Notices
RX-8 Discussion General discussion about the RX-8 that doesn't fit in one of the specialty forums.

Why is the RX8 always compared to cars 2x the engine size?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Rate Thread
 
Old 09-16-2007, 11:24 AM
  #1  
Registered User
Thread Starter
iTrader: (1)
 
champi0n's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Portland, ME
Posts: 562
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Why is the RX8 always compared to cars 2x the engine size?

I'm not sure i understand why everyone puts a 1300cc engine in the same class as a 3500cc engine? I don't get the comparison.

They dont put 150lb fighters in with 300lb fighters in the UFC.
Old 09-16-2007, 11:41 AM
  #2  
Registered
 
ken-x8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 5,027
Likes: 0
Received 5 Likes on 5 Posts
Because the rotary engine is twice as good as a piston engine.

Ken
Old 09-16-2007, 11:42 AM
  #3  
Illudium Q-36 Space Moderator
iTrader: (1)
 
Kane's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: PCB
Posts: 6,364
Received 41 Likes on 31 Posts
Our engine fires every stroke.... unlike a piston which is every other stroke.

So our engine acts more like a 2.6 liter from a power and breathing standpoint.
Old 09-16-2007, 11:45 AM
  #4  
DGAF
iTrader: (1)
 
Rootski's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Austin, TX
Posts: 1,953
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Because if you didn't, all the comparos would be against the Chevy Aveo.
Old 09-16-2007, 11:58 AM
  #5  
space for rent
iTrader: (2)
 
CTrx8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Kansas City, MO
Posts: 2,714
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by champi0n
They dont put 150lb fighters in with 300lb fighters in the UFC.
they used to
Old 09-16-2007, 12:07 PM
  #6  
Registered
 
robrecht's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Hunterdon County
Posts: 1,932
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Rootski
Because if you didn't, all the comparos would be against the Chevy Aveo.
Is the Chevy Aveo faster?
Old 09-16-2007, 12:07 PM
  #7  
Registered
iTrader: (1)
 
NgoRX8's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: CA, Rowland Hts.
Posts: 10,239
Likes: 0
Received 4 Likes on 4 Posts
Well, considering everyone compares this car to others in the same price range. it is compared to those of much larger engines in "size." I'd say the rx-8 was put in comparison with them from the beginning, wouldn't you? if not, then tell me what cars you were considering before you decided on the 8. engine size doesn't matter. it could be thought of as 1.3, 2.6, or even 3.9.
Old 09-16-2007, 12:46 PM
  #8  
Destroying Threads
 
tajabaho1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: (swartsnegga state)
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
i was looking for a 5.4 v8 corvette
Old 09-16-2007, 02:07 PM
  #9  
Registered User
 
Rems31's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Mississauga, ON
Posts: 2,080
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
cuz it's in the same price range and hp as those with "2x the engine size"
Old 09-16-2007, 05:12 PM
  #10  
Registered
 
lucifuge's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Canberra, Australia
Posts: 278
Likes: 0
Received 1 Like on 1 Post
Originally Posted by NgoRX8
Well, considering everyone compares this car to others in the same price range. it is compared to those of much larger engines in "size." I'd say the rx-8 was put in comparison with them from the beginning, wouldn't you? if not, then tell me what cars you were considering before you decided on the 8. engine size doesn't matter. it could be thought of as 1.3, 2.6, or even 3.9.
No, as Kane correctly said, it is effectively a 2.6L engine. 1.3L only makes sense when compared to other rotary engines(ie 12A =1.2L or 10A = 1.0L). But when you want to compare to traditional piston engine cars you need to understand it as a 2.6L engine, not 1.3L nor 3.9L. Rotary engine has one power stroke per cycle per revolution. Normal piston has one power stroke per cycle per every 2nd revolution....hence the doubling required to equate fuel usage to piston engine cars.
Old 09-16-2007, 06:26 PM
  #11  
Shootin' from the hip
 
Revolver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: Sydney, Australia
Posts: 7,584
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Forget about engine size - think power and (lack of, lol) torque. It is usually compared to cars of similar price, performance and configuration (i.e. mid-priced coupe-shaped respectably quick sports cars). The fact that it has such unique characteristics just makes such comparisons more interesting.
Old 09-17-2007, 11:22 AM
  #12  
i pwn therefore i am
 
saturn's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Delaware, USA
Posts: 2,332
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by Revolver
It is usually compared to cars of similar price, performance and configuration (i.e. mid-priced coupe-shaped respectably quick sports cars). The fact that it has such unique characteristics just makes such comparisons more interesting.
This is exactly right. For anyone who is actually planning on buying a car and not just magazine race, price is pretty much the starting point -- not engine size.
Old 09-17-2007, 04:20 PM
  #13  
Registered User
 
rotopsycho's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Denton, Texas
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by tajabaho1
i was looking for a 5.4 v8 corvette
heh good luck finding that (5.4=332=ford 5.7=350=chevy) there hasnt been an engine smaller than a 350 since 76
Old 09-19-2007, 12:03 PM
  #14  
Mu ha.. ha...
 
Razz1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2004
Location: Cali
Posts: 14,361
Likes: 0
Received 3 Likes on 3 Posts
When the under dog wins races, you have to compare it to the big boys.
Old 09-19-2007, 01:06 PM
  #15  
Registered User
 
pf100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 21
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by champi0n
I'm not sure i understand why everyone puts a 1300cc engine in the same class as a 3500cc engine? I don't get the comparison.
For the same reason why they allowed the 4 stroke bikes to have twice the displacement as the 2 strokes when they started allowing them in MotoGP, because otherwise it would have been unfair.

I like the rotary, and if more people besides Mazda developed it, I am sure it would be even better than it is now.

It still has terrible fuel mileage.

I could ask, why does a car with double or even triple the displacement get better mileage?
Old 09-19-2007, 01:32 PM
  #16  
Destroying Threads
 
tajabaho1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: (swartsnegga state)
Posts: 2,296
Likes: 0
Received 2 Likes on 2 Posts
Originally Posted by rotopsycho
heh good luck finding that (5.4=332=ford 5.7=350=chevy) there hasnt been an engine smaller than a 350 since 76
I have a buncha those, 69s 70s blah blah, 7k for 1....
Old 09-19-2007, 05:35 PM
  #17  
Registered
 
Ploppity Drown's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: LA
Posts: 36
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
When I read this in a comparison between the RX-8, 350Z, and 330i on Automobilemag.com I was initially confused in light of the discussion in this thread about doubling the Renesis' displacement to compare it to a four-stroke engine:

...the twin-rotor Mazda 13B displaces just 1308 cubic centimeters and produces only two power pulses per engine revolution versus the reference cars' three.
But I think I've made sense of it now. The gearing between the E-Shaft and the rotor results in 1 power pulse per revolution. With two rotors connected to the shaft, that's two power pulses per revolution.



With a 6 cylinder piston engine, though, you get 3 power pulses per revolution of the crankshaft, since it takes 720 degrees for each piston to complete the four stroke cycle--only half of the pistons fire per 360 degrees. Which means that power is produced by the full displacement only after two revolutions.

So depending on your perspective, the displacement of the Renesis is either 100% underrated, or that of the piston engine is 100% overrated.

And this means that the twin-rotor engine delivers power like a 4-cylinder.
Old 09-19-2007, 05:57 PM
  #18  
Administrator
iTrader: (7)
 
Jedi54's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: The Dark Side
Posts: 22,396
Received 2,634 Likes on 1,884 Posts
because people are idiots.
Old 09-19-2007, 06:05 PM
  #19  
Turbo SR20deT Son!
 
Uncivilizedracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: North. dallas(Texas)
Posts: 790
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
I say give me the MAzdaspeed version and run another comparison... see what they have to say then
Old 09-19-2007, 08:54 PM
  #20  
dos
Registered User
 
dos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 363
Likes: 0
Received 0 Likes on 0 Posts
Originally Posted by Jedi54
because people are idiots.
http://www.mazdausa.com/MusaWeb/keyC...modelYear=2007
Including Mazda?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Jesus Martinez
Series I Aftermarket Performance Modifications
72
07-26-2023 11:29 PM
ladnarf1
New Member Forum
4
04-29-2021 11:53 PM
mr. GrandGame
New Member Forum
5
03-23-2016 10:16 AM
Shinka84
RX-8's For Sale/Wanted
6
08-19-2015 04:55 PM



You have already rated this thread Rating: Thread Rating: 0 votes,  average.

Quick Reply: Why is the RX8 always compared to cars 2x the engine size?



All times are GMT -5. The time now is 07:17 AM.