Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

WTF—Drunk Driver w/no license or insurance, My 8—lots of damage. Need Advice.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-05-2004, 10:47 PM
  #26  
Registered User
 
Benthic's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Seaside, CA
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Like many in the forum, I think that most of the lawsuits today are ridiculous; this would be an exception. A 40-plus year-old woman, previous DUIs, suspended license, Jack-in-the Box, living in the Bay Area.....not likely she has any assets, and probably deeply in debt.

I'd have the car fixed if it isn't totalled, then SELL it and buy new.
Old 09-05-2004, 10:50 PM
  #27  
Registered User
 
Rob Tomlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PoLaK
I'm really sick of how everyone in the US can sue anyone for anything.

However i have no sympathy for drivers under the influence. I say sue her for everything you possibly can, put her scum piece of *** on the street. You have no reason to feel guilty about it, after all by her saying "i can't get another DUI" this wouldn't be the first time.
If she didn't have insurance, she probably doesn't have much in the way of assets either. In which case it will be very difficult to even find an attorney who would take the case to begin with.

Hope for criminal prosecution.

AAA is one of the better insurance companies out there.
Old 09-05-2004, 10:58 PM
  #28  
Registered User
 
Woodie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 5
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hey, sorry bout the 8. I agree with PoLaK. I don't like lawsuits, but this is a perfect case for one. Get her off the streets and protect the rest of society. Keep us posted on the outcome.
Old 09-06-2004, 01:07 AM
  #29  
Registered
 
LiveBlues's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Sun Valley, ID
Posts: 291
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by ezrider55
You must look for the money if you want to sue. Where did she get drunk. If it was in a bar ( I do not think Jack lets his employees drink on the job), GO AFTER THE BAR OWNER. The insurance Co. should total it, if not, get an atorney. Sorry about your loss, but at least you were not in it when this happened.
I have to disagree with this. Go after her all you want, since she is responsible. The bar is not responsible and should not be included in the lawsuits.
Old 09-06-2004, 01:24 AM
  #30  
Felix the Wankel!
Thread Starter
 
RotaMotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco East Bay
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Thank You.

Thank you to everyone for you condolences and suggestions. Oh, and I could definitely live vicariously thought a few of the more irrational ones.

Yeah, I would love to sue the woman, but I think that would probably be a waste of time and effort. Yes, I’m mad as hell, and want her to feel some pain and hassle from what she’s putting me through. I should be able to get my time, money, and happiness back.

Yes, I want to get even. Yes, her complete lack of responsibility shouldn’t cost me time and money. Yes, I’m probably going to feel like throwing up when I have to make my next payment on the car, and it’s not in my driveway. Yes, the euphoria of owning my fist new car in 12 years, my first “real” car, the car I’ve dreamed about since high school has turned into a nightmare. She has no right to do to me what she did, but she did. Right now I wish I hadn’t bought the car. This is such a nightmare.

Then when reality sets in, I figure she is most likely a career alcoholic and her life is probably a real mess with more debt than assets. The best I can do it to see if my experience with her can be used to take her out of society for a while, and maybe make her think a little harder about recovery. She’s on the “Jails, Institutions, or Death” career path.

Also, I can’t help but think about a horrendous DUI nightmare that happened out here about a year ago. Same situation, but it was two children who were run over and killed. The woman, who I think was in her 40s and had a history of DUIs, took off.

Ironically, if “society” i.e. local government uses my experience with her as a reason for some jail time, that would really limit her income potential J and any assets to go after.

Last edited by RotaMotion; 09-06-2004 at 04:46 PM.
Old 09-06-2004, 02:22 AM
  #31  
Registered User
 
Rupes's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Columbus Ohio
Posts: 426
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Doh, sucks man. Thats an aweful situation to be in and I hope all works out for you. But I got another story that reminds me of yours and one you might not want to hear (Although slightly different)...

My father bought a new BMW 330 convertable, fully loaded for around $50k. Three days after he bought it, an SUV pulled in front of him at an intersection and he crashed the car at about 40MPH. Was 100% the other drivers fault, which she admited to the cop that showed up at the scene. The car had $22k in damage (ouch) and less than 100 miles on the tach. The insurance WOULD NOT give him a new car, even though my dad has a perfect record and has been with the insurance company (AAA) for many many years. It took about 1 1/2 months to fix, and while they did a good job, I feel we got lucky that nothing has gone wrong with it (yet).

My dad was praying that the car would require another 3-4k in repairs so it could be deemed "totaled." Anyway I hope that they are able to compensate you better than him.

-Rupes
Old 09-06-2004, 02:28 AM
  #32  
Felix the Wankel!
Thread Starter
 
RotaMotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco East Bay
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Post My Working Project Plan for Dealing with my new 8 that was hit by an Uninsured Drunk

Thank you to everyone for your suggestions, ideas, insight, and support.

The following is a working document. It is a compilation input from this thread and my own ideas. Last Updated 9/6/2004.

It is my hope that the final version will be useful to other Rx8Club member that are unfortunate enough to have their 8 damaged by others. In other words, prevent other 8 owners from getting $crewed and later saying to themselves “if I had only known xxx and did xxx after the SOB hit me.”

Disclaimer: I'm having a hard time with the formatting. It changes when I save it.

1. Visually document the accident. Took five million pictures. (Done)



2. Contact insurance company.
a. File claim. (Done) b. Get adjuster contact info. (Done)c. Stress that my 8 is essentially brand new, and I want a new 8.

d. I have uninsured motorist insurance, but my collision deductible is $1,000. Will I have to pay it?
e. Find out what it takes to total my 8 or get a replacement. So far it’s been suggested that repairs exceeding 80% of the current—uncrunched—resale is a total.
f. What is the current uncrunced resale value of my 8.
g. Will this accident show up on a VIN search? If so, what will it do to my resale value.


3. Find out where she got drunk and if I can trace financial liability back to them under California drunk driving laws.
a. Note: this course is only if it looks like I’m going to take a financial hit due to this.b. So far it’s been stated lawyers want 33% of a verdict.




4. My 8 is a lease.
a. Do I have to contact leasing company?

b. Find out if I’m $crewed with the leasing company. I don’t have “gap” insurance. My insurance company didn’t offer it. I really did ask for it.



5. Get copy of police report.


6. Find out if person who hit me was the owner of the car she was driving. If not, find out if owner has insurance.



7. Find good body shop in San Francisco East Bay near Dublin.
a. Ask Rx8club members

b. Ask friends
c. Contact Mazda USA 1-800-222-5500
d. Gather more data on dealership body shops. Note: I’m very skeptical/suspicious of dealership body shops as the primary purpose of a dealership is to sell cars IMHO. So I don’t think there will be an emphasis on hiring top talent.




8. Find out if my 8’s factory warranty will be reduced due to the accident.
a. Identify steps to prevent that.
9. Identify questions for auto body shop.
a. Type of equipment to look for. b. Experience.c. Quality of replacement parts. I want genuine Mazda parts, but I hear some insurance companies can give you hassles.

d. How long will it take to get the parts?
e. Warranty on work performed.


10. Identify all damage on my 8.
a. Right front and right rear suspension from wheels being pushed into curb and then over it.

b. Exhaust system—sounds like I have an exhaust leak now.
c. Damage from undercarriage bashing into curb. Note: I’ve never bottomed-out my 8.
d. Three dead rims.
e. Bent frame.
f. Left rear wheel assembly literally pushed/tilted in at the top of the wheel.
g. Left rear quarter panel mashed in from door back. How does damage and repairs in that area affect the structural integrity of the car?
h. Sidewall damage to tires.
i. Damage to TPS valve stems?




Last edited by RotaMotion; 09-06-2004 at 04:45 PM.
Old 09-06-2004, 01:09 PM
  #33  
Registered User
 
Microdot's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 69
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PoLaK
A friend of mine once said to me "Texas is the only state still based in reality" and i couldn't agree more. If someone is in my house stealing my possessions i have no problems shooting them dead.


But in any other state then Texas that is illegal for me to do and if i do i can be sued by the burglars family for murder.
Nah, even in California you can shoot em, if you are home when they break in. The key is that you are defending yourself (or your loved ones), not your property. Even us Californians have the right to defend ourselves.

However given the California legal system, you may be better off killing them. If they live to spin the story, they just might find a way to sue you for it.
Old 09-06-2004, 03:53 PM
  #34  
Registered User
 
Rob Tomlin's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 1,160
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PoLaK
A friend of mine once said to me "Texas is the only state still based in reality" and i couldn't agree more. If someone is in my house stealing my possessions i have no problems shooting them dead.


But in any other state then Texas that is illegal for me to do and if i do i can be sued by the burglars family for murder.

Is it me or does it seem the US's legal system got F*cked sideways with a swiveled stick and it can't recover.
Gee, definitely some ignorance showing here.

Guess what? Even in Texas you can't just "shoot a burglar dead" just because he is in your house. If he is no threat and you can detain him by holding a gun in his face for example, until the police arrive, you can't simply blow him away! It's a matter of common sense here.

Then again, if someone breaks into your home and you are afraid for your life, or your family's lives, you are obviously entitled to protect them, even with deadly force. The very fact someone is inside your house can give rise to this fear, and it will be considered a reasonable fear.

It all comes down to how a reasonable person would react under the same circumstances.

Back on topic: as long as you have uninsured motorist coverage, you should be ok. A lawsuit under these circumstances would not be worth the time or effort, especially since no bodily injuries are involved. An attorney will take at least 1/3 of the recovery or will charge by the hour, which would be at the rate of at least $150.00 per hour.
Old 09-06-2004, 04:17 PM
  #35  
Registered User
 
grinch2k's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Definatly check with you lease company, they will automatically be notified of any accident you car gets into and most lease companys include gap insurance in your lease payments. This is very common, at least here in NJ, but if you leased through MAZDA, it should be the same.
Old 09-07-2004, 01:38 AM
  #36  
Registered User
 
Rotor_Newbie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Cali
Posts: 49
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
they are right.. no lawyers in their right mind will take your case.

I have AAA, and they paid 5800 on a 91 mr2 (none turbo) after my accident. The car isn't worth that much on bluebook, so they did me a favor back then. I hope they would do the same for you. Good luck and hope that 40 something freak will learn something and turn herself into a nun or something..
Old 09-07-2004, 08:41 AM
  #37  
Registered User
 
zmarko's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Denver, CO
Posts: 6
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
If you want the car to be totalled (which I would suggest), find the lowest possible value (KBB, NADA, Edunds, etc) for resale. I don't know the current mileage of your car, or options, so I'll get a generic number you can work off of.

This is for PA, where I live, so you might have to adjust it for your location.

KBB: (listed 10K miles, in excellent condition, didn't click any options that weren't checked already).

Trade-in: $22,975
Private Party Sale: $25,480
Blue Book Retail Value: $27,985

That was the only pricing site I could get to work today. (Nada and Edmunds weren't working for me today for some reason). But it gives you an idea at least of what you'll be looking at.

What insurance company are you running through? I've had excellent experience with State Farm in regards to paying for a damaged car. However I've been with them for 17 years now.


Good luck, and sorry to hear about the accident. Glad you weren't in the car though.
Old 09-07-2004, 09:43 AM
  #38  
Registered User
 
Chrisbert's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Liberty Hill, TX (Austin)
Posts: 886
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Sorry to hear it. At least you were not standing by it when it got hit. An aquaintence in high school died while leaning against his car while his drunk friend was throwing up on the passenger side. Driver / Friend was sober and was doing the passenger a favour by driving him home. He got sideswiped by another drunk driver.
Old 09-07-2004, 10:12 AM
  #39  
Registered User
 
Raevik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 307
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I'm sorry...am I the only one disturbed about the lynch mob here?

It sounds like this lady's life absolutely sucks already. She's wasted at 9pm, works at a fast food sh*thole, has no insurance, is driving illegally (probably due to necessity), has a bad record, etc.

She accidentally hits your car, is freaking out, and is probably going to lose her job and perhaps go to jail. Meanwhile, you're in a fury because of your car? Your inanimate, soul-less object which is just a collection of parts...

I love my car as much as anyone here (though I don't sit in my driveway with a toothbrush like some). However, this is somebody's life. Is she responsible, hell yes. Should she be accountable for her actions? YES. Should you JUDGE her and demean her and threaten to sue her for nothing just for vengeance? Uh...no.

I'm sorry about your car, I'm sorry this messed up lady hit it. I'm sure everyone involved is sad that it happened (except for a potential lawyer, but that tells you something about them by nature, doesn't it?). The reality is, it's just an object that can be replaced or fixed. You have been inconvenienced. She might go to jail, lose her already crappy job, and end up dead in a gutter in 2 years as a spiraled result of all this. Who knows?

You know the sad thing? I'm the republican. All you CA guys are supposed to be the bleeding hearts...
Old 09-07-2004, 10:28 AM
  #40  
Registered User
 
bowman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: SW Missouri
Posts: 354
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
The lady made her choice and she must live with the consequences.

You can't get blood from a stone, but maybe a short jail term will knock some sense into her.

I can understand why he's upset. His car that he worked for was pissed away by a woman with no respect for herself or anyone else.
Old 09-07-2004, 10:33 AM
  #41  
Registered User
 
MTCD01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern VA, USA
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It sounds like this lady's life absolutely sucks already. She's wasted at 9pm, works at a fast food sh*thole, has no insurance, is driving illegally (probably due to necessity), has a bad record, etc.
I can see your POV but I have a really hard time developing any sympathy/empathy for this lady.

My reasoning:
1. This woman is an Alcoholic (.20 at 9PM driving alone)
2. This woman has no right to own or operate a motor vehicle (probably due to her past DUIs)
3. The car could just as easily been a person.
4. I don't care where she works or lives. This woman is as big a threat to everyone around her as a violent criminal with a gun.
5. To blow a .20 she must have had about 10 drinks in a one hour period (not hard for an alcoholic). Someone fed her these drinks, took her money, and sent her out into the world to drive.

Screw this lady. I have no problem with people doing drugs but when they endanger other people with their drug use they become a problem for everyone. Uninsured, unlicensed, and 2x+ (in VA) beyond the legal limit of alcohol. This woman does not care about herself or anyone else. So why should anyone care about her?

She is a drain and a danger to society...nothing more.

Edit: Forgot to mention that had her car been drivable we'd be looking at another hit n' run thread. If she had hit something soft (like a person) the car would most likely still have been drivable and she would have fled the scene because she "can't get another DUI". Feeling sorry for this lady is impossible IMO.

Last edited by MTCD01; 09-07-2004 at 10:52 AM.
Old 09-07-2004, 11:58 AM
  #42  
Registered User
 
Sykyll's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Jacksonville, FL
Posts: 3
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Normally I don't agree with extreme punishment when someone makes a mistake, but this was not an accident from necessity. From her blood level it does not appear she was making a quick trip to the grocery store for food or she was returning from work. It does not apperar she accidently lost control of her vehicle because a dog or a child caused her to swerve to miss them.

She was obiviously intoxicated. She obviously has a past problem, that she tried to run from. Her decission making skills were obviously not coherent when she tried to flee a hit and run by leaving her car behind.

This woman has an illness that she can not control. My father recently died from the same illness; but, fortunately he did not take some one with him. Jail time will allow her some time to detox and reflect about her problems, but it may or may not fix her issue. If she returns to her familar environment when she is released, the illness will probably return. We tried many ways to get my dad to quit, but it just couldn't be done. You can't be with these people 24 hours a day and still live your life in some normal manner. Hopefully for her, she gets jail time and some counselor works on her self confidence.

I truely hope you get your vehicle fixed. You can sue this woman, but alot of people in this condition don't have anything left in value. I know you love your car, but it is a lifeless object that can be repaired. I would be crushed if someone wrecked mine, but I have had 2 dream cars rear ended by drivers. They were fixed, and life went on. Be happy you or someone else were not in the car when she hit it. It always seems the ones they hit die in the accident and not them.

The only pity I have for this woman is she can't see life beyond the end of the bottle. She made her choices, so I have no pity for the punishment that comes with them.

Last edited by Sykyll; 09-07-2004 at 04:58 PM.
Old 09-07-2004, 12:27 PM
  #43  
Registered User
 
MTCD01's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Northern VA, USA
Posts: 264
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
It always seems the ones they hit die in the accident and not them.
There are some interesting theories/studies on this subject that basically say that because a drunk person is more relaxed (limp probably due to intoxication and/or the fact that they didn't see the accident coming) during the actual collision they are far less likely to incur injury. The natural reaction for everyone else is to tense up (brace for impact) which actually can result in more/more serious injuries.
Old 09-07-2004, 10:11 PM
  #44  
Mad as a wet hen
 
Aratinga's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Big Blue State on the LEFT
Posts: 486
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by RotaMotion
d. I have uninsured motorist insurance, but my collision deductible is $1,000. Will I have to pay it?
My insurance company waived my $500 collision deductible because the party who hit me was 100% at fault, and they knew they could collect the deductible from that party. You might ask to have your deductible waived. Since the woman who hit you is uninsured, however, they may choose not to waive it; in that case you'll have to pay it to bail your car out of the body shop when/if it's repaired.

e. Find out what it takes to total my 8 or get a replacement. So far it’s been suggested that repairs exceeding 80% of the current—uncrunched—resale is a total.
f. What is the current uncrunced resale value of my 8.
I went through trying to ascertain what the value of my car was. I have a Red Touring package MT with 9,000 miles. I ended up going to a dealer who had sold a used 8 similar to mine and asked him what he sold it for; it was $24,800. So for my car to be totalled the repair bill would have to be 80% of that, or nearly $20,000, in order to be totalled.

g. Will this accident show up on a VIN search? If so, what will it do to my resale value.
Eventually, yes it will -- assuming you did what you were supposed to and file a DMV Form SR-1. By law, you must report any accident resulting in more than $750 damage to DMV within 10 days of the accident. If you need the form, download it here. Depending on how long the backlog is at DMV getting these forms into their database, Carfax will eventually know that your VIN has been in an accident.

My 8 is a lease.
a. Do I have to contact leasing company?
YES. My car was financed through Mazda Credit (purchase, not lease). When I found out that repairs would take two months or more, I contacted them and asked to have my payments for those months postponed. They were happy to do that for me for a $25 "processing fee". The payments just got tagged onto the end of the loan, making my payoff date two months later. Perhaps the same is possible with your lease; it wouldn't hurt to ask since you have to contact them anyway.

b. Find out if I’m $crewed with the leasing company. I don’t have “gap” insurance. My insurance company didn’t offer it. I really did ask for it.
You're only screwed out of your deductible if the car's repaired. If it is totalled, you could be screwed out of much more -- the difference between your payoff and the market value of the car.

6. Find out if person who hit me was the owner of the car she was driving. If not, find out if owner has insurance.
Good idea. If the owner isn't the driver, but gave the driver (with her history of DUI and no license) permission to drive the car, they've got to be liable for something. The information on the car's owner will be in the police report.

I’m very skeptical/suspicious of dealership body shops as the primary purpose of a dealership is to sell cars IMHO. So I don’t think there will be an emphasis on hiring top talent.
Actually, my car is at a dealership-affiliated bodyshop and so far, they're doing excellent work. They do have access to the dealership's parts department, so they will order parts directly from Mazda. There aren't too many sources of non-Mazda RX-8 body panels out there yet, as far as I know, so you're pretty well assured of having only Mazda parts used if you're at a dealership shop. They will also have access to Mazda's official body repair manual and shop manuals; this is especially important since most body shops haven't worked on RX-8s much, if at all, so you don't want some bozo screwing up the job because he's never done an RX-8 before. I say you're overall better off at the dealer's shop unless they have a really bad rep with other Mazda owners who've used them.

8. Find out if my 8’s factory warranty will be reduced due to the accident.
d. How long will it take to get the parts?
e. Warranty on work performed.
Another advantage to having repairs done at a dealership-affiliated body shop -- your original warranty should be unaffected. And even though Mazda was having real problems with parts delays earlier this year, my parts (entire rear end of car, including both rear quarter panels and driveshaft) all arrived very quickly. Also, my bodyshop offered a lifetime warranty on their repairs; so if their paint job starts to peel in 6 years, I can take it back and have it repainted.

g. Left rear quarter panel mashed in from door back. How does damage and repairs in that area affect the structural integrity of the car?
I was very concerned about this as well, since to repair these body panels they must actually cut through the car in places it's never been cut before. However, if the repair technician follows Mazda's body repair manual, the structural integrity and future crashworthiness of the car SHOULD be the same as before. I've attached a scan of one page of that Mazda repair manual and a picture of my car with the cuts to the quarter panel below.

I hope this helps. Feel free to PM me if you have any other questions. I'm hoping to be able to pick my car up next week (maybe even in time for SevenStock!).
Attached Thumbnails -roxyq-panel.jpg   -rx8bodyrepair4.jpg  

Last edited by Aratinga; 09-07-2004 at 10:17 PM.
Old 09-08-2004, 02:29 AM
  #45  
Felix the Wankel!
Thread Starter
 
RotaMotion's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: San Francisco East Bay
Posts: 139
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Hi Aratinga
Thanks for the marathon post. I appreciate all the time you put into answering my questions. So here’s some of the data I got today. Note: way too much time on the phone at work
Originally Posted by Aratinga

My insurance company waived my $500 collision deductible because the party who hit me was 100% at fault, and they knew they could collect the deductible from that party. You might ask to have your deductible waived. Since the woman who hit you is uninsured, however, they may choose not to waive it; in that case you'll have to pay it to bail your car out of the body shop when/if it's repaired.
You’re right! Talked to my insurance company today. They will waive the deductible since it is not my fault. That’s a relief.

I went through trying to ascertain what the value of my car was. I have a Red Touring package MT with 9,000 miles. I ended up going to a dealer who had sold a used 8 similar to mine and asked him what he sold it for; it was $24,800. So for my car to be totalled the repair bill would have to be 80% of that, or nearly $20,000, in order to be totaled.
Now that the shock is starting to subside, I really doubt it will be a total. I mean, if your 8 weren’t a total, then I don’t see how mine could be.

Eventually, yes it will -- assuming you did what you were supposed to and file a DMV Form SR-1. By law, you must report any accident resulting in more than $750 damage to DMV within 10 days of the accident. If you need the form, download it here. Depending on how long the backlog is at DMV getting these forms into their database, Carfax will eventually know that your VIN has been in an accident.
My insurance co said the SR-1 is being handled since there is a police report, so I don’t have to worry about that. Cr@p on the CarFax, that will cost me $$ during resale time.

YES. My car was financed through Mazda Credit (purchase, not lease). When I found out that repairs would take two months or more, I contacted them and asked to have my payments for those months postponed. They were happy to do that for me for a $25 "processing fee". The payments just got tagged onto the end of the loan, making my payoff date two months later. Perhaps the same is possible with your lease; it wouldn't hurt to ask since you have to contact them anyway.
I theoretically went through Mazda, but it ended up with Wells Fargo. Don’t know exactly what that means? Anyway, I contacted them today. Oh, I used to be in banking, so be very careful of those guys. If they are just moving out your payments two months and the $$ amount stays the same—great. However, if they are just deferring two payments and your are still being charged interest on the money borrowed, you could have a significant amount of additional interest at the end of your loan in addition to two additional payments.

Also, the leasing company (Wells Fargo) verified that I have Gap insurance and if the car is totaled there won’t be any “early termination’ fees.

Another advantage to having repairs done at a dealership-affiliated body shop -- your original warranty should be unaffected. And even though Mazda was having real problems with parts delays earlier this year, my parts (entire rear end of car, including both rear quarter panels and driveshaft) all arrived very quickly. Also, my body shop offered a lifetime warranty on their repairs; so if their paint job starts to peel in 6 years, I can take it back and have it repainted.
As for who does the repairs, that’s such a tough one. there are so many different ways to look at it. I’m going to have my car sent to Cooks in Walnut Creek on a flatbed. The do a lot of high end cars and have a very good rep with the fussy enthusiast high-end car types. From what I can tell, it’s sort of like whenever someone asks what sort of wax to put on their car, a blizzard of Zymol replies pop up all over the place. Well, Cooks is, theoretically, like that for collisions.

My insurance (AAA) company said they will guarantee the work for the life of the car—whew. Also, I'm realizing so much of who does the work comes down to reputation. So if both of the places we are going to have good reps, we should, hopefully, be good

Last edited by RotaMotion; 09-08-2004 at 02:38 AM.
Old 09-08-2004, 02:45 AM
  #46  
The Eyes Have It
 
Grabitquick's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 272
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
RotaMotion, the previous post appeared to provide some very good advice. As a Mazda guy who's MX-6 spent more time in the body shop than Cher, I'd take the advice and move forward. Sounds like you're on the way already. Good luck, dude!
Old 09-08-2004, 09:22 AM
  #47  
Registered User
 
Atacdad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Austin Texas
Posts: 186
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Aratinga
My insurance company... [Snipped]
Aratinga

That has to be one of the more useful posts I've seen in recent memory.

Excellent!
Old 10-07-2004, 01:13 AM
  #48  
Registered User
 
Scazda 4's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Antioch
Posts: 8
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Rota Motion:
I realize that this post is a month old, but I have a question for you. I too was involved in an accident with an uninsured driver. My accident occurred on 9/7/04. I still do not have my car back from the repair shop. I chose to use the dealer where I purchased the car because I figured parts would be easy to get and they were a preferred shop for my insurance company (I am using my un-insured motorist policy). The newest word on my car is that it "should" be ready "early" next week. Tomorrow marks 1 month without my car. I have, however, continued to make my car and insurance payments. The dealership is saying they are having a "difficult" time getting parts. Sheesh.....they are a Mazda dealer. If they can not get the parts something is wrong. Did Cook finish the repairs on your car to your satisfaction?
Old 10-07-2004, 07:12 AM
  #49  
WWFSMD?
 
Deslock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Massachusetts, USA
Posts: 597
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Llathos
I'm sorry...am I the only one disturbed about the lynch mob here?

It sounds like this lady's life absolutely sucks already. She's wasted at 9pm, works at a fast food sh*thole, has no insurance, is driving illegally (probably due to necessity), has a bad record, etc.
Drunk drivers should be severely punished. First offense = madatory jail time. Second offense = executed. Yes, executed. The kinetic energy of a moving car qualifies it as a lethal weapon and anyone who is ignorant or apathetic to that doesn't deserve to live.

RotaMotion, I hope this all worked out for you. Keeping things in perspective, while this was an significant inconvenience, no one was hurt and cars can be fixed. That's all that matters.

Originally Posted by Llathos
You know the sad thing? I'm the republican. All you CA guys are supposed to be the bleeding hearts...
I'm a libertarian-leaning independent, but I'm from Massachusetts so doesn't that make me a liberal?
Old 10-07-2004, 12:32 PM
  #50  
Senior "Member"
 
Hard 8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Kallyforniiya
Posts: 613
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by PoLaK
Is it me or does it seem the US's legal system got F*cked sideways with a swiveled stick and it can't recover.
I have to agree with you in general. But here's an interesting fact: In California, years ago the state legislature overrode some court decisions, and thus reinstated the traditional rule here, to the effect that, under most circumstances, there is no legal claim against a social host who "allows" his guests to get drunk (and, for example, go out and kill someone on the road), nor is there any claim against a bar for the same thing. There is an exception (serving an already drunk minor), but otherwise, there is civil immunity for serving drinks in California.

Here are some details:

Business and Professions Code section 25602 (“Sales to habitual drunkards; Civil liability; Consumption of alcoholic beverages as proximate cause of injuries inflicted upon another by intoxicated person”) sets forth these provisions:

(a) Every person who sells, furnishes, gives, or causes to be sold, furnished, or given away, any alcoholic beverage to any habitual or common drunkard or to any obviously intoxicated person is guilty of a misdemeanor.

(b) No person who sells, furnishes, gives, or causes to be sold, furnished, or given away, any alcoholic beverage pursuant to subdivision (a) of this section shall be civilly liable to any injured person or the estate of such person for injuries inflicted on that person as a result of intoxication by the consumer of such alcoholic beverage.

(c) The Legislature hereby declares that this section shall be interpreted so that the holdings in cases such as Vesely v. Sager (5 Cal. 3d 153), Bernhard v. Harrah's Club (16 Cal. 3d 313) and Coulter v. Superior Court (------ Cal. 3d -----) be abrogated in favor of prior judicial interpretation finding the consumption of alcoholic beverages rather than the serving of alcoholic beverages as the proximate cause of injuries inflicted upon another by an intoxicated person.

Civil Code section 1714 (“Responsibility for willful acts or negligence; Proximate cause of injuries resulting from furnishing alcohol to intoxicated person; Liability of social host”) provides, in part:

(b) It is the intent of the Legislature to abrogate the holdings in cases such as Vesely v. Sager (1971) 5 Cal.3d 153, Bernhard v. Harrah's Club (1976) 16 Cal.3d 313, and Coulter v. Superior Court (1978) 21 Cal.3d 144 and to reinstate the prior judicial interpretation of this section as it relates to proximate cause for injuries incurred as a result of furnishing alcoholic beverages to an intoxicated person, namely that the furnishing of alcoholic beverages is not the proximate cause of injuries resulting from intoxication, but rather the consumption of alcoholic beverages is the proximate cause of injuries inflicted upon another by an intoxicated person.

(c) No social host who furnishes alcoholic beverages to any person may be held legally accountable for damages suffered by that person, or for injury to the person or property of, or death of, any third person, resulting from the consumption of those beverages.

(See also Biles v Richter (1988) 206 Cal App 3d 325 [plaintiff injured by an intoxicated social guest may not avoid the statutory civil immunity by couching complaint against host in terms of negligent supervision of guests, rather than the act of furnishing alcohol—alcohol consumption by active tortfeasor alone is proximate cause of injuries inflicted upon another by intoxicated person]; Cardinal v. Santee Pita, Inc. (1991) 234 Cal App 3d 1676 [Legislature, in amending Civ. Code, § 1714 and Bus. & Prof. Code, § 25602, abolished tort liability against furnisher of alcoholic beverages except in only one situation, namely, providing alcohol to an obviously intoxicated minor. No other exceptions to this immunity exist—Legislature has “loudly and clearly” rejected even limited liability for those selling or furnishing alcoholic beverages to anyone other than obviously intoxicated minors].)


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: WTF—Drunk Driver w/no license or insurance, My 8—lots of damage. Need Advice.



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 08:11 AM.