is a perfectly valid response to say that you don't care about racing. That is why I said it depends on your perspective. If you don't intend to push your car to its limit on the track then, sure, .5 seconds means nothing.

But if you are going to push your car to its limits, then there is a world of difference between the straight-line performance of the 3rd gen seven and the 8. And by straight-line I mean the backstraight of VIR, not quarter-mile.

And fwiw - I see more 8's on track-days than 7's, so I don't think you really speak for all 8 owners.
I never claimed to speak for ALL owners, just most of them. Most people don't race no matter what they drive. And the fact that you see more 8s than 7s on a track day should be no surprise. Eventually, the older cars just go to heaven.
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 05:20 PM
  #1043  
jayk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by MP3Guy
I never claimed to speak for ALL owners, just most of them. Most people don't race no matter what they drive. And the fact that you see more 8s than 7s on a track day should be no surprise. Eventually, the older cars just go to heaven.
True, but my point was that plenty of 8's make it to the track. And I'd actually say it is a shame to own a car with such brilliant handling and never experience it the way it is meant to be driven.
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 06:23 PM
  #1044  
kinchu007's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 424
Likes: 0
From: Los Angeles
Originally Posted by MP3Guy
Let us examine the pathologies exhibited in this response.

First, I doubt if 3% of all RX-8s sold in this country will ever get any time on a track. And that's for a number of reasons, including the fact that many people don't live anywhere near one.

Second, it doesn't make anyone less of an enthusiast if they don't.

Lastly, I gather from your remark that you race to prove your manhood. If that is the case, some couch time might be more beneficial than track time.

Just a suggestion.
I was just pointing out that you made a strange statement, especially for someone on the RX8 forums...that 3% figure is a little higher on the forums don't you think? Check out the racing section...you left yourself open assuming that a statement like that would gel well with people here...I'm not the only one that pointed that out...I was just the one that tried to make it funny.

Is reading about sports cars so you can drive them at the posted speed limit your definition of "enthusiast"? Cause it sure isn't mine...and it has nothing to do with proving anything...that's why it's a passion...some people just don't get it and think that reading about stuff and then regurgitating it makes them look smart. Good job!
Old Jan 25, 2008 | 09:12 PM
  #1045  
eviltwinkie's Avatar
Banned
 
Joined: Jan 2007
Posts: 2,756
Likes: 2
From: everywherez...
Originally Posted by jayk
True, but my point was that plenty of 8's make it to the track. And I'd actually say it is a shame to own a car with such brilliant handling and never experience it the way it is meant to be driven.
Indeed...this is so very true with this car...you should make it a point at least once while you have one to get it to a HPDE for some track time. I guarantee you will have a good time. You don't even have to feel like your out to race anyone. Just drive it around with the cruise control set to 40 mph...and you wont ever even need the brakes...and you'll STILL have a good time...

Seriously...its like...fun...

If anything...its TOO easy to drive fast...waaay too forgiving...

Also kinda fun passing cars twice the price...

Power is not everything...this much I now know and finally understand...finesse is waaaay faster than making up for mistakes with raw power...

After FI...raw power in the long straights will no longer be a problem...heh
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 08:25 AM
  #1046  
krillin_boi's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
when will the 09s be available to purchase or preorder? there have been confirmed reports of pre=production vehicles on the street already
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 08:56 AM
  #1047  
ShAdOwFoX's Avatar
Soon to be born.....
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 262
Likes: 0
From: AC<-->NYC
i luv those advan t5s on the ms concept!!!!!!!
Old Jan 26, 2008 | 09:01 AM
  #1048  
robrecht's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 1,932
Likes: 0
From: Hunterdon County
I want one of those MS8s, but with a 16X in it!
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 09:18 AM
  #1049  
jayk's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 106
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by robrecht
I want one of those MS8s, but with a 16X in it!
It really is a shame they are so scared of releasing something like the MS8 with a 1.6 in America. I'd be at the dealer with my check 10 minutes from now if I could buy one. Instead they keep releasing these minimal "upgrades" that haven't really excited anybody, including (it seems) rx-8 enthusiasts.
Old Jan 29, 2008 | 09:53 AM
  #1050  
restiller's Avatar
sofa king
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 292
Likes: 0
From: Great America, IL
Originally Posted by kinchu007
Haha...a true car enthusiast...Motor Trend was made for you! Go get em tiger!
LL!

Motor Trend and Car & Driver were the main reasons why the 8 was one of the top 3 cars I considered buying when I was shopping around last year.

I read up on the specs and reviews and compared. These journalists spend time in different kinds of cars. I did the numbers thing, but after driving a GTO, it felt too heavy. I drove a GTI and it felt too floaty. I knew the RX-8 had shitty mpg and torque, but after the test drive I fell in love and discovered for myself why C&D praises it.

And Gran Turismo with a Driving Force Pro wheel had an influence as well


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 02:44 AM.