Notices
RX-8 Media News Report the latest RX-8 related news stories here.

1.6L Rotary for the next RX7?

 
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 05:36 PM
  #1  
swiftrx8's Avatar
Thread Starter
Registered
 
Joined: Apr 2007
Posts: 217
Likes: 0
From: Arlington, VA
1.6L Rotary for the next RX7?

I don't know if this is news but I was flipping through a euro car mag (I believe it was "evo") It said that Mazda was developing a 1.6L Wankel Rotary engine to be used in a 2010 or 2011 RX7. The target was 300hp. Don't know if we will ever see the 7 again but the engine development seemed interesting.
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 05:38 PM
  #2  
legendkurado's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 963
Likes: 1
From: Houston, TX
serious?
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 05:55 PM
  #3  
salveya's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 40
Likes: 0
From: Oakville, Ontario
Sweet, my lease is done in 2011. Bigger rotary to replace the rotary I am growing to love.
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 06:05 PM
  #4  
lesper4's Avatar
T-29 years and counting
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,062
Likes: 0
From: North Fontana, CA.
its funny how all these rummors are all round the same numbers. wont happen, i would be more inclined to find out if there will be a 4th-5th year rx-8. this is about the time when all the other rotaries stoped production.
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 06:55 PM
  #5  
chinx's Avatar
zoom zoom
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 407
Likes: 0
From: soCal
the same rumor was supposedly published in automobile. most likely rumors, tho if you look at mazda's concept cars, i'd say close to half of them lead to, or at least resemble, some production models. so what i'd be realistically interested in is a rotary coupe based on the kabura
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 07:03 PM
  #6  
77mjd's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,134
Likes: 1
From: Sheboygan Falls, Wisconsin
I think one thing that can be agreed on is there will be some form of the Kabura out in the next few years. What will be under the hood is still anyones guess. But there is no way that new rotary engine they are supposedly working on will have 300hp, unless there is some forced induction. If that engine does not end up in the Kabura, there could be something else in the pipeline for it that nobody has seen yet.
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 07:54 PM
  #7  
AJ's Shinka's Avatar
Enthusiast
 
Joined: Mar 2007
Posts: 1,145
Likes: 1
From: LAS VEGAS
Originally Posted by abbid
1.3 litre = 20 mpg
1.6 litre = 12.5 mpg
12.5 mpg is what I get now. 95% street driven. I don't care though still love my car.
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 08:18 PM
  #8  
dshiznit1489's Avatar
Formerly Polak Graphics
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,855
Likes: 0
From: New Jersey
12.5mpg FTW

Old Jul 9, 2007 | 08:44 PM
  #9  
rotary magic's Avatar
20 mpg
 
Joined: Jan 2006
Posts: 72
Likes: 0
From: Atlanta
I read the same in latest issue of automobile. Word is that Mazda is working on an RX7 16C rotary (1.6L) that pushes 300hp with "25% more displacement than the RX8." Article states that; "In spite of flagging interest in the RX8 (new 2006 models are still avaliable with a $3,000 discount), Mazda hasn't abandoned hope for the Wankel power."
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 08:48 PM
  #10  
Easy_E1's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 7,675
Likes: 5
From: Bellevue WA
Yawn.
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 10:00 PM
  #11  
turok4n64's Avatar
I Am Turok!!
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 197
Likes: 0
From: Hermitage, TN
interesting...but i wont ever be getting rid of my rx8, its so pretty
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 10:01 PM
  #12  
ScottyStyles's Avatar
Tailhappy
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 165
Likes: 1
From: Portland, OR
I'd pick one up, probably via lease, if the rumors are true... especially if the rumors of 300+ hp without forced induction are true.

Of course, "One point three liter piston eater" flows and sounds a lot better than "One point six liter piston eater". Not that I'd complain, mind you... just saying it would ruin my favorite phrase about the car. :-p
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 10:07 PM
  #13  
WarmFreedom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
im also begining to grow to dig rotaries
becos with a few sensible mods its really quick believe it or not i've done 0-100 in 4.8s only with the following;

Mods that contribute to improving acceleration - NA JDM

-catless midpipe
-MS flywheel
-KNN filter
-lightweight rims (8.2kg)
-coilovers (hard setting)
-MS muffler (dont know if this did anything for the car, cos it already came with it, but its a mod nevertheless)

Last edited by WarmFreedom; Jul 9, 2007 at 10:11 PM.
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 10:07 PM
  #14  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
I'd say a 1.6 flows better than a 1.3 :D
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 11:00 PM
  #15  
Raptor2k's Avatar
Club Marbles Member
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 3,252
Likes: 0
From: DFW, TX
Originally Posted by WarmFreedom
im also begining to grow to dig rotaries
becos with a few sensible mods its really quick believe it or not i've done 0-100 in 4.8s only with the following;

Mods that contribute to improving acceleration - NA JDM

-catless midpipe
-MS flywheel
-KNN filter
-lightweight rims (8.2kg)
-coilovers (hard setting)
-MS muffler (dont know if this did anything for the car, cos it already came with it, but its a mod nevertheless)


Originally Posted by abbid
1.3 litre = 20 mpg
1.6 litre = 12.5 mpg
Not necessarily.
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 11:01 PM
  #16  
Ajax's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, TX
Originally Posted by Raptor2k




Not necessarily.
agreed.
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 11:05 PM
  #17  
Razz1's Avatar
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Joined: Aug 2004
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 3
From: Cali
Zoom Zoom
Old Jul 9, 2007 | 11:45 PM
  #18  
TeamRX8's Avatar
Registered
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 26,936
Likes: 2,141
lol, 4-6 mpg FTW (racing mileage)
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 12:08 AM
  #19  
mike1324a's Avatar
Need'd a Turbo
 
Joined: Jul 2005
Posts: 1,328
Likes: 0
yeah! Race mileage, but only if it has race horsepower haha
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 01:41 AM
  #20  
WarmFreedom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by Raptor2k



LOL just becos u cant get it, its BS... so the world must b all about u, and only u. your world i.e.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 02:07 AM
  #21  
FE'dup's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 50
Likes: 0
From: Joseph, OR
Originally Posted by WarmFreedom
LOL just becos u cant get it, its BS... so the world must b all about u, and only u. your world i.e.
WTF are you talking about? 4.8s 0-100, I bet Porsche is pissed, half their cares barely reach that time in 0-60!
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 02:13 AM
  #22  
WarmFreedom's Avatar
Registered User
 
Joined: Sep 2006
Posts: 453
Likes: 0
by 0-100, i mean 0-100kmh
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 08:37 AM
  #23  
Ajax's Avatar
Registered
 
Joined: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,390
Likes: 0
From: Lewisville, TX
Originally Posted by WarmFreedom
LOL just becos u cant get it, its BS... so the world must b all about u, and only u. your world i.e.
Sorry, but no one here is going to believe that with those mods, you're doing 0-62 in 4.8.

Post a timeslip.. otherwise, it didn't happen.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 08:43 AM
  #24  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
you might be able to get 4.8 with FI, but no way NA.
Old Jul 10, 2007 | 08:46 AM
  #25  
mysql101's Avatar
⎝⏠⏝⏠⎠
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 8,625
Likes: 5
From: USA
http://www.060calculator.com/

Thread Tools
Rate This Thread
Rate This Thread:
You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.


All times are GMT -5. The time now is 12:16 PM.