Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Will a turbocharger lower the longevity of a rotary engine?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 04-24-2011, 02:08 PM
  #1  
Anthony
Thread Starter
 
MIAMISFINEST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: miami, fl
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Will a turbocharger lower the longevity of a rotary engine?

Whatsup guys? Ive been looking into installing a turbo in my 8 but i wanted to know if it would severely affect my engine life. Opinions??
Old 04-24-2011, 02:10 PM
  #2  
Drummond Built
iTrader: (6)
 
WTBRotary!'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: DFW, Texas
Posts: 3,703
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
...
Old 04-24-2011, 02:11 PM
  #3  
no sleep til it spools
 
warren(silver-roxy-8)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
yep, but how much it effects the engine depends entirely on how much boost you're running, a tune (i think), and you're driving habits. someone more knowledgeable will chime in soon. also, read this sticky:

https://www.rx8club.com/series-i-major-horsepower-upgrades-93/power-adders-fi-dummies-turbo-supercharger-nitrous-122645/
Old 04-24-2011, 02:11 PM
  #4  
#50
 
bse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Caput Mundi
Posts: 7,521
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Yes, it will. No, it will not.
The truth is... it depends.

When modifying ANY car extensively engine life becomes a concern. Pcm tuning, power levels, car's use (show car, track car, daily driver etc) and maintenance play a role in that. So the truth is that it isn't necessarily forced-induction dependant but rather build and use dependant.
Some engines last 150.000miles, other last 20 hours. Is it necessarily the engine's fault?
Old 04-24-2011, 02:11 PM
  #5  
Rear Mount GT35R
iTrader: (7)
 
bumblebeerx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: toledo,ohio
Posts: 976
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
if you read in the major hp threads there is a bunch of info. there is no cut and dry anwser
Old 04-24-2011, 02:13 PM
  #6  
Anthony
Thread Starter
 
MIAMISFINEST's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: miami, fl
Posts: 65
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Okay, thanks guys!
Old 04-24-2011, 02:17 PM
  #7  
no sleep til it spools
 
warren(silver-roxy-8)'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Austin, Texas
Posts: 502
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Old 04-24-2011, 02:59 PM
  #8  
Registered
 
rx8r3mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
usually forced induction in general will affect engine life. i am highly against forced induction in any car that you want to last. i wouldn't even put a supercharger or turbos on my LS3. and thats a much stronger engine than a mazda rotary.
Old 04-24-2011, 03:11 PM
  #9  
Registered User
iTrader: (2)
 
Spoolin8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: Dallas, Texas
Posts: 726
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8r3mike
usually forced induction in general will affect engine life. i am highly against forced induction in any car that you want to last. i wouldn't even put a supercharger or turbos on my LS3. and thats a much stronger engine than a mazda rotary.
adding cams that add 40 extra hp would be potentially the same wear as adding a turbo that gives you 40hp. Its more the HP increase rather then the turbocharger itself....sure you have increased heat and some other side affects but the underlying remains the same
Old 04-24-2011, 03:28 PM
  #10  
I HATE SPEEDBUMPS!
 
monchie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Las Vegas, NV
Posts: 8,549
Likes: 0
Received 7 Likes on 6 Posts
If i were you, don't do it. It will definitely reduce the life of your rotary engine and what was already said, it will depends on your driving habits and such.
Old 04-24-2011, 03:53 PM
  #11  
Registered
 
rx8r3mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Spoolin8
adding cams that add 40 extra hp would be potentially the same wear as adding a turbo that gives you 40hp. Its more the HP increase rather then the turbocharger itself....sure you have increased heat and some other side affects but the underlying remains the same
well when you put a more aggressive cam in a car. ( which i have done and gained 40HP like you said.) you replace the value train, springs. Valve Springs, value seals, locks, push rods, retainers crank bolt etc.... the list goes on. aggressive cams are not "forcing" air into the engine. all cams are doing is increasing duration and lift over stock. which allows the engine to work more efficiently in terms of producing more power.
Old 04-24-2011, 04:01 PM
  #12  
hakuna matata!
iTrader: (41)
 
alz0rz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: NYC
Posts: 6,002
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
You ask ANYTHING to generate more power then it was designed to do it will decrease it's life expectancy (and its proportional). However you can help the situation by keeping temperatures in check and making sure your tune is optimal. That means shell out the $ for a bigger intercooler, upgrade your radiator (common sense if you're generating more power you are generating more heat), and pay for a professional tune instead of running around on a base or non-specialized tune... to name a few. Cheap, fast, reliable - pick two and you can't have the other one.

Last edited by alz0rz; 04-24-2011 at 04:05 PM.
Old 04-24-2011, 04:22 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
haze310's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Posts: 80
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
My opinion about turbos, is that it'll only lead to 1 problem.....more problems
Old 04-24-2011, 05:16 PM
  #14  
Registered
 
tcole6's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: NJ
Posts: 316
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
This brings up an interesting point for me. I have an 02 jetta 1.8t engine that has over 200,000 miles and has never needed any engine or turbo service work. Granted the cars now throwing 20 lbs of boost or anything, but still, just as reliable as any na engine. So why can't that be achieved on an rx8? I would love to add 7-8 lbs of boost to my 8, but would rather not kill my engine prematurely.
Old 04-24-2011, 05:24 PM
  #15  
I don't "smell good".
 
supergoat's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Location: Crowfield Plantation, SC
Posts: 910
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
depends on the setup. I'm more than likely getting the GReddy kit soon and keeping it at the 5-6psi. Actually after doing the fix it would drop to an effective 4ish psi and I'm fine with that. I'm just looking for a little more oomph for passing. At such a low boost pressure I don't expet to shorten the life of the engine.
Old 04-24-2011, 05:35 PM
  #16  
Registered
 
rx8r3mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tcole6
This brings up an interesting point for me. I have an 02 jetta 1.8t engine that has over 200,000 miles and has never needed any engine or turbo service work. Granted the cars now throwing 20 lbs of boost or anything, but still, just as reliable as any na engine. So why can't that be achieved on an rx8? I would love to add 7-8 lbs of boost to my 8, but would rather not kill my engine prematurely.
it might have something to do with the car being made from with a turbo. the engine was made for a turbo. any n/a car was not made to be turbocharged. of course you can mod the engine to work well with turbos. but that is always pricey.
Old 04-24-2011, 06:02 PM
  #17  
Smile,It confuses people!
iTrader: (6)
 
mushkid's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Miami (RiceVille)
Posts: 402
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
same thing can be said to FD'S, they may last forever, or some may last a few months.

i don't like how people seriously underestimate the renny, i think that achieving 231 HP without the help of twin turbos (to achieve 280), is a great feat. you will see later on someone will find a way to make a More reliable renny.

as the other stated, if your going FI; make sure you have added reliability mods,and get yourself a real bad *** tune (AP,ETC..) the magic number seems to be 300-320whp to have a somewhat reliable renny.

if adding a turbo to achieve big numbers and reliability, is a main concern to you. then as ignorant as this may sound; you chose the wrong car.

Originally Posted by MIAMISFINEST
Whatsup guys? Ive been looking into installing a turbo in my 8 but i wanted to know if it would severely affect my engine life. Opinions??
in layman's terms yes....

Last edited by mushkid; 04-24-2011 at 06:06 PM.
Old 04-24-2011, 06:08 PM
  #18  
Registered
 
Rote8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Boosted...
Posts: 1,574
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Forced induction will shorten the life span of an engine; we do not know how much shorter, that depends entirely on the tuner of the car and your throttle foot.
Old 04-24-2011, 06:08 PM
  #19  
#50
 
bse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Caput Mundi
Posts: 7,521
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8r3mike
well when you put a more aggressive cam in a car. ( which i have done and gained 40HP like you said.) you replace the value train, springs. Valve Springs, value seals, locks, push rods, retainers crank bolt etc.... the list goes on. aggressive cams are not "forcing" air into the engine. all cams are doing is increasing duration and lift over stock. which allows the engine to work more efficiently in terms of producing more power.
It doesn't make sense. Anything moving more air in any way will generate more torque hence more stress on the parts. However, there's a range that doesn't affect reliablity at all thanks to engineering margins. Find that and you'll be golden.
Add reliablity mods and you can go even further up.

Originally Posted by alz0rz
You ask ANYTHING to generate more power then it was designed to do it will decrease it's life expectancy (and its proportional). However you can help the situation by keeping temperatures in check and making sure your tune is optimal. That means shell out the $ for a bigger intercooler, upgrade your radiator (common sense if you're generating more power you are generating more heat), and pay for a professional tune instead of running around on a base or non-specialized tune... to name a few. Cheap, fast, reliable - pick two and you can't have the other one.
Amen! There's still a margin where engine life is barely reduced, if at all. Nobody ever cared to find what that point is for our engine though... they all messed up something sooner or later lol.
Originally Posted by monchie
If i were you, don't do it. It will definitely reduce the life of your rotary engine and what was already said, it will depends on your driving habits and such.
No comment.
Originally Posted by tcole6
This brings up an interesting point for me. I have an 02 jetta 1.8t engine that has over 200,000 miles and has never needed any engine or turbo service work. Granted the cars now throwing 20 lbs of boost or anything, but still, just as reliable as any na engine. So why can't that be achieved on an rx8? I would love to add 7-8 lbs of boost to my 8, but would rather not kill my engine prematurely.
That car has a lot of potential left on the table whereas sportscar engines don't\shouldn't. The part where you talk about random numbers in lbs has no sense. Flow, not boost, is what makes power.
Old 04-24-2011, 07:39 PM
  #20  
Registered
 
jasonrxeight's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Omaha, NE
Posts: 3,487
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
a turbo will shorten the life of any engines. end of story.
Old 04-24-2011, 08:00 PM
  #21  
Registered
 
rx8r3mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by bse50
It doesn't make sense. Anything moving more air in any way will generate more torque hence more stress on the parts. However, there's a range that doesn't affect reliablity at all thanks to engineering margins. Find that and you'll be golden.
Add reliablity mods and you can go even further up.


.
well my point is that making a N/A engine work more efficiently in general is better for a N/A engine. as a rule of thumb. yes there is a "safer"limit. but you have to ask your self, if 6-8k worth the safe limit? and if you want to go "further up" with the boost. be ready to spend ALLOT of money to insure to minimize problems down the road.



on a side note, my camaro put down 410WHP. with bolt-ons and a custom tune. i put in a stage 2 street cam. and gained about 40WHP now around 450WHP and the car is still very drivable . 40 HP gains are not even that big of a cam. its decent gains for a v8. so don't go around thinking a 40HP gain is a huge cam lol. there are plenty on my forums with bigger.
i spent 5k to get about 95HP over stock. and the car is drivable and reliable. a supercharger/turbo would have costed double, and the gains wouldn't have been as much in the "safe" limit on boost. now you see why we put cams in our car ?
Old 04-24-2011, 08:12 PM
  #22  
Registered
 
DukeDerox's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2008
Location: NZ
Posts: 0
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Basically if you're gonna go F/I don't go cheap!

Aftermarket radiator, water meth cooling, bigger intercooler, larger capacity oil pan, whatever you can afford...
Old 04-24-2011, 08:28 PM
  #23  
Registered
 
maffatato15's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: new york
Posts: 61
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
basically, boost doesn't kill cars, ignorant people do. If you do it and do it right, then you will be fine.

Stand alone fuel management

3 inch exhaust to get rid of the heat

Better radiator and the mazmart waterpump

Good engine oil

Nice intercooler with good airflow

Possible fuel pump and injectors with highest pump octane

Wideband o2 sensor and meter

keep boost reasonable unless you wanna build an engine first.

Possibly a vented hood to help get rid of heat?

Don't forget about the tranny and rear diff. Some nice redline fluid.


Just a few things off the top of my head with my experience with turbo cars.
Old 04-25-2011, 12:12 AM
  #24  
the giant tastetickles
 
yiksing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: in the basement
Posts: 2,758
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Bad tune, installation aside. If the metal parts, etc are still within tolerance range while performing their function, i doubt it would decrease the engine life.
Old 04-25-2011, 04:01 AM
  #25  
#50
 
bse50's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: Caput Mundi
Posts: 7,521
Received 10 Likes on 10 Posts
Originally Posted by rx8r3mike
on a side note, my camaro put down 410WHP. with bolt-ons and a custom tune. i put in a stage 2 street cam. and gained about 40WHP now around 450WHP and the car is still very drivable . 40 HP gains are not even that big of a cam. its decent gains for a v8. so don't go around thinking a 40HP gain is a huge cam lol. there are plenty on my forums with bigger.
i spent 5k to get about 95HP over stock. and the car is drivable and reliable. a supercharger/turbo would have costed double, and the gains wouldn't have been as much in the "safe" limit on boost. now you see why we put cams in our car ?
The problem is that the v8 your camaro has is an engine with 50 years old technologies and built stronger to keep it cheaper. The v8 i drive wouldn't gain 10% of its power with cams just like yours. Why? it's already a sporty engine.
Anyway cammes will affect engine life no matter what you say.
We lost around 5hrs of engine life in one of our fiat engines to gain 7hp with a new camshaft thanks to the rule changes. That engine lasts 25hrs now, then it's rebuild time.


You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Will a turbocharger lower the longevity of a rotary engine?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 06:50 AM.