Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

Facelifted RX8 revealed!!!!

 
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 03:23 AM
  #851  
faboo's Avatar
Downhill Touge FTW!!
 
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 380
Likes: 0
From: Buena Park
Originally Posted by enforcer
When you also consider the changes over the years, this new model has got some signficant developments....(stats from RX8Club.com.au site)

2004
Sump Changed
Windscreen washer water bottle changed from black to clear (Late 04)
Green indicator arrows changed from green to yellow/green colour within dash

2005
Starter Motor Changed
Sunroof model added
Lightning Yellow removed
Flick key provided as standard
Limited Edition RX-8s available in Ebony Black (ie. Cherry/Coca-Cola colour) and Titanium Gr

2006
Changes to leather seats
Snowflake White Pearl added
Galaxy Grey replaces Titanium Grey
Stormy Blue added
Phantom Blue replaces Nordic Green?

2007
Reduction of Power by 7kw
3rd Oil Seal added*
change to side seals*
Lightning Yellow removed

2008
A longer list which is growing by the day...
paint changes are significant developments
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 05:18 AM
  #852  
DMRH's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 782
Likes: 0
From: Sydney, Australia
Originally Posted by rotarygod
I personally think a 4.77:1 rear end is a huge mistake on Mazda's part. I feel taht way about the 4.44:1 though. The car needs a 4.10:1 or go back to a 5 speed tranny. It's already got too much. More isn't better.
Perhaps you are right in piston power terms but rotary power tends to throw the piston learnt theories out the window at times.

Back in the 80's a well known rotary racer of the series-II RX-7 at Australia's famous Bathurst race track tried a 4.8 ratio & did quite well. Then he swapped to a 5.1 ratio & despite dropping around 10km/h off his top speed he improved his lap times by 2-seconds per lap.

Faster out of corners, faster through the gears was more than enough to get him into the top positions ending up #2 on the podium for the 83 classic race.

His name was Allan Moffat but its the gearing that made his difference.

REgards
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 05:36 AM
  #853  
enforcer's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,432
Likes: 0
From: Brisbane
Originally Posted by faboo
paint changes are significant developments
No the're not...but my post was in context of signficant changes to this model compared to previous years....
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 05:50 AM
  #854  
jird20's Avatar
Mad for a Furai
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Madrid - Spain
Originally Posted by enforcer
[

2007
...
3rd Oil Seal added*
change to side seals*
...
Is that true? I was completely unaware that the Renesis has had modifications affecting internal parts.

Now, if a 3rd oil seal has been added, then the rotor shape has also had to be changed to accomodate the first!

Could anyone develop on this info? Any link o a thread covering it? (I would not like to hi-jack this thread !!)

Cheers

jird20
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 05:51 AM
  #855  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Remember that the car has now 19 inch wheels, the 4.77 is to compensate for the larger size as well as 225/40 instead of 225/45 tires

Last edited by rotary crazy; Jan 15, 2008 at 05:54 AM.
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 05:53 AM
  #856  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Originally Posted by brillo
There is alot we don't know at this point. It would appear Mazda made changes, rear end (hopefully tranny gearing), exhaust, prolly the cat and ECU, to get the car more average power. I bet when dyno'd the car is now slightly under rated, rather than over rated. Mazda likely didn't want to go through the brain damage and PR of re rating the car again, rather choose to get more average power and let the results speak for themselves in the magazine reviews. I bet the car dyno's around 203whp now.

Mazda prolly got another 10-12 peak whp out of the car, but from a marketing perspective, thats not going to make a HP junkie decide he doesn't want a Z anymore.

Mazda has to have changed the tranny ratios to compensate for the rear end, or the mileage is going to ****. If they didn't I'm going to be shocked....
Thi is what I heard too, the car will dyno fron 200 to 205 RWHP
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 06:09 AM
  #857  
altspace's Avatar
Eccentric Shafting
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,649
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod
Originally Posted by huzer21
I notice this car still has the current 5 spokes.
Indeed it does. That's because only the RS version has the 19" wheels.
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 06:10 AM
  #858  
altspace's Avatar
Eccentric Shafting
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,649
Likes: 0
From: Cape Cod
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
Remember that the car has now 19 inch wheels, the 4.77 is to compensate for the larger size as well as 225/40 instead of 225/45 tires
That's only the RS model.
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 07:23 AM
  #859  
Imp's Avatar
Imp
What's next?
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 1,087
Likes: 2
From: SE Mass
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
Remember that the car has now 19 inch wheels, the 4.77 is to compensate for the larger size as well as 225/40 instead of 225/45 tires
How so? Weight? No one knows what the weight of the new wheels are yet. Nor the weight of the tires (see edit below for a link to tire rack that shows weights of the RE050A)

225/40-19 diameter is only .1" higher than the 18" and sidewalls are 4" for the 18" and 3.5" for the 19". So you're taking 1/2 of rubber and support from the inner circumference on both sides of the 19" tire. .1 diameter isn't much add'l height. Heck, you'll lose more tread than that over the life of a tire.

The 19" tire could actually end up being lighter in this instance than the 18" to offset the weight of the wheel increase (if there even is one).

Edit: Confirmed.

http://www.tirerack.com/tires/Spec.j...irePageLocQty=

RE-050A tires (these are the tires on the car in the initial post...)
225/45-18 are 28 lbs
225/40-19 are 27 lbs

So, if the 19" wheel weighs a pound more than the stock 18" wheels, it's all a wash.

--kC

Last edited by Imp; Jan 15, 2008 at 07:32 AM.
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 08:10 AM
  #860  
jird20's Avatar
Mad for a Furai
 
Joined: Sep 2004
Posts: 117
Likes: 0
From: Madrid - Spain
Food for though:

One fact that makes one think the gearbox could be well different from the current one is that " ...Driveshaft rigidity is improved".

Current one is carbon fiber. IMO Mazda is not going to replace something that it is perfect to make it more perfect. There is not point (commercially speaking) but...

It could happen that the "new" transmission could be different in size and therefore the driveshaft had to be replaced with a different one. If the lenght is shorter the driveshaft would be more rigid easily (and this can be used as publicity given the fact that the car will not come many new apparent features). Now (and this is a bit of wishful thinking) if the gearbox is longer (bigger) it could be because it has been redesigned to be i.e. stronger. Once you make it different, gear ratios could be also different.

Then again, who knows.

Cheers

jird20

Last edited by jird20; Jan 15, 2008 at 08:13 AM.
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 08:24 AM
  #861  
GoesLikeStink's Avatar
Drive like you stole it!
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 247
Likes: 1
From: Toronto
Originally Posted by Kane
Unlocks the door - the 2007 have them too.
Was also available on some 2006 models too.
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 08:26 AM
  #862  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
maybe in the RS the wheels are a lot more heavy?
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 08:31 AM
  #863  
Hanzo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
maybe in the RS the wheels are a lot more heavy?
"Shockingly enough, Mazda did not want to spend much time today talking about the 2009 RX-8. Details on its new front fascia were left unsaid, and the new R3 sport package that adds Bilstein shocks, Recaro seats and urethane-filled suspension crossmembers was barely mentioned. So when a Mazda official told us after the press conference that the car was also 45 pounds lighter than before we were skeptical. Turns out the optional 19-inch wheels that come with the R3 package are actually lighter than the stock 18s. And apparently those Recaro seats are much lighter than stock. Combined with the new shorter rear end gear, this RX-8 might actually feel new from behind the wheel."

Source: http://blogs.edmunds.com/Straightlin...etroitAutoShow
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 09:02 AM
  #864  
smrx8's Avatar
Registered User
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jan 2004
Posts: 1,752
Likes: 0
From: WHITE HOUSE
So will these hit dealers early this year or late in the year ?
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 09:03 AM
  #865  
chiketkd's Avatar
Row faster, I hear banjos
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jul 2003
Posts: 2,217
Likes: 2
From: Charlottesville, VA
Originally Posted by Hanzo
"Shockingly enough, Mazda did not want to spend much time today talking about the 2009 RX-8. Details on its new front fascia were left unsaid, and the new R3 sport package that adds Bilstein shocks, Recaro seats and urethane-filled suspension crossmembers was barely mentioned. So when a Mazda official told us after the press conference that the car was also 45 pounds lighter than before we were skeptical. Turns out the optional 19-inch wheels that come with the R3 package are actually lighter than the stock 18s. And apparently those Recaro seats are much lighter than stock. Combined with the new shorter rear end gear, this RX-8 might actually feel new from behind the wheel."

Source: http://blogs.edmunds.com/Straightlin...etroitAutoShow
Interesting...45lbs lighter.
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 09:22 AM
  #866  
CTrx8's Avatar
space for rent
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, MO
some more info from edmunds on the 2009 changes (not sure if it's already been posted):

What is it?
2009 Mazda RX-8

What's special about it?
If you're really into rotary engine-inspired wheels, the 2009 Mazda RX-8 might fall into the "special" category. For the rest of us, this RX-8 is merely what car companies like to call a "midcycle refresh." No major sheet metal changes, a relatively untouched interior and nothing much going on under the hood. It's an attempt to inject some newness into an aging car without spending the big bucks to give it a full redesign.

In this case, the refreshed exterior pieces include the front and rear bumpers, front fasica and the headlights. Oh, and the tailpipes now measure 90mm across, which is wider for those who aren't familiar with the tailpipe diameter of the current RX-8.

Inside the RX-8, the upgrades for 2009 are equally minor. Mazda has redesigned the center stack and added a new steering wheel. The front and rear seats have been changed, and we can only assume that they'll be a more comfortable place to sit than before. There's also a new tachometer with a variable redline similar to BMW's M cars, so as the engine oil warms up, the redline rises. Not a bad addition considering the Mazda rotary's 9,000-rpm capability. Horsepower remains unchanged at 232 hp, but a shorter 4.77:1 rear-axle ratio should give manual-equipped cars some added low-end punch.

Mazda says it also added some structural reinforcements to boost the RX-8's overall body rigidity and has also made a front strut-tower bar standard equipment and strengthened the front suspension towers as well. A stiffer driveshaft and reconfigured rear suspension are also part of the refresh.

If these upgrades don't sound substantial enough, there's also a new R3 sport package. It adds Bilstein shocks and a sport-tuned suspension complete with urethane foam-filled crossmembers up front. Since no one can see those nifty crossmembers, the R3 package also includes a rear spoiler, extended side sills, foglights and a more aggressive front bumper. A set of 19-inch forged aluminum alloy wheels with high-performance summer tires is also part of the package.

There are interior upgrades included in the R3 package as well. Recaro seats with leather side bolsters replace the stock units, while the stereo has been upgraded to a 300-watt Bose audio system with integrated Bluetooth connectivity. There's also the all-important leather-wrapped parking brake handle and a keyless ignition system.

What's Edmunds' take?
All the RX-8 has ever needed was a little more horsepower. Making it look good might help for now, but a full redesign couldn't come soon enough. — Ed Hellwig, Senior Editor
Source: http://www.edmunds.com/insideline/au...9mazdarx8.html
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 09:24 AM
  #867  
rotary crazy's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,525
Likes: 0
From: Santiago, Dominican Republic
Originally Posted by Hanzo
"Shockingly enough, Mazda did not want to spend much time today talking about the 2009 RX-8. Details on its new front fascia were left unsaid, and the new R3 sport package that adds Bilstein shocks, Recaro seats and urethane-filled suspension crossmembers was barely mentioned. So when a Mazda official told us after the press conference that the car was also 45 pounds lighter than before we were skeptical. Turns out the optional 19-inch wheels that come with the R3 package are actually lighter than the stock 18s. And apparently those Recaro seats are much lighter than stock. Combined with the new shorter rear end gear, this RX-8 might actually feel new from behind the wheel."

Source: http://blogs.edmunds.com/Straightlin...etroitAutoShow
That is great news!!

Lighter, 4.77, and maybe a few hp more, I want one!
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 09:26 AM
  #868  
CTrx8's Avatar
space for rent
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 0
From: Kansas City, MO
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
That is great news!!

Lighter, 4.77, and maybe a few hp more, I want one!
if edmunds is right there are no HP gains
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 09:28 AM
  #869  
TheKDog's Avatar
2007 BB RX8 GT
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 333
Likes: 1
Originally Posted by enforcer

2007
Reduction of Power by 7kw

Really? How much hp is that?
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 10:44 AM
  #870  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
why the bigger exhaust pipe if the car does not make any more power? if the pipe is bigger will it use the same mufler?
i started mulling this over yesterday and talked with brilo about it a bit to get some ideas out of my head.but basically- im not sur eyet and need to contemplate this some more.

what it came down to yesterday was potentially better average power so acceleration and dyno(wheel) numbers would be up without enough of a hp rise to warrant changing the spec number.

im not happy with that as the end of the discussion tho.
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 10:54 AM
  #871  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
Originally Posted by rotary crazy
Remember that the car has now 19 inch wheels, the 4.77 is to compensate for the larger size as well as 225/40 instead of 225/45 tires

only on the R3 and we don't know if the 4.77 are model wide or just on the R3. everything announced could be JUST the R3
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 10:59 AM
  #872  
Jason Saini's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 51
Likes: 1
Provided the ratios don't change from the MX-5 transmission, the following should be a very accurate gear chart showing the differences between an '04-'08 car and the '09 R3. At 60mph, the new car will only be about 124rpm more in 6th gear. Not the direction some were hoping for, but also not as drastic of a change as it may have seemed.

I'll work to verify that the ratios aren't going to change. We hope to have a test-mule transmission here to play with (I've already eyeballed one in the tech center,) within a month or so, and when we do I'll let everyone know how it holds up.



Car (1st 2nd 3rd 4th 5th 6th FD)
04-'08' RX-8 (3.760 - 2.269 - 1.645 - 1.187 - 1.000 - 0.843 - 4.440)
09' RX-8 R3 (3.815 - 2.260 - 1.640 - 1.177 - 1.000 - 0.832 - 4.770)


Revs @60, '04-'08 RX-8 - 2nd - 8391.9 / 3rd - 6084.1 / 4th - 4390.1 / 5th - 3698.5 / 6th - 3117.9
Revs @60, '09 RX-8 R3 - 2nd - 8807.4 / 3rd - 6391.2 / 4th -4586.9 / 5th - 3897.1 / 6th - 3242.4



Speed @Redline, '04-'08 RX-8 - 2nd - 63.6 / 3rd - 87.8 / 4th - 121.6 / 5th - 144.4 / 6th - 171.3
Speed @Redline, '09 RX-8 R3 - 2nd - 60.6 / 3rd - 83.6 / 4th - 116.4 / 5th - 137.0 / 6th - 164.7



Rev drop, '04-'07 RX-8 - 2nd to 3rd - 6746.7 / 3rd to 4th - 6715.0 / 4th to 5th - 7839.9 / 5th to 6th - 7845.0
Rev drop, '09 RX-8 R3 - 2nd to 3rd - 6885.3 / 3rd to 4th - 6809.6 / 4th to 5th - 8061.4 / 5th to 6th - 7894.2

Last edited by Jason Saini; Jan 15, 2008 at 11:05 AM.
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 11:11 AM
  #873  
Hanzo's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 672
Likes: 0
From: Richmond VA
Originally Posted by zoom44
only on the R3 and we don't know if the 4.77 are model wide or just on the R3. everything announced could be JUST the R3
It wouldn't be cost effective to have 2 different transmission just on the manual version.
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 11:16 AM
  #874  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
i know im just suspicious of the pr department and not showing the stock model or even clearly mentioning the stock changes.
Old Jan 15, 2008 | 11:20 AM
  #875  
zoom44's Avatar
Administrator
 
Joined: Jul 2002
Posts: 21,958
Likes: 115
From: portland oregon
thanks jason i was thinking of doign the same



Speed @Redline, '04-'08 RX-8 - 2nd - 63.6 / 3rd - 87.8 / 4th - 121.6 / 5th - 144.4 / 6th - 171.3
Speed @Redline, '09 RX-8 R3 - 2nd - 60.6 / 3rd - 83.6 / 4th - 116.4 / 5th - 137.0 / 6th - 164.7
im being obtuse this morning- how does the 4.77 make the car quicker if at redline the car is actually slower in each gear....

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 01:35 AM.